banner2e top

A Deep South Governor’s Race to Watch By Ben Jealous

July 2, 2023

benjealous pfaw

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - A year in which there are only three races for governor’s seats, all in the Deep South, wouldn’t normally create a lot of political speculation. Kentucky’s popular Democratic incumbent may have a tough race, and chalking up Louisiana and its neighbor to the east to a Republican would be typical conventional wisdom.

But “Mississippi Miracle” may well become the catchphrase of this election season. Brandon Presley is making a strong bid to become the first Democratic elected governor in the Magnolia State this century.

Presley (yes, Elvis from Tupelo is a cousin) has won a seat on the state’s Public Service Commission four times, where he’s opposed a huge coal-fired power plant and a proposal to dump nuclear waste in Mississippi and fought to expand internet access in rural areas.

He’s hard to pin as a typical Democrat. He lowered taxes and balanced budgets as a mayor, endorsed George W. Bush in the 2004 presidential election and describes himself as a pro-life Christian (which he is quick to note demands supporting health care, education, and seniors as well).

Presley has a powerful personal story that reaches well beyond his kinship with the King of Rock and Roll. He was raised by a single mom who worked in a garment factory after his father was murdered. He’s told poor and working-class voters that they should see their own names on the ballot when they see his.

Nettleton, the town of about 2,000 people in the northeastern Mississippi that Presley hails from and he first became mayor at age 23, is split about 60% White and 40% Black like the state as a whole but has a median income $10,000 below the median in one of the poorest states in the country.

It’s no surprise that Presley is campaigning on issues that matter most to those voters. He responded to Gov. Tate Reeves’ state of the state address outside a shuttered rural hospital to highlight his $1 billion Medicaid expansion plan, which he says will improve health care to low-income residents and save nearly 40 Mississippi hospitals at risk of closing.

Reeves is unpopular even among his party’s voters. Six in 10 voters in a recent poll, including a third of Republicans and two thirds of independents, said they want “someone else” to be governor. While he’s campaigning on a raise he gave educators, the teachers union has endorsed Presley.

The incumbent has been tied to a scandal in which up to $94 million in welfare funds were diverted to pet projects of the state’s most powerful while many families in need were being denied $170 a month in assistance. It's a particularly salient issue at this moment when Mississippi and other states are beginning to seek and spend hundreds of billions in federal dollars to build infrastructure and create clean energy jobs.

Presley will need a big turnout from the 38 percent of Mississippi voters who are Black. He’s not well known in Jackson and the southern end of the state where most of them live. He had the endorsement of Rep. Bennie Thompson, the state’s only Black member of Congress, almost immediately after announcing his campaign (the last Democrat who ran did not).

Black and low-income voters would gain much from Medicaid expansion and Presley’s plan to cut Mississippi’s regressive 7 percent grocery tax. Having suffered with a Republican leading the state a decade ago, they’d have a champion as governor as legislative and Congressional districts are redrawn in response to the census this time around.

Even more broadly, a Presley victory and his economic proposals might begin to shift what’s been a historical migration pattern for Blacks out of the state up the Mississippi River and westward to California. When I was a young organizer in Mississippi in the 1990s, a mentor who had helped build the state’s public health clinics during the Kennedy and Johnson years told me that there were more Black doctors who’d been born in Mississippi living in Los Angeles County than in the entire state of Mississippi.

No state can thrive indefinitely letting its best and brightest look for opportunity elsewhere. Mississippi may decide to turn off that spigot in November.

Ben Jealous is executive director of the Sierra Club, the nation’s largest and most influential grassroots environmental organization. He is a professor of practice at the University of Pennsylvania and author of “Never Forget Our People Were Always Free,” published in January.

Yusef Salaam of the Central Park Five is Running for the New York City Council

June 27, 2023

Yusef Salaam

Yusef Salaam

Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from BlackMansStreet.Today

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - When Yusef Salaam and the other four members of the Central Park Five were cleared after another man confessed to the 1980 brutal rape and beating of Trisha Meili, the Central Park jogger, Donald Trump didn't like it one bit. 

Trump took out a full-page ad in four New York newspapers, calling for the boys to die in custody, and declaring that New York should bring back the death penalty.

Salaam is now running for New York City Council, and Trump, who is running for again president for the second time, may be headed to prison.

Salaam is now 49.  He was 15 when he went to prison. He spent seven years in prison for a crime he and other boys, all Black or Hispanic, did not commit. 

Matias Reyes admitted that he raped Meili. "The cops and the press did not give the presumption of innocence," Salaam said during an interview.

He says he is now ready to change things from the inside. 

Salaam is running against three other candidates for the coveted Harlem district on the New York City Council.

He faces  Al Taylor, of the New York State Assembly, and Inez Dickens, a former city council member. Early voting will be held from June 17 to June 25. The primary election is set for June 27, 2023, and the general election will be held on November 7, 2023.

His opponents claim he does not have experience.  He said, "I have a great record in the 34 years since I fought to clear my name in the Central Park Jogger case."

Will Trump Get a Get Out of Jail Free Card? By Jesse Jackson

June 17, 2023

Jesse3

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - The federal indictment of Donald Trump – the first federal indictment of a former president in U.S. history – poses the question. Trump’s enraged reaction – calling it the “greatest witch hunt of all time” and denouncing special counsel Jack Smith, a career prosecutor, as a “deranged lunatic” – makes the question unavoidable. Obviously, Trump deserves a fair trial, his guilt or innocence determined by a jury of his peers. But every candidate for president should be asked if they would pardon Donald Trump if they were president. As Gerald Ford proved when pardoning Richard Nixon, a presidential pardon can be issued before a trial, or even before formal charges are brought, so the question needn’t wait on the trial.

Whether Donald Trump is found guilty or not (it will only take one juror in his upcoming Miami trial to produce a hung jury), the charges in the indictment are serious, and the facts alleged describe clear violations of the law. The president took classified documents that did not belong to him. These included truly consequential secrets – “information regarding defense and weapons capabilities of both the United States and foreign countries, U.S. nuclear programs … and plans for possible retaliation in response to a foreign attack.” Trump shared classified information with guests who did not have security clearances, essentially crowing about his possession of them. When the National Archives and the Department of Justice sought return of the documents, Trump hatched efforts to hide some of them, even after he was issued a federal subpoena – a legal demand – that he return them. He lied to federal officials, and even deceived his own attorney. As Bill Barr, Trump’s former attorney general, stated, “there is no excuse for what he (Trump) did here.”

Anyone running for office must decide whether to stand with Trump and accuse the Justice Department of being “weaponized” or stand for the principle that no man is above the law, and the law should be applied to the powerful and the powerless alike.

The leading Trump challenger in the Republican Party, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, reacted to the indictment by charging that the “weaponization of federal law enforcement represents a mortal threat to a free society.” Former Vice President Mike Pence tried to have it both ways, comparing the indictment to the way a “third-world nation” would use criminal charges to attack their opponents, while saying that it is imperative that the law be enforced even-handedly and demonstrate that no man is above the law. Similarly, Sen. Tim Scott tried to straddle, saying the charges were a “serious, serious challenge” to Trump, but denouncing the DOJ as “weaponized” against Trump.

Sadly, the only Republican contenders to criticize Trump are those that run lowest in the early polls. Former Arkansas Governor Asa Hutchinson called on Trump to withdraw from the race, and urged the Republican National Committee to revise the requirement that any Republican participating in the debates pledge to support the party’s eventual nominee by excluding anyone found guilty of espionage or a felony. Former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie called Trump’s perils “self-inflicted,” dismissing the attack on the independent special counsel.

Trump, of course, is free to run for president while under indictment or even from prison if he is found guilty. In 1920, Eugene Victor Debs ran for president while jailed for opposing World War I, garnering 900,000 votes as the Socialist Party candidate. Trump and his supporters now are promising violent “retribution.” Kari Lake, the failed Arizona gubernatorial candidate, addressed the Georgia Republican Party convention, warning the prosecutor, the attorney general and President Biden that “if you want to get to President Trump (sic), you are going to have to go through me and … through 75 million Americans just like me. And “…Most of us are card-carrying members of the NRA.” That’s not a threat,” she said, “That’s a public service announcement.”

That rhetoric will grow ever more heated as the prosecution proceeds – and as seems likely, if Trump is indicted in Georgia for trying to overturn an election and in Washington for his complicity in the sacking of the Capitol on January 6. So, it is incumbent on those who seek the presidency to be clear about where they stand. Do they stand with the proposition that no man is above the law, or would they give Donald Trump a pass? Will they support the criminal justice system – whatever the verdict – or will they offer Trump a pardon? Trump, of course, has made it clear he would pardon himself. Where do the other contenders for the presidency stand on that?

Many issues will be debated in the presidential race – the economy, abortion, guns, the “war on woke,” Ukraine, catastrophic climate change, the right to vote and more. One central issue is posed by Trump’s vicious attack on the Justice Department, and the independent special counsel. Americans have the right to know: Would contenders for the presidency allow the criminal justice process to proceed or would they issue Trump a get out of jail free card?

 

Trump Indictment to Test Criminal Justice System By Barrington M. Salmon

June 12, 2023

DonaldTrump

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Former US Attorney General Bill Barr may have said it clearest:P “If even half of it is true, then he’s toast. It’s a very detailed indictment and it’s very, very damning." Barr was responding to a 37-count indictment handed down by a Florida grand jury in a stunning denouement to the classified documents case against former President Donald Trump.

Department of Justice Special Counsel Jack Smith dropped the hammer on Trump in the 49-page indictment after Trump, 76, took more than 11,000 classified documents, including Secret and Top-Secret documents and related material to his home in Florida.

The charges substantiate that Trump violated the Espionage Act, illegally withheld national security secrets, lied about it and obstructed the DOJ investigation, according to the Justice Department. Despite pleas and multiple requests from the National Archives, Trump refused to return the documents until the Federal Bureau of Investigation raided Mar a Lago last August and seized the critical papers.

Through it all, Trump continued to argue that he had the right and executive privilege as a former president, to hold on to these and other government documents, including documents holding America’s most critical and sensitive military and nuclear secrets. Trump is now the first U.S president to face federal charges.

“I’m not seeing evidence from all the past issues that he’ll be held to accountable. The list of Trump’s wrongdoings is like a receipt from CVS. Much of the wrongdoings were done well before he became president and he’s untouched,” said political consultant and commentator, Michele Watley. “Call me when he’s convicted. I would be surprised if he is convicted. Chalk it up to White privilege, wealth, his network and family connections. All of these have shielded him.”

Trump is looking at 37 charges detailed in a 49-page indictment: willful retention of national defense information (31 counts); conspiracy to obstruct justice; withholding a document or record; corruptly concealing a document in a federal investigation; a scheme to conceal; making false statements and representations; and espionage. He is slated to appear at a federal courthouse in Miami on Tuesday, June 13.
 

Watley, a Kansas City, Missouri resident and founder and owner of The Griot Group LLC, a strategic communications and political advocacy consulting practice, said “no one Black that I know of would not be held accountable or killed or had their careers desecrated for the things he’s done.”

At his age, she said, Trump has spent three quarters of a century doing all the illegal, illicit and questionable things he’s done and he’s never being held accountable or responsible. With Trump facing his first indictment and unresolved cases in the District of Columbia and Georgia, there are a host of uncertainties.

“When you look at all the charges, it will be interesting to see how this plays out with his base. And how other candidates will treat him and his presence in the race,” said Watley, who has more than 15 years’ experience in public affairs, political strategy and advocacy, and governmental processes.

Special Counsel Jack Smith, who had not made a public statement during the investigation, held a brief press conference after the indictment was unsealed.

“Our laws that protect national defense information are critical to the safety and security of the United States and must be enforced,” said Smith, who encouraged everyone to read the document in full. “Violation of these laws put us at risk. Americans put their lives at risk. We have one set of laws in this country, and they apply to everyone.” 

Bill Berlow, a retired writer and associate editor at The Tallahassee Democrat said he was aghast at Trump’s treasonous behavior.

“Given Trump's well-documented laziness and haphazard attitude toward securing highly sensitive classified information, during and after his presidency, one can only guess how much of that information fell into the hands of agents of foreign governments, especially since access to Mar-A-Lago was not difficult,” he said. “I would be extremely surprised if this fiasco has not already cost the lives of some U.S. and foreign agents and other assets who provided our intelligence services with sensitive information.”

Berlow, a consultant at William R. Berlow Inc., said his guess is that the actual damage to America’s intelligence services is incalculable.

“… Not only because of the breaches described in the indictment but, perhaps more importantly, those dozens of examples left out of the indictment at the behest of U.S. intelligence agencies. I can think of only one word to appropriately describe this: treason."

David Cannady, senior partner at Cannady & Associates, offered an unusual scenario that would nullify the clear and present danger Trump still poses to the safety and security of the United States, whether it be his alleged cavalier treatment of state secrets, his involvement and instigation of the Jan 6 coup and riot and his reputed fascist and authoritarian leanings.

“It’s pretty significant. They did not pull any punches,” Cannady said of Smith’s investigative findings. “They made sure that unlike Hillary and other cases, that they can’t say they don’t know if he did or didn’t do it. It was conclusive. That was extremely important to protect the political process.”

This might be why Trump wants to run – to have fodder for his campaign run, said Cannady, a former assistant state attorney with the Broward State Attorney’s Office.

“These are felonies. If he’s convicted of these crimes, this will prohibit him from ever becoming president again,” he said. “The question is do you, are you, can you indict a former president? If you say no one is above the law, then you have to go through this process. This is not something that people haven’t been indicted for in the past. It’s so jarring because of who it is and the political climate.”

Cannady said the claims made against Trump are legitimate and the indictment is pretty boiler plate, but if convicted, Trump could be looking at a long stretch.

“Did he do it? Yeah, he did it,” Cannady asserted. “He’s so brazen, he thinks he can flout and disregard any and all laws. If he’s convicted, what are the implications to his presidency? All the things inside of me say he will be indicted. They’re showing him they can reach out and touch him. He faces 90 years in prison. I think if he’s convicted, he would serve something minimal and be pardoned by whoever is president, Democrat or Republican.”

Cannady’s reasoning was simple.

“If he is convicted, I believe a president will pardon him. It’s important for people like him to know they can be touched,” he said. “We’ll be seeing the judiciary and criminal justice aspects of the system play out. If he’s ultimately indicted and sentenced, he will know that anybody can be touched. Trump may negotiate and offer, through a plea deal, not to run again.”

There is considerable angst among law enforcement, Democrats and political observers that Trump’s Tuesday appearance may trigger violence from his devoted and rabid followers. Trump has been coaxing his followers to react to this latest indictment and social media has been abuzz with anger and threats against the Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Biden administration and Democratic members of Congress.

It is clear that even if Trump isn’t re-elected president, during his time in the White House he ignited a wildfire of white grievance, self-pity, persecution and retribution that excites his base and is scaring the hell out of what used to be the Republican Party.

One thing is clear: Conviction, sentencing or not, Donald John Trump isn’t going away. And it appears that those most concerned about the considerable blast radius caused by Trump and Trumpism still have no idea how to defuse what he’s selling and what he has come to represent.

The Debt Ceiling Struggle: Who Gets the Gold? Who Gets the Shaft? By Jesse Jackson

May 6, 2023

Jesse3

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Over the next few weeks, the manufactured crisis over the “debt ceiling” will reach its boiling point. But this is pure melodrama, badly overacted with the outcome already known. The real question is about our priorities – and about who gets the gold and who gets the shaft.

On the debt ceiling, President Biden says he won’t negotiate over raising it. House Speaker Kevin McCarthy says Republicans won’t raise it without negotiations. This is like teenagers playing chicken in cars racing toward each other – only in this case a crash would blow up the world economy. That can’t happen – and so it won’t. The United States will pay the debts it owes. Our full faith and credit will not be trashed.

That will still leave the question about our priorities and the national budget. Who pays and who benefits? Here – beneath the posturing – is the real deal. Here’s a handy guide to what’s in the deck.

First on our annual deficits. The best solution to the deficit is economic growth. When the economy grows, more people get jobs and raises. As wages and profits rise, the government collects more in taxes and pays out less in support – on everything from unemployment insurance to welfare to food stamps. Deficits come down.

How do we get growth? For years, Republicans have passed tax cuts – largely for the rich and corporations – saying that would lead to more investment and more jobs. Turns out it mostly led to more inequality, slower growth and thus more deficits.

Biden argues that we need to invest in areas vital to our economy – in modern infrastructure, in research and development, in subsidies that get companies to locate plants in the U.S. and not abroad. Although his program has just begun, it seems to be working – with unemployment down, wages up, and deficits getting reduced.

That said, politicians in both parties still want even faster deficit reduction. The big question is one of priorities. Here common sense should apply.

Over the past years, the richest Americans have captured more and more of the nation’s income and wealth. The middle class has struggled, and the poor haven’t kept up. Common sense would suggest that the wealthy should pay more in taxes, rather than the middle class or the poor.

On the spending side, the military budget has been rising – and now is at levels not seen since the height of the Cold War. We spend as much on the military as the next 10 nations combined. Health care costs have been rising even as life expectancy has been declining. We spend nearly two times per capita than other advanced countries with far worse results.

We can reduce our military budget and still have the most powerful military in the world. And we can transform our medical system – moving as other advanced countries have done to the equivalent of Medicare for All, providing more service for less cost. Biden has taken a small step by controlling the price gouging on some prescription drugs, but much more can be done.

But common sense rarely surfaces in the Washington debate. Consider the Republican debt ceiling “proposal” that passed the House. Republicans oppose asking the rich and corporations to pay more. They oppose cutting the military budget (and in fact want to raise it substantially). They oppose controlling drug prices, or moving to Medicare for All or even having a public option in health care that would limit insurance company excesses. Trump and Biden have convinced them that they shouldn’t touch Social Security or Medicare – at least before the election.

That leaves all the cuts to come from domestic programs – and the pain to be borne primarily by the most vulnerable – and by the middle class. Low-income families will see cuts in food support, in affordable housing, in health care through Medicaid, in infant nutrition, in childcare. The poor and middle-income families will suffer cuts in public education, in clean water and air, in safe workplaces, in childcare. The country will suffer with the slashing of investments in renewable energy, energy efficiency and electric vehicles. All of us will pay more from extreme weather as climate change goes unaddressed.

All the fulminations about the debt ceiling come down to this. Will the wealthy pay a little more in taxes or the poor a lot more in pain and hunger? Will we invest in more smart missiles or more smart children? Will we support the obscene profits of the private health insurance companies or the essential health care Americans need? Will we fund wars abroad or curb the extreme weather that threatens our communities at home? Don’t be misled by the sound and fury over the debt ceiling. The real question is who pays and who benefits.

 

X