banner2e top

How We Get Over By Dr. E. Faye Williams, Esq.

Feb. 7, 2016

How We Get Over
By Dr. E. Faye Williams, Esq.

williams2

(TriceEdneyWire.com) —My good friend, Dick Gregory, often says the strongest two forces in the world are the Black woman and the Black church.  He makes that statement in all seriousness.  With a bit of humor, he points out just how strong Black women are by saying, “The Black woman is the only one strong enough to cut tires to the rim with a butter knife.” That’s kind of a joke in the Black community when a Black woman asks the man in her life, “Who is Mildred?” and he tries to lie to her, brush her off or pretend he doesn’t know what she’s talking about.

Well, I must admit, in my experience, Black women are pretty strong.  We have to be because we have so much that is negative with which we have to deal (often alone) on a daily basis. Although our challenges go much farther back, let’s start with a few recent cases.

Look at what Sandra Bland had to go through with a white police officer who couldn’t bear the thought of a Black woman exercising her right to remain in her automobile. She asked him a few questions and tried to have a cigarette while doing so.  For her having the audacity to do that, she was taken to jail where she died mysteriously. She paid the ultimate price for being strong and challenging unjust treatment.

Let’s look at this past week when three young Black college women from State University of New York at Albany were accosted and disrespected by several white men while riding a city bus in Albany. Put aside how an argument may have started, the students said they were beaten and kicked by a group of white men and had to endure being called nigger by white classmates on the bus. No one helped them. Two of the young women had to seek medical attention at the Albany Medical Center for minor scrapes on their faces.  The President of the university has pledged to work with authorities to get to the bottom of the situation. Can you imagine what life on campus is like for these 3 young women not knowing which of their classmates were involved in this melee?

Fast forward to a couple of days later when MSNBC anchor, Melissa Harris-Perry narrowly escaped a hate crime in Iowa.  There were many other news people in Iowa for the Presidential Caucuses, but a hateful white man had the audacity to walk up to her, violate her space and proceed to aggressively quiz her about her qualifications for her job! He saw a Black woman minding her own business—and because of his perceived superiority, he felt that he had a right to accost her. Despite the fact that Melissa has been a distinguished professor several places, and is still one at Wake Forrest University, this man took liberties that were not rightly his to take. Realizing he may have been trying to harm her, she moved away. After signaling hotel personnel, the man left and drove away while the hotel failed to pay much attention to her concern.  After all, the political caucuses were going on, and a Black woman’s concern surely couldn’t top that in importance!

We Black women get so tired of having our lives minimized, brutalized and trivialized, so we must come together to support each other. I’m a Black woman and I care about the struggles of my sisters. I’m proud of the young women leading the protests in Albany. They’re leaders in the National Congress of Black Women. Keep them in your prayers, as well as Melissa and Sandra’s family. We can get over through prayers and support of each other.

(Dr. E. Faye Williams is President of the National Congress of Black Women.  She can be reached at 202/678-6788www.nationalcongressbw.org.)

 

In It to Win It - Head Hilary, Heart Bernie By Julianne Malveaux

Feb. 7, 2016

In It to Win It - Head Hilary, Heart Bernie
By Julianne Malveaux

malveaux

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - I am looking forward to November 8, 2016, and to voting for Hilary Rodham Clinton to lead these United States.  I am so extremely excited that a woman of character, experience, and discernment can lead our nation.  Even as I look forward to the November vote, I am fully enjoying the path to November.  Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders has provided tone and texture to this race.  He has forced Senator Clinton to hone her positions on health care, Wall Street and income inequality.  He came so amazingly close to toppling her in Iowa that it gave me Post Dramatic Stress Syndrome.  She didn’t make my drama hers, though.  She has managed, with stoic dignity, to stake her claim for this presidency.

My head is with Secretary Hilary Clinton, but my heart is with Senator Bernie Sanders.  I realize that he has promised everything and hasn’t shared how he might pay for much of it -- free tuition, universal health care, or Wall Street reform.   Still, his energetic bluster has been a galvanizing factor in a race that might otherwise have been seen as a cakewalk or a coronation.  Hilary needs to be pushed as hard as Senator Sanders can push her.  And even though Sanders says he does not care about her “damn emails”, the email conversation has to remind Senator Clinton that she has to figure out ways to restore trust among those who support her positions but look askance at the ways she has been too frequently presented.

There is an element of sexism in this.  Hilary Clinton has been on the national stage for several decades, from the time when her husband, was elected governor of Arkansas in the 1980s.  As First Lady, she had to juggle her smarts and her secondary role, blundering as she tried to offer clarity around health care, soaring as she provided rhetorical leadership on women and children’s issues.  And since the Clintons left the White House, she has been nimble and focused as a Senator, managing to make friends in both political parties, and managing to provide solid international leadership as Secretary of State.  Were she a man, would she be judged as harshly because some find her “unlikeable”?  Would her every facial expression be parsed?  Would opponents feel free to comment on her marital business?  Thrice-married Donald Trump has spoken of Bill Clinton’s fidelity, but it is documented that he was a big time philanderer.  Carly Fiorina says she would have left her husband if he’d cheated like Bill, but we don’t know that, do we?  What we know is that Hilary’s gender is a double-edged sword.  I cringe whenever she says, “I am woman”, or “the only woman”, or some reference to her clear self-evident gender.  But I also cringe when the gender-bashers seem incapable of interpreting her words and her work fairly.

That’s not why I’ll vote for Hilary, though.  I’ll vote for her because she is a center-left moderate (Bernie Sanders is not in charge of who gets to be a progressive, and I really don’t care as much about labels as about outcomes) who will pragmatically work toward social and economic justice.  She isn’t perfect and may, indeed, be fundamentally flawed (as most politicians are), but she has been a consistent advocate for the least and the left out – for children and for elders.  Is she weak on Wall Street reform?  Absolutely.  But as Bernie Sanders pushes her, she gets stronger.

A year ago, many predicted this race as a dynastic smack down, with Jeb Bush and Hilary Clinton winning primaries toe-to-toe.  Who would have thought that an unhinged demagogue, Donald Trump, would suck much of the air out of the Republican space, leaving babbling bumblers to confuse adhominum ignorance with issues?  The collective performance of the Republican team could not equal that of either Sanders or Clinton, but those R’s keep slogging on.  To what end?  Do we really want a President who will trash talk Putin, Mexico and the United Nations?  Do we want sons of immigrants who do vilely disrespect their ancestors that they’d offer punitive possibilities for citizenship?

I’m not really torn between my head and my heart.  I’m simply enjoying the excitement of Bernie Sanders, and the way he has galvanized young people, especially, to become politically engaged.  I am hoping that his commitment to the process is such that he will encourage his supporters to remain involved, even after Hilary wins the Democratic nomination.  And I’m sad that a woman who might knock it out of the park can also be kicked to the curb if this campaign becomes corrosive.

Congressman Stephanie Tubbs Jones was a sorority sister (Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, of course), and a fierce legislator.  She stuck by Hilary Clinton in 2008 even after then-Senator Barack Obama entered the Presidential race and earned the endorsement and support of many “mainstream” African Americans.  Stephanie and Hilary had “heart” with each other.  As a woman, Hilary can’t out shout Bernie without appearing shrill.  She can’t out-snide him without appearing *itchy.  But she can out heart him if she channels Stephanie’s energy.  Stephanie Tubbs Jones was in it to win it.

Julianne Malveaux is an author, economist and Founder of Economic Education. Her latest book “Are We Better Off? Race, Obama and Public Policy” is available for pre-order at www.juliannemalveaux.com

ASALH Director Encouraging Visits to the "Hallowed Grounds" of Black History by Hazel Trice Edney

Feb. 2, 2016

ASALH Director Encouraging Visits to the "Hallowed Grounds" of Black History
By Hazel Trice Edney

cyrus sylvia
Sylvia Cyrus, director of ASALH PHOTO: Courtesy

nps-africanburialgroundinnewyork
African Burial Grounds, an NPS historic site in New York. PHOTO: NPS

nps-brownvboardhistoricsite
Brown v. Board of Education Historic Site in Kansas. PHOTO: NPS

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Thousands of priceless relics, artifacts and Black historic sites around the U. S. have been destroyed by accident, negligence or intention.

This is the reason that the Association for the Study of African American Life and History (ASALH) is calling for African-Americans and others to pay homage to those “Hallowed Grounds” of Black history during the entire year of 2016 – beyond Black History Month.

“There are a number of communities that have been completely eradicated off the map due to urban renewal, etc. There were places where Black people had thriving communities; that when change came they were completely just annihilated. We need to remember those sites,” says Sylvia Cyrus, executive director of ASALH, the 101-year-old organization founded by the “Father of Black History”, Dr. Carter G. Woodson. “We want to encourage people to find these sites and do something to support them and to increase the profile for them so that we can continue to show America and the world that African-Americans have made significant contributions and there are places that we can go that have significant importance to our history and to American history.”

Under the Black History Month theme, “Hallowed Grounds: Sites of African American Memories”, Cyrus says ASALH is joining in support with the National Park Service (NPS) to encourage people across the U. S. to visit the approximately 400 federally designated historic sites in commemoration of the NPS’s 100th anniversary this year.

“We are a spiritual people. And there’s no way in many of these instances that we can tell our story were it not for how hallowed these places are,” Cyrus says. “If you look at Annapolis, Maryland, the place where African slave ships came in. I mean that’s holy ground for us. You have to understand why that should be important to you, how that speaks to your soul, how that speaks to who we are as a people.”

However, Cyrus confirmed that only 25 of the 400 NPS-designated sites pertain specifically to Black history. Within, NPS, these 25 sites are called the African-American Experience Fund. There are efforts to add more, but she said budget shortfalls have made that difficult.

“The reality is that with the federal budget being what it is today that the National Park Service cannot even maintain the sites that they have now,” she says. “So, we know that the reality is we cannot depend upon the federal government to identify and support these sites. We have got to be able to do this through our own communities, through our states; through organizations like ASALH and walking tours and local history so that people know about these sites.”

Many historic sites and artifacts are privately owned, kept in Black families, or entrenched in communities, she points out. They may include places like a church in a local community; a place where a race riot started, or the site of some local activity that dealt with civil rights or education.

“We are charging Americans to look – not just nationally at these sites - but in your own communities; to start a dialog about places of importance that have impacted African-American Life and History.”

Robert G. “Bob” Stanton, who was the first African-American appointed as NPS director, has been credited with the growth of the NPS-designated Black history sites. The number of sites increased as well as their prominence and care during his four-year tenure between 1997 and 2001. Appointed by President Bill Clinton, Stanton established the African-American Experience Fund for that purpose.

“There are certainly more sites that need to be recognized,” says Cyrus. “We work every year to bring more on board.”

But, for now, the following are the 25 federally designated historic sites and state locations in alphabetical order:

African American Civil War Memorial, DC; African Burial Ground National Monument, New York;  Booker T. Washington National Monument, Virginia; Boston African American National Historic Site, Massachusetts;  Brown V Board of Education National Historic Site, Kansas;  Cane River Creole National Historical Park and Heritage Area, Louisiana;  Carter G. Woodson Home National Historic Site, DC;  Charles Young Buffalo Soldiers National Monument, Ohio; Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical Park, Ohio;  Frederick Douglass National Historic Site, DC;   George Washington Carver National Monument, Missouri;   Gullah/Geechee Cultural Heritage Corridor, South Carolina; Harriet Tubman Underground Railroad National Monument, Maryland;  Little Rock Central High School National Historic Site, Arizona;  Maggie L Walker National Historic Site, Virginia; Martin Luther King Jr National Historic Site, Georgia; Martin Luther King,Jr. Memorial, DC;  Mary McLeod Bethune Council House National Historic Site, DC; Natchez National Historical Park, Mississippi; National Underground Railroad: Network To Freedom, Nebraska; New Orleans Jazz National Historical Park, Louisiana;  Nicodemus National Historic Site, Kansas;  Port Chicago Naval Magazine National Memorial, California;  Selma to Montgomery National Historic Trail, Alabama; Tuskegee Airmen National Historic Site, Alabama; and Tuskegee Institute National Historic Site, Alabama.

“Our intent is to engage our community to certainly seek out hallowed grounds, visit them, support them, talk about them and share the history,” Cyrus says. “It’s only when we talk about this, only when we identify it that our history is not forgotten. Because we have already lost so much history, we don’t want to lose anything else.”

Veteran Black Politician in Iowa Says Clinton Squeaked by With Black and Latino Vote by Hazel Trice Edney

Feb. 2, 2016

Veteran Black Politician in Iowa Says Clinton Squeaked by With Black and Latino Vote

By Hazel Trice Edney

hillarytwitterphoto
Hillary Clinton claims victory in Iowa Monday night. PHOTO: Clinton Twitter

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Democratic Presidential contenders former Sec. Hillary Clinton and Sen. Bernie Sanders ended the Iowa Caucuses in nearly a dead heat on Monday. But, the Iowa Democratic Party (IDP) has confirmed that Clinton actually won the Iowa Democratic Caucus.

Meanwhile, a Black political veteran in Iowa says had it not been for Blacks and Latinos, Clinton would certainly have lost given the closeness of the race.

“We’re researching right now,” said Wayne Ford, a former veteran member of the Iowa Legislature who long served as its only African-American member. “A lot of young minorities came up to me and told me how they fought and argued to make sure they had the delegates to win those precincts. They were excited about that.”

A Clinton supporter, Ford said although some Blacks did support Sanders, his assessment and observation are that the Black and Latino caucus participants were engaged in supporting Clinton nearly on the same level as they were for Obama when he won Iowa over her seven years ago. Not quite as much, though, he said. If that had been the case “she would have had a landslide…But, yes, she won because the baby boomers didn’t sit home. And those minorities knew they had to get out.”

Ford knows well Iowa politics. In 1984, he co-founded Iowa's Brown & Black Presidential Forum. In 1996, he was elected to represent Iowa’s House District 71, which includes a mixture of some of the wealthiest and impoverished neighborhoods in the 92 percent White state. He was the only Black in the legislature and only the tenth elected to the body in the history of the state. He served for 14 years, becoming the longest serving African-American until his retirement in 2010.

On Monday morning, Sanders had also proclaimed a victory of sorts despite the fact that he had not won the balloting. In his view, to come so close indicated his ideals were being respected.

Iowa has 1,781 precincts in 99 counties. The result was Clinton, 49.8 and Sanders, 49.6, the IDP has confirmed. Former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley dropped out of the race with few votes.

Iowa Democratic Party Chair Dr. Andy McGuire said in a statement that the results are “the closest in Iowa Democratic caucus history.” 

McGuire said the Democratic Caucus also “featured one of our strongest turnouts ever and passion and energy from Democrats all across our state” as voters competed to choose between Clinton and Sanders.

Ford predicts the spiritedness of Iowa’s Democratic Caucus indicates the fervor of the Democratic electorate in coming months. African-Americans typically vote more than 90 percent Democratic. The next major Democratic votes will be casted in New Hampshire Democratic and Republican primaries Feb. 9.

Meanwhile, in a big surprise, Republican Sen. Ted Cruz defeated billionaire Donald Trump by a relatively wide margin. Polls had predicted an easy win for Trump. But pundits credit his defeat to his skipping a Fox News debate Friday night in an argument with station over who would moderate it.

With 99 percent of the precincts reporting, the Associated Press released the following results in the Republican Caucus: Cruz: 26 percent, Trump, 23 percent; Sen. Marco Rubio 23 percent and Ben Carson, 10 percent. Candidates Sen. Rand Paul and Jeb Bush received one delegate each, but other Republican candidates Chris Christie, Carly Fiorina, Jim Gilmore, Mike Huckabee, John Kasich and Rick Santorum were statistically insignificant.

The Iowa Caucus, casting the first votes in the 2016 presidential race, revealed widespread enthusiasm among voters in both parties. The final party nominees will be decided by delegates at the Republican National Convention starting July 18 in Cleveland, Ohio and the Democratic National Convention the week of July 25th in Philadelphia. The following is the schedule for all primaries and caucuses through June 14. Source: The New York Times and wire reports.

Feb. 2 – Iowa Republican and Democratic caucuses

Feb. 9 – New Hampshire Republican and Democratic primaries

Feb. 20 – South Carolina Republican primary; Nevada Democratic caucus

Feb. 23 – Nevada Republican caucuses

Feb. 27 – South Carolina Democratic primary

March 1 – Super Tuesday: Alabama Republican and Democratic primaries, American Samoa Democratic caucuses, Alaska Republican caucuses, Arkansas Republican and Democratic primaries, Colorado Republican and Democratic caucuses, Georgia Republican and Democratic primaries, Massachusetts Republican and Democratic primaries, Minnesota Republican and Democratic caucuses, Oklahoma Republican and Democratic primaries, Tennessee Republican primary, Texas Republican and Democratic primaries, Vermont Republican and Democratic primaries, Virginia Republican and Democratic primaries

March 5 – Kansas Republican and Democratic caucuses, Kentucky Republican caucuses, Louisiana Republican and Democratic primaries, Maine Republican primary, Nebraska Democratic caucuses

March 6 – Puerto Rico Republican primary, Maine Democratic caucuses

March 8 – Hawaii Republican caucuses, Idaho Republican primary, Michigan Republican and Democratic primaries, Mississippi Republican and Democratic primaries

March 12 – District of Columbia Republican convention, Northern Mariana Islands Democratic caucuses

March 15 – Florida Republican and Democratic primaries, Illinois Republican and Democratic primaries, Missouri Republican and Democratic primaries, North Carolina Republican and Democratic primaries, Ohio Republican and Democratic primaries, Northern Mariana Islands Republican caucuses

March 19 – U.S. Virgin Islands Republican caucuses

March 22 – Arizona Republican and Democratic primaries, Idaho Democratic primary, Utah Republican and Democratic caucuses

March 26 – Alaska Democratic caucuses, Hawaii Democratic caucuses, Washington Democratic caucuses

April 5 – Wisconsin Republican and Democratic primaries

April 9 – Wyoming Democratic caucuses

April 19 – New York Republican and Democratic primaries

April 26 – Connecticut Republican and Democratic primaries, Delaware Republican and Democratic primaries, Maryland Republican and Democratic primaries, Pennsylvania Republican and Democratic primaries, Rhode Island Republican and Democratic primaries

May 3 – Indiana Republican and Democratic primaries

May 7 – Guam Democratic caucuses

May 10 – Nebraska Republican primary, West Virginia Republican and Democratic primaries

May 17 – Oregon Republican and Democratic primaries Kentucky Democratic primary

May 24 – Washington Republican primary

June 4 – U.S. Virgin Islands Democratic caucuses

June 5 – Puerto Rico Democratic caucuses

June 7 – New Jersey Republican and Democratic primaries, California Republican and Democratic primaries, Montana Republican and Democratic primaries,  New Mexico Republican and Democratic primaries. North Dakota Democratic caucuses. South Dakota Republican and Democratic primaries

June 14 – District of Columbia Democratic primary

Does a Dollar Spent in the Black Community Really Stay There for Only Six Hours?

Feb. 1, 2016

Does a Dollar Spent in the Black Community Really Stay There for Only Six Hours?
Fact-Finding Site Debunks Apparent Myth Often Stated as Fact

overdue-recognition-art-gallery-e1450543628823

Art collectors attend an opening at the Overdue Recognition Art Gallery in Bowie, Md., which represents about 100 African-American artists and was co-founded in 2004 by Jackie and Derrick Thompson. The gallery is one of 2.6 million Black or African American-owned companies, which have increased nationally 34.5 percent, up from 1.9 million between 2007 and 2012. Photo: Joe Bellard.

dollar-bill-creative-commons

Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from TruthBeTold.news

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Editor’s Note: The following article by Truthbetold.news reveals how an unfounded, unproven and  apparently false statistic pertaining to spending by Black consumers with Black-owned businesses has been circulating in the Black community for years.  Cited recently by several news agencies, including Roland Martin’s NewsOne Now and the Trice Edney News Wire, the statistic is often used to compare spending in the Black community with other ethnicities by stating that the dollar stays in the Black community only about six hours.  The statistic has long been used by authorities on Black economic justice. Here, the TruthBeTold. News article details the exhaustive fact-finding and research methods that concluded that the statistic is baseless:

Two weeks ago, journalist Roland Martin, host of NewsOne Now, cited a figure that has often been used to show how little Blacks spend in their neighborhoods compared to other racial and ethnic groups.

The lifespan of a dollar in the Asian community is 28 days, in the Jewish community the lifespan of a dollar is 19 days and the lifespan in the African-American community is approximately six hours, Martin said during his news talk show on the black-owned cable network TV One.

Maggie Anderson, a guest on the show and author of “Our Black Year: One Family’s Quest to Buy Black in America’s Racially Divided Economy,” which was published in 2012, nodded in agreement.

Anderson, a proponent of Blacks spending more with Black-owned business, has often used the “six hours” figure. In a series of talks around the country and in her book, she uses the figure to argue that African- Americans need to do more to support Black-owned businesses.

Anderson isn’t alone. The “six hours” circulation statistic is an often-cited figure by a wide variety of individuals, organizations and news outlets.

The figures have been attributed to various sources including the NAACP and the Selig Center for Economic Growth at the University of Georgia.

But does a dollar spent by Black people really stay in the community for only six hours?

The Facts

To fact-check the statistic, TruthBeTold.news tried to track down the source of this widely cited figure.

Several federal government agencies produce data on black spending patterns.

The Federal Reserve Bank publishes a survey of consumer finance that contains information on consumer spending patterns, but it does not contain the level of detail that would show how often a dollar would circulate in a given community. The Bureau of Labor Statistics also produces reports on black spending patterns. But this data also does not show how often money circulates within a neighborhood.

Other agencies like the Small Business Administration keep track of black businesses. But the SBA also does not compile figures that would allow a comparison of how often money circulates within a community.

Private research organizations such as Nielsen and the Chicago-based Target Market News also track Black spending patterns.

The available data shows that 43 million Blacks in the United States have about $1.1 trillion in spending power. Additionally, the most recent government data shows there were 2.6 million Black or African-American-owned firms nationally in 2012, up from 1.9 million or 34.5 percent in 2007.

But TruthBeTold.news was unable to locate any agencies or private research firms with data that show how long money circulates within a community.

TruthBeTold.news also asked for the source of the six-hour timeframe mentioned on the NAACP website in an article posted on Sept. 24, 2012.

In an email, Nicole Kenney, the writer of the NAACP article, said she used several sources, including Maggie Anderson’s 2012 book and data from Nielsen and the Minority Business and Development Agency.

TruthBeTold.news also contacted the Selig Center about the figures attributed to the economic research unit: “Money circulates zero to one time within the Black community, compared to the more than six times it circulates in the Latino community, nine times in the Asian community and unlimited amount of times within the white community.”

In an email, Jeffrey M. Humphreys, director of the center, said: “I’ve never heard that. It’s not from our center, and it does not sound accurate, but I’ve got no idea what the actual number are.”

The data appears to have first been used in a book by author Brooke Stephens, a financial planner. The book, “Talking Dollars and Making Sense: A Wealth Building Guide for African-Americans,” was written in 1996 and cites the six-hour figure on page 18 of the book.

There is no reference to the original source of the data or the study. Stephens attributes the data to a “John Wray,” who is described as an “economic development specialist” in Washington. There is no other mention of Wray or the study in the book.

TruthBeTold.news reached out to Stephens, who lives in Brooklyn, N.Y., for more information about Wray and the study.

In an interview, Stephens said Wray and a co-author, Lee Green, did the study over a six-month period in 1992, possibly through a nonprofit organization that might no longer exist. She did not remember the name of the report and could not provide any information about Wray or Green, beyond saying that Wray might have taught at Howard University in 1993. The human resource office at Howard said it could not find a reference to a Jim or John Wray. In addition, TruthBeTold.news was unable to locate Lee Green or any studies co-authored by him.

There was no media coverage of the study that can be found in the LexisNexis research database, and the only reference to the study appears to be in Stephens’ book.

TruthBeTold also reached out to Maggie Anderson to see if she remembered the name of the study or could provide any information about Wray.

“I know Brooke Stephens. I know about the statistic,” Anderson said. “I did run into her phenomenal research and the study about the economic lifespan of a dollar in different ethnic groups.”

Anderson attributes the six-hour figure in “Our Black Year” to Brooke Stephens’ book. “I published her findings in my book, ‘Our Black Year,’ and I refer to it whenever I speak and interview. I have been promoting that six-hour statistic quite heavily over the past six years.”

She continues to say how it is the foundation of her work and research commissioned for her year-long Empowerment Experiment through Steven Rogers, a professor at the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University.

“Our Kellogg study proved that less than 3 percent of our $1 trillion in buying power makes it back to our community via our spending with our businesses and the companies that engage our businesses,” she said.

Anderson said the study also found “that if the middle-class black consumers were to spend a little more — 7 percent more, just 10 percent of their spending — with black firms and the mainstream firms that engage them, we can create almost 1 million jobs.” She also includes the six-hour figure and the Kellogg findings in an essay in the National Urban League’s 2014 State of Black America report.

“Brooke Stephens’ statistic about the six hours shows why we need to do more to support our businesses and reverse the exploitation of our consumers and the socio-economic crises our neighborhoods endure,” Anderson said.

TruthBeTold.news also reached out to other Black economic development advocates who have cited the figure and while many of them had heard of the numbers, not one had actually seen the study that produced them.

“I’ve been trying to kill this thing for years,” said Ken Smikle, president of Target Market News, a Chicago-based research firm that tracks black spending patterns. “It’s just not true.”

Smikle, who has produced an annual report called The Buying Power of Black America for nearly two decades, disputes the notion that the circulation of money can be tracked in a community.

“There is no scientific way to do that,” Smikle said. “I mean, how would you do it?”

Economists contacted by TruthBeTold.news to review the figures agree.

“It’s what I consider an urban myth,” said William Spriggs, a former labor department official in the Obama Administration, who is now chief economist at the AFL-CIO union. Spriggs also teaches economics at Howard University.

Spriggs said a red flag for him was the mention of dollars circulating in the Jewish community for 19 days.

“What makes me suspicious is that it has economic data based on religion when the federal government doesn’t collect any information by religion,” Spriggs said. “Where would you get that from?”

“When you say Asian communities you’re talking about a very diverse population that includes Indians, Chinese, Japanese, Koreans and they are all different and not a monolithic community. It would be a mistake to try to include all of these different people under one umbrella to talk about spending in communities,” he said.

He added: “And even if you surveyed customers about their spending with business, how would you know the religion of the person who owned the business? If I shop at Macy’s, I don’t know the religion of the person who owns it.”

Justin Wolfers, an economics professor at the University of Michigan, cited other problems with the figures used by Stephens and others.

First, there is no clear definition of community. “Are we talking about specific neighborhoods or as a whole?” Wolfers asked.

Secondly, he points out, like Spriggs, that the federal government does not collect economic information by religion nor does it collect hourly economic activity.

“It seems highly improbable that you could get this data the way it’s described,” Wolfers said. “The inclusion of religion data alone makes me question the figures.”

A screenshot from NewsOne Now with the statistics from “Talking Dollars and Making Sense” by Brooke Stephens.

Truth Be Told

The claim that a dollar circulates in the Black community for only six hours cannot be substantiated.

The federal government does not produce data that would allow such a comparison.

In addition, economists contacted by TruthBeTold.news said some of the data cited, such as information about dollars circulating in the Jewish community, is questionable because the federal government does not collect information by religion. And researchers would be unable to get the information accurately from a survey of consumers.

The earliest source of the statistic appears to be a book that is nearly 20 years old. The book also never mentions the name of the study nor provides any information about the author.

Economic experts agree that blacks may spend little of their estimated $1.1 trillion in buying power with Black business. And they agree that efforts like Anderson’s to patronize those businesses are laudable goals. But they add that proponents should stop using the six-hour figure because, while it is shocking, it cannot be verified.

“I understand where people who use this figure are coming from and I don’t want to downplay the issue, but you don’t solve the problem by using questionable data,” said Spriggs, the Howard economist.

Brookie Madison is a staff writer for TruthBeTold.news.

X