banner2e top

Give Us the Ballot: Restore the Voting Rights Act By Marc H. Morial

July 2, 2017

To Be Equal 

Give Us the Ballot: Restore the Voting Rights Act
By Marc H. Morial

marcmorial

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.”  — The Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776

Voting is not a privilege. It is a fundamental, constitutionally ratified right afforded to all eligible citizens. The right to elect your federal, state and local representatives and weigh in on proposed local policies via ballot measures is the very definition of democracy: rule by the people. Laws that deny eligible men and women the right to the ballot, legislation that strips the power vested in the people to elect their representatives and decide their collective fate contradicts that central definition and cripples our republic.

It is a shame that as we prepare to celebrate the 241st anniversary of that momentous occasion when our fledging nation famously declared its independence from England and pledged allegiance to a republic governed by the people, we remain caught in the clutches of a debate as old as the founding of these united states: whether to expand or limit access to the franchise.

Today, legislation and prejudicial partisan tactics that disenfranchise communities of color and groups perceived to be progressive voters are on the rise. Restrictions on voter registration, including the elimination of same-day registration, strict voter ID laws, and limiting or eliminating early voting are some of the tools in the toolbox that dismantle our democracy.

Fifty-two years ago, the Voting Rights Act of 1965 was introduced and enacted to “break the grip of state disfranchisement” by prohibiting discrimination at the polls. The act also included a provision that monitored states with established histories of discriminatory voting practices, such as poll taxes and literacy tests. Those states could not implement any change or law that affected voting until the federal government reviewed the law and determined that it neither had a discriminatory purpose or effect. Shelby County v. Holder changed everything.

In his Supreme Court opinion for the case, Chief Justice Roberts reasoned that “things have changed dramatically” since the adoption of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, and with that the court struck down the provision that required pre-clearance, leaving states free to change their voting laws. The impact of the decision was immediate. Within minutes, then Texas Attorney General Greg Abbot tweeted that the state’s voter ID law that had been blocked by the federal government would go into effect. In the year that followed the ruling, eight states that were previously monitored passed voting restrictions that disproportionately impacted Black and Brown voters. To date, close to 100 bills to restrict voter registration and access voting have been introduced in 31 states.

Before the rising tide of coordinated efforts to wrench the vote away from huge swaths of our country stand patriots, including Representatives Terri Sewell, John Lewis, Jim Clyburn, Judy Chu and Michele Grisham Lujan, who are committed to protecting the right to vote for all Americans. In its decision, the Supreme Court instructed Congress to come up with a modern-day formula that protects voting rights, and it has: the Voting Rights Act Reauthorization, which creates a new state coverage formula that applies to states with repeated voting rights violations in the last 25 years. To restore the promise of voter equality and restore the integrity of our elections, Congress must take up this bill and pass it into law.

The ability to vote, to have a say in the policies and people we choose to represent us, is democracy. It is far too sacred a right to allow it to become weakened over a partisan lust to win at all costs. Strict voter ID laws, race-based gerrymandering, obstacles to voter registration and a current federal investigation into debunked voter fraud claims that will only serve as a front to introduce more—and likely more severe—voter suppression laws inflict grave harm on our adopted form of governance and its integrity.

As we contemplate our country’s early battles for independence, and our national struggles to expand opportunity, equality and freedoms originally denied many Americans, it is clear that we have come too far to accept any rollbacks now. We must restore and protect every American’s access to the polls.

Look Back and See the Future (Part Two) By James Clingman

Blackonomics

Look Back and See the Future (Part Two)
By James Clingman

clingmanheadshot2

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - An excellent example of the impact our history has on the way we are today, especially economically, can be found in an article titled, The Reluctant Entrepreneurs, by Joel Kotkin, author of the book, Tribes.

The feature discusses several reasons for Blacks not going into business and being surpassed in this area by other ethnic groups.  Among other reasons, the history of African Americans was cited.  The article quotes Robert Hill, a Black Historian at the University of California at Los Angeles, who traced the lack of entrepreneurial tradition to African origin and the brutality of the American system of slavery.  "Africa", Hill explained, "is more a communitarian society, where notions of private property have never been so entrenched as in Europe or North America.  The culture of capitalism is just not part of our African heritage."

The piece goes on to say, "...certainly slavery and its progeny, the sharecropper system, did nothing to foster confidence, independence, or a capitalist inclination among African Americans.  Before slavery and after, white landowners believed the proper way to treat the Black was, in the words of one slave owner, 'to create in him a habit of perfect dependence...' And it was a system that proved to be enormously successful and enduring."

The article continued, “we are a race of people who for generations, both before and after Emancipation, were denied freedom of movement, education, and even a rudimentary familiarity with the free market, not to mention credit, legal status, or safety from lynch mobs.  That we, as descendants, have not taken naturally to entrepreneurship should hardly come as a big surprise.”

The fact still remains that despite their poorest of circumstances, some Black people engaged in entrepreneurship even before the Emancipation, and did well at it.  According to John Sibley Butler, in his outstanding work, Entrepreneurship and Self-Help Among Black Americans, “They (Black entrepreneurs) became the merchant class in northern cities, and it was through their enterprises that Black income in the last third of the nineteenth century grew faster than that of whites.”

The INC. article cited the economic protestations of Booker T. Washington, who established the National Negro Business League, exhorting Blacks to "uplift" themselves by striking out on their own.  It celebrated the "new" ministers like Adam Clayton Powell, who urged aspiring congregants to go into business on a larger scale.

While early Black businesses had to rely solely on the Black consumer market, such is not the case today.  However, if we do not move collectively through the economic maze, making our monetary clout felt in the widest of circles and obtaining the reciprocity we deserve as a massive consumer army, our businesses will not achieve the growth they need to prosper in this economy.  Moreover, African Americans will have abdicated our responsibility to carry forth the legacy passed on to us by our fathers and mothers.

We must never forget our history and the reasons for our attitudes on economics, business ownership, and mutual support.  We must also realize that if we are going to make it in this country, we had better get down to business NOW!  I think our ancestors would be proud.

Economic empowerment is a constant struggle, and if we do not view it as a struggle, we will never achieve the goals to which we aspire.  No one is going to "give" us anything.  If they do, it will not be without encumbrances.   The economic power we seek is within us all, and examples for us to follow are everywhere.  We simply need more cooperation within our own ranks.

In seeking that economic power, remember what Frederick Douglass said:  "...This struggle may be a moral one; or it may be a physical one; or it may be moral and physical; but it must be a struggle.  Power concedes nothing without demand.  It never did and it never will.  Find out just what people will submit to, and you have found the exact amounts of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them...The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress."

I say: If we rise up, as Marcus Garvey exhorted us, resolving to cooperate with one another and do for ourselves, our economic manifesto would be clear.  Our struggle will be easier, and the powers we face will concede to our demands.  However, if African Americans choose individuality over collectivism, yes a few of us will "make it", but we will go down in history as a paradoxical people; a people who, with all of our wealth and knowledge, acquiesced and continued in economic oppression.   And the blame will rest squarely upon our shoulders.

Let our past be the light that guides us to a brighter economic future.

Is There No Decency? by Julianne Malveaux

July 2, 2017

Is There No Decency?
By Julianne Malveaux

malveaux

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - During the 2016 campaign, our 45th President once promised that he would be “so Presidential that it will be boring.”  If only.  Instead, he has managed to irk even his Republican allies by wallowing in the muck of name-calling, yet again, belittling a woman for her looks.  Morning Joe host Mika Brzezinski, 45 tweeted, was still “bleeding from her facelift” when he saw her during the New Year’s holiday.  He also disparaged Brzezinski’s intelligence and poked fun at her co-host Joe Scarborough.  Dozens of Republicans, including leaders like House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI), have scolded the President on his language in the June 29 tweets.  Some have used terms like “civility” and “decency” to distance themselves from his comments.

It is easy to scold this president on the indecent ways he speaks to, and of, women.  It is easy to shake one’s head at his juvenile tweets.  Certainly, our President has the temperament of an unruly 8 year old (and that is unkind to 8 year olds).  But we can spend so much time wondering about this President’s temperament that we can forget about his abhorrent policy initiatives that are far more dangerous than his mindless tweets.

At the same time that 45 is attacking cable news hosts, the Senate is supposed to be considering a health care plan that “repeals” the Affordable Care Act.  There is no civility or decency in advocating for a health care plan that would leave more than 22 million people uninsured.  There is nothing civil or decent in the President suggesting that Obamacare be repealed, even if there is no replacement for it.  So while many hours of television time will be spent excoriating 45 for his silly tweets about the Morning Joe team, far more should be spent dealing with health care, with employment creation, and with prison reform.

All eyes are on the president and his poison pen.  I’m not so sure that’s a good thing.  We should be equally concerned about other policy actions that are happening even as 45 is clowning on the public stage.   He wakes up in the morning to send out mindless tweets, but his minions, who are neither tweeting nor clowning, are working to roll back our civil and voting rights.

Are decent Republicans an endangered species?  Certainly, some Republicans will step up when 45 crosses the line on civility with his unhinged tweets.  Too many others, though, are silent, not only in the face of misogynistic tweets, but also in the face of inhumane public policy.  Because they have placed partisanship over common humanity, they have been silent in the face of draconian public policy, especially around health care.  Those who have stood up, such as Nevada Senator Dean Heller, have attracted the ire of the big-money alt-Trump regime, those deep-pocketed PAC funders who have attempted to bully Heller into supporting Trumpcare.  Indeed, those Republicans who have bucked the 45 machine have found themselves unfairly attacked.  Attacks on Republicans like Heller and Collins are ways to intimidate others into silence.

While 45 is tweeting insanity, immigrants who are honorably discharged veterans are being deported.  The joined the Armed Services, and served our country, both because they are patriots, but also because they were promised citizenship in return for their service.  Is there no decency?  While 45 is doing his best imitation of a schoolyard bully, school administrators from both red and blue states are looking at the ways Trumpcare would affect poor children and pushing back on the horrible legislation.  Both Democratic and Republican governors are appalled at the ways Medicaid cuts will hurt their constituents, but 45 is too busy tweeting on posturing to deal with his natural allies in the states.

45’s tweets are simply the tip of the iceberg.  They illustrate a lack of decency that is worse that the incivility of name-calling.  The indecency and incivility in this administration is as much about flawed and inhumane public policy as juvenile name-calling.  In criticizing 45’s decency, let’s keep our eyes on the prize.  Our President is not just a clueless buffoon; he is a dangerous and clueless buffoon.  We should focus on the danger more than the cluelessness.

Julianne Malveaux is an economist, author, and Founder of Economic Education. Her podcast, “It’s Personal with Dr. J” is available on iTunes. Her latest book “Are We Better Off: Race, Obama and public policy is available via amazon.com

Gone, But Not Forgotten By Dr. E. Faye Williams, Esq.

July 2, 2017

Gone, But Not Forgotten
By Dr. E. Faye Williams, Esq.

williams2

(TriceEdneyWire.com) The only time I can remember TIME moving as slowly as it has during the past six months was when I was eight and had to wait an entire year between Christmases.  True or not, it feels like the Trump Administration has slowed the progress of time and assigned each day an additional 36 hours.  One wonders how long it’ll take to lumber through his term in office.

I surmise that my lack of restful sleeping, and similar reports from others, has something to do with the current occupant of the Oval Office.  It's my opinion, but shared by many, that the discord and anxiety in our current socio-political structure directly relates to the incompetence of that occupant.  We're plagued with the question, "What are the long-term consequences to the nation because of this mistake in the White House?”

When at my limit, I retreat to the security of my memories.  My only solace is the memories of the eight years of leadership by President Barack Obama and the Obama family.  I, like unnumbered others, miss the Obamas and nostalgically wonder where their judgment and demeanor have gone.  Most of us recognize that our national leadership is in drastic need of an injection of the Obama character.

When the Obamas left us, they both expressed the need for much needed sleep and spending "quality time" with family.  They also said that they wanted to do "some normal stuff."  I doubt that anything they do will be considered "normal," but God Bless them with the peace and tranquility to regain a measure of normalcy.

Many are sad that the Obamas had to leave us, but we're realists and understand the political game.  What we can't reconcile is waking each morning with the ominous questions, "What did he do last night?  What crisis of his making will we have to face today?"  Those questions are a far cry from the surety that most of us had upon waking in the Obama Era.

We became used to the phrase "No drama Obama!"  Whether spoken with positive or negative intent, we were comforted by understanding that, whatever the crisis, President Obama was versed on the subject and would take a thoughtful and measured approach to its resolution.  The last thing to be expected from President Obama was a knee-jerk reaction to any event.  We were comfortable with the "Nuclear Football" in his possession.

More often than not, on networks other than Fox, we hear opinions alleging Trump's emotional instability.  We're deluged with reports of his rants in the White House and are audience to his "disturbed" Tweets against adversaries - both real and imagined.  Rather than comfort, we're in denial about who now controls that "Football."

In the past few months, the Obamas have traveled to the British Virgin Islands, French Polynesia and Italy among other destinations.  The world is still consumed with interest in their activities; yet, they remain connected to the imperatives of the nation.  With a successor who is Hell-bent on destroying his legacy, President Obama has spoken out in the interests of common citizens and the consequences of an ill-conceived health plan - Trumpcare.  To the joy of many, Michelle Obama delivered a recorded tribute to Chance the Rapper on the occasion of his receiving the 2017 BET Humanitarian Award.  Those acts exemplify the "state of normal" concern for the Obamas.

I was blessed to visit the White House many times while they were there, but I have no desire to return!  I've had an invitation, but I turned it down to preserve the memory of a White House as positive as it was when the Obamas lived there.  No future visit to the White House could ever match the Obama years there.

 

(Dr.  E. Faye Williams is President of the National Congress of Black Women. www.nationalcongressbw.org.)

$3 Million Settlement Paid in Cop Killing of Philando Castile By Frederick H. Lowe

June 27, 2017

$3 Million Settlement Paid in Cop Killing of Philando Castile
By Frederick H. Lowe

castile

Special to the Trice Edney New Wire from NorthStarNewsToday.com

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - The city of St. Anthony, Minn., has agreed to pay nearly $3 million to the mother of Philando Castile, a registered gun owner who was shot to death by a police officer during a routine traffic stop although he was complying with the cop’s orders.

Under the terms of the settlement, Valerie Castile, as trustee, will receive a payment in the amount of $2.995 million, St. Anthony announced in a news release Monday morning.

Jeronimo Yanez, a police officer with the St. Anthony, Minn., police department, shot to death Castile, a cafeteria worker employed by St. Paul, Minn., Public School District, on July 6, 2016.

After the stop, Castile told Yanez that he was a registered gun owner and that he was carrying a pistol. Yanez said, “Ok. Don’t pull it out,” according to police dash-cam video.

Castile had handed Yanez his car’s registration and was reaching in his back pocket for his driver’s license as ordered to by Yanez. “Don’t pull it out [the gun],” Yanez screamed angrily before he began firing his gun into Castile’s car. He fired a total of seven shots, killing Castile. His gun was found in his front pocket and no bullets were in its chamber. Before the shooting began, Castile said he was not reaching for his gun.

Castile’s girlfriend Diamond Reynolds, who was sitting in the front passenger seat, livestreamed the shooting’s aftermath over Facebook. The couple’s -yea4r-old daughter was sitting in the backseat. Neither was harmed.

The livestream, coupled with dash-cam video, provide a complete view of the deadly shooting.

The District Attorney’s Office charged Yanez was with one count of second-degree manslaughter and two counts of dangerous discharge of a firearm. A mostly white jury acquitted Yanez of all charges on June 16, 2017. That same day, he was fired from the police force by the City of St. Anthony.

“No amount of money could replace Philando. With resolution of the claims the family will continue to deal with their loss through the important work of the Philando Castile Relief Fund,” city officials said. “The death of Philando Castile is a tragedy for his family and for our community.”

The settlement agreement was reached with Valerie Castile, her lawyers, Robert Bennett and Glenda Hatchett, and the City of St. Anthony. The agreement avoids a federal civil rights lawsuit that would have taken years to resolve, city officials said. The settlement will be paid through the city’s coverage with the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust. No taxpayers monies from the city of St. Anthony will be used to fund the settlement.

X