banner2e top

Pastors' Spouses Plead For Medicare Protection

By Vivian Berryhill

berryhill

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - As Congress works to reduce the deficit, the National Coalition of Pastors’ Spouses (NCPS), asks that it protects the Federal Medicare program. Without a doubt, drastic spending cuts and reforms will have a negative impact on the millions of Americans who rely on this critical program for access to quality care and affordable medicines.

Millions of residents rely on Medicare to help with their health care needs, according to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Medicare works for America, and should be protected because the program provides seniors, low-income minorities and disabled Americans with access to affordable treatments and medicines.

Medicare Part D, also known as a Prescription Drug Plan, was created under the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (2003 Medicare Act) to help cover the costs of prescription drugs for patients and seniors. Before the health care reform law was passed, Medicare Part D patients who reached a certain level of spending on prescription medications, known as the Part D coverage gap or “donut hole,” were required to pay 100 percent of the cost of their drugs out-of-pocket until their spending reached a level qualifying them for catastrophic coverage.

Regardless of your opinion of the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act, a/k/a ObamaCare, under this new law, the "donut hole" has the potential to start to close. This particular portion of the Affordable Care Act will cut the cost of prescription drugs for millions of people with Medicare, including a new 50 percent discount on brand-name drugs for seniors and people with disabilities who experience the coverage gap.

That change means preventative care and adherence to prescription drug recommendations by providers for this population segment will only get better. Spending cuts that negatively impact patient access to care will only make worse the problem of rising health care costs in the long run.

CMS has expressed concern that doctors, and other health care providers might leave the Medicare program as a result of such extreme cuts. As pastors' spouses, we are concerned that this would mean ration care, and remove choices and lower the of quality services for seniors, low-income minority families and people with disabilities.

It is no secret that low-income Americans, members of racial and ethnic minorities, people with disabilities, and other underserved populations often face limited access to health care and experience poorer health outcomes across their lifespan.

For example, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), African-Americans and Hispanics have significantly lower influenza and pneumococcal immunization rates compared to the rest of the population. Older Americans in these underserved populations are also less likely to get the preventive care they need to stay healthy.

People of color experience higher rates of many chronic conditions (such as heart disease and diabetes), as well as higher death rates from many of these conditions compared to the general population. The National Coalition of Pastors' Spouses believe that by tweaking the health care delivery process and improving the current health care payment system, in addition to placing more emphasis on preventative care––using neighborhood churches and other trusted grassroots community facilities as health hubs––are the real keys to reducing health care costs!

Mrs. Vivian Berryhill is the founder and president of the National Coalition of Pastors’ Spouses (NCPS). Formed in January 2001, NCPS’ goal is to raise education and awareness levels in minority communities, as well as improve risk identification for diseases and social ills that detrimentally impact the minority community.





Ryan’s Hope Could Be America’s Nightmare

By Dr. Wilmer J. Leon III

Wilmer_Leon

(TriceEdneyWire,com Mitt Romney, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee announced that he has selected  Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) as his vice presidential running mate.  Conservatives are hoping against hope that this selection will relaunch Romney’s campaign by providing the necessary policy focus that has been lacking up to this point.  Conseravtive columnist Paul Gigot recently wrote, “The case for Mr. Ryan is that he best exemplifies the nature and stakes of this election…Against the advice of every Beltway bedwetter, he has put entitlement reform at the center of the public agenda…”  Gigot calls Ryan “a man of big ideas”.  Ryan’s hope could be America’s nightmare.

Romney’s choice of Ryan was not as much of a bold move forward as it was a bad selction from a pool of bad options.  Conservatives looked at Bobby Jindal, Tim Pawlenty, Chris Christie, Condie Rice and others as potential running mates for Romney. Before Louisiana Governor Piyush “Bobby” Jindal started palling around with Romney he endorsed Texas Governor Rick Perry, "Rick Perry is the candidate who can lead our party to victory in 2012..."  And Jindal is hailed as one of the “brightest minds in the Republican Party.”  Really?  Can anyone honestly believe that ultra-conservative WASP’s in the Republican Party would vote for a VP nominee named Piyush?  To them that is almost as bad as a president who’s middle name is Hussein.

Former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty would have had trouble overcoming his primary challenges to  Romney’s health care initiatives.  According to Pawlenty, "President Obama said that he designed Obamacare after Romneycare and basically made it Obamneycare…" By his own admission, New Jersey Governor Christie understood that he was not ready.  “It doesn’t feel right to me. If I do this, I just feel like I’d be second-guessing myself the entire time I was out there, and I can’t do it that way.”  Former Secretary of State Rice’s perspective’s on Affirmative Action and abortion make her too liberal and like Jindal, I have a difficult time seeing ultra-conservative WASP’s backing an African Ameican woman on the Repubican ticket.

Usually, during the primary process a candidate will tack towards the extreme end of the political spectrum to capture their party’s nomination and jib back towards the center to capture the more moderate faction of the electorate in the general election.  In this instance, Mitt Romney tacked to the furthest extremes of  ultra-conservative ideology by changing his positions on issues such as immigration, health care reform, and contraception.  With the selection of Paul Ryan as his running mate Romney has compounded his tack towards the right in an effort to convince ultra-conservatives that he’s really in their camp.

Conseravtives will have the electorate believe that Ryan’s budget, his so-called “Path to Prosperity” is new and innovative.  It is actually the latest version of Reagan administration budget director David Stockman’s “starve the bast” fiscal philosophy.  "Starving the beast" is a fiscal-political strategy of American conservatives to cut taxes in order to deprive the government of revenue in a deliberate effort to create a fiscal budget crisis.  Creating the crisis then allows conservatives to make the case for cutting the social programs “the beast” they have opposed since their inception.  They force the federal government to reduce spending by cutting programs (rather than raise tax levels).

Ryan’s proposed cuts to social programs such as medicare, medicade, food stamps, and housing assistance while maintaining the Bush-era tax cuts for the wealthy is a 2012 version of a failed 1980’s idea. The “trickle down” economics of the Reagan era as applied during the Bush 43’ era has contributed to sinking fiscal boat America finds itself in today.  During the 1980 presidential campaign, George H.W. Bush called it “voodoo economics.”

Part of the solution is to simply go back to the tax rates of the Clinton era. Congressman Bobby Scott (D-VA) idea of allowing the Bush-era tax cuts and the 2% payroll tax holiday to expire is a very simple way to revenues back on track. According to Scott, "The President's FY 2013 budget proposes ending the Bush-era tax cuts for the wealthy, among other savings…My proposal is to let all the Bush-era tax cuts and the 2% payroll tax cut expire as currently scheduled.  This would yield approximately $5 trillion – $4 trillion more than the sequester.  In the first year, the additional revenue could be immediately put towards direct job creation, such as investments in transportation and infrastructure, to accelerate economic growth.  It would also be more than enough to cancel the economically damaging sequester.  These proposals put real numbers on line items, and do not hide behind poll tested talking points and generalities, such as 'reduce the size of government,' which do not propose any concrete solutions.”

Conservatives hope that Romeny’s adding Ryan to the Republcian ticket will provide the policy focus that the campaign has sorely lacked.  If Rayan is the “man of big ideas” they are the wrong ideas.  It’s bad policy with the wrong focus.  Ryan’s hope would prove to be America’s nightmare.

Go to www.wilmerleon.com or email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. www.twitter.com/drwleon

© 2012 InfoWave Communications, LLC.

 

 

 

 

It’s Race, Stupid

Reality Check
By A. Peter Bailey

A._Peter_Bailey

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - It was the 1992 Bill Clinton-George H.W. Bush presidential campaign which introduced the memorable political slogan: “It’s the economy, Stupid.” That slogan was a way of explaining why Bush was in danger of losing his job.

During the 2012 campaign between President Barack Obama and former Massachusetts governor, Mitt Romney, a clarifying explanation as to why the President is in danger of losing his job is similar: “It’s Race, Stupid.”

Of course, one would never know this if dependent upon commentators on radio and television and op-ed columnists with major newspapers and magazines. They go on and on about everything that threatens President Obama’s re-election prospects except the fact that many, if not most, Whites in this country, especially White males, have had more than enough of seeing a Black man in the White House.

For example, hosts of public affairs programs on television and radio and newspaper and magazine columnists have analyzed and discussed the speech made by Rep. Paul Ryan after he was chosen as Romney’s running mate without once dealing with the most revealing statement he made. After citing several actions that must be taken by those who detest Obama being in the White House, Ryan noted that if those things were done “We will get our country back on November 6.”

In all the vitriolic, partisan attacks made on presidents Clinton and George W. Bush by their opponents, I don’t recall a single attacker insisting that the president must be defeated for re-election so “we can get our country back.” That has been the mantra only about President Barack Obama. Rep. Ryan and those who share his sentiment believe the following: That the United States must be rescued and that President Obama - with his Muslim father from Kenya, African-American wife, Asian-American sister and other Kenyan blood relatives - is an outsider who can’t possibly be as American as they are.

They insist this is so despite the fact that the President’s policies helped save thousands of jobs in the automobile industry, have maintained the Bush tax cuts focusing on helping those who have money get more money, have provided health care support for working class and middle income mostly White families that are one catastrophic illness away from financial disaster, have provided a stimulus package which gave money even to the congressional districts of hypocritical anti-stimulus politicians such as Rep. Ryan, and have created an economic climate in which corporations have made record-setting profits.

His policies also resulted in the killing of U.S. public enemy number one, Osama bin Laden, have nearly crippled al-Qaeda with constant drone attacks that also killed dozens of non-combatants, have continued the neo-cons’ war of choice in Afghanistan and have significantly expanded economic sanctions against Iran, among other things.

Most notably, President Obama has determinedly avoided any kind of gesture or policy that could honestly be described as reaching out to African-Americans. And he has kept his cool, even when Glenn Beck mocked his daughter and when personally insulted by code names such as Food Stamp President to avoid being labeled an angry Black male.

Though one may oppose these policies or regard them as insufficient for what is needed, they don’t remotely reflect a person from whom the country must be rescued. So what is left but the conclusion that for Rep. Ryan and his cohorts, a Black man in the White House, any Black man, including brothers from another mother such as Herman Cain, Rep. Alan West of Florida, Rep. Tom Scott of South Carolina, Artur Davis and others of that ilk, is unbearable, a severe shock to the White psyche. In other words, "It’s Race, Stupid.”

Journalist/Lecturer A. Peter Bailey, a former associate editor of Ebony, is currently editor of Vital Issues: The Journal of African American Speeches. He can be reached at 202-716-4560.

 

 

Activism - Then and Now

By Julianne Malveaux

malveaux

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Every time I see a march or rally, I think of the rally of all rallies, which was the 1963 March on Washington. Forty-nine years later, there is nothing that equals that march, not in participation, nor in results.

These days, folks march to make a point, but back in the day, we marched to get legislative action.  Shortly after the March on Washington, both the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act were passed.  I challenge anyone to tell me what other marches or rallies have yielded.  They’ve made a point and galvanized people, yet they’ve had no direct or immediate results.

I am thinking, in some ways, of the Occupy movement, a self-admittedly leaderless group that has brought attention to corporate greed and growing wealth gap in our nation.  In many ways Occupy has been extremely effective in making a point. But the point has been lost with their many skirmishes with law enforcement officers, with the condition of the camps they set up, and with the vagueness of their demands.

It is specious and ineffective to call for the collapse of capitalism - as desirable as such a goal might be.  Instead, the Occupy folks might agitate for tax reform that is redistributive, favoring the poor and middle class instead of the wealthy.  Such legislation will not end capitalism, but it will give people something to rally around.

Many people believe that the March on Washington was a spontaneous movement, but the March took months of planning.  The highly disciplined organizers vetted every speech and were mindful and deliberate about their goals.

To counter negative impressions of African-American people, many of the marchers dressed in their Sunday best.  All of the signs spoke to the civil rights movement, not to other issues.  Today marches seem to be a grab bag, with everyone with a cause carrying signs offering up their issues.  Again, people are marching, almost for the sake of marching.

The Montgomery Bus Boycott and the March on Washington were exceptional because of their focus and also because of their utter audacity.  Nearly one hundred years after Emancipation, people of African descent were standing up for their rights. And given the long period of relative acquiescence, it was wholly unexpected that oppressed people would offer resistance to the status quo.  It was also wholly unexpected that Black people would have the audacity to stand up. And, it was totally unexpected that a movement of African-American people would inspire so many others to also stand up.

In the wake of the March on Washington, the National Organization for Women (NOW) was founded.  In the wake of the march, the National Council of La Raza was founded, and in their own words,  “traces its origins to the civil rights movement of the sixties”.  Also, the Stonewall riots happened in 1960 and gay rights marches began in the 1970s.

Unfortunately the right win has appropriated some civil rights tactics with their own marches and movement.  Also unfortunately, civil rights activism has become professionalized with many activists now on the payrolls of either the government or of an organization that relies on foundation funding.  In either case, activists are relatively muzzled so that the radicalism of the sixties is muted by funding realities or government restrictions.

That former President Bill Clinton jettisoned Lani Guinier and current President Barack Obama did the same thing to Van Jones is instructive.  Can activists co-exist with government moderation?  The answer is probably not.

Still, the nomination of Paul Ryan to be second on the Republican ticket is a cause for concern to anyone who has the slightest progressive tendency.  Ryan would trim the size of government, eliminating key agencies.  He opposes contraceptive rights and a woman’s right to choose.  He has not taken a position on any civil rights issues, but one might guess that he is not an ardent supporter of equality. Whether people take it to the streets or to the voting booth, it is clear that those who care about freedom have much to oppose on this Republican ticket.

We can take a page from the March on Washington to organize a highly disciplined opposition to the odious positions that the official representatives of the Republican Party have taken.  Or, we can be silent, absent ourselves from the polls, and suffer the consequences.

GOP Spotlight on Democrat-Turned-Republican

Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from the Afro American Newspapers

Artur_Davis

Former Democratic Congressman Artur Davis is now a Republican.

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Political turncoat Artur Davis, who was once an Obama surrogate and supporter, will be a “headliner” at this year’s Republican convention in Tampa, Aug. 27-30, GOP officials announced Aug. 16.

Davis, who served as the Democratic congressman for Alabama’s 7th District from 2003-2011, was, four years ago, on an upward trajectory. As an up-and-coming political power player, he was onstage at the 2008 Democratic National Convention and was the one to second then-Sen. Obama’s nomination for president.

Since then, he has left the Democratic party, joined the GOP, announced his support for former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney and serves as one of President Obama’s prominent African-American critics.

Davis’ defection from his longtime party came after a disastrous run for Alabama’s governorship in early 2011. After his loss to a more liberal candidate, he moved to Virginia and dropped out of sight. Then in May of this year, Davis announced his plans to switch political allegiance. The change was not much of a surprise—Davis was often out of step with his Democratic colleagues; he was the only member of the Congressional Black Caucus to vote against the Affordable Care Act and the 2007 Employment Non-Discrimination Act.

"At the end of the day, being in the Republican Party feels like a more comfortable ideological home for me," Davis told The Root in an interview published on June 6.

And in a May 29 post on his blog, Davis said he would consider re-entering politics—under a different banner.

He wrote, “If I were to leave the sidelines, it would be as a member of the Republican Party…wearing a Democratic label no longer matches what I know about my country and its possibilities."

X