banner2e top

African-Americans are Not Bystanders to America's Economy by William Spriggs

Jan. 24, 2016

 
African-Americans are Not Bystanders to America's Economy
By William Spriggs

billspriggs

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - As we reflect on Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Day, we think about African-Americans as agents of history. Well-documented gaps in unemployment rates, earnings, poverty and wealth too often lead to viewing African-Americans as bystanders to America's economy. At worse, there is a tendency to observe the gaps in economic success and blame African-Americans for being disengaged and not trying to respond to clear economic realities -- a lack of investment in education, skills, training and personal saving.

But, a clear and fair understanding of Dr. King's legacy, is that in fact, African-Americans have been fully aware of the barriers they face to success, and have been steadfast to struggle to remove them. Indeed, Dr. King was assassinated during a campaign by black sanitation workers in Memphis to exercise their right to organize, strike and demand fair wages; a key theme of American worker advancement during the first 80 years of the last century and one repeated this Dr. King Holiday by airport workers demanding a living wage.

The lack of wealth in the African-American community is well known. The median net wealth of White households is 12.2 times greater than that of Black households. The difference in wealth does not grow smaller when comparing white and black households headed by college graduates, or when controlling for differences in income. Because the easy answers like education and income differences don't explain the wealth gap -- which measures accumulated savings over multiple generations - the fall back is often to blame the savings' behavior of Blacks. And, here, old stereotypes of African-Americans being profligate can easily substitute for documentation.

This is why those early years after emancipation are key in addressing the deep history of African-Americans as their own agents. During the Civil War, African-American leaders, most famously, Frederick Douglass, campaigned hard to have black soldiers officially sworn into the fight to end slavery. With issuing the Emancipation Proclamation, Lincoln also finally signed on that in 1863 not only would slaves in the rebellious states be free, but African-American men would join the United States Army and Navy in quelling the Southern revolt. Close to 180,000 black men signed-up as official members of America's Armed Forces to defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic. They became the largest paid workforce of African-American men to that point in America's history.

The issue quickly arose as to where could they deposit their paychecks? A few fledgling efforts were made to start banks. And, that effort culminated with the establishment of the Freedmen's Savings and Trust by Congressional act in March 1865; the Freedmen's Bureau bank. Recently the U.S. Department of Treasury and Secretary Jack Lew dedicated an annex to honor the Freedmen's Bureau Bank. 

By 1870, the bank operated 37 branches throughout the South, with African-Americans trained as branch managers. In all, almost 70,000 African-Americans made deposits in the bank, reaching savings of about $57 million. Those facts stand to clearly demonstrate the efforts of a people, subject to slavery, freed with nothing from their previous labors to start anew having built wealth for others for free.

But, fate would intervene. The accumulation of those savings came during a period when the federal government still stood in the way of restoring the South's old hegemony of white southern planters. And, it came when the nation's banks were still conservative following the uncertainties of the Civil War. Southern banking laid prostrate, devastated by the collapse of the Confederacy and the meaningless holdings of Confederate dollars, and the long mystery of the disappearance of the gold reserves that backed that currency on its desperate journey south from Richmond, Virginia in April 1865 as Robert E. Lee surrendered the fighting cause at Appomattox Court House under the vigilant eyes of 2,000 black men in seven units of the United States Colored Troops.

By the start of the 1870s, the expansion west made possible by the Homestead Act and transcontinental railroad - both enacted during the Civil War - restored the nation's prosperity and financial zeal. The result was over speculation in railroading. In Europe, financial pressures mounted from the Franco-Prussian War. Germany refused to continue issuing silver coins. This resulted in plummeting silver prices, and the eventual move by the United States to go from backing its currency in silver and gold, to use only the gold standard. This led to the collapse of investments in silver mines in the western United States. The result was a global financial collapse that swept Europe and the United States in 1873. With it came the collapse of the U.S. banking system.

Sound familiar? And, with that collapse came the collapse of the Freedmen's Savings and Trust as well. At a time of general financial collapse and no Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation -- a creation learned from the Great Depression -- many depositors lost their savings. The millions in savings of the newly free went away, too. Not too different than the 240,000 homes that disappeared from the African American community after the financial collapse of 2007.

In 1876, a compromise to resolve the Presidential election resulted in the removal of federal protection of African-Americans in the South. The end of reconstruction meant the restoration of southern white hegemony and the evisceration of voting rights for African-Americans, the protection of the access to many occupations and the limiting of their equal access to education. This too sounds familiar.

To accurately measure history, it takes measuring all the hills and valleys right. Dedicating a building to the Freedmen's Savings and Trust allows us to properly assess the toil and efforts of African-Americans. It shows the hard work and industrious nature of a determined people. It reminds us of the mountains of betrayal as well.

 Dr. Bill Spriggs is Chief economist, AFL-CIO and professor of econonomics at Howard University.


The Economics of Water By James Clingman

Jan. 22, 2016

Blackonomics

The Economics of Water
By James Clingman

clingman

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - “Water, water, everywhere, and not a drop to drink.”  Rime of the Ancient Mariner, by Samuel Taylor Coleridge.

I can hear the backroom discussion now.  “We can save money if we stop taking our drinking water from Lake Huron and start using water from the Flint River instead.”   Those may not be the exact words, but the leaders of Flint, Michigan, including the two recent Emergency Managers, City Council, the EPA, and the Governor, have caused a catastrophe.

Money is the common theme among the perpetrators in Flint; it is always lurking in the shadows of the many problems facing Black and poor people.  Now, in a city that is approximately 60 percent Black and has a 40 percent + poverty rate, money trumps life again.  Money trumps the long-term effects on more than 8,000 children, many of whom will grow up suffering from the physical, cognitive, and emotional illnesses caused by lead poisoning.  As one person said, “Everybody in the city has been poisoned, everybody.”

Sophia A. McClennen (Salon.com ), wrote, “The story of Flint is the story of what happens when profits are more important than people. What Michael Moore captured in his movie, Roger and Me, was a clear prelude to what is happening [in Flint] today.  First, Flint residents lost their jobs. Twenty-five years later they have lost their water and their health. There are ten dead…from Legionnaire’s disease in Flint and countless others with serious illnesses from contaminated water.”

Politicians are playing games with this emergency, and trying to garner votes from it.  Remember Rahm Emmanuel’s quote?  “You never let a serious crisis go to waste. And what I mean by that is it's an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before.”  Where is the “opportunity” in this crisis?  Was the slow response to this crisis really just an opportunity to get more money?

This is far from being about what party is in charge.  Some folks are blaming the Republican Governor and some are blaming the city council, on which the Democrats hold a 7-1 majority.  But so what?  The damage is done; the right question is “Now what?”

Many people have marshalled their forces to assist the people of Flint, first, by bringing water.  The Feds have granted a measly $5 million to help but the POTUS, who went to nearby Detroit but did not go to Flint, denied the request by the governor to declare the situation a “major disaster,” which under law applies to natural disasters and “certain other situations.”  Isn’t this a “certain other situation”?  Isn’t it just as important as getting water to Katrina victims and providing healthcare for Flint’s citizens?

It would be great to see our doctors, psychologists, attorneys, scientists, engineers, and technical personnel lend their talents to help, like we do in other countries.  In light of this terrible situation, Flint is in need of all the services, assistance, contributions, and prayers that we can muster.  By the way, so are the folks in Ft. Walton Beach, Florida, where the citizens are suffering from all sorts of diseases and untimely deaths because of the still lingering effects of the BP oil spill.  (See article written by Earnest McBride: jacksonadvocateonline.com)

The lawsuits will come and the money from the taxpayers’ coffers will flow, money that could have been used to prevent the problem in the first place.  The long term health ramifications of lead poisoning are irreversible but manageable if the funds to do so are available.  The State of Michigan, as it deals with myriad financial issues, will now have to pay billions for its neglect and lack of concern for poor people.

Beginning with Idlewild in 1912, Michigan has had issues with Black/White relationships, social/environmental justice, and economic progress, which provides a context from which to view Michigan’s current predicament, Detroit and its recent economic woes notwithstanding.

In Benton Harbor, with a 90% Black population, Edward Pinkney was imprisoned for fighting for social and economic justice, another example of money trumping what is right.  The NAACP abandoned brother Pinkney and opted, by its silence and lack of advocacy on his behalf, chose the path of least resistance, and who knows what they received from the Whirlpool Corporation in return for their silence?  Once again, as it has throughout the nation, the NAACP manipulated the local election to get rid of Pinkney as President.  He went to prison and Whirlpool got an NAACP award.

Three of the five great lakes, Michigan, Huron, and Erie, virtually surround Michigan.  For folks in Flint to have to drink water from the Flint River in order to save money is reprehensible.  “Water, water, everywhere, and not a drop to drink.”   To all of you “Civil Rights” advocates:  What could be a greater “civil right” than having clean water to drink?

 

The Source of Life by Dr. E. Faye Williams, Esq.

Jan. 24, 2016

 

The Source of Life

By Dr. E. Faye Williams, Esq.

williams2


(TriceEdneyWire.com)  — Previously, I’ve written about environmental racism and the untold and unpredictable impact it’s had/will have on communities of color.  Common to these episodes have been motives of profit and financial gain.  Additionally, there’s been a total disregard for the welfare and humanity of affected communities.

Reflecting on news from Flint, Michigan, I am struck by the severity and long-term impact of this case of environmental racism.  Unless you live under a rock, you are aware of the callous and systematic poisoning of Flint residents over the past eighteen months. 

Typical of the industrial Midwest, Flint is overwhelmingly controlled by elected officials affiliated with the Democratic Party.  The racial make-up of its current population is 56.6% African American, 37.4% white, 3.9% Hispanic/Latino, and the remainder a mixture of Native American and Asian.  40% of Flint's population lives below the poverty line. 

Like its neighbor Detroit, Flint played a major role in the automotive industry serving as home to Buick and Chevrolet.  The AC Spark Plug Company also originated in Flint.  By all measures, Flint flourished because of a robust auto industry.  As the industry declined, companies began to consolidate their manufacturing facilities and Flint was abandoned.  Insolvency followed.

Uniquely, the Emergency Financial Manager Laws of Michigan allow Republican Governor Rick Snyder to usurp the authority of elected officials of cities in financial insolvency.  Almost as an act of racial/political subjugation, Snyder has used his power to appoint emergency managers who have total autonomy over Flint.  This system allows emergency managers to act independently of any laws passed or decisions enacted by duly elected officials.  By 2013, six Michigan cities and almost half of the state's African American population were under emergency management.

This brings us to the decision to change Flint’s water supply.  Prior to April 2014, Flint obtained its public water through Detroit's system sourced from Lake Huron.  In a cost-saving effort to trim $12 Million in annual cost, the sitting Emergency Manager decided to obtain water from the Flint River.  Early response to the change and current knowledge show the impact upon Flint’s public water supply to be an environmental calamity of incalculable proportion.  Simply put, Flint River water was toxic, corrosive and unfit for consumption.

In September, Flint's Hurley Medical Center released a study that found the number of infants and children with elevated lead-blood levels had doubled.  In high risk areas, it tripled.  The impact of this exposure can’t be determined now, but it is estimated that, among those exposed, significant learning disabilities will result and the need for special juvenile services will develop.

Instead of a prudent and remedial response to complaints and evidence of polluted water, the Snyder administration acted with reckless disregard.  Residents were told to "relax" and were assured that, despite the brown color and noxious odor, the water was "safe" to drink.  Such action against Flint’s large African American population can most assuredly be called GENOCIDE.

Water is the source of life.  The callous mismanagement of that essential commodity gives greater meaning to the phrase "Black Lives Matter."  It should also teach African American communities that we are our own best caretakers.  We cannot continue to put full-faith and trust in government or institutions to do the right thing.

In his 1970 preface to the book, "We Charge Genocide," Ossie Davis wrote: "We will submit no further to the brutal indignities being practiced against us; we will not be intimidated, and most certainly not eliminated.  We claim the ancient right of all peoples, not only to survive unhindered, but also to participate as equals in man's inheritance here on earth.  We fight to preserve ourselves, to see that the treasured ways of our life-in-common are not destroyed by brutal men or heedless institutions."

(Dr. E. Faye Williams is National President of the National Congress of Black Women.  www.nationalcongressbw.org.  202/678-6788)

Tuning Out: Why I Will Not Watch the Oscars Marc H. Morial

Jan. 24, 2016

To Be Equal 
Tuning Out: Why I Will Not Watch the Oscars 
Marc H. Morial

marcmorial

 
(TriceEdneyWire.com) - “The Academy has a problem. It’s a problem that needs to be solved…For 20 opportunities to celebrate actors of color, actresses of color, to be missed last year is one thing; for that to happen again this year is unforgivable. This institution doesn’t reflect its president…I am an Academy member and it doesn’t reflect me, and it doesn’t reflect this nation.” – David Oyelowo, Actor, January 2016

It turns out that Hollywood does, in fact, love a sequel.

For the second straight year in a row, the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences—the organization behind Hollywood’s biggest and splashiest awards show—failed to nominate a single actor or actress of color in the lead and supporting acting categories. This year, when pay equity and gender equality were as much a Hollywood narrative as anything screened in local movie theaters, women earned more Oscar nominations (up almost 24 percent versus 21 percent in each of the last two years), but they were shut out from the best cinematography and best director categories—again. In a nation as diverse as ours, an Oscars ceremony that neither recognizes nor includes the vast artistic talent and contributions of women and people of color is a white-washed fiction that would better serve us as the premise of a sci-fi feature and not as a mirror of our multicultural reality.

While my role is not to question the cinematic credentials of the academy’s 6,291 voting members, I do question how it is that in a season that produced critically-acclaimed films such as “Beasts of No Nation,” which stars Idris Elba as an African warlord; the N.W.A biopic “Straight Outta Compton;” and “Creed,” the latest installment in the iconic “Rocky” franchise, there were no Black screenwriters, directors, composers, cinematographers or actors to be found whose contributions deserved academy recognition. Ironically enough, two films helmed by either Black actors and/or directors—“Creed” and “Compton”—were recognized by the academy, but their sole nominations were denied to people of color, with Sylvester Stallone receiving a best supporting actor nod for his role in “Creed” and writers of “Compton” receiving a nomination for best original screenplay.

A lot of ink has been spilled citing the composition of the academy and its role in travesties like this year’s copycat lock out of talent from communities of color. A much-cited 2012 survey of the academy by the Los Angeles Times highlights the crux of the problem: the academy’s members are 94 percent white, 77 percent male, and an average age of 63—hardly representative of the diversity we see in the streets and increasingly on our TV screens. There was a push for more inclusion after last year’s infamous snub of the civil rights movie “Selma,” with a record 322 invitations sent to join the academy. The list of invitees included fewer than 20 new African-American members, close to 14 Asian and Pacific Islander members and a handful of Latin Americans, according to “The Wrap,” an industry-insider magazine. Here are a few more statistics you should also take into consideration. In its most recent study, the Bunche Center at UCLA found that film studio heads were 94 percent white and all male and that film studio senior management was 92 percent white and 83 percent male. The problem is two-fold.

The struggle to transform the academy into a diverse body that thoughtfully contemplates and recognizes the work of communities who do not fit the cookie cutter mold is one that must take place within the academy, but change will remain elusive if there is no transformation of white male dominated studio system that decides what gets made—and perhaps most importantly, what doesn’t get made. Major studios are not greenlighting the projects that reflect our nation and the few movies that are produced end up on the cutting room floor of the nomination process.

Like so many others, I am scandalized by the shut out of people of color across most major awards categories for the second consecutive year. I will continue to add my voice to the public scrutiny necessary to keep this issue on Hollywood’s front burner. And I will also be doing something else this year: I will not be watching the Oscars. I am not an Academy Award member. I do not green-light films, nor do I direct them. But I do control what does—or doesn’t— appear on my television screen. If we want Hollywood to tune in to our legitimate concerns and issues, I, for one, will be tuning out.


Economic Inequality at Home and Abroad by Julianne Malveaux

Jan. 22, 2016

Economic Inequality at Home and Abroad
By Julianne Malveaux

malveaux

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Days before the opening of the World Economic Forum, Oxfam, the international organization that works on world poverty issues, released a report that addressed inequality. They found the international wealth gap growing rapidly.  Last year, just 62 individuals had the same wealth as the 3.6 billion people who make up the bottom half of the world population.  Wealth has become much more concentrated – in 2010, more than five times as many people shared the same amount of wealth as the bottom half.

While the top 62 people saw their wealth grow by 44 percent in five years, the bottom half saw their wealth drop by about the same amount.  41 percent.   And world incomes reflect increasingly concentrated wealth inequality.  Nearly half of the world’s population lives on less than $2 a day.  One in five people – 1.2 billion – live on less than a dollar a day.  Oxfam says that “growing economic inequality is bad for us all – it undermines growth and social cohesion ..the consequences for the world’s poorest people are particularly severe.” (https://www.oxfam.org/sites/www.oxfam.org/files/file_attachments/cr-even-it-up-extreme-inequality-291014-en.pdf

While the Oxfam world inequality data is jarring, we don’t have to go global to witness the “particularly severe” consequences of domestic income and wealth inequality.  Consider Flint, Michigan, the small (population 100,000) Rust Belt city that has made national (if not international) news because of the quality of its drinking water.  Republican Governor Rick Snyder appointed an emergency manager who recommended switching the city’s water source from Lake Huron to the Flint River.  The river water was so foul that General Motors refused to use it, saying it would rust auto parts.  If it would rust parts, what about kids?

More than 40 percent of the people in Flint are poor.  Fifty-six percent are African American.  The city’s median income is about $23,000 a year, compared to $48,000 for the rest of the state.  Clearly, the people of Flint can’t afford to purchase politicians or to force them to be responsive to their needs.  Instead, like a billion people worldwide, the people of Flint have been deprived of the human right to clean and safe water.

We in the United States like to brag about how much better off we are than the rest of the world.   But we can’t seem to provide our citizens with something the United Nations (UN) has declared a basic human right.  In 2010, the UN General Assembly said that access to clean and safe water is a human right, noting, “Everyone has the right to water, no matter where s/he lives.”  The UN has said that they will monitor the progress of nations in providing water and sanitation.  Maybe the UN should come and monitor Flint.

While the UN has said that water is a human right, some industrialists disagree.  In 2013, Nestlé’s chairman Peter Brabeck-Letmathe said he wanted to privatize the water supply.  While he has been vocal in talking about the fair distribution of water, he also leads a company that is the world’s top seller of water, and is charged with returning value to shareholders no matter how water is distributed.  It would be good to see Nestle and Mr. Brabeck-Letmathe weighing in on the Flint situation, perhaps providing some donated water to make underscore the need for fair water access.  Certainly, capitalism minimizes the possibility of fair access when proposals to privatize water are considered.

Cher has donated 180,000 bottles of Icelandic Global water to Flint.  She is paying for half of the bottles of water, and the water bottlers are donating the other half.   She has shared her outrage about the Flint situation in cyberspace, calling out Governor Snyder for his callous indifference to the people of Flint.   The governor’s tepid apology, only delivered under pressure, does nothing to ameliorate the damage to thousands of children and young people who have been exposed to the leaded water.

Governor Snyder says he hopes the issue does not become “political”.  Really?  If politics is the practice of dividing resources, then this clean water matter is intrinsically political.  Who gets clean water?  Why?  When the demographics of Flint are compared with those in the rest of the state of Michigan, it is clear that the poorer, blacker residents of Flint get far less attention from the governor than wealthier, whiter residents.  The citizens of Flint have been forced to accept a deficient water quality, for political reasons.

The plight of Flint citizens will hardly make the agenda of the Davos World Economic Forum.   But the United States cannot claim lofty space as a world human rights leader when our own citizens are denied the basic right to clean water.

Julianne Malveaux is an author, economist and Founder of Economic Education. Her latest book “Are We Better Off? Race, Obama and Public Policy” is available for pre-order at www.juliannemalveaux.com

X