banner2e top

Romney’s Agenda: Class Warfare

By Rev. Jesse L. Jackson

Jesse3
(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Raise taxes on the rich? “Class warfare” the Republicans rail. Any discussion of inequality, says Mitt Romney, should be held privately “in quiet rooms.” Yet the Romney agenda for the country opens a new offensive in class warfare — only on the side of the few, not the many.


America’s inequality has already reached extremes not seen since 1929 before the Great Depression. In 2010, the richest 1 percent captured an obscene 93 percent of the nation’s income growth. The top 1 percent now has as much wealth as 90 percent of Americans.

As Warren Buffett, one of America’s richest men, told New York Times columnist Ben Stein: “There’s class warfare, all right, but it’s my class, the rich class, that’s making war, and we’re winning.”

Romney and Republicans demand extension of the extra Bush tax cuts that go to those earning more than $250,000 a year. In addition, Romney calls for slashing individual tax rates across the board by 20 percent, eliminating the estate tax that applies only to the multimillionaires and sustaining the concessionary 15 percent tax rate on capital gains income overwhelmingly pocketed by the wealthiest Americans.

He promises to pay for these tax cuts by closing “loopholes,” but refuses to identify them. But even with the most generous assumptions, the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center — a joint venture of the Urban Institute and Brookings Institution — found that the rich don’t collect enough in loopholes to pay for the proposed tax cuts. Romney’s tax plan would end with the richest Americans getting a tax cut while most Americans end up paying more.

Class warfare straight up.

On spending, Romney claims that he can cut federal spending while increasing spending on the military and putting off his (poisonous) plans for Medicare and Social Security for a decade (so that those 55 and over won’t vote against him). But neither Romney nor running mate Paul Ryan will reveal what they would cut. Ryan’s budget calls for devastating cuts in Medicaid and food stamps. The Center for Budget and Policy Priorities estimates that more than three-fifths of the Ryan cuts in the first decade come from programs for the poor. Class warfare again.

Add to this the Romney “Bain Capital” economic policy. Romney criticizes Obama for not signing more corporate trade treaties, despite the fact that our trade policies not only ship jobs abroad but rack up more than $1 billion a day in trade deficits, more than half to China. (To be fair, Romney pledges to certify China as a currency violator, but every candidate promises to get tough with China, then folds once in office).

Romney also wants to repeal even the modest reforms of Wall Street that Obama got through Congress. He opposes raising the minimum wage and echoes Republican scorn of worker rights and unions. But the decline of unions has contributed to an economy in which workers no longer gain a fair share of the increased productivity and profits that they help to create. Once more, class warfare on the side of the CEOs and against working families.

Increasingly a Southern-based “whites only” dominated party, Republicans wrap their class warfare into scorn for “those people”: poor people of color. Can they consolidate support among white blue-collar workers, even as their policies attack those workers? Divide and conquer is an ancient strategy in warfare and in politics. Will it work for Mitt Romney, so clearly a man of, by and for the 1 percent?

We’ll know in November.

South Africa Mining Massacre Denounced Worldwide

August 26, 2012

Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from GIN

south african women

Women praying at the mines.

(TriceEdneyWire.com) – Disturbing images of gun-toting police firing point blank at striking miners shocked South Africans and others around the world. Thirty four workers fell dead in the melee - the worst case of post-apartheid state-sponsored violence since 1994.

The Marikana massacre, named after the UK-based Lonmin platinum mining complex, was denounced by labor leaders including U.S. labor chief Richard Trumka, among others.

Trumka, a former mineworker and now AFL-CIO president, said: “Once again, mineworkers who produce so much wealth under often dangerous daily working conditions have paid the highest price—their lives— in a completely avoidable industrial conflict. We call on the South African government to take immediate action to address the brutality.”

Tony Maher, head of Australia’s miners’ union added: “Lonmin sowed the seeds of industrial relations by bypassing established collective bargaining processes and now threatening to sack 3,000 striking workers.”

Lonmin’s past safety record at Marikana was deplorable, Mr Maher said, with six fatalities occurring in the first seven months of 2011 alone.

Ironically, among Lonmin's non-voting executive directors is the former secretary of the Africa National Congress, now billionaire, Cyril Ramaphosa. As strike talks broke down and violence loomed, ANC leader Jacob Zuma, Ramaphosa and others were out of town.

An effort to browbeat the workers back to their jobs was called off when only a quarter of the work force showed up on Monday.

Flags were lowered to half mast and an official day for nationwide memorial services was held last Thursday.

Meanwhile, former ANC youth leader Julius Malema, at a miners rally, denounced Pres. Zuma for his late arrival to the incident. President Jacob Zuma has presided over the "massacre of the people of South Africa,” Malema charged. “How can he call on people to mourn those he has killed? He must step down."

Obama’s Race Still Has Bearing on Media Coverage

By Nadra Kareem Nittle

Obamareflective

Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from the Maynard Institute

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Long before a little-known Illinois politician ran for president, the mainstream media focused on his race. When he flourished as a presidential candidate four years ago, everyone in America knew that Barack Obama was Black.

Have his blackness and extensive coverage of that fact boosted his political career or made it more difficult for him to win re-election? Perhaps surprisingly, some of the nation’s best political minds are divided on this question.

Obama’s race dominated media coverage about him before he became president. In 2004, he made headlines for becoming only the third African-American elected to the U.S. Senate since Reconstruction. In the 2008 presidential campaign, news stories questioned whether he could connect with African-American voters because he was born to a white Kansan mother and a Black Kenyan father, neither connected to Blacks in America.

When Obama became the first Black president, mainstream media portrayed his historic accomplishment as a symbol of a post-racial, colorblind America. That framing is contrary to the experience of millions of African-Americans and other people of color beset by conscious and unconscious bias daily in this country.

As Obama’s first term nears its end, the impact of his race in mainstream media coverage remains unclear.

At times, his blackness may have been an advantage in news reports about him, say political experts consulted by the Maynard Institute for Journalism Education. In other cases, however, his race has been a distinct disadvantage, marginalizing him in ways that his presidential campaign rivals, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, a member of a religious minority, haven’t been.

“During the presidential campaign, he was probably treated better than other candidates in the mainstream press because of the historical nature of his candidacy,” says Michael R. Wenger, senior research fellow at the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies in Washington. “After his election, I think the media tried very hard to make the case that we’re in a post-racial society.”

Wenger, author of the soon to be released book, My Black Family, My White Privilege: A White Man’s Journey Through the Nation’s Racial Minefield, says that notion is misleading because institutional racism didn’t disappear when Obama became president. He also takes issue with the media covering extravagant claims by conservative Republicans about Obama.

Wenger says no president’s religious beliefs have been questioned to the extent that Obama’s have, in the sense that because Obama has Black Kenyan heritage, people have accused him of lying about being a mainline Protestant like the majority of Americans. While the mainstream media may not have started rumors about Obama’s religious background, they helped to spread them, he says.

Herb Tyson, a Democratic government relations consultant in Washington, agrees.

“First of all, they [the media] don’t challenge the reports under the guise of being fair and balanced,” he says. Outrageous claims about Obama have been reported as “valid policy arguments as opposed to treating it as an absurdity,” he adds.

Mainstream news outlets should not only treat baseless gossip about the president as just that but should also cite the hypocrisy of some attacks against Obama, Tyson says. For example, he notes conservatives’ allegations that Obama wasn’t born in the United States. He says the media should have noted that some Republicans supported changing the U.S. Constitution to allow non-citizens to run for president when Austrian-born Arnold Schwarzenegger became governor of California.

Moreover, the media devoted little coverage in 2008 to the fact that McCain was born in the Panama Canal Zone while some reports suggested that Obama is an Arab. Exposing such discrepancies makes it easier for the public to see how Obama’s race often spurs attacks against him.

“It doesn’t make sense for anyone to portray the president as non-American,” Tyson says. “You can disagree with a president, but never before has a president been called non-American. It’s also hard for me to buy into the questions about his Christianity because of the Jeremiah Wright scandal. Is he a Christian, or is he a Muslim? How can he be both?”

A video of the Rev. Wright, Obama’s former pastor, was circulated during the 2008 presidential race and threatened to knock Obama’s campaign off course. In a sermon at Chicago’s Trinity United Church of Christ in April 2003, Wright used the phrase “God Damn America” three times. Conservatives suggested that the video indicated Obama wasn’t a patriot.

“The White part of him is never given credit,” Tyson says. “No one says that makes him a patriot, he’s a good American. It’s always he’s the Kenyan.”

Tyson says “Jack Kennedy was the first Catholic president, and his family came from Ireland. He was broadly more accepted than Obama.” Romney’s Mormonism hasn’t overshadowed his campaign, Tyson says, because Mormonism has been “passed off as a subset of Protestantism. . . . Romney looks presidential. He looks like a WASP.”

Pollster Ron Lester says the mainstream media has covered Obama-related controversies adequately. “When you have people like Donald Trump who are making these kinds of allegations, they’re going to be covered,” Lester says. “I don’t think the coverage was excessive. I think it was pretty fair and balanced.”

Lester says Obama has transcended race by not making it the focal point of his political campaigns. “I think he’s done an excellent job making his case and allowing the voters to evaluate him on the merits.”

Obama may not have placed his racial background front and center in his political campaigns, but the media have often highlighted it.

On the 2010 census, Obama declared himself Black, spurring widespread news attention. As recently as last month, the media reported on Obama’s maternal link to a slave ancestor. News reports about his wife, Michelle, have also explored her family’s ties to slavery. Collectively, the number of stories about Obama’s racial background far outweigh those penned Romney’s Mormon background.

When journalists aren’t reporting about Obama’s race, they’re quoting foes’ innuendoes about it, Tyson says. Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, who ended his presidential campaign in May, famously referred to Obama as the “food stamp president,” a label with racial overtones that was widely circulated in the media.

Wenger says conservatives have largely characterized the president as a radical. Some have accused Obama and Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. of failing to take action against the New Black Panther Party for voter intimidation because two of its members, seen on video, were accused of trying to discourage some people from voting at a Philadelphia polling place on Election Day 2008.

“He is very much in the mainstream of the Democratic Party,” Wenger says of Obama. “Most would not consider him to be very left of center. Despite all of the evidence to the contrary, he’s been stamped somehow as otherwise. I think some members of the Republican Party have been unscrupulous in trying to further that.”

Nadra Kareem Nittle writes media critiques for the Robert C. Maynard Institute for Journalism Education. Her reports and other media critiques are available at www.mije.org/mmcsi and can be republished free of charge. For more information, please contact Elisabeth Pinio at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.or 510-891-9202.


August 28: A Story of American Struggle, A Lesson for the Future

August 26, 2012

By U.S. Rep. John Lewis, (D-Ga.)

lewis_john

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Next year this nation will celebrate the 50th anniversary of the March on Washington on August 28, 2013.  Many of you will be on your way to DC to honor the legacy of a movement that helped liberate, not only African-Americans but all Americans from the chains of legalized segregation. As we approach this significant moment in our history, I challenge you to dig even deeper into your own legacy and reflect upon the importance that this one day-- August 28th--has played in our history.  You will find that its history reads like a chronicle of the modern African-American story.

It was on August 28, 1955, that a 14-year-old boy named Emmett Till was kidnapped from his uncle’s home in Money, Mississippi and lynched.  Many historians mark his death as the launch of the modern-day Civil Rights Movement in America.  Just a few months later on December 1, 1955, Rosa Parks’ action would inspire the boycott of segregated buses in Montgomery, Alabama that lasted 381 days.

On August 28, 1957, Strom Thurmond, a Republican senator from South Carolina and a staunch segregationist held the longest filibuster any one senator ever conducted to block passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1957.  The bill was written by then Senate Majority Leader, Lyndon Johnson, and originally devised as an attempt to mandate voting rights for African Americans by outlawing intimidation and coercion at the polls.  The filibuster ended with alterations to the bill, but it did not stop its passage. It was ultimately signed into law by President Dwight Eisenhower, establishing the Civil Rights Commission and the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice.  Those two agencies continue to play powerful roles in helping to ensure that the voting rights and civil rights of African Americans and all Americans are enforced to this day.

On August 28, 1963, Dr. King gave his historic I Have A Dream Speech on the National Mall at the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom.  It was a testament to the power of non-violent resistance.   But just one year later on August 28, 1964, acts of police brutality incited rioting in Philadelphia. Over 300 were injured and over 700 arrested. Altogether seven American cities experienced rioting that summer including the Harlem riots and, Rochester, New York and those in Paterson and Elizabeth City, New Jersey.  Violence struck again on the 28th in1968 outside the Democratic National Convention in Chicago due to another episode of police brutality.

By midday on August 28, 2005, Hurricane Katrina slammed the New Orleans coast with 145 mile an hour winds prompting a mandatory evacuation of Orleans Parish.  And finally on August 28, 2008, as if to link this great past to a turning point in America’s future, Barack Obama became the first African-American Democratic nominee for President of the United States.

The story of August 28 tells a powerful tale of the African-American struggle to demand respect for human dignity in America. I was there when Dr. King pricked the moral conscience of the nation calling us to lay down the burdens of hate and division.

As the last remaining speaker from the March on Washington I can tell you that the lessons of that make it plain that we cannot defeat the adversaries of justice in one day, a week or a year. Ours is the struggle of a lifetime.  We must dedicate ourselves to this higher calling and stay in the struggle.  The only way to make a difference is to get involved and stay engaged, through the highs and lows, the easy times and the difficult struggles.  That is the lesson of August 28th.  We have to keep on pushing and pulling knowing without a doubt that “the arc of the moral universe is long, but it always bend toward justice.”

That is why we must vote in November and vote like never before, not because we have gotten everything we ever wanted from the political process.  But because, if we do not join forces together and continue to take action,we cannot ever expect to get what we so rightly deserve.

Black-owned Newspaper Fights City Agency's Contract Decision

By James Wright

informer protest 2

Attorney Johnny Barnes, at the mic, stands by Washington Informer publisher Denise Rolark Barnes (no relation.) Ward 6 Advisory Neighborhood Commissioner Keith Silver (far right) held a press conference with supporters of The Washington Informer Newspaper on Monday, August 20 in front of the Judiciary Square Building in Northwest Washington, D.C. PHOTO: Roy Lewis

Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from the Washington Informer

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - A group of community activists and leaders has staged a rally to protest the denial of a city contract to the largest District-based African-American newspaper solely on the basis of it not being a "newspaper of general circulation."

Keith Silver, a Ward 6 advisory neighborhood commissioner and civil rights activist, and noted attorney Johnny Barnes, held a press conference on August 20 in front of the Judiciary Square Building in Northwest to protest a recent ruling by the director of the D.C. Office of Contracts to award an unclaimed property advertising contract worth more than $30,000 to The Washington Times instead of The Washington Informer.

Silver demanded that the board "review and reverse its procurement decision."

"I challenge the assertion that The Washington Informer serves a specific ethnic group," said Silver, quoting a part of an e-mail that Informer Publisher Denise Rolark Barnes received on July 30 from Joseph A. Giddis, director of the contracts office, as to why her newspaper did not receive the contract.

However, shortly after the demonstration and after Barnes filed legal documents requesting that a stay or a delay be granted by the District of Columbia Contract Appeals Board on the contract agreement, The Washington Informer received a response from the contract appeals board that said the matter is "moot" because the Times already published the advertisements in its August 13 and August 20, 2012 editions

"In addition, the District responded that urgent and compelling reasons existed to continue with contract performance of the contract," according to the response.

The Washington Informer, located in Southeast, was co-founded by Calvin and Wilhelmina Rolark in October 1964 to publish positive stories about the District's Black community. In 1981, under the leadership of Wilhelmina Rolark, a D.C. Council member, a law was passed that allowed newspapers other than The Washington Post to bid for city listings of tax and unclaimed properties on the basis of being a newspaper of general circulation.

As recently as September 2009, The Washington Informer published the D.C. Unclaimed Property advertisements and in June 2011, it ran the D.C. Tax Sale advertisements.

In June, the Office of the Chief Financial Officer's Office of Contracts issued a solicitation bid for the publication of the city's unclaimed property listing to "a newspaper of general circulation" that is "widely distributed in the District of Columbia." The Washington Informer, the Times and two other publications submitted bids.

On July 24, the contracts office sent an e-mail to Denise Rolark Barnes stating the bid "is expected to be awarded to The Washington Times." On July 30, Giddis e-mailed Rolark Barnes, saying that "in this solicitation, only one awardee was anticipated, and the requirement for the publication is a newspaper of general circulation."

That day, Rolark Barnes responded by e-mail stating that The Washington Informer has a general circulation and has been recognized as such by the contracts agency since 1981.

On Aug. 2, Giddis responded to the publisher via e-mail saying, "The Washington Informer was found non-responsive based on the fact that the Washington Informer serves a specific ethnic group."

"It is our view that targeting a specific ethnic group does not meet the requirement of a newspaper of general circulation," he said.

Washington Informer supporters vehemently disagree with Giddis.

"The Washington Informer speaks for the entire community," said Nick McCoy, a political and gay rights activist.

"I generally get the newspaper on 14th and P Streets, N.W., but you can get it on Connecticut Avenue, in Bloomingdale and on Alabama Avenue in Southeast. The statement that it is not a newspaper of general circulation should be retracted."

John Zottoli, who lives in the Adams Morgan neighborhood of Northwest and who is white, said he's surprised with the board's reasoning.

"I am a faithful reader of the Informer," said Zottoli, 66. "I pick up the Informer at the Safeway on Columbia Road. I read the newspaper for the editorial and news sections."

Zottoli said that "he was offended" by the unspoken assertion that because he is White, he does not read the Informer.

Nathan Saunders, president of the Washington Teachers' Union, concurs, saying that the founders of The Washington Informer gave the newspaper its name for a reason.

"Calvin and Wilhelmina Rolark did not name it The Washington Black Informer," Saunders said. "It is designed for all of Washington. It would not have lasted this long if it were only for Blacks."

Roach Brown, an activist for the District's returning citizens, said "you cannot find the Washington Times in Ben's Chili Bowl" and "the Washington Informer goes to federal penal facilities across the country."

Trayon White, who represents Ward 8 on the D.C. State Board of Education, said that The Washington Informer helped him get back into school when he was kicked out because he wore dreads and that "The Washington Informer stands up for the people."

"We need to support the Black press," said White, 28.

Johnny Barnes offered a detailed analysis of the paper's legal standing in this matter. The request for the stay of the Times contract is based on the fact that The Washington Informer has been a newspaper of general circulation as defined by the D.C. government since 1981; the language of Section 5 of the District law that applies to the situation "makes it clear that The Washington Informer qualifies as a newspaper of general circulation"; the decision by the contracts board's director on the basis of The Washington Informer serving a "specific ethnic group" may be in violation of District and federal civil rights laws. The Washington Informer is a Certified Business Enterprise in the District and has priority in contracts whereas the Times is not; The Washington Informer has deep roots in the District and the demands for an automatic stay for discovery and a hearing have not been addressed.

Johnny Barnes added that the basis of awarding the contract is flawed.

He said, "None can argue that anecdotally the likely subscribers to the Washington Times are conservative and Republican – the anecdotal opposite of the population of the District of Columbia, which is overwhelmingly Democratic and progressive."

"If The Washington Informer can be disqualified because it appeals to a specific ethnic group, a similar disqualification can be leveled against the Washington Times, which some might subjectively argue appeals only to a certain ideological group. In truth and objectively, neither newspaper should be disqualified for such a reason, not permitted by law."

X