banner2e top

A New Sheriff at DOJ by Dr. E. Faye Williams

Feb. 14, 2026

drefayewilliamsnew

(TriceEdneyWire.com)-I listened to a Congressional Oversight Hearing where Atty. General Pamela Bondi was requested to answer questions regarding how DOJ is being handled. One question that stands out was about women sitting in the room, who’d experienced sex abuse—some of them having these illegal things happen when one was as young as 9 years old. Others were teenagers when they were introduced to Donald Trump’s friend, Jeffrey Epstein. One Member asked several questions of the women if they had ever been able to meet with the Attorney General about their case. All the answers were “NO”.

Being such a huge case, one would think the A.G. would be happy to get information from the victims. The names coming up in the case, including the President’s over 30,000 times, you’d think the A.G. would be interested.  Not this A.G! When asked about meeting with girls or apologizing to them, Bondi absolutely refused to apologize!  As shocking as the A.G.’s refusal was, she flippantly declined. She interrupted Members not allowing them to finish their questions. She would turn to staff to grab a piece of paper with non-responses to what was being asked then reading about a so-called problem in the Member’s district. She talked over Members, yelled at them and disrespected them in all the ways she could, but did not answer their questions.She relished answering things they didn’t ask, and the Republican Committee Chair supported her. 

Many listeners were surprised by her evasive and sassy responses to questions about her department's actions. She stuck to saying anything to attack any member who wore the Democratic label. When a Republican Member who’d been seeking answers spoke, he received the same treatment as Democrats.

Bondi did everything she could to shield Trump from alleged abuses and totally became his guardian. She never deviated from her job to protect Trump. I kept thinking she would deviate from her notes that were constantly fed to her by staff. Rep. Lucy McBath, when speaking about the murder of her son, Bondi tried to modulate her tone.

 I must give her credit that she knew what her mission was and she never deviated.  The people sitting behind her handing her pictures and notes knew what their mission was. It was to attack the speaker. Bondi was busy getting the pre-planned notes she was told to use.  As a woman, I was embarrassed for her, but she had no shame for herself.  She just wanted to please her boss!

Maybe no one taught her what her job was to do when called before a Congressional Oversight Committee! Instead of sitting in the hot seat all day, she could have told the truth and gotten back to whatever they do over at the DOJ before lunch. We saw the show Bondi put on today when she had a chance to show the American people what DOJ had been doing to advance Justice! She chose to evade why 250 people left DOJ; why 69 were separated, why many deputies, attorneys and career prosecutors left DOJ when they saw good people fired or laid off. She forgot she was now in the big leagues and when you cannot live up to the responsibilities of your job, you soon get a chance to return home! She should be on her way back to Florida now!

She tried to control the conversation with compliments about Donald Trump. Under Bondi, the reputation of DOJ took a big hit in this Oversight Hearing. The way she handled things was nothing short of insanity. Victims of the Epstein matter were sitting right behind her. Knowing the facts, she refused to say the simple words “I’m sorry” while at least two Members of Congress gave her a chance to do so. She spent her time praising Donald Trump!

When a President Turns Dehumanization Into Policy By Barbara Reynolds

Feb. 8, 2026

barbara reynolds2

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - There are moments in American history when cruelty is not accidental—it is strategic.

Recent reports that the president circulated or endorsed a video depicting former President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama as monkeys, followed by a refusal to apologize or disavow the imagery, belong to a long and poisonous tradition in this country. It is the  deliberate dehumanization of Black people to justify harm, exclusion, and control.

Why monkeys?

Because in America, likening Black people to animals has never been random. It has been a tool. Enslavers used it to argue Africans were less than human. Scientists distorted it into “race science.” Politicians weaponized it to excuse chains, whips, lynch mobs, Jim Crow, and voter suppression. When you deny someone’s humanity, you can deny their rights—and eventually their lives.

This is not isolated behavior. This is pattern.

The same political figure launched his national career by pushing the birther lie—that Barack Obama was not a U.S. citizen, not legitimate, not truly American. Since then, we have heard immigrants from African nations dismissed as coming from “shitholes,” Somalis described as “garbage,” and Black-led initiatives branded as “tainted” under the attack on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion—programs that were never about favoritism, but about access long denied.

Words matter. Images matter more.

Psychologists will tell you that repeated dehumanizing imagery does measurable harm—especially to children. When a president traffics in such symbolism, it gives permission for bullying, for employment discrimination for unfair massive incarceration.  Young Black people do not experience these moments as abstract politics; they experience them in hallways, online spaces, classrooms, and workplaces—where being called a “monkey” is not satire, but threatening dehumanization.

I have seen this damage up close.

In 2017, while teaching journalism and training Black students to excel in a profession that has rarely made room for them, my class discovered online images of the Obamas—and even their daughters—grotesquely depicted as monkeys. My students were shaken. I was shaken. And yet, I did what Black elders have always done: I taught history, resilience, brilliance. I reminded them that Black Americans survived slavery, Jim Crow, lynching, redlining, and voter suppression—not alone, but alongside White Americans who refused to surrender their conscience.

But survival should not be the standard. Dignity should be.

The real scandal is not just the imagery—it is the silence surrounding it. Where is the outrage from business leaders who break bread with power while families struggle to afford food? Where is the sustained pressure from media institutions that soften coverage in pursuit of access, contracts, or future ventures? Where are politicians—of all parties—who understand that democracy cannot survive when hate is normalized at the top?

Scripture warns us plainly: “Death and life are in the power of the tongue.” (Proverbs 18:21) In modern America, that tongue includes images, policies, budgets, and omissions.

Dehumanization is never just rhetoric. It is rehearsal.

History teaches us that once a group is portrayed as less than human, violence—economic, psychological, or physical—soon follows. Jobs are stripped. Contracts are canceled. Protections are erased. And the public is told this is efficiency, not cruelty.

Actions speak louder than words—but silence speaks, too.

This is a moment that demands more than statements. It demands refusal. Refusal by media to normalize hate. Refusal by corporations to profit from proximity to power while communities suffer. Refusal by citizens to accept that this is just “politics as usual.”

America has seen this road before. We know where it leads. The question is whether we will once again pretend we don’t.

Democratic Wins Still Stunning Trump, GOP By Barrington M. Salmon

Nov. 19, 2025

Virginia Slate

Ghazala Hashmi, Abigail Spanberger and Jay Jones, newly elected lieutenant governor, governor and attorney general of  Virginia. 

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - After more than 40 days, the US government shutdown is over, air travel is returning to normal, and people are less worried about being able to put Thanksgiving dinner on their tables. Yet families across the country will have to make significant decisions and choices around the spiraling costs of healthcare because Republicans have refused to extend Obamacare subsidies.

Yet the Democratic sweep of the Nov 5 off-year elections has given hope to the masses of Black people as the country contends with the party in power and many of its most fervent supporters who are content to watch ICE agents arbitrarily stop, harass, detain and deport immigrants and US citizens; cruelly block the issuance of SNAP benefits to 42 million needy families; and as inflation batters Americans.  

Election officials said turnout was high, with Democrats snatching up wins and voters in different parts of the country voting in favor of important ballot questions centered on free school meals, redistricting, and governors’ races.

Sweep. Those words, set against a black background on Facebook, is what met anyone who follows Dr. Avis Jones-DeWeever or who happened to scroll by her Facebook page on the Wednesday morning after national off-year elections.

DeWeever, a political strategist and content creator, said she felt a great deal of satisfaction following Democrats shellacking of MAGA Republicans in nearby Virginia, New Jersey, New York and California.

By the end of the night Tuesday, Democratic Party candidates had secured gubernatorial wins in New Jersey and Virginia; saw the surprise election of a young, Democratic Socialist candidate, Zohran Mamdani, elected mayor in New York City, powered by young, multi-ethnic, disaffected voters; passage of Proposition 50, a measure that gives California legislators the room to redistrict electoral lines and give Democrats the opportunity to potentially capture five additional seats in the House of Representatives; the defeat of a measure in Maine that would have restricted voting; and the reelection of three Pennsylvania Supreme Court judges to retain the Democratic majority.

Just about all the races revolved around affordability issues, experts said.

“These wins were critical because it showed that people will fight back even if the Democratic Party appears spineless. It was a powerful rejection in multiple states in multiple ways. It was a full-fledged rejection of (the Trump administration’s) autocratic ways,” said Jones-DeWeever.

She said the comprehensive wins across the country illustrates that “we are still a two-party system. We can’t allow these criminals to maintain power.”

DeWeever said she’s struck by the Virginia results, where voters elected the state’s first woman governor, Abigail Spanberger; the first Muslim lieutenant governor, Ghazala Hashmi,  and a Black man, Jay Jones, as attorney general. In addition to these gains, the Dems picked up 13 seats, giving them much more room to legislate.

“The legislature will be able to redistrict, counteract Trump efforts,” she said. “What’s most important to me is Mamdani’s win. It is based on turnout and expansion of the electorate. He ran the type of campaign Democrats could have run if they had a spine.”

Mamdani, a former New York state assemblyman and a Muslim immigrant from Uganda, electrified voters in New York, while terrifying Republicans, billionaires and corporatist, right-leaning Democrats.

Billionaires, and political action committees tied to former Mayor Andrew Cuomo, poured more than $40 million into an effort to derail Mamdani’s race to grab the seat. Trump endorsed Cuomo the day before the race, inaccurately characterizing Mamdani as a communist and threatening to without federal funds to New York City if he won.

That was all for nought, because by the time the race was called 35 minutes after polls closed, Mamdani had secured more than 1 million votes and 50 percent of votes cast.

Democrats are celebrating after the decisive victories in several high-profile contests, the nation’s first major elections since Trump’s second term in office. Political pundits and other experts said these crucial wins are an early barometer of the public reaction to Trump’s policies and programs and will provide fuel for Democrats before the 2026 mid-term elections.

Trump admitted Wednesday that Republicans had “a bad night,” and met with fellow Republicans the next day to discuss the fallout and implications of the win. DeWeever said the public also are angry and concerned about Trump policies such as burgeoning inflation, high consumer prices, the suspension of SNAP payments and the administration’s antagonistic and aggressive tactics on the immigration front.

Dr. Malik Sekou, a longtime politics and history professor at the University of the Virgin Islands, said he expected Mamdani to come out on top in New York.

“Yes. If you look at my (Facebook) posts for the past few months, I saw this. I thought he was going to win because certain times determine leadership,” said Sekou, an acknowledged Pan African who said he sits far-left politically and supported Rep. Bernie Sanders over Joe Biden. “The way the US is today is that we’re confronted by with a far-right offensive which is on the march in every aspect of American life and which has been taken international. No one can be confused with what’s in front of us. It’s either fight back or surrender. You have to do it Trump’s way or surrender.”

Sekou said anyone who carries the principle of social consciousness in them, they have to fight.

“You have to fight, you have to fight,” he asserted.

It is not lost on him, Sekou said, that Mamdani is taking over leadership in New York City.

“New York City is the cultural capital of the USA. It is the cultural driver and has a large immigrant population, so they have to oppose the policies against them,” said Sekou, who said both of his parents were born in NYC.

But both DeWeever and Sekou cautioned Democrats to enjoy the wins but to temper their excitement and tread carefully.

“I think we have to be very careful. We are still a two-party system,” DeWeever said. “We should celebrate for one day. The only thing we should be very careful of is that we should not let this win allow us to coast into the midterms. The fight for the midterms starts today. We have to fight, make significant investments in organizing and campaigning, getting people ready to vote and prepping for the midterms.”

Like Sekou, DeWeever said she feels that current Democratic leadership is not equipped to fight effectively or successfully against Trump and MAGA Republicans.

“Mamdani won and will serve as a Democrat. It makes sense to utilize this structure. It offers the best chance of winning,” she said. I think we have to be strategic but also be bold in pulling and pushing the party. We must work behind the scene and come out to vote.”

 

Lawmakers, Advocates Push Back Against HUD's Retreat from Fair Housing By Charlene Crowell

 
October 05, 2025
 
HUD Building
 
(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Recent whistleblower complaints of systemic dismantling of fair housing and civil rights enforcement at the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) have led ranking minority members of both chambers of Congress to jointly call for hearings.
On September 30, a letter co-signed by Rep. Maxine Waters who serves on the House Financial Services Committee, and Sen. Elizabeth Warren who serves on her chamber’s Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, together charge that HUD is on “an unalterable course” towards violating long-standing fair housing and related enforcement.
The two lawmakers also identified specific HUD leadership actions that substantiate their requests:
  • Advised staff that fair housing work was “not a priority” but an “optics problem”; and encouraged reassignment within the agency as fair housing staff was cut by 70 percent.
  • Implemented a gag order that prevented its Office of Fair Housing (OFH) from communicating with external parties both within and outside of HUD “without express approval from political leadership.” This single directive resulted in closing over 100 housing discrimination cases.
  • Reassigned 75 percent of the OFH staff assigned to its Violence Against Women’s Act, leaving the office unable to serve or support survivors of domestic violence, human trafficking, and sexual assault. 
“The enforcement of fair housing and civil rights laws is not an ‘optics problem.’ Alleged efforts by HUD leadership to dismantle decades of progress are shameful, betray the American public, and represent a profound abuse of taxpayer dollars,” wrote the lawmakers. “Failure to act leaves millions of Americans at risk of rampant discrimination in housing and mortgage lending.”
From January to July this year, the OFH approved less than $200,000 in settlements stemming from similar discriminatory charges. By comparison, OFH staff, including 22 lawyers, managed 2,000 new complaints annually that resulted in legal settlements ranging from $4-8 million in each of the last five years.
Two September memoranda – one sent to HUD staff, and the other to Fair Housing Initiatives Program Grantees made clear the agency’s shift away from pursuing investigations and enforcement of fair housing violations, and towards swift investigation of alleged violators that prevent burdensome investigations.  
On September 16, John Gibbs, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity, advised staff of the changes that took immediate effect. Individual complaints will now only consider personal experiences, rather than racial or community-based trends and practices.
“This memorandum also calls attention to priorities and practices that must be eliminated,” wrote Gibbs. “[T]he previous administration’s prioritization of so-called “appraisal bias” and targeting of market-based appraisals was lawless. This group-oriented, race-based guidance runs counter to basic civil rights principles and departs from the plain text of the Fair Housing Act.”  
The next day, September 17, Gibbs issued a second memo advising Fair Housing Initiatives Program Grantees of the withdrawal of long-standing documents that provided guidance and context on a range of fair housing issues such as legal standards, real estate transactions, income testing, reasonable accommodations for disabilities, and more.
“The Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity is committed to issuing guidance only where that guidance is necessary and would reduce compliance burdens rather than increase them”, wrote Gibbs. “Historically, the Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity has at times released guidance without adequate regard for whether it would increase or decrease compliance burdens and costs. This policy has changed.” 
News of a whistleblower complaint filed by a HUD attorney was first reported by the New York Times on September 22:
“In one email, a Trump appointee at the Department of Housing and Urban Development described decades of housing discrimination cases as “artificial, arbitrary and unnecessary.”
 
In another, a career supervisor in the department’s Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity objected to lawyers being reassigned to other offices; the supervisor was fired six days later for insubordination.
 
“The emails are among dozens of pages of internal communications, memos and other documents reviewed by The New York Times that show efforts by the Trump administration to limit enforcement of the Fair Housing Act, the landmark civil rights law that has prohibited discrimination in housing for nearly six decades.”
On September 23, a civil rights coalition facilitated by the National Fair Housing Alliance brought united concerns from 38 national organizations, 22 states and the District of Columbia, along with 47 state/local organizations – all opposing HUD’s actions.
“In his confirmation hearing, HUD Secretary Scott Turner promised he would “commit to upholding the fair housing laws” during an exchange where he was asked whether he would commit to the vigorous enforcement of the nation’s fair housing laws,” wrote the coalition. “Under his direction, HUD has not lived up to the promise… HUD is affirmatively dismantling its capacity to carry out its statutory responsibility to enforce the Fair Housing Act and other fundamental civil rights laws.”
When redlining continues to deny communities of color access to affordable housing and finance, and racially biased appraisals diminish the accrual of wealth via homeownership that other races and ethnicities receive, the need for fair housing enforcement should not only remain but should be aggressively enforced.
For many consumers and housing advocates alike, catering to alleged fair housing violators instead of those measurably harmed by their actions is a distortion of the letter and spirit of the Fair Housing Law. 
Charlene Crowell is a senior fellow with the Center for Responsible Lending. She can be reached at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it." data-linkindex="5">This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

Why Democrats Need a Year-Round Voter Engagement Strategy By Kevin Harris and Richard McDaniel

 Kevin Harris

Kevin Harris

Richard McDaniel headshot

Richard McDonald

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Last week marked national voter registration day and Democrats sure could use the help. Between 2020 and 2024, Democrats lost 2.1 million registered voters while Republicans gained 2.4 million across the 30 states that track party registration. That’s a net swing of 4.5 million voters—adding to Democrats bleeding as more Americans already have negative impressions about our brand. 

Democrats’ approval ratings have dropped below 35 percent among white men, Hispanic men, and working-class voters across the board. The party’s advantage among Black adults has shrunk to its smallest margin since 1999, while Donald Trump nearly doubled his support among Black voters and drew even with Democrats among Hispanic voters in 2024.

These numbers hold strong implications for the Democratic Party’s ability to win national elections. In the battleground state of Pennsylvania our voter registration lead has collapsed from over 500,000 to just 53,000 today. Similar trends exist across several other key battlegrounds needed to recapture Congress and the White House. 

Like our brand, the key infrastructure Democrats need to win is crumbling. 

Democrats have made fatal assumptions about voter loyalty among key groups. For too long, we assumed working class white, Black and Brown voters would always be there. We stopped meaningfully organizing these communities. Our engagement is relatively tepid, simply investing resources late in the game just before an election. Voters are right to ask where have we been? 

To win again, Democrats must re-engage the working class from the ground up 365 days a year. Democrats need permanent staff conducting monthly drives at community centers, churches, barbershops, and college campuses—not just during campaign season. 

We need year-round organizing that connects our policies with the daily struggles working class voters are experiencing. Registering voters without educating them about Democratic policies is political malpractice. 

We have to remember that politics is relational and not every objective can be achieved through a splashy advertising campaign alone. Democrats need consistent presence supporting local causes and community events that build trust over time across communities. 

And Democrats must make digital organizing and texting a permanent fixture, particularly in reaching young working class voters. 

Regular town halls and listening sessions must happen year-round to maintain coalitions, not just when Democrats need votes.

The bottom line is that 4.5 million voters didn’t swing away from Democrats overnight. This resulted from years of Democratic neglect while Republicans methodically engaged in voter manipulation and intimidation to lock in a governing majority. 

Trump’s attacks on the democratic process and integrity of our elections are well documented. He’s pressuring red states to redraw congressional maps before the 2026 midterms to ensure a GOP majority before a single vote has been cast. 

When Republicans control redistricting, they eliminate competitive districts. When they suppress civic engagement through intimidation, they reduce Democratic turnout. All of this adds up to the working class losing more and more ground and Democrats falling farther behind. 

The only counter to systematic voter suppression is systematic voter engagement—infrastructure that works 365 days a year.

Republicans are playing the long game while Democrats play election to election. The GOP is investing in permanent infrastructure while Democrats rely on temporary and transactional mobilization. Republicans are building sustained relationships while Democrats send texts every two years asking for votes.

Democrats are treating voters as numbers instead of building genuine relationships. The path forward requires admitting the old model failed and committing to year-round organizing—showing up consistently, investing in communities, and earning trust through sustained presence must be central to how Democrats regain relevancy in the lives of working class voters. 

Democracy isn’t a spectator sport, and neither is voter engagement. Democrats must stop analyzing our problems with working class voters and start acting to bring those voters back into the fold block by block and one registration at a time. 

Kevin Harris and Richard McDaniel are veteran Democratic strategists with over 100 political campaigns between them including the last five presidential elections and several congressional races. They co-host “Maroon Bison Presents: The Southern Comfort Podcast.”

X