banner2e top

Consumer Knowledge of Credit Scoring Drops Over Past Year - Blacks Appear to Need Most Education By Barrington M. Salmon

July 17, 2017

Consumer Knowledge of Credit Scoring Drops Over Past Year
 Blacks appear to need most education
By Barrington M. Salmon

brobeck
Stephen Brobeck, Consumer Federation of America

marcia griffin 2
Marcia Griffin, HomeFree-USA

barrett burns
Barrett Burns, VantageScore

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Sharae Newton (Not her real name), has made many mistakes that damaged her credit score. They include running up debt as a college student – including student loans.

But after Newton earned a second Master’s degree and began working with the federal government, she thought she was secure. She now admits that she still has an uncomfortable relationship with money largely because of her lack of credit literacy.

Like many middle class African-Americans, Newton makes a concerted effort to monitor her credit score and learn all she can about how to protect it. Yet, Newton, who asked that her identity be kept confidential for the sake of financial privacy, lives with a great deal of uncertainty; especially when something unusual happens that affects her regular financial life.

“I’m the only income earner in my household, but I had a series of medical issues that lost me money and cost me money,” said Newton, who owns a home in Northeast Washington, DC but has no significant savings. “I never expected the medical problems I’ve had over the last five years. I’ve had multiple orthopedic surgeries because of a condition that causes my tendons to tear. I earned my second masters, got out of whatever credit quandary I was in prior, but my medical expenses got me right back into it.”

Her most recent surgery was in January and the portion she’s required to pay is $14,000. She said she and some of her friends and associates are caught in the vice of making too much money to get subsidies and other types of help to pay medical bills that the poor or vulnerable receive.

“All of the safety nets, I was not eligible for them,” she said. “You cannot buy something like Aflac unless you have a catastrophic illness like a heart attack or a stroke. Federal jobs provide you a certain privilege but don’t protect you. … I had to start using leave without pay. It does make you feel like what else can you do to feel protected? This destroyed my credit and I face a very uncertain future.”

Newton’s dilemma illustrates that there is very little financially that Americans can do that isn’t in some way tied to or influenced by their credit scores. In the financial world, a person’s credit score illustrates their creditworthiness which simply means how likely it is that a person will pay their bills and whether they will pay them on time.

A bad credit score means the owner of that score could end up spending thousands of additional dollars in interest or fees if they want to borrow money, rent an apartment, buy a house, rent or buy a car, obtain insurance. So financial experts stress that it behooves consumers to do all they can to ensure that they keep a positive credit score and hone their knowledge about credit scoring.

In that regard, Stephen Brobeck, executive director of the Consumer Federation of America (CFA) and Barrett Burns, CEO of VantageScore Solutions, LLC, spoke to reporters in a recent conference call to discuss the findings of a survey to measure consumer knowledge of credit scores.

In the seventh year that the survey has been conducted by the organizations, one of the major findings is that consumer knowledge of credit scores has eroded over the past 12 months.

According to the survey, a smaller number of respondents were aware that non-credit service providers used credit scores in determining prices and the services they offer. For cell phone companies the consumer awareness was down from 68 percent to 59 percent, and for electric utilities this awareness was down from 53 percent to 44 percent.

“We wish the survey results were more positive,” Burns said. “Consumers should make every payment on time and we urge them to check their credit every 12 months. The greater availability of credit scores and credit reports is certainly a net positive for consumers, however the data demonstrates that we collectively have work to do to help consumers understand that credit scores are used by more than just lenders.”

Brobeck said the findings generally show that consumers have a dire need for greater levels of financial education.

“One would think that increasing access to one’s credit scores would help increase knowledge about these scores,” said Brobeck. “But that apparently has not been the case to the detriment of consumers. Low credit scores can cost consumers hundreds, and sometimes thousands, of dollars a year in higher loan and service costs.”

On the plus side, the percentage of respondents who said they had obtained at least one credit score in the past year has steadily risen – from 49 percent in 2014, to 51 percent in 2015, to 54 percent in 2016, to 56 percent in 2017.

Barrett and Brobeck said that the surveys, in addition to consumer education, are designed to help consumers understand the varied factors that affect their credit. They stressed that it’s crucial for people to make loan payments on time. Failure to do so can adversely affect one’s credit.

It is encouraging, the pair said, that a large majority of consumers correctly identified key factors influencing scores – missed loan payments (91 percent), high credit card balances (86 percent), and personal bankruptcy (85 percent). And also two important ways to raise their credit scores or maintain high scores – making loan payments on time (96 percent) and keeping credit card balances low (80 percent).

Little research has been done to determine the racial disparities in credit score knowledge. However, there is strong evidence that, in general, credit scores of Blacks are lower than those of Whites.  A study by the Federal Reserve Board in 2008 and an Illinois study by public interest groups in 2014 demonstrated the difference, which no credible source denies. A proximate cause of this credit score difference is that more Blacks than Whites have poor credit reports, the main basis for credit scores.  A study by Freddie Mac in 2013 found that 27 percent of Whites but 48 percent of Blacks had poor credit reports.

One basic cause of the lower credit scores in the African-American community is that Blacks appear to know less than Whites about credit scores.  In the 2016 CFA/VantageScore survey, for example:

  • 90 percent of Whites, but only 69 percent of Blacks, knew that personal bankruptcy influences one’s credit score.
  • 86 percent of Whites, but only 73 percent of Blacks, knew that 700 was a good credit score.
  • 77 percent of Whites, but only 62 percent of Blacks, knew that the CFPB is the best place to file a complaint related to a credit score.

Blacks are aware of this void in their knowledge of credit scoring.  In the 2016 CFA/Vantage/Score survey, 54 percent of Whites, but only 40 percent of Blacks, thought that their knowledge of credit scores was good or excellent.

To address the need for credit score education in the general community, CFA and VantageScore have created a 12-question credit score quiz to help educate consumers about credit scoring. The quiz can be found at www.creditscorequiz.org.

The Center for Financial Advancement, a new collaboration between HomeFree-USA, Wells Fargo, Freddie Mac and Mortgage Bankers Association, will engage students, faculty, parents and the local communities on such topics as credit, student loans, savings, homeownership and opportunities in the mortgage profession. The center aims to improve the economic outlook of African-Americans.

“More than half of all African-Americans in our country rent, it’s a fact that a homeowner’s net worth is 36 times that of a renter, and it’s a fact that that the median income for an African American household is $35,000 compared to the national average of $53,000", says Marcia Griffin, president/founder of HomeFree-USA, a HUD-approved homeownership development, foreclosure intervention and financial coaching organization.

Burns concludes, “Credit scores can have an impact on everything from your loan terms to the size of the deposit required to acquire a mobile phone, so it’s critical that consumers take our quiz and become educated.”

Study: Blacks Comprise Majority of Defendants Who are Wrongfully Convicted By Frederick H. Lowe

July 16, 2017 

Study: Blacks Comprise Majority of Defendants Who are Wrongfully Convicted
By Frederick H. Lowe

arrested-black man in handcuffs
Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from NorthStarNewsToday.com

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - African-Americans comprise the majority of defendants wrongfully convicted of murder, sexual assault and drug crimes who are later exonerated, according to a study released by the National Registry of Wrongful Convictions.

The report titled "Race and Wrongful Convictions in the United States" reported that African-Americans constituted 47 percent of the 1,900 exonerations listed in the National Registry of Exonerations as of October 2016, and a great majority of more than 1,800 additional innocent defendants who were framed and convicted of crimes in 15 large-scale police scandals and later cleared in “group” exonerations.

The report examined racial disparities for the major crime categories of murder, sexual assault and drug crimes, three crimes that produce the largest number of exonerations.

African Americans who were convicted of murder are about 50% more likely to be innocent than other convicted murderers, the report stated.

“A major cause of the high number of black murder exonerations is the high homicide rate in the black community—a tragedy that kills many African-Americans and sends many others to prison,” the report stated.

Blacks imprisoned for murder are more likely to be innocent if they were convicted of killing white victims. Only about 15 percent of murders by African- Americans involve White victims, but 31 percent of innocent African-American murder exonerees were convicted of killing White people.

The convictions that led to murder exonerations with black defendants were 22 percent more likely to include misconduct by police than those with White defendants.

Police assist in convicting black murder defendants through witness tampering, which occurred in 21 percent of murder exonerations with white defendants but occurred in 39 percent of trials with Black defendants.

“Many of the convictions of African-American murder exonerees were affected by a wide range of types of racial discrimination, from unconscious bias and institutional discrimination to explicit racism,” the report stated.

Black exonerees spent three years longer in prison before release than White murder exonerees, and Black exonerees sentenced to death spent four years longer behind bars.

Black prisoners serving time for sexual assault are three and-a-half times more likely to be innocent than a White assault convict.

“The major cause of this huge racial disparity appears to be the high danger of mistaken eyewitness identification by white victims in violent crimes with Black assailants,” the report stated.

Drug crimes are also those in which the majority of blacks are exonerated.

Although Blacks and Whites use drugs at an equal rate, African-Americans  are about five times more likely than Whites to go to prison for drug possession. And judging from exonerations, innocent Black people are about 12 times more likely to be convicted of drug crimes than innocent White people.

That is because police enforce drug laws more vigorously against African-Americans than against the white majority. Police stop Blacks more frequently, search, arrest and convict them in cases where they are innocent.

“Since 1989, more than 1,800 defendants have been cleared in group exonerations that followed 15 large-scale police scandals in which officers systematically framed innocent defendants,” the report stated. “The great majority were African-American defendants who were framed for drug crimes that never occurred.”

In Harris County, Texas, for example, there have been 133 exonerations in ordinary drug possession cases in the last few years. The defendants pled guilty, but routine lab tests showed those arrested were not carrying drugs.  Houston is the largest city in Harris County.

The National Registry of Wrongful Convictions is a project of the University of Michigan Law School, Michigan State University Law School and Newkirk Center for Science & Society at the University of California Irvine.

Harvard Study: Steep Declines in Black Home Ownership in Major Cities by Charlene Crowell

July 16, 2017

Harvard Study: Steep Declines in Black Home Ownership in Major Cities
39 million families challenged with housing costs
 By Charlene Crowell

housing study

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - For the 12th consecutive year, America’s national homeownership rate has declined, according Harvard University’s Joint Center for Housing Studies (JCHS)’ annual report, State of the Nation’s Housing 2017. This year’s report also found these declines vary by race and ethnicity.

As some might expect, the steepest homeownership decline occurred in Black communities, where the percentage of homeowners dropped to 42.2 percent. Among the nation’s largest metro areas, Black homeownership declined the greatest in Atlanta, Baltimore, Dallas and Detroit. By contrast, Latino-American homeownership is higher at 46 percent; but both communities of color severely lag behind the nearly 72 percent rate of white homeownership.

“The ability of most US households to become homeowners,” states the report, “depends on the availability and affordability of financing.”

And therein lies the crux of the problem: access and affordability.

The lack of access to mortgage financing in Black America has a long history rooted in outright discrimination by private actors such as banks, and supported by inequitable federal housing policies that favored white communities, while intentionally disadvantaging Black communities. This discrimination hindered generations of Black families from entering and remaining among America’s middle class. These practices also resulted in lower levels of both Black wealth and homeownership.

Today, applying for a mortgage means a visit to a bank where high incomes, low debt and high

credit scores are among the most favored measures for loan application success. Since the foreclosure crisis, according to the JCHS report, the median credit score for an owner-occupied home purchase origination increased from about 700 in 2005 to 732 in 2016.

Just as communities of color were wrongly targeted for predatory and high-cost mortgages that pushed them into foreclosure, these same communities are the most likely to have suffered credit score declines from foreclosures, unemployment or delinquent debt – or a combination of all three.

According to a 2017 CFED report, A Downpayment on the Divide, the mortgage denial rate for Blacks is more than 25 percent, near 20 percent for Latinos but just over 10 percent for white applicants.

The issue of housing affordability is just as challenging. CFED also found that whites are three times more likely than Blacks to receive financial assistance from families to pay for down payments and other upfront costs that accompany a mortgage. The racial disparity is due to America’s history of whites being able to accumulate wealth through homeownership opportunity while Blacks were denied. As a result, Black households typically delay homeownership 8 years longer than whites, resulting in a comparable delay in building home equity.

JCHS also found that nearly 39 million American families are financially challenged with their cost of housing.

So is the American Dream of homeownership realistic for communities of color?

A June 29 public hearing before the U.S. Senate Banking Committee focused on how mortgage finance reform and government-sponsored enterprises, also known as GSEs, must live up to its “duty to serve” all communities.

“Homeownership is the primary way that most middle-class families build wealth and achieve economic stability,” testified Mike Calhoun, President of the Center for Responsible Lending.  “Wide access to credit is critical for building family wealth, closing the racial wealth gap and for the housing market overall.”

In the throes of the 1930s Great Depression, Congress created the GSEs to provide stability to capital markets and to increase the availability of mortgage credit throughout the nation. They were also given a mandate: Serve all credit markets all times, ensuring access and availability across the country.

From 2003 to 2006, the years leading up to the housing crisis, the GSEs followed an unfortunate private mortgage market trend. By loosening underwriting guidelines, particularly for Alt-A no documentation loans, millions of foreclosures occurred and GSE credit losses led to conservatorship under the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008, also known as HERA. HERA also enacted a number of reforms that have made today’s market stronger.

Now, with far fewer foreclosures nationwide, Congress is deliberating over the future of the GSEs and $6.17 trillion in mortgages they now hold along with Federal Housing Administration issued mortgages.

“Home equity accounts for only 30 percent of the net worth for wealthier households,” continued Calhoun, “but constitutes 67 percent for middle-to-low income households. Home equity accounts for 53 percent of African-American wealth as compared to 39 percent for whites.”

Homebuyers of the future will be more racially and ethnically diverse than those of the past. The JCHS reported that non-whites accounted for 60 percent of household growth from 1995-2015. By 2035, it predicts that half of millennial households will be non-white.

When communities of all sizes, colors, and economies succeed, so does America. While much of our nation has financially recovered from the foreclosure crisis that brought the loss of homes, jobs, businesses, and wealth, recovery has been uneven and left many communities behind.

Those entrusted with leadership roles in the public and private sectors must agree that it is in our national interest to ensure that the recovery is inclusive and sustainable long-term. Broad access to mortgage credit still helps families and the national economy.

Concluded Calhoun, “The goal must be to ensure that the full universe of creditworthy borrowers – regardless of where they live, including in rural areas, or who they are – have access to the credit they need to be able to secure a mortgage so that they can build their American dreams.” 

Charlene Crowell is the communications deputy director for the Center for Responsible Lending. She can be reached at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

America and the Tale of Two Realities by Dr. Wilmer J. Leon, III

July 17, 2017

America and the Tale of Two Realities
By Dr. Wilmer J. Leon, III

NEWS ANALYSIS

baltimore-protestorconfrontspolice
Protests of police-involved deaths across the nation have painted the picture of a tale of two realities. White supremacy appears to be the root of it all. PHOTO: Trice Edney News Wire

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - “It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness…in short, the period was so far like the present period, that some of its noisiest authorities insisted on its being received, for good or for evil, in the superlative degree of comparison only.” - Charles Dickens, “A Tale of Two Cities” 1859

Americans, especially African-Americans, stand shocked but not surprised in the wake of the acquittal on all charges of officer Jeronimo Yanez in the fatal shooting of Philando Castile in Minnesota.  Castile, armed but licensed to carry, is dead after informing Yanez that he was armed and licensed. Castile appeared to follow Yanez’s directions.

Officer Yanez’s defense? He was “in fear for his life”. Yanez was afraid that Mr. Castile was grabbing for the gun, telling the jury, “I thought I was going to die” and that he (Officer Yanez) had visions of his wife and “baby girl”. This is ironic testimony from Yanez since his shooting of Mr. Castile took place with Castile’s fiancé and her young daughter in the car.

In Tulsa, Okla., a jury found Officer Betty Jo Shelby not guilty in the death of Terence Crutcher. Shelby fired a single bullet into the chest of an unarmed Terrence Crutcher as he stood next to his car on a tree-lined street. Her defense? She was in fear for her life. She testified that she had a reasonable fear that Mr. Crutcher was reaching for a gun and that she simply reacted based upon her training.

A jury deadlocked in the murder trial of former University of Cincinnati police officer Raymond Tensing. Tensing shot and killed an unarmed Samuel DuBose during a routine traffic stop in July 2015. The traffic stop took place off campus. Judge Leslie E. Ghiz declared a mistrial for the second time in this case.

How is it that in these recent cases and countless others; families are left looking for indictments or guilty verdicts while juries see justified shootings?  In spite of body cameras and independent video, juries view what the public sees but are unable to indict or convict the officers. They can’t believe their lying eyes. They believe the police accounts of “I feared for my life” even when it is proven that the officer’s account of the event wasn’t true or the unarmed victim was trying to comply with the directives given by the officer.  In America, it’s the tale of two realities.

I know that not all people fall into the following categories and I am about to paint with a broad brush. But I believe the premise is valid.  It starts with how the police are viewed by different segments of society. Many people in the dominant culture, White people, see the police as a force that is there to serve – them, and protect their property against threats and attacks by people of color.  Many people in communities of color, especially African-Americans and Latinos have a different experience and historical perspective. They see the police as an occupying and oppressive force. 

A police officer telling a jury, “I was in fear for my life”; or “he made a furtive move”, resonates with some White jurist’s fears and perceptions. This enables them to ignore the reality projected in the video and nullifying the common-sense conclusion drawn by those with a different reality. Jurors have said, yes, I saw the video but I could not bring myself to convict that officer of man-slaughter or murder.

This reality is not as simple as Black and White.  African-American police officers have been acquitted of killing African-American people as in the case of Milwaukee police officer, Dominique Heaggan-Brown. Officer Brown, shot Sylville K. Smith in his chest even after Smith had thrown his weapon over a fence.  Juries with African-Americans on them have acquitted African-American officers for killing people of color as in the Smith case. Four of the twelve jurors were African-American.

I believe the most dominant factor in these cases can be attributed to racism (White supremacy) and the misperceptions and emotions conjured up by issues involving the artificial construct of race. Dr. Francis Cress Welsing defines racism (White supremacy) as the local and global power system structured and maintained by persons who classify themselves as White, whether consciously or subconsciously determined. This system consists of patterns of perception, logic, symbol formation, thought, speech, action and emotional response, as conducted simultaneously in all areas of activity (economics, education, law, etc.). Even though some of the officers or jurors involved are African-American, the analysis still applies. African-Americans can and have fallen victim to the same conditioning as White people.

These White supremacist perceptions and actions not only play themselves out on the streets of America but are articulated on the world stage as well. They are clearly expressed by representatives of the local and global power system such as American members of Congress and President Donald Trump.

As anti-immigrant and Islamophobic rhetoric gains traction in many corners of European society, Iowa Congressman Steven King praised the far-right Dutch politician Geert Wilders, who has espoused anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim rhetoric and recently called Moroccans “scum”.  While in Europe, King said, “You cannot rebuild your civilization with somebody else’s babies…You’ve got to keep your birth rate up, and you need to teach your children your values. In doing so, you can grow your population, you can strengthen your culture, and you can strengthen your way of life.”

While in Poland President Trump gave a not so subtle nod of approval to Poland’s authoritarian and anti-immigrant President Duda.  Trump, the patron saint of the “birther movement” spoke about defending “Western civilization” and “Western values”.  He also said, “We must work together to confront forces…that threaten over time to undermine these values and to erase the bonds of culture, faith, and tradition that make us who we are…” How were these sentiments interpreted by leaders from Asia, Africa and Saudi Arabia?

To the average American these are innocuous words, standard American rhetoric.  To those with another reality who understand settler colonialism, American racism and hegemony, this is White Nationalist code language.  As Dr. Ronald Walter’s wrote in “White Nationalism Black Interests”, “if a race is dominant to the extent that it controls the government of the state…most policy actions appear to take on an objective quality, where policy makers argue they are acting on the basis of “national interests” rather than racial ones.” In short, they don’t have to articulate racist narratives; it’s baked into the policy.

If one truly understands the pervasive impact of racism (White supremacy) and White Nationalism it is easy to understand how juries can rationalize and dismiss the murderous behavior of police officers.  It is important to understand that the members of these juries may not be consciously racist. They have been raised, taught and indoctrinated in and by a system that creates, supports and perpetuates this mindset.  These precepts play themselves out on the streets of America and its courtrooms. They are articulated by American presidents and members of Congress on the world stage even today.

If you are a beneficiary of the American Dream, it is best of times.  If you are oppressed by the American nightmare, it is the worst of times.  Are we living in an age of wisdom or an age of foolishness where “fake news” and “alternative facts” rule the day? It’s America and tale of two realities.

Dr. Wilmer Leon is the Producer/ Host of the nationally broadcast call-in talk radio program “Inside the Issues with Leon,” on SiriusXM Satellite radio channel 126. Go to www.wilmerleon.com or email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. www.twitter.com/drwleon and Dr. Leon’s Prescription at Facebook.com

Vendors in Tears as Zambia's Biggest Outdoor Market Burns

July 16, 2017

Vendors in Tears as Zambia's Biggest Outdoor Market Burns

fire-zambia market

(TriceEdneyWire.com/GIN) – A fire of unknown origins raced through the largest outdoor market in Zambia, destroying the livelihood of its many vendors. Goods worth millions of kwacha – the Zambian currency – have gone up in flames.  Images on social media show how the fire which began July 4 and was barely extinguished by July 7 destroyed the Lusaka market. 

The market was built a decade ago with a designated police post as well as day and night guards. It is also said to be a facility that prohibits cooking and fire inside the market.  Reacting to the catastrophe, Zambian President Edgar Lungu blamed arsonists and economic saboteurs who will be found out, he warned, wherever they are hiding. 

But the President’s words were cold comfort for many Zambians who fear the country is sliding into dictatorship.They cite a series of incidents including the jailing of opposition leader Hakainde Hichilema, the suspension of 48 members of parliament for boycotting a speech by Mr. Lungu, and the imposition of a state of emergency over the apparent arson attack. 

A Zambian professor, writing in the online UKZambian, wondered if 53 years of peace since independence in 1964 could be coming to an end. “Creating a nation of peace and tranquility is not easy,” noted Mwizenge S. Tempo in the news website. “When I saw the images of the massive fire in which 1,901 shops were destroyed, I was alarmed,” he wrote, adding that since August 2016 there have been over 10 such incidents with fires gutting public building and vandalism.

“I am both stunned and fearful about my home and country of Zambia. Could this be the end of peace in Zambia after 53 years?” In BusinessLive of Zambia, writer Greg Mills condemned the arrest and jailing of Mr. Hichilema on treason charges.  

Critics of President Lungu are "systematically being silenced", he charged. This “stop-at-nothing government” has closed the major opposition paper, The Post, shut down opposition rallies and constricted access to the state broadcaster, he declared. Mills heads the Brenthurst Foundation, and is the co-author of ‘Making Africa Work: A Handbook for Economic Success’.

GLOBAL INFORMATION NETWORK creates and distributes news and feature articles on current affairs in Africa to media outlets, scholars, students and activists in the U.S. and Canada. Our goal is to introduce important new voices on topics relevant to Americans, to increase the perspectives available to readers in North America and to bring into their view information about global issues that are overlooked or under-reported by mainstream media.

X