banner2e top

Black Women and Pay Equity: At the Margin Again by Julianne Malveaux

April 14, 2014

Black Women and Pay Equity: At the Margin Again
By Julianne Malveaux

malveaux

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - When John and Ann started working on January 1, 2013, John had something of an advantage.  Because women earn 77 cents for every dollar John earns, it will take Ann until April 11, 2014 to earn the same amount of money that John earned in the calendar year of 2013.   The issue of unequal pay is so pressing that President John F. Kennedy signed the Equal Pay Act 50 years ago.  While we have "come a long way, baby", the pay gap has remained stubborn.  This is why President Obama signed the Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Restoration Act as soon as he assumed office.

This year, to commemorate National Equal Pay Day (that’s the day Ann finally earns as much as John), the President signed an Executive Order protecting workers from retaliation when they speak of unequal pay in the workplace  (one of the ways employers can maintain unequal pay is to make discussing pay grounds for firing).  The President, through the Secretary of Labor, is also requiring federal contractors to provide data on pay, race, and gender to ensure that employers are fairly paid.   Furthermore, the Senate is considering the Paycheck Fairness Act, which may pass the Senate, but not the House of Representatives.

We know all about John and Ann, but what about Tamika?  If women earn 77 percent of what men earn, what about an African-American woman.  Women surely have come a long way, but some are moving far more slowly than others.  How many African American women are there in the Senate?  Among Fortune 500 leaders?  In other positions of power?  What about pay?  African-American women earn about three quarters of what other women earn, meaning that if it takes Ann until April 11 to catch up with John, It will take Tamika until about June 1 (or about another 6 weeks) to catch up. Tamika earns in 18 months what Tom earns in 12 months.

Even African American women with the highest levels of education experience these differences.  White men with a postgraduate degree earns a median salary of $1666 a week African-American women earn a median salary of $1000 during the same time period.  For all the talk of pay equity and paycheck fairness, the status of African American women is largely ignored.

It wouldn’t take much for the President, or some of those feminist groups who support paycheck fairness to throw in a line or two about African-American women.  Nor would it hurt African-American organizations, especially those who serve black women, to point out this injustice.  Are African-Americans invisible?  Don’t we count?  African American women raise the majority of our children, and shoulder many of the challenges in the African American community.  Ignoring us in a conversation about unequal pay simply marginalizes our experiences and us.

The focus on “overall” data is yet another way of marginalizing not only African-American women, but other women and men of color as well.   Reporting aggregate data gives some notion of economic progress.  Reporting data as it pertains to African-American women and men makes it clear, for example, that African-Americans experience depression-level unemployment rates.

I was delighted that President Obama signed the Lily Ledbetter Act when he did, and have been privileged to hear Ledbetter speak on more than one occasion.  She is an amazing woman with a talent for “breaking it down”.  When she learned

that men doing the same job she did earned more money, she cried “foul” but the law said it was “too late” for her to complain.  In her inimitable way, she said that grocers did not charge her less money because she was female, nor did doctors, or anyone else.  She said that higher-paid men didn’t have to make uncomfortable choices about which child would get new shoes or clothes.

African-American women can tell the same story as Lily Ledbetter.  Indeed, the gaps African-American women are likely to be more severe than the ones Lily Ledbetter faced.  The pay gap for African-Americans is larger and too many live in food deserts where the cost of food is higher even as the quality is lower.

Lily Ledbetter deserves the limelight she earned because she brought this matter to the President’s attention.  There’s a Black woman out there who can tell a similar story.  She, too, needs to be lifted up.  We ought to know her name, see her name on a piece of legislation.  Ledbetter is an ordinary shero, a working class woman who stood up for her rights.  She reminds us that, in the words of Dr. Martin Luther King, “you don’t have to be great to serve”.  We need a similar sister to remind us that we don’t have to be elected, appointed, or anointed to make a difference.

When African-American women are marginalized so are our girls.  They are left with the impression that we have not fought for our rights. We’ve been fighting and fighting, but somehow the story of a sister struggling is too unremarkable to be noted by the media.

Race and gender continue to shape the opportunities that African-American women have, and race and gender continue to marginalize us Black women.  When do African-American women have equal visibility in the policy and imagery arena?  When we demand it, when we stop applauding at our own marginalization!

The Ryan Budget Is a Path to Economic Disaster by Marc H. Morial

To Be Equal

The Ryan Budget Is a Path to Economic Disaster
By Marc H. Morial

marcmorial

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - “Affluent Americans would do quite well.  But for tens of millions of others, the Ryan plan is a path to more adversity.” Robert Greenstein, president of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

In the same week that we marked the 46th anniversary of the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and learned that 7.1 million Americans had enrolled in the Affordable Care Act, House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan introduced a draconian 2015 budget plan that increases military spending through 2024 by $483 billion – to pre-sequester levels, yet cuts non-defense spending by $791 billion.  This illogical plan proposes to repeal the Affordable Care Act, end Medicare as we know it, and slash critical safety-net programs, including the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (or SNAP – formerly food stamps), Head Start and Pell Grants.  It is ironic that a plan called the “Path to Prosperity” is nothing more than a path to political grandstanding and partisanship that has no place among constructive efforts focused on real prosperity for all Americans – not a select few.

At a time when Americans are looking to Washington for solutions to the problems of income inequality and the ever-increasing Great Divide, the Ryan budget goes in the opposite direction.  Rather than closing the gaps, it exacerbates the problems by raising taxes an average of $2000 for middle-class families with children, according to the Office of Management and Budget, while giving the wealthiest taxpayers a break by lowering their taxes from 39.6 percent to 25 percent.  The Economic Policy Institute (EPI) estimates that the “prosperity proposal" would result in the loss of three million jobs over the next couple of years, thereby reversing the gradual upward trend in job creation.  In short, the Ryan budget, while not surprising in its familiar ideology or fanciful push towards austerity, represents the height of irresponsibility and is a blueprint for disaster for millions of hard-working Americans.  It has immediately, and rightfully, drawn widespread condemnation.

Ethan Pollack, Senior Policy Analyst with the non-partisan Economic Policy Institute concluded that much like the budget Ryan proposed last year, this one burdens seniors, the disabled, and children – while cutting taxes for the rich.  “Tax cuts for people who don’t need them and economic insecurity for everyone else is grossly irresponsible budget and economic policy,” he added.

The non-profit Center on Budget and Policy Priorities reports that “Some 69 percent of the cuts in House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan’s new budget would come from programs that serve people of limited means.  These disproportionate cuts…contrast sharply with the budget’s rhetoric about helping the poor and promoting opportunity.”

The Center for American Progress called Ryan's plan "the same conservative, top-down policies that have failed the nation's middle and working-class families, seniors, and the economy," while the New York Times called it “Destructive to the country’s future.”

Thankfully, spending for the next two years was set by the budget agreement passed in the Senate and the House and signed by President Obama in December 2013.  So it is unlikely that the Ryan budget will become law in the short-term or is for anything more than show.  Nonetheless, it is a dangerous “vision” for our nation.  The National Urban League strongly rejects this budget because of its likely destructive impact on employment, the economy and poverty.  We urge Paul Ryan and his colleagues to drop this plan and get serious about developing a responsible budget that does not depend on hurting millions of working and middle-class Americans to benefit the richest few.

I would expect that Rep. Ryan would be more conscious of the critical need to accomplish this, especially as this year’s State of Black America® report and the new Black-White Metropolitan Equality Index™ finds that three of the five least equal cities in America for unemployment and two of the five least equal cities for income are in his home state of Wisconsin (Minneapolis, Milwaukee, and Madison; and Milwaukee and Minneapolis, respectively).  With an equality index of 23.8 percent (on a 100-point scale), Madison ranked at the bottom for Black-white unemployment (18.5% vs. 4.4%).  With an equality index of 40.3 percent, Minneapolis ranked at the bottom for Black-white median household income ($28,784 vs. $71,376).

The night before Dr. King’s April 4, 1968 assassination, he said:

“The question is not, if I stop to help this man in need, what will happen to me? The question is, if I do not stop to help the sanitation workers, what will happen to them?…Let us move on in these powerful days, these days of challenge to make America what it ought to be. We have an opportunity to make America a better nation.”

We can start now by stopping the Ryan budget – and even more importantly, stopping its budget-cutting fever that threatens the economic health and recovery of our nation.

NNPA Foundation Honors Charles Tisdale and Paul Redd During Black Press Week

April 13, 2014

NNPA Foundation Honors Charles Tisdale and Paul Redd during Black Press Week

charles  tisdale
Charles Tisdale
paul redd
Paul Redd

Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from Target Market News

(TriceEdneyWire.com) The National Newspaper Publishers Association Foundation has inducted publishers Charles Tisdale of the Jackson Advocate and M. Paul Redd of the Westchester County Press into its Gallery of Distinguished Black Publishers. The ceremony took place at the NNPAF's annual Black Press Week activities in Washington, D.C. last  month.

Charles Tisdale was much more than a publisher and radio show host. He was a civil rights advocate clothed as a newspaper publisher. His genuine concern about the welfare of all Jackson, MS, citizens led to his outspokenness about both black and white elected officials. Backlash often resulted in personal death threats and brutality against his publication, which was firebombed on more than one occasion. As host of a radio talk show on WMPR, Tisdale often took elected officials to task for not effectively serving their communities.

Tisdale purchased the Jackson Advocate in 1978 from Percy Green, the newspaper's first owner. The Jackson Advocate is the oldest Black-owned newspaper in Mississippi. Born November 5, 1926, the Athens, AL, native died on July 8, 2007 while undergoing dialysis.

Westchester County Press publisher, Paul Redd's passion for eradicating racism and bigotry inspired many to pursue careers in public service. He made such a powerful impact in the region that on January 9, 2009, Mayor Clinton Young, Jr. declared a day of mourning and remembrance in the City of Mount Vernon, NY to pay homage to the life and legacy of Redd.

His "M. Paul Tells All" column reminded Hudson Valley readers of Redd's "tell-it-like it-is" persona and candidness. His vision was to see others achieve the American Dream. Redd was born on August 11, 1928 in Martinsville, VA. He died of complications from a massive heart attack in 2009.

With the theme "Access to Economic Empowerment," the enshrinement ceremony memorializing Tisdale and Redd was part of several planned Black Press Week. Other activities included a State of the Black Press Luncheon at the National Press Club; a special Black Press & The Pulpit breakfast and a visit to the White House.

FAMU Becomes Partner in Creation of Black TV News Channel

April 13, 2014

FAMU Becomes Partner in Creation of Black TV News Channel

jc watts
Former Congressman J. C. Watts

Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from Target Market News

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Florida A&M University, one of the nation's Historically Black Colleges and Universities, has signed on to a partnership with the Black Television News Channel (BTNC) making the university home to the nation's only Black-owned cable news network.

The network will be operated and managed at the School of Journalism and Graphic Communications building by co-founding partners: former U.S. Congressman J.C. Watts; Robert "Bob" Brillante, a 30-year cable TV veteran and founder of Florida's News Channel; Frank Watson, a 30-year broadcast industry veteran; former U.S. House of Representatives Budget Director Steve Pruitt and Evan Leo, a Washington D.C. telecommunications and regulatory attorney.

The signing of the agreement is the culmination of years of planning by Watts and his partners. The 11-year contractual partnership was agreed to by FAMU's Board of Trustees earlier this month. Through the partnership, BTNC will return up to $500,000 annually to FAMU for the first three years of the network's operation and $1 million for each of the seven years remaining in the contract. The first year of the partnership will be dedicated to renovating, upgrading and installing equipment in the SJGC building, with a total price tag of $10 million. The channel is expected to begin operations in 2015.

"We're excited to be among the energy of the youth on this campus. Thank you to the FAMU family for embracing us and the idea of a 24-hour news channel that is culturally specific," said Watts. "The world only gets a sliver of who the Black community is today. We look forward to telling that story."

SJGC Dean Ann W. Kimbrough, DBA, said the contract positions FAMU to be on the cutting-edge in training future multimedia professionals. BTNC will serve as an independent manager of the school's course of study in network broadcasting and operations. FAMU students will hone their crafts through first-hand [experience] while utilizing the latest digital broadcasting technology and systems.

"We are excited about this visionary opportunity that connects our mission with that of the Black Television News Channel's goals," said Kimbrough. "This is not a singular opportunity. We see it as a multidisciplinary opportunity for our students, alumni and faculty."

FAMU presently broadcasts the student-run News 20 at Five, Monday-Thursday at 5:00 p.m. over FAMU-TV 20 the university's educational access UHF channel. FAMU-TV 20 is carried via cable television by Comcast to more than 80,000 households in North Florida and South Georgia. The news channel will be staffed with working professionals.

BTNC had earlier struck an agreement with Comcast that would carry the news channel in seven of the 10 top African American markets: Chicago, Philadelphia, Atlanta, Washington, Baltimore, Detroit and Miami.

In addition to upgrading the campus television studio to house the network, BTNC and SJGC are partnering with electronics giant SONY for state-of-the-art equipment. The building will include a network operation center, additional studio facilities, teleport(s), mobile ENG infrastructure and an automated newsroom.

VisualiZation Real Time (VizRT), an international producer of content production equipment for digital media will outfit the production area with advanced virtual reality television production assets. Other BTNC partners include: WorldLink Ventures, a global provider of multi-platform sales; financial partners Inkbridge, LLC; Enterprise Florida and the City of Tallahassee Economic Development Council.

Black Capitalism – Fulfillment or Failure? By James Clingman

April 7, 2014

Blackonomics

Black Capitalism – Fulfillment or Failure?
By James Clingman   

clingman                                               

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - In light of what most of us know about the economy and where Black people fit, mostly as consumers rather than producers, a discussion of Black Capitalism is in order.  The term was promoted by Stokley Carmichael in 1966 as part of the “Black Power” movement, but came into vogue in 1968 when the Nixon administration adopted it from a proposal by Robert Kennedy.  Black Capitalism originally called for loan assistance, credit guarantees, and technical assistance for Black owned businesses in an effort to stimulate economic development in the ghettos.

Black Entrepreneurship in America, by Shelly Green and Paul Pryde, cites, “[Black capitalism] constituted a movement by Blacks to gain control over the business development of their own communities…Directing business growth in the Black community was considered the first step toward  achieving a powerful Black economic presence in the larger American economy.  [It] called for a new kind of social contract among racial groups in America—one based on mutual self-interest rather than integration.”

Andrew Brimmer, noted economist and Lyndon Johnson appointee to the Federal Reserve Board, had a different perspective on Black Capitalism.  In the book, A Different Vision: African American Economic Thought, edited by Economist, Thomas Boston, Brimmer wrote, “…the strategy of Black capitalism offers a very limited potential for economic advancement for the majority of the Black population.”

In support of his contention, Brimmer posited, “The ghetto economy…does not appear to provide profitable opportunities for large scale business investment.”  He noted a large part of the problem was due to “a tendency for affluent Blacks to shop in the more diverse national economy.”

Brimmer suggested that Black Capitalism fails because it is founded on the premise of self-employment, as opposed to employment in salaried positions where the rewards are greater and the risks are much lower.  (That reality gives credence to Thomas Boston’s “20 by 10” strategy of Black businesses hiring Black employees.)  Brimmer suggested that Black Capitalism “may retard Blacks’ economic advancement by discouraging many from the full participation in the national economy…”  His position assumed that corporations would hire Blacks; but his concern about the greatest risk being placed on those who can least afford to take risks is quite valid.  We have several examples of that reality in Black businesses today.

Has Black Capitalism worked?  Is it working?  One thing is certain: Korean Capitalism is working. They control the Black hair care market via their stores in the ghettos, where Black folks are their only customers; and Koreans hire their own people as well.  This is a great example of how “segmented” capitalism can and does work.

Economist, Milton Friedman said, “History suggests only that capitalism is a necessary condition for political freedom [since many nations can be identified that have] economic arrangements that are fundamentally capitalist and political arrangements that are not free.”

History Professor, Dr. Juliet E.K. Walker, wrote, “The existence of Black entrepreneurship… provides an example of an economic arrangement in this nation’s antebellum free enterprise system that was fundamentally capitalistic, but within which some of the capitalists, the African Americans, were not fundamentally free.”

The problem with Black Capitalism is structural inequity due to a paucity of government support.  Just as the government has subsidized large corporations, it should do the same for Black businesses.  The International Journal of Humanities and Social Science (November 2012) carried a paper written by Ryan Very, titled, Black Capitalism: An Economic Program for the Black American Ghetto, in which Mr. Very made a good case for government support of Black Capitalism.

Here is the Abstract from that paper: “The American federal government supported the creation and expansion of economically depressed urban residential areas where blacks live in segregation from whites. These ghettos face barriers to economic development including high unemployment, a low wage labor market, capital drain, and market dualism. Three popular ghetto economic development strategies are ghetto dispersal, corporate branch planting, and black capitalism. Black capitalism breaks the ghetto’s economic barriers better than ghetto dispersal and corporate branch planting, but it will only be possible with significant support from whites and the federal government.”  In other words, the government caused the problem, and the government should fix it.

Mr. Very continued, “Black access to capital coupled with subsidized entrepreneurial training services would…allow more residents to start their own potentially successful businesses in the ghetto. With a sizeable government subsidy, ghetto residents could even build manufacturing plants. If ghetto residents would export enough manufactured goods, both the drain of capital and the (neighborhood) trade deficit would decrease.”

Until Blacks understand our economic and political positions in this country, we will continue to languish in what Dr. Ron Daniels calls, the “Dark Ghettos” of either or, and we will never move to the land of both and.

X