banner2e top

Black Mayors: Climate Change is in America’s Top Five Crucial Issues By Hazel Trice Edney

August 3, 2026

Flint Mayor Sheldon Neely

Flint, Michigan Mayor Sheldon Neeley

Baltimore Mayor Brandon Scott

Baltimore Mayor Brandon Scott, president, African American Mayors Association

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - As the Trump Administration continues to deny the reality and community impact of climate change, Black mayors have united to protect African-Americans and other people of color, who are increasingly and disparately in danger across the nation.

“Even though we have an administration that doesn’t even believe that climate change is real, we’re smart and we know that it is real,” says Baltimore Mayor Brandon Scott, president of the African American Mayors Association (AAMA), in an interview with the Trice Edney News Wire. “People can see these storms that are causing flooding in areas that have never been flooded. People know it’s hotter. They can see that. What we’re doing now is just allowing ourselves to be prepared for the world that we know that we want.”

Baltimore mayor since 2020, Scott has earned a reputation for using his power to actively prepare for the world that he envisions. For example, three years into his administration, he signed into law City Council Bill 21-0159, to help "facilitate a transition to zero emissions vehicles for the City’s administrative fleet. Under the law, by 2030, all procurements for the City’s administrative fleet – comprised of light-duty, standard-occupancy vehicles, including sedans, small pickups, and SUVs – will be required to be zero emission vehicles, mostly likely all electric," according to a press release describing the bill. 

This action followed the 2022 announcement of Scott's vision for a goal of 100 percent carbon neutrality by 2045. 

Among his earliest legislative actions, Scott also signed a bill requiring the city’s three pension funds to divest from the fossil fuel industry.

“My administration knows the critical importance of ensuring our city is able to confront the climate crisis head-on and do everything in our power to ensure Baltimore is leading the way in sustainability and climate resilience," he said in a press statement. "Doing so requires us to look at the steps city government can take to change the way it operates, and work to modernize our systems to be more climate conscious."

In the interview, he said he wants Baltimore to lead the nation by example. "When you look at the milestones that we're setting for ourselves, that's how we're holding ourselves accountable."

He said he hopes this vision will spread around the nation to mayors of AAMA as effects of climate change - including global warming, pandemics and other health crisis - have historically affected Black and other people of color disparately.

Scott represents the 641 African American mayors of the AAMA, an organization that grew out of the 50-year-old National Conference of Black Mayors, which merged with the AAMA in 2016. Black mayors represent 48 million citizens across the country.

It has been widely reported by credible environmental agencies that climate change causes frequent and severe weather events, heavier than normal rainfalls, dangerous thunder and lightning storms, droughts and scorching heat waves such as those taking place this summer. Coupled with long time environmental racism in poor Black neighborhoods, climate issues have risen to crisis level.

Among America’s worst recent environmental crisis was the Flint, Mich., water crisis from 2014-2019. Between 6-12,000 Flint children were exposed to high levels of lead in Flint’s drinking water after residents complained about the taste, smell and appearance of the water for years. Lead affects the brain and central nervous system when consumed.

Flint Mayor Sheldon Neeley, mayor since 2019, is still dealing with the aftermath of the crisis. In an interview, he agreed with observers that Flint suffered the inattention that led to the crisis largely because the community was poor and Black.

 “We would not have had to experience the things that we are still currently experiencing had we been a community of not so many minority members of our society,” he said.

Environmental racism doesn’t just impact physical health. The continued fear and mistrust of the government also impact mental health.

“When we talk about the psychological and social impact that we've had, you know, there's a crisis of confidence, especially in government,” Neeley said. “Definitely the psychological impact is something that we cannot see and we have to really understand what that is. And so, segments of our community still believe that we're still in crisis.”

Neeley says climate change is among the top five most important issues America currently faces. That is why the AAMA now partners with organizations studying and advocating issues pertaining to climate change.

AAMA, a non-partisan organization, works alongside climate organizations, such as the Climate Action Campaign (CAC), which has kept a sharp eye on moves made by the Trump Administration against climate change issues. CAC pushes for “equitable federal action to tackle the climate crisis.”

For example, CAC has a web feature called, “Trump’s Climate and Clean Energy Rollback Tracker”. Currently it states, “The Trump administration has accelerated the climate crisis and endangered communities’ health, driven up costs and undermined economic growth. The rollbacks tracked below – cuts to extreme weather preparedness, frozen investments, and blocked pollution protections, and more – will have a devastating impact on every American, and particularly the most vulnerable.”

Neeley stresses that he works from a non-partisan perspective; and therefore, will do everything possible to fill gaps where funds have been cut by the federal government.

Meanwhile, the damage continues to grow in the Black community as the AAMA fights back.

The Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) reports, “African American communities are more vulnerable to severe weather and floods. More than half​ of African Americans in the United States live in the South, an area that is and will continue to see stronger hurricanes and increased flooding from climate change. Many communities adjacent to ​ power plants, petrochemical ​plants, factories, and other sources of pollution, are African American or other people of color. Unfortunately, recent hurricanes have shown that many of these facilities are ill equipped to deal with flooding from increasingly stronger storms, often leading to releases of air and water pollution.”

The report continues, “For example, after Hurricane Harvey [in 2017], independent monitors found petrochemical plants released cancer-causing benzene at rates ​six times higher​ than safe levels. Neighborhoods near Superfund sites, which have also seen ​ flooding​ from recent storms, are also ​more likely​ to be African American. Historic segregation has resulted in African Americans living in less desirable ​ low-lying and flood prone areas​ in many cities throughout the United States.”

The EDF reports it will only get worse. But Scott says it won’t be difficult to measure the impact the mayors are making. “When you talk about our legacy residents who now have heating and air in their homes. Even things like cool roofs and mitigating extreme flooding,” Scott said. “And people’s basements aren’t being ruined year after year after year. We can hold ourselves accountable for that.”

Scott concludes that the key will be the mayors working together and sharing strategies for success.

"As president of the African American Mayors Association, we do this on every issue, making sure that we're looking for best practices across the country, putting things together and helping each other to make policy better - not just for one city, but for all cities."

Black Doctors Fear Medicaid Fraud Crackdown Will Unfairly Target Them By Angela Greene and Barbara Reynolds

Legalized Extortion

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - As the Trump administration announces an expanded campaign to combat Medicaid fraud, many Americans will hear only the promise of rooting out waste and abuse. Far less attention is being paid to another concern voiced by some physicians, attorneys and civil rights advocates: whether aggressive fraud enforcement has historically fallen hardest on doctors serving poor communities, particularly Black physicians.

For decades, physicians who treated large numbers of Medicaid patients have argued that fraud investigations often blurred the line between criminal misconduct and regulatory mistakes. Billing disputes, coding errors and documentation deficiencies, they contend, were sometimes escalated into criminal investigations carrying devastating professional and personal consequences.

Tose concerns are explored in the forthcoming book Legalized Extortion: How the Government Hunted Black Doctors for Treating Poor and Elderly Medicaid Patients. Drawing upon decades of reporting, interviews and case studies, we examine allegations that aggressive enforcement practices disproportionately affected physicians who devoted their careers to caring for Medicaid recipients.

Beginning in the 1980s, former USA TODAY columnist Barbara Reynolds, investigated Medicaid fraud prosecutions across the country, interviewing physicians, investigators, prosecutors and families whose lives had been upended. More recently, Atlanta journalist Angela Greene expanded that investigation, documenting physicians who say they faced overwhelming financial penalties, criminal charges and professional ruin arising from what they maintain were administrative violations rather than intentional fraud.

Many physicians described similar experiences. Armed raids on medical offices frightened patients away before guilt or innocence had been established. Some doctors lost their practices, their life savings and their medical licenses. Even physicians later cleared of wrongdoing often found their reputations permanently damaged. Several families reported tragedies that included depression, financial collapse and suicide.

The administration has emphasized that expanded fraud enforcement is intended to protect taxpayers and preserve Medicaid for those who need it. Few would argue against prosecuting genuine fraud. The question is whether enforcement mechanisms include sufficient safeguards to distinguish deliberate criminal conduct from complex billing disputes and documentation errors—particularly for physicians practicing in underserved communities where administrative resources are often limited.

This debate extends beyond physicians. Black Americans already face persistent shortages of Black doctors, who comprise less than five percent of the nation’s physicians. Research has shown that many Black patients experience improved communication, trust and, in some circumstances, better health outcomes when treated by physicians who share similar cultural backgrounds. Any policy that further reduces that workforce deserves careful public scrutiny.

The solution is not to weaken efforts against genuine fraud. Rather, policymakers should examine whether current investigative practices adequately protect due process while ensuring access to healthcare in medically underserved communities. Proposals advanced by physician advocacy groups—including reforms to administrative review procedures, increased transparency, independent oversight and stronger due process protections—deserve thoughtful bipartisan consideration.

At a time when America faces physician shortages and widening healthcare disparities, the nation cannot afford policies that discourage doctors from serving Medicaid patients. If physicians conclude that caring for the poor carries an unacceptable legal risk such as fines and imprisonment, it is vulnerable communities—not fraudsters—that will pay the highest price.

Dr. Barbara Reynolds was a former editorial director and columnist for USA TODAY and author of eight books including the memoirs of Coretta Scott King.  Angela Greene is a radio journalist in Atlanta and author of the book Legalized Extortion.

More than 7 Million Mostly Black Student Loan Borrowers Face Sept. 29 Deadline by Charlene Crowell

July 1, 2026
 
Center for American Progress Graphic
 
(TriceEdneyWire.com) - As of July first, the income-driven student loan repayment plan that lowered monthly payments for more than 7 million borrows while accelerating loan forgiveness is gone. In place of the Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) plan are two new choices that now require borrowers to prioritize either the amount of loan payments or the total amount borrowed. 
 
“Borrowers should really do their research to see what plan is going to work best for them,” said Nicholas Kent, undersecretary of Education in a recent interview. “But the reality is that SAVE borrowers will have to transition to a new repayment plan sooner rather than later.”   
 
Under the Repayment Assistance Plan (RAP), monthly loan payments are based on that borrower’s income and number of dependents. Alternatively, the Tiered Standard Repayment plan offers fixed terms of 10, 15, 20, or 25 years based on a borrower’s total outstanding loan balance.
 
The deadline to choose is September 29. Once borrowers complete their new enrollment, monthly payments will begin per the terms of each. After the deadline, any borrower that did not choose will be placed in a standard repayment plan. Further, pending SAVE applications will be denied.
The SAVE plan’s popularity was due to the meaningful relief that borrowers with modest incomes or long repayment histories received. Many achieved reduced payments, as the plan factored in income and family size. Hundreds of thousands of borrowers with smaller original balances were able to reach loan forgiveness more quickly.
Reactions to these changes from student loan advocates vary from worsening financial stress to anticipating higher payments and still unresolved student loan servicer issues.  
A June issue brief by the Julian Bond Institute found that 45 percent of all student loan borrowers suffered credit distress – missed payments or collections - over the past five years. This financial strain is taking a toll on consumers’ long-term financial goals.  
“For many borrowers, they’ll end up having a higher payment in the RAP plan than they would in the IBR plan, and certainly (more) than they would in the SAVE plan,” Abby Shafroth, director of the National Consumer Law Center’s Student Loan Borrower Assistance Program said.
“Now 7.5 million borrowers have weeks to switch repayment plans,” stated Chris Hicks, Senior Policy Advisor at Protect Borrowers. “The companies standing between them and default are the same ones that have spent decades driving borrowers into it. Lawmakers and regulators at every level must step up now to protect borrowers by reining in these servicers—instead of handing them yet another opportunity to profit at borrowers’ expense.”   
Hicks’ comments stem from a recently released joint report by Protect Borrowers and the Debt Collection Lab at Princeton University. Entitled, Repeat Offenders, the report takes aim at student loan servicers that are paid more than a billion dollars each year to support borrowers but instead “provided borrowers with the wrong information, taken illegal fees, and wrongly rejected applications for borrowers trying to get in an affordable repayment plan.”  
The report also found that in 2025, every nine seconds another borrower defaulted on their loans.  As the lack of effective student loan servicing continues, the report rejects the idea that the new payment plans will relieve the financial stress of unsustainable loan debt.
“This report makes clear that the dysfunction borrowers experience isn’t a series of isolated mistakes, said Bonnie Latreille, visiting Senior Fellow with the Debt Collection Lab at Princeton University and former Student Loan Ombudsman for the U.S. Department of Education. “It’s the predictable result of a fragmented system that shifts risk onto the people least equipped to absorb it, with no one held accountable.”
The end of SAVE and the start of new repayment plans are the result of a 2025 lawsuit settlement reached last December.  The lengthy litigation brought in 2024 by Missouri’s then-Attorney General (AG) Andrew Bailey was joined by his colleagues in Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, North Dakota, Ohio, and Oklahoma in a lawsuit that challenged SAVE, arguing the program was illegal.
The only former SAVE borrowers excused from these payments are those who have been approved for either forbearance or deferment, both temporary and most often used during financial hardships. Forbearance allows a temporary pause in payments but does not pause interest accrual. Deferment also allows a temporary payment pause but can also pause interest from accruing – depending upon the type of loans borrowed. Information on these choices, who is eligible and the terms affecting each is available on Federal Student Aid’s website.  
“For a population already managing multiple debt obligations, with little savings and limited cash flow, policy changes that increase payment obligations, narrow repayment options, or resume aggressive collections could not be coming at a worse time”, concluded the Julian Bond Institute brief.
Charlene Crowell is a senior fellow with the Center for Responsible Lending. She can be reached at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

Singing with 'Soul' to Heal America, Ray Charles Led the Nation Forward By Hazel Trice Edney

 June 29, 2026

BlackMusicMonthGraphic

HazelTriceEdney columnheadshot

Ray Charles singing America the Beautiful

Ray Charles sings "America the Beautiful on Oct. 28, 2001 Photo: Screenshot

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - It was Oct. 28, 2001, less than two months after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks on the Pentagon in Virginia and the World Trade Center in New York City. Yankee Stadium was packed with more than 40,000 baseball fans as the second game of the World Series was about to be played – the New York Yankees vs. the Arizona Diamond Backs.

With the deaths of nearly 3,000 people, including 344 New York firefighters weighing heavily on the hearts and minds of Americans across the nation, the atmosphere was somber and pensive as the players lined up, hats over their hearts, and the audience looked on. Then came the voice of the announcer: “Ladies and gentlemen, to honor America with the singing of ‘America the Beautiful’, please welcome the man and his soul, Mr. Ray Charles!”

Charles’ powerful voice and the soul-stirring melody of his masterful piano-playing electrified the stadium. Rocking side to side in his iconic way, he appeared to sing the words with every fiber of his being. Narrating for a moment, he recalled the words of the song from his childhood: “America! America! God shed his grace on thee…He crowned thy good with every brotherhood from sea to shining sea!”

At the end of the song, he invited the audience to sing along. The crescendo, like no other moment in American history; included a huge flag draping the field, a U. S. Airforce four-jet fly over, a sustained standing ovation and cheers that appeared to melt away tensions and even begin the healing of the nation.

Revisiting this scene nearly 25 years later during Black Music Month 2026, it is striking to observe that despite the vastly White audience, it was the blind grandson of formerly enslaved Black people whose singing of his love for America helped to begin the healing of the nation in that historic moment.

Some people may have questioned how the now late Ray Charles could have embraced that moment with such endearment for a nation that had also, less than two months earlier, begrudgingly participated in the World Conference Against Racism in Durban, South Africa. During his career, Charles had personally refused to perform for segregated audiences and described racism and poverty as "two scourges that I have known since early in my life.”

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. used to say, “There can be no great disappointment where there is no great love.”

In Ray Charles’ soulful singing about the “amber waves of grain”, perhaps he was drawing from his knowledge of how this nation was built on the backs of his ancestors toiling in the fields day after day.

Perhaps academic and author Michael Eric Dyson said it best in his book, “Entertaining Race”:

Dr. Dyson wrote, “We have entertained the country with our gifts and used those gifts to entertain the idea of race, indeed, the idea of America, with a redemptive love that is both unquenchable and nearly incomprehensible.

This article is the third in a four-part series powered by AARP in commemoration of Black Music Month, June 2026.

Harvard Housing Report: Persistent Discrimination Burdens Blacks, Other Consumers of Color By Charlene Crowell

June 27, 2026
Black couple reviewing housing opportunities
 
 
 
(TriceEdneyWire.com) - An annual research report, considered by many to be the country’s best barometer on housing issues, makes clear that in 2026, affordability is not the only housing crisis confronting Black America.
The State of the Nation’s Housing 2026, newly released by Harvard’s Joint Center on Housing Studies, makes clear that the financial anxiety nearly all consumers suffer from housing cost burdens is but one of many dimensions to a national crisis affecting consumers, business, and government alike.
Over the past year, the future of fair housing has been the focus of increased advocacy. From federal funding and staff cutbacks to policy reversals, and lawsuits challenging these moves, Blacks and other people of color have sensed that many of the hard-fought battles of the 1960s face extinction.  
 
“The US faces interlocking housing crises—affordability, homelessness, climate change, and discrimination— that demand coordinated action across federal, state, local, private, and nonprofit actors,” states the report. “Discrimination in the housing market persists, but the tools to fight it are deteriorating. Obligations to “affirmatively further fair housing” (AFFH) have been weakened by recent federal rollbacks that replace structured planning requirements with general commitments.”  
During the 2025 government shutdown, about a third of the 300 HUD employees laid off were people who investigated fair housing complaints. Combined with resignations earlier in the year, the remaining fair housing staff is estimated to have decreased by about two-thirds. But over the last 10 years, the number of fair housing complaints has risen 20 percent, according to the National Fair Housing Alliance.
While about one in five (22 percent) of white homeowners are cost burdened – each month spending more than 30 percent of their income on housing - disproportionately higher costs are borne by homeowners who are also people of color. Racially, Black homeowners suffer the largest burden at 32 percent, followed by Latinos (29 percent), Asians (27 percent), and Native American (25 percent).  
The report also found that:
  • For the fifth straight year, the median sales price for an existing single-family home hovered near five times the median household income. Since 2020, home prices have increased by 54 percent nationwide and more than 50 percent in 73 of the nation’s 100 largest markets.
  • Even so, the median age for owner-occupied homes rose to 42 in 2024, compared to 33 years of age in 2010.
These affordability challenges seep into the rental market as well. The median price for newly built units in 2025 was $1,900 per month. Additionally, by the first quarter of 2026, asking rents for professionally managed apartments had risen 29 percent since 2020, outpacing non-housing inflation.
“The existing stock of low-rent housing is shrinking rapidly, and private markets are incapable of producing enough deeply affordable units,” said Alexander Hermann, senior research associate at the Center. “The number of units renting for under $1,000 a month in real terms fell by more than 7 million between 2014 and 2024, while higher-rent units surged. Without significant new subsidies and stronger protections for at-risk properties, we risk losing even more of the limited affordable stock that remains.”
Other factors heighten overall housing costs while diminishing funds for other living needs. For example, the report cites the ICE Mortgage Monitor report for March 2026 that found property taxes rose 31 percent nationwide between 2019 and 2025. Also in 2025, 23 weather and climate-related disasters affected more than 72 million homes nationwide. Additionally, between 2019 and 2025, increased insurance costs added on average $2,412 per year or $201 per month to family budgets.
“Across the country, we see governors, mayors, and local leaders stepping up with creative solutions to expand supply and support vulnerable households,” said Chris Herbert, managing director of the Center. “But these efforts are patchwork and often precariously funded.
“Only the federal government has the scale and staying power necessary to close the gap between what our housing system produces and what our lowest-income households can afford. Without a more robust national response, we risk deepening inequities and entrenching housing instability for millions,” concluded Herbert.
Charlene Crowell is a senior fellow with the Center for Responsible Lending. She can be reached at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it." data-linkindex="3">This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..
 
X