banner2e top

Lynch Supporters Lobby Senate Intensely This Week by James Wright

March 16, 2015


Lynch Supporters Lobby Senate Intensely This Week
By James Wright
loretta lynch
Attorney General Nominee Loretta Lynch
Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from the Afro American Newspaper

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - African-American and civil rights organizations are in full lobbying mode to push for the confirmation of Loretta Lynch to be the nation’s next attorney general.

The NAACP, in conjunction with the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights (LCCR) and a number of other rights organizations, set up a toll free number, 1-866-338-5720 that their members could use on March 11 and March 12, known as “Call-In Days,” to contact U.S. senators to vote to confirm Lynch soon. Lynch’s nomination has been stalled for months, inciting pro-civil rights activists and politicians to press the Senate to proceed with the confirmation process.

It has been widely reported in the media that the Lynch vote will take place during the week that starts on March 16, though no specific date has been given at this time. Still, pro-Lynch organizations are moving forward with their lobbying efforts.

“The U.S. Senate may delay a vote beyond this week; and that’s completely unacceptable,” an “Action Alert” e-mail sent by the LCCR to its members recently stated. “Loretta Lynch, if confirmed, would be the first African-American woman attorney general. With a historic vote on the line for a highly qualified candidate, we must tell senators not to put politics ahead of progress.”

Hilary Shelton, the NAACP’s Washington bureau chief and senior vice president for policy and advocacy, said that in addition to coordinating with LCCR, his organization is making sure that its membership is “activated, educated and engaged” in the Lynch process.

On Feb. 26, Lynch’s nomination was sent to the Senate floor by the Senate Judiciary Committee by a 12-8 vote. All of the Democrats on the committee supported her nomination and three Republicans, Sens. Orrin Hatch (Utah), Lindsey Graham (S.C.), Jeff Flake (Ariz.) voted for her also.

Shelton noted that NAACP members from North Carolina were coming to Washington to lobby that state’s two senators, Thom Tillis (R) and Richard Burr (R) to support Lynch. Tillis voted against Lynch in the Judiciary Committee and Burr has sent out signals that he plans to do the same.

Lynch, the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York, is a native of North Carolina with many family members who still reside there.

Shelton said that he has urged NAACP members to contact their senators through the U.S. Capitol switchboard numbers. He stressed those senators who didn’t vote for Lynch in the Judiciary Committee should continue to be lobbied for support.

“It’s possible for some committee members to change their vote to support Lynch on the Senate floor,” he said.

Thelma Daley, a past president of Delta Sigma Theta, said her fellow members had their “Call-In Day” on March 10 from 8 a.m.-12 p.m. But, the organization’s leaders urged members to contact their senators to support Lynch even after March 10. Lynch is a Delta.

“We are sticking with it,” Daley said. “We are not giving up.”

Funeral Services for Another Unarmed Black Teen Killed by Police By Frederick H. Lowe

March 16, 2015

Funeral Services for Another Unarmed Black Teen Killed by Police
By Frederick H. Lowe
robinson tony terrell

More than 1,000 people attended the funeral  on Saturday of Tony Terrell Robinson Jr.  
Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from NorthStarNewsToday.com
(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Tony Terrell Robinson Jr., 19, was shot in the head, torso and right upper arm by Madison, Wisc. police officer, Matt Kenny, who had been involved and cleared in a 2007 deadly shooting.
Barry E. Irmen, director of operations for the Dane County Medical Examiner, wrote in a news release to NorthStar News Today and BlackmansStreet.Today that Robinson died from firearm-related trauma. His death is under investigation by the State of Wisconsin Division of Criminal Investigation, Madison Police Department and the Dane County Medical Examiner’s Office.
Robinson’s friends called police saying that he was acting erratically, jumping in and out of traffic and that he attempted to strangle someone. Initial police radio reports said Robinson had a gun. He ran into an apartment leased to two friends. Police received a 911 call, reporting a man with a gun, and Kenny responded.
The Guardian newspaper reported that Robinson suffered from severe depression, anxiety disorder and ADHD. Kenny broke down a door to the apartment and a confrontation ensued, leading to the deadly shooting, Kenny claimed. He is now on paid administrative leave.
Robinson’s death sparked days of demonstrations by people holding up signs that read “Black Lives Matter.” Sometimes the demonstrations attracted 1,000 people at city hall in Wisconsin’s capital city.
Robinson’s funeral was held at East High School in Madison on Saturday, March 14. More then 1,000 attended. Similar demonstrations were held after the police shooting death of an unarmed Michael Brown. Ferguson, Mo., police officer Darren Wilson shot and killed Brown on August 9, 2014. Wilson, who was cleared of murder charges related to Brown, 18, has since left the force.

Racism in the North Hurt me as Much as Racism in the South By Rev. Dr. Barbara Reynolds

March 15, 2015

Racism in the North Hurt me as Much as Racism in the South
By Rev. Dr. Barbara Reynolds

barbarareynoldsheadshot

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - On March 7, 1965, before my grandmother could quickly change the channel from the evening news, I caught a glimpse of White men on horseback in Selma, Ala., beating people who looked like me. Astonished, I turned to my grandmother: “Why?” She shrugged and changed the subject.

As a Black student from Ohio, I had never seen brutal racism or thought much about skin color. My relatives and teachers protected me from the painful realities of racial hatred. It wasn’t uncommon for adults to keep secret the stories of our agonizing past — slavery, Jim Crow, legal injustice and Southern terror — fearing it would make children feel either inferior or rebellious enough to stir up unnecessary trouble. My parents voted and owned property; my history books presented sanitized versions of history; and the police officer who visited my school was always friendly. The sheltering was an effort to put the past behind us. Even amid the horrifying images from Edmund Pettus Bridge, the adults around me wouldn’t provide answers. In frustration, I decided to head south to find out for myself.

I joined an integrated group of students from Ohio State University, where I was a freshman, going south to meet Dr. Martin Luther King. Jr., who was leading the drive for voting rights. I thrust myself into the world of Jim Crow, naïve to the murderous vigilantism that enforced the rules of segregation. But white Southerners weren’t the only ones who would shatter my wall of innocence. Black Southerners distanced themselves from our cause, uninterested in stirring a pot that they knew could easily boil over with racial violence. And one of the biggest shocks came after I returned to Ohio. As I headed south with my friends in a pea-green jalopy, I did not know that, upon returning home, the emotional pain of Northern racism would wound as deeply as the threats of physical harm in the South.

Most of the students in our group had never ventured far from Ohio, so we proudly told our friends that we were going south to be with Dr. King, as though when we crossed the Mason-Dixon line he would be standing there with out-stretched arms. Instead of heading for Selma, however, our team leaders answered an invitation to aid a church group who needed volunteers for a May voter registration drive in Brownsville, Tenn.

We arrived on a Saturday, just before sundown. The Black churchgoers who hosted us sternly warned not to venture out after dark.  But we had a better idea. On the way, we had seen a flashing neon light advertising a local bar.  As soon as our hosts had gone to bed, we sneaked out to drink beer and pass the night dancing the Funky Chicken. We walked into the bar laughing and joking: three guys – one Black, one White, and one Hispanic – two blond White girls, and me. We headed to the jukebox in the corner, but just as a nickel was inserted to get things rolling, a white man with a strange drawl snatched the plug out of the wall. “Get them niggahs,” he hollered.

We bolted through the door so fast that I didn’t feel my feet touch the ground. One of the guys in our group lifted me and threw me in the car, barely waiting for the door to close before taking off. The friend we had ribbed for having a souped-up car with large racing wheels was now a hero. The men chasing us in pickup trucks could not catch us.
Advertisement

The next morning, our hosts – unaware of our encounter at the bar – warned us never to go out in an integrated group because the KKK was active in town. It was the first time I ever encountered the notion that being the wrong color could get you killed, and that some police officers shouldn’t be trusted. At my first protest march, when white cops with dogs arrived and ordered us to disperse, I was the only one who broke ranks. Accustomed to obeying authority figures, I am ashamed to admit that I ran and hid out of fear, and watched my colleagues get arrested from the back of a truck.


During our two weeks in Brownsville, we gave speeches about voting rights in Black barber shops and beauty salons, encouraging locals to register to vote. Initially, we were puzzled by their indifference. They would stare at us, occasionally give a polite nod, but generally show little interest in what we had to say. We didn’t understand why we – already free to easily access the ballot box — were more excited about the impending Voting Rights Act than the people who stood to gain from it most. Little did we know that 25 years earlier, when members of the newly formed Brownsville NAACP had attempted to register to vote, a white mob had murdered the local NAACP secretary, Elbert Williams, and drove the other NAACP members out of town. Black people courageous enough to register ran the risk of being killed, thrown off their land or having their homes burned down.

A week into our trip, we learned we were considered Northern trouble-makers and we had landed in a danger zone for which we were completely unprepared. One night after church, a group of white locals set up a roadblock to trap us, a tactic that had led to beatings and even deaths of other activists in the South. Once again, our fast jalopy saved us, breaking through the barrier. But our nerves were frazzled.  That was when I began having nightmares about men on horseback, like the ones in Selma I saw on the TV, circling our homes and shooting us as we ran. Fortunately one student had the foresight to bring bottles of Nervine, a tonic advertised on TV claiming to calm down jumpy nerves. It worked just as well as the alcohol we were ordered not to bring.

After two weeks of heart-throbbing anxiety, I was elated to return home to our familiar Northern environs. But I quickly discovered that what was on the other side of the Mason-Dixon line was no safe haven. While the racism of the South had rattled my nerves, racism in the North would bruise my soul. Soon after we returned from Brownsville, I called a White friend who had shared a room and a bottle of Nervine with me during our trip, and announced I was coming over to visit. There was a pause and then she said, “We don’t allow coloreds in our sorority house.” I was crestfallen.  Down South she was my friend; up North, a stranger.

My experience in the South inspired me to write my first newspaper story, which would lead to a life-long career. I shared the discovery of my newfound passion with the dean of the journalism department, hoping to receive advice and encouragement. Instead, without a second thought, he told me that I shouldn’t bother pursuing a career in journalism – a colored woman would never make it as a reporter. These encounters seemed more characteristic of the small Southern town I had fled than the Northern city I had grown up in. During my childhood, I had been blinded to the bigotry silently affecting my experience.

I learned that just because racism isn’t blatant, doesn’t mean it isn’t there. That remains true today. Some 50 years after the voting rights bill was signed, there are efforts to dismantle the significant progress it made in diversifying the American electorate. Today, young Black Americans are even more likely to vote in congressional elections than their White peers, and the racial voting gap among older Americans has narrowed. In response, many Southern states – and some in the North – have instituted more sophisticated voting barriers like voter ID laws, which disproportionately affect minority voters. Black and Hispanic voters also face longer lines at polling booths, because fewer poll workers and voting machines are allocated to precincts that serve their neighborhoods. These more covert tactics are replacing the old-fashioned barriers that the Voting Rights Act abolished, like literacy tests and grandfather clauses.

Though it was just two states away from my hometown, Tennessee seemed as foreign to me as the Soviet Union when I traveled there in 1965. But my ties to the state were stronger than I knew. Just two generations earlier, my own family had called Tennessee home — until racism ran them out of town, too.  The Reynoldses had the misfortune to live in Pulaski, Tenn., the same town that gave birth to the KKK in 1865. My great-grandfather, Cpl. Smith Reynolds, was born a slave in Pulaski and served in the Civil War in the Union Army. He was captured by Confederate troops but was freed shortly at the war ended.

Because of the family tradition of keeping secrets, I didn’t learn about my Southern roots until my cousin Edward Reynolds Davis wrote a book about it, “Whispers from African Hollow.” Though my great-grandfather risked his life for the Union, he could not vote and was denied his military pension, Davis wrote. Injustices like that help explain why some families keep secrets, thinking it wiser to look ahead to a hopeful future rather than reflecting on a painful past. But secrets have a way of coming out, and history has a way of affecting our future, especially when we try to ignore it. At least in the realm of voting rights, I hope we aren’t destined to repeat it.

Reynolds is an ordained minister and the author of six books. She is a former editor and columnist for USA Today.

Black media, Business and Civil Rights Groups Take Issue With Lawsuit Attacking Sharpton

Black media, Business and Civil Rights Groups Take Issue With Lawsuit Attacking Sharpton

 

 

 

jim_winston

Jim Winston, president/CEO, National Association of Black-owned Broadcasters

michael grant
Michael Grant, president/CEO, National Bankers Association

 
ronbusby
Ron Busby, President/CEO, U.S. Black Chambers, Inc.

 Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from Target Market News

(TriceEdneyWire.com) Three national African-American organizations have issued a joint statement in response to the $20 billion lawsuit filed by television producer Byron Allen charging Comcast Corp., Time Warner Cable, the NAACP, the National Urban League, Rev. Al Sharpton and his National Action Network, and former FCC Commissioner Meredith Attwell Baker with racial discrimination.

In the lawsuit Allen alleges that his production company, Entertainment Studios, is "being denied the same opportunity to contract with Comcast as White-owned channels. Comcast is intentionally treating 100% African American-owned media differently on account of race."

The lawsuit further claims "Comcast has paid Reverend Al Sharpton and the National Action Network over $3.8 million in 'donations' and as salary for the on-screen television hosting position on MSNBC that Comcast awarded Sharpton in exchange for his signature" on a Memorandum of Understanding saying that Sharpton would not challenge Comcast's proposed merger with NBC Universal in 2010.

In radio and TV interviews, Allen has said Sharpton was "bought off" by Comcast because he was the "least expensive Negro," and that "President Obama was bought and paid for."

The National Association of Black Owned Broadcasters, National Bankers Association and U.S. Black Chambers today issued a joint statement on Allen's lawsuit, urging the producer to "redirect" his criticism of civil rights leadership and focus on encouraging corporations to increase their business commitments to African-Americans. The three groups had come together in 2010 to raise concerns about the Comcast/NBCU merger.

"We have joined together to issue this statement, because we believe this lawsuit needs to be discussed, but not for the reasons it has drawn so much media attention," said Jim Winston, President of NABOB, which for 40 years has represented African-American radio and TV owners. "The media should be focusing on the underlying issue, the lack of business being done with African American owned businesses by major corporations. In particular, Comcast missed a huge opportunity to advance that goal when it failed to sell any of its cable television systems to companies owned by African-Americans."

"Rev. Sharpton and the organizations attacked by Mr. Allen do important and extensive work on behalf of the African-American community," said Winston. "We hope that the Byron Allen lawsuit will get the discussion ... focused on business and not personal attacks against the leadership of America's foremost civil rights organizations.

"Our organizations have always worked closely with these civil rights organizations in the past, and we look forward to doing so in the future," said Michael Grant, president of the National Bankers Association. "We hope that Mr. Allen will redirect his attention to the corporate practices he highlighted and not to the civil rights organizations."

Al Sharpton and the National Action Network responded to the lawsuit with the following statement:

"National Action Network has not been served with any papers and considers this claim frivolous. If in fact we were to be served, we would gladly defend our relationship with any company as well as to state on the record why we found these discriminatory accusations made by said party to be less than credible and beneath the standards that we engage in."

Comcast issued the following statement in response to the lawsuit:

"We do not generally comment on pending litigation, but this complaint represents nothing more than a string of inflammatory, inaccurate, and unsupported allegations.  We are proud of our outstanding record supporting and fostering diverse programming, including programming from African American owned and controlled cable channels.  We currently carry more than 100 networks geared teeoward diverse audiences, including multiple networks owned or controlled by minorities.

"Diversity organizations from across the country, including numerous diverse programmers, have supported our transaction with Time Warner Cable.  That deal will extend our industry-leading commitment to diverse programming to even more homes across America, one of the reasons so many groups in the African American community have supported it.

"Comcast has engaged in good faith negotiations with this programmer for many years.  It is disappointing that they have decided to file a frivolous lawsuit.  We will defend vigorously against the scurrilous allegations in this complaint and fully expect that the court will dismiss them."

The Economics of Selma - 2015 By James Clingman

Blackonomics

The Economics of Selma - 2015
By James Clingman

clingman

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - I remember back in 1999 when my daughter came to me crying about something she had seen on TV.  It was the movie, “Selma, Lord, Selma!”  She was distraught, even at six years old, at the mistreatment of Black folks in Selma in 1965.  My daughter related to Jurnee Smollett and Stephanie Peyton in their portrayals of Sheyann and Rachel, two young girls growing up in Selma during that time. That being a teaching moment, she and I had a talk about Selma and other issues pertaining to injustice toward and mistreatment of Black people in this country.

Adding to the title of that movie, by making it “Selma, Lord have mercy, Selma!” captures my effort to highlight and reemphasize not only the historical tragedy of Selma but also its current political and economic condition in light of the 50th anniversary of Bloody Sunday.

Last week, March 3-7, 2015, tens of thousands of people converged on Selma, including politicians, of course, celebrities and corporate executives. Selma enjoyed the national and world spotlight for a brief time, but I wondered if those folks would leave Selma without addressing current critical issues that exist there.   Daily life in Selma includes a 40 percent poverty rate, high unemployment, low median family income, crumbling infrastructure and building facades, and closed businesses.

I can only pray that some of the folks who visited and made speeches also left some money there, maybe to start a micro lending fund, an equity fund, or even invested in a business in Selma. I hope the politicians who say they hold Selma in such high esteem went back to their respective offices committed to allocate funds to help the city that some refer to as, "The Third World of Alabama."

As Representative Terri A. Sewell (D-Ala) said, "We have to move beyond the bridge." Along with all the crying, preaching, inspiring speeches, and marching back across the bridge, I trust that on this 50th anniversary of Bloody Sunday the folks living in Selma received more than just well wishes.

During our family visit there in 2001, former head of the National Voting Rights Museum and Institute, Joann Bland, gave us a tour (Even though it was past closing time); she told her personal story of being in the march at 10 years of age and shared her wealth of knowledge with my then 8-year old daughter.  My eyes were opened to the history and the present state of Selma, a city still waiting for change, especially economic change.

Fifty years since 1965 that famous bridge, named for Edmund Pettus, a former U.S. Democratic Senator, chairman of the state delegation to the Democratic National Convention for twenty years, and Grand Dragon of the Alabama Ku Klux Klan, has even greater meaning.  Back then it symbolized the struggle for voting rights; today it is a guidepost for a new struggle, the struggle for economic justice and empowerment.  Those who walked that bridge in 1965 won their battle; we must be as strong and as determined as they were then to win the battle we face today.

Obviously the political environment has changed in the city that elected as its Mayor the sheriff who supported the beat-down in 1965, and kept him in office until 2000.  Selma leaders like Terri Sewell know, however, that political change is not enough; they know change must also come in the form of economic empowerment and federal support.

Is it enough to have gone to Selma simply because it was the 50th anniversary?   Albeit a treasured occasion, for some it has become more symbolism than substantive, a photo-op, just as the 50th anniversary of the famous March on Washington was in 2013.  Today our words and activities in Selma must result in progressive and appropriate action, so that next year we can celebrate the victorious culmination of that revered freedom march, rather than lamenting our continued frustration over the fact that 50 years later, as some of the dignitaries said, “Our march for justice continues.”

Selma needs much more than an annual celebration.  It needs economic development, businesses, employment, and revitalization.  It should be valued well beyond the platitudes, pretentiousness, and pontification proffered by politicians and their pundits.  That city, so important to our history, should be held in the highest esteem by Washington D.C., the State of Alabama, and the rest of us.  In addition to an annual spotlight, we must keep it on the political radar screen throughout the year, until it is given the assistance it certainly commands and truly deserves.

The culmination of true freedom is economic freedom.  Selma citizens and those who endured the batons, horses, dogs, and those who were murdered leading up to and during the march, are certainly deserving of more than 50 more years of “We ‘shall’ overcome.”

X