banner2e top

Flint's Water Crisis and GOP's Class War By Jesse Jackson Sr.

Jan. 31, 2016

Flint's Water Crisis and GOP's Class War
By Jesse Jackson Sr.

Jesse3

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Why did Flint suffer a water catastrophe that now requires that children be treated as if they had been poisoned?

It wasn’t because the people were negligent. From the moment Flint began taking its water from the polluted Flint River, residents warned about water that came out of the faucet brown, tasted foul and smelled worse. They began packing public meetings with jugs filled with water that looked like brown stain.

It wasn’t because the democracy failed, because in Flint democracy had been suspended. The city, devastated by the closing of its auto plants and industrial base, has been in constant fiscal crisis. Republican Gov. Rick Snyder, one of the crop of proud conservative governors promising to cut taxes for the rich and get government out of the way, appointed an emergency manager to run the city. Elected officials had no say.

It wasn’t because the city manager and the state environmental agency and the governor weren’t warned. Warnings were issued from the beginning. General Motors even suspended using the water because it was too corrosive for the auto parts it was making. Nevertheless, city and state officials assured the worried residents of Flint that it was still safe to drink.

The result is that Flint’s children — particularly those in the older, poorer, disproportionately black neighborhoods — have been exposed to elevated levels of lead.

Lead poisoning isn’t like contracting a cold or getting the flu. Lead is an immediate and unrelenting threat to health. It causes miscarriages and births of low-weight babies. Children exposed to lead can have disabilities that afflict them for their entire lives. Lead stays in your bones. Yet even after a federal EPA official warned that the tests were being skewed to underreport levels of lead, even after heroes like LeeAnne Walters reported that her children’s hair was falling out and that they were developing rashes and constantly sick, even after the heroic pediatrician Dr. Mona Hanna-Attisha, an Iraqi-American, reported elevated levels of lead in children’s blood, their concerns were dismissed, their alarms scorned, they were attacked for sowing hysteria and the poor residents of Flint were told the water was safe to drink.

Why were the people and the obvious signs and the experts ignored?

They would not have been ignored if these were wealthy suburban neighborhoods and the water suddenly turned brown. They would not have been ignored if the children of an all-white community were at risk.

State officials dismissed the complaints as exaggerated. The brown water was just rust. Officials thought people ought to be grateful for what they had. The laws, they wrote, ensure the water is “safe to drink.” It doesn’t regulate how it looks, its “aesthetic values.” The water looks bad because it’s from the “Flint River.” Flint is old and poor. The pipes are old and poor. The people are black and poor.

They just have to learn to put up with it. And if the lead seems to be at dangerous levels, flushing the system before the tests, skewing the sample to the most recently built systems can jigger the results to get by. Some might get hurt, but no one worth caring about.

This is the ugly reality of the right-wing assault on America’s working people and particularly on people of color. They want to get “government out of the way” — out of the way of their greed. The successful have earned special treatment — in taxes, in contracts, in interest rates, in public investment. The unsuccessful need to learn self-reliance. They need to accept what they get and be grateful for it.

Flint is not a bug in their perspective; it is a feature. They fought against African-Americans getting the right to vote. Now they use “emergency” to set up dictators — emergency managers — to occupy predominantly African-American communities. They worry that the poor get too much “free stuff” — food stamps (once a Republican program), health care through Medicaid (so they refuse to expand it), unemployment insurance when they lose their jobs (so they limit its coverage), minimum wages (which they fight against) and “costly regulations” that require safe water and clean air and safer workplaces.

The “establishment” Republican candidate Jeb Bush has called for a “regulatory spring cleaning” to strip away regulations that protect health and safety. The Republican Congress annually seeks to cut backs EPA’s budgets and authority. The Republican governors gleefully gut the budgets of their own state agencies. They don’t worry. The children of the rich will be protected. It is the poor — of all races but disproportionately people of color — who will be left at greater risk.

Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder should have the common decency to resign. The state and the federal government should step in and rebuild Flint’s water system immediately. A federal investigation should issue indictments where justified. But this isn’t simply about water and Flint. This is about an ideology that believes in this rich country, the privileges of the few must be protected, even if the necessities of the many are sacrificed. “Of course there is class warfare,” billionaire Warren Buffett once acknowledged, “and my class is winning.”

 

Black History Month Serves Not Only to Educate, but to Inspire by Marc H. Morial

Jan. 31, 2016

To Be Equal

Black History Month Serves Not Only to Educate, but to Inspire
By Marc H. Morial

marcmorial

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Those who have no record of what their forebears have accomplished lose the inspiration which comes from the teaching of biography and history. – Carter G. Woodson
Carter G. Woodson was born in Virginia, 10 years after the fall of the Confederacy. Working as a sharecropper and a miner, he rarely had time to attend school until the age of 20. He would devote the rest of his life to study, becoming known as “The Father of African-American History.”
Through his studies, Woodson found that African-American contributions to history "were overlooked, ignored, and even suppressed by the writers of history textbooks and the teachers who use them."  He concluded that racial prejudice "is merely the logical result of tradition, the inevitable outcome of thorough instruction to the effect that the Negro has never contributed anything to the progress of mankind."
Black History Month, which Woodson founded as Negro History Week in 1926, was his effort to combat that tradition.  Chosen to coincide with the birthdays of Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglas, considered heroes by most Black Americans, the second week in February was set aside to celebrate Black history.
The first year, education officials of only three states and two cities recognized the event, but by 1929 it was being promoted in nearly every state in the nation. In 1970, Black students at Kent State University celebrated the first unofficial Black History Month and in 1976, President Gerald Ford officially recognized the event, saying, "The last quarter-century has finally witnessed significant strides in the full integration of black people into every area of national life. In celebrating Black History Month, we can take satisfaction from this recent progress in the realization of the ideals envisioned by our Founding Fathers. But, even more than this, we can seize the opportunity to honor the too-often neglected accomplishments of black Americans in every area of endeavor throughout our history."

In the intervening 40 years, we’ve seen remarkable progress in racial justice, and also heartbreaking setbacks. There are some in our own community who feel Black History Month is unnecessary – as there were in Woodson’s own day. And their essential point is valid: Black history is American History, and its teaching should not be relegated to one month per year. But that isn’t the point of Black History Month.
The American Dream remains perilously out of reach for many people of color. The National Urban League Equality Index, a comprehensive comparison of Black America’s status in the areas of economics, health, education, social justice and civic engagement, stands at 72.2 percent.
Racial disparity won’t disappear if we simply ignore it. Justice will not be achieved unless we actively seek it out. Black History Month not only serves as a reminder of what our forbearers have achieved, but as an inspiration for the journey that remains before us.

Paying Greater Attention by Dr. E. Faye Williams, Esq.

Jan. 31, 2016

Paying Greater Attention
By Dr. E. Faye Williams, Esq.

williams2

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - There’s little question that parenting is a more complex endeavor than it ever was.  The goal of most conscientious parents is to create as many options for opportunity and success as possible for their child(ren).  Consistent with that goal is the additional objective of developing that child into an injury-free, healthy, independent thinking young adult who is a productive member of the community.  However, this parental desire is often frustrated by the goal itself.  Let me explain.

In order to realize the best and most rewarding opportunities, life has become more competitive for youth.  More than ever and earlier than ever before, youth are required to distinguish themselves from their peers.  'Mere academic success' is no longer the exclusive measure of capability.  Most evaluators of our youth now do so with a "whole person concept" that allows for other measures of capability.  Mainly among these is the participation in sports.

While sports activities are an excellent means of maintaining fitness and the development of unique reactive and performance-based physical skills, they are also the cause of serious and debilitating injury to youth.  The statistics and costs of these injuries are staggering.

In a 2012 survey of emergency room visits, the organization Safe Kids Worldwide discovered facts that are significant to the welfare of our children.  Their study revealed that 1.35 million youth were seen in a hospital emergency room for a sports related injury.  That total reflected a youth sports related visit at a rate of one every 25 seconds.  It was determined that among those visits, at a rate of one youth every 3 minutes, a child was seen for a sports-related concussion.  Among those seen for concussions, younger athletes from ages 12 to 15 made up a staggering 47%.

At an annual cost of more than $935 million, sprains, strains, fractures, contusions, abrasions and concussions are the most frequent injuries experienced by youth ages 6 to 19.   These reported figures do not reflect injuries to youth who are too poor to seek medical treatment or those who choose to "play through the pain."  Not surprisingly, these injuries are sustained by males and females in sporting activities that include football, cheerleading, soccer and basketball.  Surprisingly for many, in sports in which girls and boys participate, girls report a higher percentage of concussions.  Football resulted in both the highest number of all injuries and the highest concussion rate.  Wrestling and cheerleading had the second- and third-highest rates.

Though these rates are regrettable, the parental challenges of rearing an African American child are even more daunting.  There are few African Americans who have not personally experienced the verbal admonishments of the mother urging the personal safety and behavioral restraint of her child.  Even comedians have made these chastisements a part of their acts.  Who among us has not heard the oxymoron, "If you fall out of that tree and break your neck, I'm going to kill you!"

Successfully rearing the African American child takes on a more serious tone than that of the general population.

Most of our children were taught that "Children should be seen and not heard" in the hope that the child wouldn’t say or do something that would offend white law enforcement or other hostile whites.  The Emmitt Till story is among the most dramatic in this regard.

Times, however, have changed.  The 'safety' lessons we teach our children seem no longer sufficient.  The recent lessons of Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown and Tamir Rice demonstrate that APPEARANCE can be as great an offense as any miscreant behavior.

The lessons of Flint, MI, illustrate that the welfare of our youth can be sacrificed to the goal of saving money.  We must do more to avoid injuries of all kind to our children.

(Dr. E. Faye Williams is President of the National Congress of Black Women.  www.nationalcongressbw.org.  202/678-6788)

Political Decisions vs Political Choices by James Clingman

Jan. 30, 2016

Blackonomics

Political Decisions vs Political Choices      
By James Clingman

clingman                                      

(TriceEdneyWiire.com) - Picture this headline:  “Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders win respective primaries.”  Let that Marinate for a moment before reading any further.

Now, what is your reaction?  Faced with those two choices, what will you do?  For whom will you vote?  Will you vote at all?  Or, will you go to either (or both) of the candidates and make demands, insisting that unless they support your positions publicly and in writing you will not vote for them?  No matter who ends up on the ballot, our choice for President will be based on decisions made by others.

Some people use “deciding” and “choosing” interchangeably, and in some cases that’s fine.  But in politics, it’s intellectually dangerous and comes with negative results for the electorate.  Remember George Bush’s words, “I am the decider”?  That was his way of saying I have the final say.  Like the President, the Supreme Court decides; political handlers, donors, and operatives decide.  The electorate chooses, with the exception of the 2000 election where the Supremes decided who would be President.

What about Black folks?  As I wrote last year (“Spectator Politics”), Black folks do not have a say in who wins Iowa and New Hampshire, which are the primary indicators of who gets the final nomination for President.  Why would candidates spend millions of dollars to win those two small states? Iowa has a 91 percent White and 2 percent Black population, and only six electoral votes; New Hampshire has a 93 percent White and 1 percent Black population, and only four electoral votes.  By the way, the third state to vote is South Carolina, which has a 28 percent Black population and nine electoral votes.

The bottom-line in this exclusionary process that takes place during the run-up to the Presidential election is this:  The majority of the electorate is only left with choosing among, and later between, the candidates decided upon by a hand-full of powerbrokers and opinion leaders.

Listen to the speeches and watch the debates, and you will see a glaring absence of rhetoric about Black issues, such as those listed in the political platform of the One Million Conscious Black Voters and Contributors (OMCBVC).  Lip service and posturing are the rules of the day for candidates who want the Black vote.  The bar for their response to our needs is insultingly low.  Just say, “Yes, Black lives do matter,” and you got Black votes.  Just say, “I am for voting rights,” and you lock up Black votes.  Just mention “MLK’s Dream, or Rosa Parks’ refusal, or the Selma Bridge, and the Black votes are in the bag—mostly the Democrats’ bag.

Bernie Sanders, according to an article written by Ta-nehisi Coates, said, the likelihood of reparations for descendants of enslaved Africans in America “is nil...I think it would be very divisive.”  That’s a real interesting response in that reparations for Jewish people were not deemed “divisive” by Sanders.  Barack Obama does not support reparations; Hillary Clinton and all the Republican candidates do not support reparations.  So Black folks “ain’t got nothin’ coming.”  Surprised?  I doubt it.

What do we do?  Well, we must first understand that in politics there is a difference between choosing and deciding.  Then we must organize ourselves into a “deciding” force rather than continue to be a “choosing” afterthought.

How do we do that?  By joining the OMCBVC and reaching a critical mass of Black folks who are willing to play politics to win by leveraging our votes as a bloc, and by combining our financial resources in order to leverage our dollars within the political campaigns of prospective candidates.

Ice cream moguls, Ben Cohen’s and Jerry Greenfield’s support of Black Lives Matter and their ties to Bernie Sanders in Vermont, notwithstanding, Charles and David Koch, Sheldon Adelson, George Soros, and all the rest of the puppet masters whose money controls politics, show us that we have very little decision-making power.  What we have at this stage of the game is the ability to choose from the power-brokers’ decisions.

Beyond the superficial, Black folks’ issues are not being discussed by any candidate.  But why should the candidates deal with us?  They are courting virtually all-White audiences in the two states they want us to believe will ultimately determine our next President.  When the game comes to South Carolina it will change a little; we’ll see Black church visits, gospel hymns being sung, and arm-in-arm prayer, which always turns us on and captures our support.

I implore you, if you are a conscious Black voter, to join the movement that is focused on bringing about a significant change in how public policy is determined, go to www.iamoneofthemillion.com and sign up.  We must be deciders, not choosers.

Standing on Sacred Ground by Julianne Malveaux

Jan. 31, 2016

Standing on Sacred Ground
By Julianne Malveaux

malveaux

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Three unarmed black men encountered a group of white men walking down a dirt road in Slocum, Texas on July 29, 1910.  Without warning, and with no reason, the white men opened fire on the black men.  And for two days White men simply slaughtered black people.  

Eight deaths have been officially acknowledged, but historians who have studied the Slocum Massacre say that it is likely that dozens more were killed, with some saying as many were killed in Slocum as in Tulsa in 1921 (and those numbers range into the hundreds). The New York Times quoted William Black, the sheriff at the time of the massacre: “Men were going about killing Negroes as fast as they could find them, and so far as I was able to ascertain, without any real cause. I don’t know how many were in the mob, but there may have been 200 or 300. … They hunted the Negroes down like sheep.” 

History mostly swallowed the horror of the Slocum Massacre. Some descendants of those massacred pushed for official acknowledgement of the horror, but there have been efforts to cover up the carnage, with some in Slocum pretending that the Massacre never happened.  It took more than a century, until 2011, for the Texas Legislature to formally acknowledge the massacre.  A roadside marker commemorating the tragedy was just placed on January 26, 2016.  

A local member of the Anderson County Historical Commission opposed the marker because “The citizens of Slocum today had absolutely nothing to do with what happened over a hundred years ago. This is a nice, quiet community with a wonderful school system. It would be a shame to mark them as racist from now until the end of time.” 

E.R. Bills, author of The 1910 Slocum Massacre: An Act of Genocide in East Texas, says that there are more than 16,000 historical markers in the state of Texas.  “The Slocum Massacre historical marker will apparently be the first one to specifically acknowledge racial violence against African Americans.”  His book meticulously documents the Slocum facts, and asserts, “Many white folks got away with murder”.    

Only 11 were arrested for their role in the massacre.  Seven were indicted but none were prosecuted for their crimes.  The eleven were only the known criminals.  According to Bills, many murderers buried dead bodies on their land to perpetuate the cover up. 

The Slocum historical marker stands on sacred ground.  There is much other sacred ground in these United States, ground that is soaked with the blood of lynched and murdered African Americans.  Yet there are few markers of our nation’s historical madness.  

The Equal Justice Initiative, an Alabama-based organization that has documented the magnitude of our nation’s lynching history, hopes to build markers and memorials on lynching sites, much like the one in Slocum.  We need these memorials to remind us of an era of racial terror, and to consider the contemporary consequences of that terror.

This year the association for the study of African American life and history (ASALH) has chosen Hallowed Grounds: Sites of African American Memories as their Black History Month Theme.  While ASALH has not focused specifically on markers and memorials for sites of lynching and massacres, the focus location is important.  They mention plantations, historic homes, and historic streets (like Beale Street in Memphis, Sweet Auburn Avenue in Atlanta, and 125 Street in Harlem) as important places to embrace and celebrate.

Many of our nation’s major cities have experienced gentrification in the past decade or so.  Washington, DC is no longer Chocolate City – more like neapolitan or chocolate chip.  The 125 Street of the Harlem Renaissance has diversified, as young whites with deep pockets are pushing the prices of historic brownstones into the seven or eight figure price range.  No matter.  The places are still sacred ground, and should be recognized as such.  

It is important to acknowledge these places with statues, markers, and memorials, lest we forget.  Those who don’t know history are doomed to repeat it.  We assert that Black Lives Matter because so many black lives were obliterated in Slocum, and because for far too long it was convenient and comfortable to forget a heinous massacre.

Dr. Julianne Malveaux is an author, economist and Founder of Economic Education. Her latest book “Are We Better Off? Race, Obama and Public Policy” is available for pre-order at www.juliannemalveaux.com

X