banner2e top

The Great Divide of Income Inequality: A Domestic Crisis on the World’s Stage By Marc H. Morial

Feb. 1, 2014

To Be Equal 
The Great Divide of Income Inequality: A Domestic Crisis on the World’s Stage

By Marc H. Morial
marcmorial

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - “We live in a world where the 85 richest people own the wealth of half of the world’s population.  In the United States, the increase in the income share of the top one percent is at its highest level since the eve of the Great Depression.” Winnie Byanyima, Executive Director, Oxfam International

“Income inequality” has become the political buzzword of 2014.  President Obama, most recently in this week’s State of the Union Address, has made it a central theme of his second term.  Both progressive Democrats and conservative Republicans in Congress are making it a focus of this year’s mid-term elections, and leading voices for human rights have called on government and business leaders to take immediate action to close the income gap for the sake of long-term economic and social stability.

Even last week, as the world’s elite – leaders from government, business and NGO sectors – gathered in Davos for the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) annual meeting, the issue of inequality was atop the agenda.  WEF’s Global Risks 2014 report recently revealed that the “chronic gap between the incomes of the richest and poorest citizens is seen as the risk that is most likely to cause serious damage globally in the coming decade.”

Another voice was added to the chorus last week when the British-based anti-poverty organization, Oxfam International, released a report in advance of the Davos gathering, revealing that the richest 85 people in the world control as much wealth as the bottom half of the global population – about 3.5 billion people.  Commenting on the report, Oxfam’s Executive Director, Winnie Byanyima said, "It is staggering that in the 21st century, half of the world's population own no more than a tiny elite whose numbers could all sit comfortably in a single train carriage. Widening inequality is creating a vicious circle where wealth and power are increasingly concentrated in the hands of a few, leaving the rest of us to fight over crumbs from the top table.”

According to the same report, in the U.S., where the gap between rich and poor has grown at a faster rate than any other developed country, the richest one percent of Americans have received 95% of the wealth created since 2009 – after the economic crisis – while the bottom 90% of Americans have become poorer.

While we are pleased that both sides of the political ping-pong table in the United States are now focusing on the domestic crisis and implications of this global problem, there are disturbing signs that the issue may fall prey to the same kind of ideological posturing that has stymied recent efforts to create jobs, reduce unemployment, raise the minimum wage and help the long-term unemployed.  In fact, as reported by CNNMoney, almost two-thirds of the delegates surveyed during a debate in Davos on Friday said that the widening gap, or what I call The Great Divide, “between rich and poor is having a corrosive effect on U.S. politics.”

For example, Senator Marco Rubio sees the problem not as one of income inequality but of “opportunity inequality” and continues to resist efforts to raise the minimum wage.  To be clear, opportunity inequality is alive and thriving in America; but any attempts to separate it from income inequality are divertive and lacking recognition of the correlation between the two.  Senator Rand Paul during a recent visit to Detroit, where unemployment has been above 15 percent for more than a year, said that it would be a “disservice” to the jobless to extend their unemployment benefits beyond the current limit.  Further, Senator Paul Ryan, another potential presidential candidate, has been traveling the country declaring how the government safety net – programs like Social Security, Medicare and Head Start – has “failed miserably.”

In contrast, President Obama has warned that “The combined trends of increased inequality and decreasing mobility pose a fundamental threat to the American dream, our way of life and what we stand for around the globe.”  He has called for an increase in the minimum wage – a move the National Urban League has been pushing since 2006 – and an extension of unemployment benefits as first steps in addressing the problem.  On January 9, he announced the creation of five “Promise Zones,” in San Antonio, Philadelphia, Los Angeles, Southeastern Kentucky and the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma that will receive targeted government tax incentives to create jobs and reduce unemployment.

In a message to the Davos attendees, Pope Francis said that “the growth of equality demands something more than economic growth, even though it presupposes it… It also calls for decisions, mechanisms and processes directed to a better distribution of wealth, the creation of sources of employment and an integral promotion of the poor which goes beyond a simple welfare mentality.  I am convinced that from such an openness to the transcendent a new political and business mentality can take shape, one capable of guiding all economic and financial activity within the horizon of an ethical approach which is truly humane.”

The need is clear.  The Urban League has raised this issue constantly over the last several years – and people are finally listening.  We must not let the seriousness and urgency of this problem get caught in the crossfire of ideological warfare.  Americans need policy solutions developed in partnership with corporate, government and non-profit leaders – now.   Awareness is good…action is better.

State of the Union Promises 'Year of Action'; But Did Speech Say Enough? By Hazel Trice Edney

State of the Union Promises 'Year of Action'; But Did Speech Say Enough?

Black leaders praise new focus on disparities; Some say speech still too ‘tepid’ 

By Hazel Trice Edney

obamaatstateoftheunion

President Obama gives state of the Union Tuesday. PHOTO/The White House

(TriceEdneyWire.com) – Finally. That was the general sentiment expressed by Black economic activists in response to President Barack Obama’s State of the Union (SOU) speech this week – a speech that surpassed previous SOUs in dealing with economic woes that disparately affect African-Americans and other people of color.

“What I offer tonight is a set of concrete, practical proposals to speed up growth, strengthen the middle class, and build new ladders of opportunity into the middle class,” the President told the joint session of Congress during his fifth State of the Union address Tuesday. “Some require Congressional action, and I’m eager to work with all of you.  But America does not stand still – and neither will I.  So wherever and whenever I can take steps without legislation to expand opportunity for more American families, that’s what I’m going to do.”

The speech set a tone that the President is willing to bypass Congress to use executive orders where possible to advance his economic agenda in the coming months.

“Let’s see where else we can make progress together.  Let’s make this a year of action.  That’s what most Americans want – for all of us in this chamber to focus on their lives, their hopes, their aspirations.  And what I believe unites the people of this nation, regardless of race or region or party, young or old, rich or poor, is the simple, profound belief in opportunity for all – the notion that if you work hard and take responsibility, you can get ahead. Let’s face it: that belief has suffered some serious blows.”

It was a common criticism from Black leaders that President Obama did not say or do enough during his first term pertaining to racial economic disparities. In fact, he often made the statement that a “rising tide lifts all boats”, implying that the poor – which are disparately people of color – would be lifted along with everyone else. Some say his new tone and strategies appear to recant that sentiment, but still doesn’t go far enough.

“It was good that he finally recognized and brought to the attention of everyone that government has to pay attention to lifting all boats and not kind of assume that just because the economy is growing that all boats are rising,” said economist Bill Spriggs, in an interview following the speech. “He said that frequently during the first term and I think that this was a clear statement that, no, the rising tide did not lift all boats. I think that is a positive step forward in terms of brain work.”

Ironically, Spriggs who was a part of President Obama’s economics team as an assistant secretary for policy at the Labor Department in his first term, is now one of his most meticulous critics. Now chief economist for the AFL-CIO, Spriggs says the SOU was fairly strong, but the President didn’t go far enough in giving specific examples to describe the suffering and depth of disparities.

For example, Spriggs pointed out how the President spoke of inequality growing 30 years before the ‘great recession’ but he blamed it on technological growth and competition. “He said nothing about workers’ rights to organize, a declining minimum wage” and how their jobs were sent overseas, Spriggs said.

The President also left out the fact that racism and Jim Crow contributed to income disparities to the extent that even today unemployment remains twice as bad in Black communities as among Whites.

“Yes, it was definitely a step forward. But in terms of where the debate is, I thought he could have taken it further,” Spriggs said. “I think he could have taken it to another level…It was like ‘I can’t play too much to the people’, which was kind of a tepid step toward understanding that this is really about people…That was the moment for him to say. ‘I’m taking the government back to the people. You either lead, follow or get out of the way.’ And he didn’t say that.”

Among the President’s Proposals:

  • He has asked Vice President Joseph Biden to lead reform of job training programs in order to “train Americans with the skills employers need, and match them to good jobs that need to be filled right now.”
  • Working with colleges and universities, such the White House’s recent College Opportunity Summit in order to attain commitments from universities, businesses, and nonprofits “to reduce inequality in access to higher education – and help every hardworking kid go to college and succeed when they get to campus.”
  • Will issue an Executive Order “requiring federal contractors to pay their federally-funded employees a fair wage of at least $10.10 an hour – because if you cook our troops’ meals or wash their dishes, you shouldn’t have to live in poverty.”
  • Challenged to Congress to likewise raise the federal minimum wage: “Today, the federal minimum wage is worth about twenty percent less than it was when Ronald Reagan first stood here.  Tom Harkin and George Miller have a bill to fix that by lifting the minimum wage to $10.10.”

Congressional Black Caucus Chair Macia Fudge (D-Ohio), also applauded the President’s speech as a great new beginning, but took a wait and see approach as to what will actually happen.

I did hear what I wanted to hear. I do think that this is one of the strongest, if not the strongest, of the five state of the unions that he’s given,” Fudge said.  I think he was very, very clear in the direction that he wants to lead this country. I think that he articulated very, very strongly a path that he expects this country to go and how he expects to lead us there,” she said.

But, given the typical push back from the politically divided Congress, she was reserved about how much would actually get done.

“The biggest drawback is going to be anything that he has to bring before Congress,” she said. “Because no matter what these people say, the will not want this President to succeed. And they will continue to obstruct for as long as they can.”

Civil rights leaders are also praising the speech for hitting the right points, but pondered whether it went far enough.

Dedrick Muhammad, director for NAACP Economic Programs, said the speech had the overtone that “Even though we’ve been technically in recovery for years, most of America hasn’t felt the recovery and much more action needs to be taken.”

However, like Spriggs, Muhammad said the President stopped short of fully describing the depth of the disparate suffering. “He could have gone into more detail about how bad the inequality is today,” Muhammad said. “To me it’s a real kind of doubling down of what he’s been talking about the last two, maybe four years.  And I think the new piece was that the first [five] years of his presidency, it was always with the hopes that you can have Republicans come on and you can get things passed through Congress. Now, he still offers that possibility, but he deals much more with the reality that it might just be up to him about what he can do.”

Africa Was a Point of Pride for Dr. King By Rush Perez

Jan. 27, 2014


Africa Was a Point of Pride for Dr. King

By Rush Perez

dr. king on ghana stamp

 

Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from Global International Network


(TriceEdneyWire.com)  – At a speaking engagement at Western Michigan University on Dec. 18, 1963, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. recalled his first trip to Africa with his wife Coretta to attend the independence day celebration of the new nation of Ghana. The couple was invited by the new President, Kwame Nkrumah.

 

“We were very happy about the fact there were now eight independent countries in Africa,” he said. “But since that night in March, 1957, some twenty-seven new independent nations have come into being in Africa. This reveals to us that the old order of colonialism is passing away, and the new order of freedom and human dignity is coming into being.”

 

Later, on Dec. 10, 1965 he gave a powerful speech at Hunter College in New York City, where he attacked the Apartheid regime of South Africa, as well as the governments of Rhodesia (today Zimbabwe) and the Portuguese control of Mozambique and Angola.

 

True to form, Dr King utilized powerful language to make his points, beginning first with a deconstruction of the popular narrative of Africa at the time.

 

“Africa has been depicted for more than a century as the home of black cannibals and ignorant primitives….Africa does have spectacular savages today, but they are not black. They are the sophisticated white rulers of South Africa... whose conduct and philosophy stamp them unmistakably as modern day barbarians.”

 

He went on to call for an international boycott of South Africa.

 

After the independence day ceremonies in Ghana, Dr King said in a radio interview that: “This event, the birth of this new nation, will give impetus to oppressed peoples all over the world. I think it will have worldwide implications and repercussions--not only for Asia and Africa, but also for America….It renews my conviction in the ultimate triumph of justice and that somehow the universe itself is on the side of freedom and justice. So that this gives new hope to me in the struggle for freedom.”

Woman President to Lead Embattled Central African Republic

Jan. 27, 2014

 

Woman President to Lead Embattled Central African Republic 

 

president samba panza

 

Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from Global Information Network


(TriceEdneyWire.com) – To the sound of cheers from the National Assembly building, the Transitional National Council of the Central African Republic on Monday tapped Catherine Samba-Panza, mayor of the capital city of Bangui, to be the country’s interim President and first woman to hold the post.

 

As the new leader of a country gripped by a ferocious sectarian war, Catherine Samba-Panza, 58, issued a call to the fighting groups, asking her “children, especially the anti-Balaka, to put down their arms and stop all the fighting. The same goes for the ex-Seleka. . . I don’t want to hear any more talk of murders and killings.

 

“Starting today, I am the president of all Central Africans, without exclusion.”

 

Born in Chad to a Cameroonian father and Central African mother, Ms. Samba-Panza is a former businesswoman, corporate lawyer, and insurance broker.  She also led a reconciliation effort during a previous civil war.

 

Paul Simon Handy, of the Institute for Security Studies (ISS) in South Africa, called her "a president who can unite both the country and the political elite” but warned: “I am afraid that this process will take longer than her period in office as interim president.”

 

The Central African Republic has been devastated by brutal fighting since a coup in March 2013 removed the unpopular president Francois Bozize. He was replaced by Michel Djotodia who suspended the constitution. Djotodia resigned this month under intense international pressure as the death toll mounted to over 1000 people and observers feared a genocide was in the works.

 

According to a New York Times report, “The state no longer exists in the CAR. Civil servants do not go to their offices, taxes are not collected, all the schools are closed. There is no budget, no army, no police force, no Parliament, no judges, no jails.”

 

Against these odds, Samba-Panza, no political novice, ran a successful campaign and beat seven other candidates for the post. Among them were two women and two sons of former presidents.

 

Now, her primary task will be to prepare the nation for elections in the coming year.  In addition she will need to temper the extreme animosity between the Christian and Muslim groups in the country.

 

Central African Republic has to hold a fresh election by February 2015 at the latest. France, however, wants the election to be held this year. Current law excludes the interim president from running.

 

“Everything we have been through has been the fault of men,” said Marie-Louise Yakemba, in a press interview. Yakemba, who heads a civil-society organization that brings together people of different faiths, added: “We think that with a woman, there is at least a ray of hope.” w/pix of Pres. Samba-Panza

National NAACP Chair Sticks With Her Boss' Racism By Joey Matthews

National NAACP Chair Sticks With Her Boss' Racism
By Joey Matthews

brock_2013

NAACP Chair Roslyn Brock

Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from the Richmond Free Press

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - The chair of the national NAACP had a grand opportunity to publicly denounce discrimination issues related to Bon Secours. Instead, Roslyn M. Brock embraced Bon Secours at a Richmond, Va. event honoring Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

The Bon Secours vice president called the health care giant “my family.” Brock has come under fire for supporting Bon Secours’ racist practices related to the Washington professional football team and its discriminatory training camp deal in Richmond. Bon Secours paid $6.4 million to sponsor the training camp that carries the racist and derogatory nickname of the D.C. team.

Brock failed to denounce the racism issues again when she recently delivered the keynote address at the 36th Annual Community Leaders Breakfast at a Downtown hotel. Bon Secours officials sat at a table near the podium where she spoke. NAACP members also were in attendance.

Brock also recognized the NAACP members, but made no reference to them being her family. The event is sponsored by Virginia Union University, Brock’s alma mater, led by President Claude G. Perkins. It draws elected officials, business leaders, members of the faith community and other community members to commemorate Dr. King.

The Richmond Free Press challenged in an editorial the day before the community breakfast to “take a public stance in support of the NAACP’s opposition to the racist practices of Bon Secours.”

Those practices include Bon Secours’ support of the D.C. team’s racist and derogatory nickname and Bon Secours’ sponsorship of the team’s discriminatory training camp deal. That deal denied Black-owned and other locally owned businesses vending opportunities inside the Washington NFL camp that opened last summer. The Richmond Free Press has repeatedly called on Brock to denounce the Bon Secours support of the racism issues.

Her refusal to do so calls into question whether her loyalties lie with Bon Secours or the NAACP. Brock also refused for several months last year to call on the D.C. team to change its
racist and derogatory nickname. The Free Press announced last year it would no longer use the D.C. team’s hateful nickname in its news columns.

Only after the Free Press chronicled her refusal to denounce the hateful nickname did Brock join with national NAACP interim President Lorraine M. Miller to issue a statement on the organization’s website criticizing the D.C. team’s racist nickname.

Apparently upset over media criticism of her backing of the racist practices, she lashed out at the media “that demonize their leaders on the front of newspapers.”

State NAACP Executive Director King Salim Khalfani also was at the event. In sharp contrast to Brock, he has been a consistent and loud critic of the D.C. team’s nickname and has lashed out at Bon Secours’ support of the discriminatory training camp deal.

In other remarks at the community breakfast, Brock challenged audience members to join Gov. Terry McAuliffe’s social justice campaign to uplift the poor.

“Stand with this governor. … and with the hundreds of thousands of citizens across this community to make this, our beloved community, one where we stand together, walk together, pray together and also we serve together.”

She added, “We must rededicate ourselves and even our lives to achieve Dr. King’s dream.”

She ripped into those looking to curb voting rights, turn back the clock on civil rights gains and sidetrack the Affordable Care Act. She joined Gov. McAuliffe’s call to expand Medicaid health coverage to more than 400,000 working Virginians.

“The hard truth is in America, across the length and breadth of this nation, race still matters in this country and the pendulum of justice is moving quickly backward for people of color and those who live below the poverty line,” she said.

In brief remarks, Gov. McAuliffe continued to promote his new Virginia way agenda to be “an open and welcoming state” with opportunity for all. He said doing so would “honor Dr. King’s spirit and his legacy of equality and service.”

Other elected officials in attendance: U.S. Rep. Robert C. “Bobby” Scott, state Sen. Henry L. Marsh III, state Delegate Delores L. McQuinn and several City Council members.

Scott said he has attended every community breakfast but one.

“It’s an opportunity for the community to come together and show support for the ideals of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.,” he said.

Mayor Dwight C. Jones did not attend because of a death in the family, his office said. Dr. Allix B. James, president emeritus of Virginia Union, drew a standing ovation when he was presented
the Lifetime of Service Award by Dr. W. Franklyn Richardson, chairman of the school’s board of trustees.

Now 91, he graduated from Virginia Union and went on to serve the school for more than 50 years. He was appointed the university’s seventh president in 1979 and served until 1985. He also taught at and served as dean of the university’s Samuel DeWitt Proctor School of Theology.

Dr. James was the first African-American to be elected president of the Association of Theological Schools and the first to be elected president of the Virginia State Board of Education. Dr. James praised his deceased wife of 67 years, Susie Nickens James, for “the partnership that played the greatest role in making everything possible.”

He closed by saying: “As we face the rising sun of a new day that has begun, let us march on, fight on, legislate on, work on until the reality of Martin Luther’s dream becomes a true factor in American life. Until it is really honored and respected. Until complete victory is won.”

X