banner2e top

Medical Attitudes Maintain Health Disparities by Julianne Malveaux

By Julianne Malveaux

malveaux

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Anna Brown, a St. Louis-based homeless woman needed treatment for a sprained ankle.  She went to three emergency rooms seeking such treatment.  In the third hospital, St. Mary’s Health Center, Ms. Brown was emphatic about needing care.  Instead she was arrested for trespassing, and died in a jail cell!  Was she ill-treated because she was homeless?  Black?  Broke?  It really doesn’t matter. The fact is that the hospital that failed to treat her may have contributed to her death.

Too many African-American people are treated in emergency rooms, as criminals, not people in need of health services.  After learning of the Anna Brown case, a sisterfriend shared that she had such an extreme anxiety attack that her 10-year-old son called 911.  When she got to the emergency room (with health insurance, thank you), she was queried about her use of drugs and alcohol, not her health condition.  It was only after her blood was tested that she was treated. So she spent four agonizing hours on a hospital bed with raspy breath, a frightened son, and no medical care.

They aren’t the only ones.  African-American and Latino men, with broken bones, are less likely to get pain medication than others.  Even children of color are less likely to receive painkillers than White children, because some physicians think they are faking the level of their pain.  When we look at health disparities and wonder why African-Americans are more likely to have diabetes, high blood pressure, kidney failures, breast cancer, AIDS and then some, one might point to the many ways that doctors, especially those in emergency rooms, signal that Black pain is not worth treating.  The result is that someone who is really hurting chooses to forego medical care instead of dealing with medical condescension and arrogance.

To be sure, and to our society’s shame, emergency rooms often become the health providers of last resort.  Those without a regular physician are stuck going to an emergency room when all else fails.  A cold becomes the flu becomes pneumonia and only when a patient is struggling for breath does she seek treatment in an emergency room.  I can understand a doctor’s frustration because the patient did not deal with her challenges earlier.  But emergency room doctors, well paid, need to do their work without judgmental attitudes getting in their way.

Anna Brown deserved to be treated as a human being.  She deserved to be treated as someone who was struggling with pain.  Instead, she was treated as a criminal because she insisted on care.  Thus, she was accused of trespassing, instead of being treated as someone who was hurting.

While many would describe our society as post-racial that is a specious and inaccurate description of the world in which we live.  Racism muddies the water that we all swim in, and pjysicians are not exempted. Those who swim in muddy water reflect the muddy attitudes that are prevalent in our society. Many doctors consider themselves “culturally sensitive” but they have come to conclusions about poor folks, black folks, and others that they treat.  It is easier to write off a woman like Anna Brown than it is to find out what is really wrong with her.

The Hippocratic oath that physicians swear to says, "first, do no harm.”  From the facts that have been published about Anna Brown though, this homeless 29-year-old mother of two children was harmed by a medical indifference that landed her in a jail cell instead of a hospital bed.  The tragedy is that Anna Brown is not the only one who has been treated this way.

We have health disparities because people are treated differently in our health care system.  We cannot talk about closing gaps without talking about the ways that medical attitudes shape the medical experience for those who are so underserved that they come to emergency rooms for help.  While the jury is out on the ways that Obamacare will reform our health care system, the intent of health care reform is to eliminate tragedies like Anna Brown’s.

Julianne Malveaux is a DC based economist and author.

The Tax Man Cometh After Easter! by Dr. E. Faye Williams

By Dr. E. Faye Williams

williams2

(TriceEdneyWire.com) – As we entered the Easter Season, I reflected on the many lessons I’ve learned from the teachings of Christ.  While most focus solely on The Crucifixion and The Resurrection, I attempted to glean as much guidance as I could from the parables that Jesus used to school His followers and adversaries alike.

This is particularly true of Jesus’ response to the tests posed by the Pharisees.  Asked by a Pharisee whether he could accept being taxed, He famously replied “Give unto Caesar that which is Caesar’s.”  Whatever logic is used to explain it in church, the takeaway of that statement is the understanding that Jesus modeled the requirement for responsible compliance with government laws.

My personal contacts and conversations lead me to believe that most Americans will, if only for the sake of avoiding unpleasantries with the IRS or the Tax Court, pay what is owed when it’s due.  Few let anything short of critical financial difficulties interfere with the payment of their taxes.  Those who fail to pay their taxes do so ONLY because of financial obligations that impact their lives more dramatically than the threat of tax complications.  Those of us with a more progressive frame of reference generally have greater understanding and empathy for fellow citizens who’re unable to pay their full tax obligation.  I would have thought that anyone familiar with our nation’s economy would feel the same.

Contrary to my expectation, Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, apparently believes those citizens who owe overdue income taxes to be miscreants of the worst order – especially those working for the Federal Government.  Chaffetz is so committed to this belief that on March 20, 2013 he introduced the Federal Employee Tax Accountability Act.  "The very least an individual on the federal payroll can do is pay their taxes," Chaffetz said in a press release.  "If you are thumbing your nose up at the American taxpayer by not paying your taxes, you should be fired or not awarded a federal contract."  If his bill becomes law, and you owe taxes and are a federal worker, you could lose your job.

Those owing taxes and seeking government employment would not fare any better.  Chaffetz’ plan would not only direct the firing of federal employees with tax liens, it prohibits hiring those with liens.  The bill requires applicants to certify that they aren’t delinquent in their taxes.  Federal employers will be responsible for reviewing public records to determine if employees or applicants have active tax liens.

The Washington Post reports that 98,000 government workers owe $1.03 billion in unpaid taxes.  On its face, Chaffetz’ plan seems to address a serious problem.  Fairness would dictate that those who owe have the responsibility to pay.  Unfortunately, rather than encouraging payment, the immediate effect of such a law would be to reduce the ability of large numbers of taxpayers to pay what they owe.

Often “obvious” facts can also present an alternate picture that more accurately reflects the feasibility of remedies.  Looking closer, I would suggest that annual subsidies to oil/energy companies, estimated from $10 billion to $52 billion (Environmental Law Institute) have a far greater impact on our national bottom-line than the $1.03 billion owed by hard working government employees struggling to maintain an adequate quality of life.

From Resurrection Sunday (Easter), we are15 days away from Tax Day when we have to “give unto Caesar.”  We do so with the reminder from Rep. Chaffetz that, under the Republican agenda, the least of us will be held accountable for paying a disproportionate amount of the national bill while the wealthy will continue to receive the untaxed opportunity for greater enrichment.  That type of reminder gives new meaning to the word Crucifixion.  Don’t forget to tell Mr.Chaffetz that.

Facebook’s COO Ignites Needed Conversation About Empowerment of Women

To Be Equal
By Marc Morial
marcmorial
(TriceEdneyWire.com) - “So please ask yourself: What would I do if I weren’t afraid? And then go do it.” Sheryl Sandberg

In a stroke of marketing genius befitting the Chief Operating Officer of the social media phenomenon, Facebook, Sheryl Sandberg chose Women’s History Month to launch her new book, Lean In, and begin a national dialogue about “Women, Work and the Will to Lead.” Ruth Standish Baldwin was a co-founder of the National Urban League more than a century ago and the inclusion and empowerment of women has been one of our most important priorities. Today, Former Labor Secretary Alexis Herman serves as Senior Vice Chair on our Board, and almost half of our 95 local Affiliate CEOs are women.  For that reason, we applaud Ms. Sandberg for her new book and are proud to join in the conversation.

We all know that historic barriers of gender discrimination, as well as the responsibilities of bearing and caring for children have made it more difficult for women to balance work and family. But Sandberg contends that women too often “hold ourselves back in ways big and small, by lacking self-confidence, by not raising our hands, and by pulling back when we should be leaning in.” Lean In appears to be written by and for women for whom the path to executive leadership has always been a realistic, if somewhat difficult, journey. But the book has sparked another conversation in Black America about how women of color have always had to “lean in” to overcome the dual hurdles of racial and gender bias.

Consider how Harriet Tubman leaned into the face of death to lead a thousand slaves to freedom on the Underground Railroad. Or how Sojourner Truth stood up and boldly asked “Ain’t I a woman” at the 1851 Ohio Women’s Rights Convention. Consider how Fannie Lou Hamer who was “sick and tired of being sick and tired,” fought for African American voting rights as an organizer of the 1964 Mississippi Freedom Summer and Vice Chair of the Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party. Or how a quiet seamstress named Rosa Parks, leaned in, sat down on a bus and lit the fuse of the civil rights movement.

Decrying the lack of women at the top of corporate America, Sandberg does admit that, “The gap is even worse for women of color, who hold just 4 percent of top corporate jobs, 3 percent of board seats and 5 percent of congressional seats.” But, with rising numbers of black women in college, preparing themselves for successful careers, clearly a lack of drive or ambition is not the problem.

Lean In urges women to “Sit at the Table,” “Seek and Speak Your Truth,” “Don’t Leave Before You Leave,” and “Make Your Partner a Real Partner.” These recommendations present a road map of success that has obviously worked for Sheryl Sandberg. But, it is largely the lack of support, the pressures of single parenthood, and systemic racial and gender discrimination that continue to keep women of color from getting a foot in the corporate door. The empowerment of all women depends on closing the wage gap, protecting women’s reproductive rights, providing greater workplace flexibility, having more women in non-traditional professions like science and engineering, and supporting common sense measures like the Violence Against Women Act which was reauthorized and signed into law by President Obama last week.

If men and women lean in together, we can foster gender equity and a better America.

A Year Later, Trayvon Martin Tragedy Still Stings by Benjamin Todd Jealous

March 31, 2013

 

benjaminjealous

By Benjamin Todd Jealous

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - One year later, the Trayvon Martin tragedy still stings - and some people are still throwing salt on the open wound. Last week George Zimmerman's brother, Robert Zimmerman, posted a tweet comparing Trayvon Martin to De'Marquis Elkins, 17-year-old black teenager charged with fatally shooting a one-year-old baby.

The tweet showed a photo of Elkins side by side with a photo of Martin, both making inappropriate gestures, with the caption "A picture speaks a thousand words. Any questions?"

Zimmerman's follow-up tweet read "Lib[eral] media [should] ask if what these [two] black teens did [to] a [woman and her baby] is the reason [people] think blacks might [be] risky". The implication was that Trayvon Martin's actions on the night he was murdered were equivalent to the killing of an innocent child.

This would be worrisome enough if it were just the opportunistic cry of a family embroiled in racial controversy. But this belief - that male "black teens" are inherently more likely to be criminals - is ingrained in our society. It has seeped into our institutions in the form of racial profiling, and too often it poisons the judgment of those who are supposed to protect us.

Last year I visited Sanford, Florida in the wake of the Trayvon Martin case. The NAACP hosted a forum where residents could report incidents of police abuse. A number of African American mothers alleged that their teenage sons had been profiled, abused or even assaulted by the police. I found that the attitude of the local police department toward "black teens" was uncomfortably similar to that of Robert Zimmerman.

But the fact is that fifty years after the Civil Rights Act, racial bias still runs rampant among law enforcement in this country. And Zimmerman's attitude infects an institution much more influential than the Sanford Police Department: the NYPD.

The New York Police Department is currently fighting a class-action lawsuit against their racially biased practice of "stop-and-frisk" policing. Stop-and-frisk allows officers to stop, question and physically search any individual they consider suspicious. In 2011 NYPD officers stopped nearly 800,000 people for alleged "suspicious activity". Nine out of ten were innocent, 99 percent did not have a gun - and nine out of ten were black or Latino.

The most revealing tidbit to come out of the class-action trial is a secretly recorded conversation between a deputy inspector and a police officer. The inspector is discussing a high-crime neighborhood, and he can be heard telling his patrolman: "The problem was, what, male blacks... And I told you at roll call, and I have no problem telling you this, male blacks 14 to 20, 21." In other words: stop more young black boys.

Other evidence indicates that patrolmen may be encouraged to meet arrest quotas. A tape played at the trial reveals a supervising officer asking for "more 250s" - or more stop-and-frisk forms. One plaintiff, a police officer, testified about the pressure he felt from supervisors - "they were very clear, it's non-negotiable, you're gonna do it, or you're gonna become a Pizza Hut delivery man."

A picture may speak a thousand words, but leaked recordings speak volumes about an institution's priorities. These tapes reveal that the NYPD has effectively placed a bounty on "black teens". By profiling young teens of color, they are using the same grisly logic as Robert Zimmerman.  And the result is apparent: in 2011, black and Latino men between the ages of 14 and 24 made up 42 percent of those targeted by stop-and-frisk. That group makes up less than 5 percent of the city's population.

The crime attributed to De'Marquis Elkins' was truly horrific and despicable. But Elkins does not represent an entire demographic, just like Adam Lanza did not act on behalf of all young white men. Racial profiling punishes innocent individuals for the past actions of those who look and sound like them. It misdirects crucial resources and undercuts the trust needed between law enforcement and the communities they serve. It has no place in our national discourse, and no place in our nation's police departments.

Ben Jealous is President/CEO of the NAACP.

More Youth Priced Out of College

By Rev. Jesse Jackson Sr. 

Jesse3

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Morehouse College, one of the most distinguished historically black colleges — with graduates like Dr. Martin Luther King, former Atlanta Mayor Maynard Jackson, film director Spike Lee and others — literally shut down for spring break this week. As its 2,000 students took their break, every member of the faculty and staff was furloughed without pay as the college struggles to balance its books.

The crisis at Morehouse, which will hit other historically black colleges and universities (HBCUs) even harder, results from the combination of foul economic times and continued cuts in support for students and colleges at the federal and state level.

African-Americans have dramatically less wealth than white families. To pay for advanced education, students piece together grants, work, family contributions and loans. Morehouse lost 200 students, part of 10,000 students in HBCUs affected, when the Department of Education suddenly tightened eligibility requirements for Parent Plus Loans that lend to eligible parents to help pay for their children’s college costs. The average Plus loan at Morehouse was $22,000 in 2010-11. Add to that the fact that college costs are rising, while the level of Pell grants is not, and colleges and faculties will be hit by the across-the-board “sequester” cuts at the federal level.

Morehouse is like the canary in the mine — an early warning signal. Student loan debt now exceeds $1 trillion dollars, greater than credit card debt. A quarter of African-Americans graduate with debt over $30,000, along with 16 percent of white students. Student debt can’t be erased in bankruptcy, or because of loss of a job.

About half of college graduates are unemployed or underemployed. In worse shape are the 30 percent of college students with loans who fail to graduate, often because they can’t afford to continue. Student loans can be deferred, meaning that no payments are due, but the interest keeps building up. Eventually, they must be paid back, although defaults are rising.

Burdened with debt, graduates find it hard to pay for a car, a place to live and health care. They find it virtually impossible to save anything for the future.

President Obama understands that educating the next generation is vital to this country’s future. In his first address to Congress, he pledged that “by 2020, America will once again have the highest proportion of college graduates in the world.” He then signed into law the largest increase in student aid since the GI Bill at the end of World War II.

But since then, rising college costs and declining federal and state support have pushed more costs onto students and their parents. Advanced education or training is increasingly imperative and unaffordable.

We will pay far more in the future for failing to educate this rising generation than we will save in cutting support for them. We need a National Commission on College Affordability to review the rising costs of and the declining support for colleges and advanced training programs. It should recommend how the rise in college costs can be slowed and how to ensure that students are not priced out of the education they need nor condemned to debt servitude to get it.

That good students are forced to drop out of a distinguished school like Morehouse because they can’t afford it is a warning sign. The furlough of Morehouse employees is a wake-up call. We need action before good schools fail and more good students are locked out

X