banner2e top

HBCUs Want to Kick Cigarettes and Their Butts Off Campus…By Frederick H. Lowe

Oct. 11, 2015

HBCUs Want to Kick Cigarettes and Their Butts Off Campus…
By Frederick H. Lowe

benjamin regina

Regina Benjamin, M.D.

buttofcigarette

Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from NorthStarNews.com

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Thirty-three of the nation’s 105 Historically Black Colleges and Universities announced on Wednesday they have kicked off a Tobacco-Free HBCU Campus Initiative, led by former U.S. Surgeon General Regina Benjamin, M.D.

In addition to Dr. Benjamin, the program is led by Truth Initiative (www.truthinitiative.org), a Washington, D.C. –based organization funded and established through the 1998 Master Settlement-agreement between attorney generals from 46 states, the District of Columbia, five territories and the tobacco industry.  The nation’s five largest tobacco companies agree to pay the groups $10 billion annually indefinitely. The Truth Initiative will provide grants schools to fund no-smoking and no-tobacco campaigns. The amount of each grant was not disclosed.

“For decades, the tobacco industry has targeted minority communities, particularly African Americans, with intense advertising and promotional efforts,” said Dr. Benjamin, who was the nation’s 18th surgeon general, serving from November 3, 2009 to July 16, 2013. “As a result of this investment, African Americans suffer the greatest burden of tobacco-related mortality of any ethnic or racial group in the U.S.”

Lung cancer, which is largely attributed to cigarette smoking is the leading cause of cancer deaths among black men and black women, according to the American Cancer Society’s Cancer Facts & Figures for American Americans for 2013-2014. Each year, approximately 47,000 African Americans die from smoking-related diseases.

Lung cancer is also the second-leading cause of cancer cases among black men and black women, according to the American Cancer Society. While the number of young people who smoke has dropped, smoking is still prevalent among African Americans. http://www.northstarnewstoday.com/health/black-teenagers-smoke-less-than-white-teenagers/

HBCUs are laggard when it comes to establishing tobacco-free campuses. The number of smoke-free or tobacco-free colleges has tripled since 2010, when 446 campuses became smoke free. The number is now 1,577, yet the majority of HBCU’s are not smoke- free.

Although HBCUs have been slow to move to smoke-or tobacco-free campuses, they are in step in with many prominent African-American institutions, including the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation, the non-profit arm of the Congressional Black Caucus.

The African-American Tobacco Control Leadership Council, an anti-smoking group, has complained that the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation receives a sizeable percentage of it annual budget from the tobacco industry.

“Working with HBCUs, we can reach young adults at risk of starting to smoke cigarettes and alternative tobacco products such as little cigars and cigarillos,” said Robin Koval, CEO and president of the Truth Initiative. “HBCUs are home to students and faculty who deserve to enjoy healthy tobacco environments.”

Shaw University hosted the Truth Initiative and the 33 HBCUs.

“We look forward  to collaborating with other HBCUs to end tobacco use on our campuses and protect our community from tobacco –related illness and disease,” said Dr. Tashni-Ann Dubroy, Shaw’s president. Each college is to develop its own anti-smoking campaign.

Here is the list of schools participating in the smoke-out: Alcorn State University, Alcorn, Miss.;  Arkansas Baptist College, Little Rock, Miss.; Benedict College, Columbia, S.C; Bluefield State, Bluefield, W. Va.; Bowie State University, Bowie, Md.;  Cheyney University, Cheyney, Pa.; Coahoma Community College, Clarksdale, Miss.;  Fisk University, Nashville, Tenn.; Florida A&M University, Tallahassee, Fla.; Florida Memorial University, Miami Gardens, Fla.;  Hinds Community College, Utica, Miss.; Howard University, Washington, D.C.; Jackson State University, Jackson, Miss.;  Jarvis Christian College, Hawkins, Tenn.; Lincoln University, Lincoln University, Pa.; Meharry Medical College, Nashville, Tenn.; Mississippi Valley State University, Itta Bena, Miss.; Morris College, Sumter, S.C.; Norfolk State University, Norfolk, Va.; North Carolina Central University, Durham, N.C.; North Carolina A&T University, Greensboro, N.C.;  Prairie View A&M University, Prairie View, Texas;  Rust College, Holly Springs, Miss.; Southwestern Christian College, Terrell, Texas; Spelman College, Atlanta, Ga.;  Shaw University, Raleigh, N.C.; St. Augustine’s University, Raleigh, N.C.; Shorter College, North Little Rock, Ark.; Talladega College, Talladega, Ala.; Tennessee State University, Nashville, Tenn.;  Texas College, Tyler, Texas;  University of Maryland-Eastern Shore, Princess Anne, Md.; and University of the District of Columbia, Washington, D.C.

Inmate Debating Team Defeats Harvard in Exhibition Match by Zenitha Prince

 

Oct. 9, 2015
 

 

Inmate Debating Team Defeats Harvard in Exhibition Match

By Zenitha Prince

bardprisoninitiative

Photo/bpi.bard.edu

Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from the Afro American Newspaper

 

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Three men imprisoned for violent crimes recently faced off against three members of the Harvard College debate team in an exhibition match. To some, the probable outcome may have seemed inevitable. But, in a shocking upset the inmates won.
The unlikely victory is a testament to the power of education and second chances in the lives of the incarcerated. The debate was set up to exhibit the Bard Prison Initiative, a rigorous college matriculation program offered to inmates housed at Eastern New York Correctional Facility, in the Catskills. “We have been graced with opportunity,” said debater Carlos Polanco, a 31-year-old from Queens in prison for manslaughter, according to the Wall Street Journal.
“They make us believe in ourselves.” Polanco and his teammates—all of whom were convicted of manslaughter—could not use the Internet to research their topic. And both their opponents and the judges were surprised by their level of preparation and the depth of their arguments. “They caught us off guard,” said Harvard debater Anais Carell, a 20-year-old junior from Chicago.
Judge Mary Nugent, who led the panel of judges, said while it may have been tempting to favor the “underdogs,” the panelists all had to justify their decisions to each other based on certain standards. And, they overwhelmingly agreed that the inmates provided compelling arguments that the Harvard team did not sufficiently counter.
“We’re all human,” she said. “I don’t think we can ever judge devoid of context or where we are, but the idea they would win out of sympathy is playing into pretty misguided ideas about inmates. Their academic ability is impressive.”
The Bard Prisoner Initiative (BPI) was launched in 1999 by Bard College in Annandale-on-Hudson, N.Y. The largest program of its kind in the United States, BPI enrolls nearly 300 incarcerated men and women across a range of academic disciplines, and offers over 60 courses each semester, according to its website. Program leaders say the program has been a positive force in boosting inmate outcomes after their release.
“The rate of post-release employment among the program’s participants is high and recidivism is stunningly low,” the website states. “By challenging incarcerated men and women with a liberal education, BPI works to redefine the relationship between educational opportunity and criminal justice.”
Out of more than 300 alumni who earned degrees while in custody, less than 2 percent returned to prison within three years, the standard time frame for measuring recidivism, BPI officials said.
The program is funded by private donations. Its annual $2.5 million budget also supports similar college-in-prison programs throughout the country, including those at Wesleyan University in Connecticut, Grinnell College in Iowa, Goucher College in Maryland, and the University of Notre Dame and Holy Cross College in Indiana. Plans are in place to establish programs in 10 other states in the next five years.

Breast Cancer Awareness Month: Raising Awareness and Saving Lives by Marc H. Morial

Oct. 11, 2015

To Be Equal 
Breast Cancer Awareness Month: Raising Awareness and Saving Lives
By Marc H. Morial 

marcmorial

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - “Too often, precious lives are interrupted or cut short by cancer. Breast cancer, one of the most common cancers among American women, affects roughly 230,000 women as well as 2,300 men each year and is responsible for more than 40,000 deaths annually in the United States. Breast cancer does not discriminate -- it strikes people of all races, ages, and income levels -- and we must raise awareness of this disease and its symptoms so we can more easily identify it and more effectively treat it.” – President Barack Obama, National Breast Cancer Awareness Month Proclamation, October 2015.

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the United States. It strikes blindly, touching women of all racial and ethnic groups. But while race is not a risk factor for breast cancer, Black and Hispanic women—who are less likely to get breast cancer than white women—are dying from the devastating disease at higher rates. To save thousands more lives, we must continue to make strides and improvements in prevention, diagnosis and treatment, while comprehensively addressing the stunning health disparities that consign so many women of color to preventable deaths.

The wide disparity in deaths and survival rates (Black women have a five-year survival rate of 77 percent in comparison to 90 percent for white women) can be attributed to a variety of factors—ranging from biology to access to quality health care. According to the Black Women’s Health Imperative, breast cancer tends to appear in Black women at a younger age and in more advanced forms. Women of color are more likely to be diagnosed with more aggressive cancers and later stage breast cancers. Because, historically, Black women have been less likely to get regular mammograms, their cancers are more likely to be advanced when they are finally diagnosed. This is why screening, and screening early, matters. While screening can neither eliminate nor undo the design of biology, the earlier you can detect and begin to treat breast cancer, the lower your risk of dying.

Women of color—particularly Black women who are 40 percent more likely to die of breast cancer than white women—need access to quality preventative measures like mammograms to reduce their risk. State and private programs that provide low to no-cost mammograms for women have helped closed the gap between the health insurance haves and have-nots. Through the Affordable Care Act, obstacles to regular screenings have practically been eliminated for all women. Under the ACA, most health insurers are required to cover recommended preventative services—including mammograms—at no out-of-pocket cost.

Despite the increase in access to screening, women of color also tend to get follow-up care later than white women. Black women often experience follow-up times of over 60 days after a receiving an abnormal mammogram result. When time is of the essence, waiting for follow-up care may lead to the cancer becoming more aggressive and it may increase its spread in the body.

Low-income and uninsured women in the 21 states that refused to expand  Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act are less likely to have breast and cervical cancer screenings than other women.   Expanding Medicare in those states could mean the difference between finding early stage cancer when it’s more easily treatable and finding it after it becomes life threatening.

Treatment is another area where disparities are potentially costing us lives. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, only 69 percent of Black women start treatment within 30 days of receiving a diagnosis of breast cancer, compared to the 83 percent of white women who begin within 30 days. Black women are also less likely to receive (or are resistant to receiving), certain surgeries, radiation and hormone therapies. Whiles strides are being made in care continuum, women of color must be educated about their options and have access—from care to treatment—to improve their outcomes.

Think about this: nearly 1,800 fewer Black women would die of breast cancer if death rates were the same as white women, according to the CDC. That’s 1,800 more birthdays, weddings and graduations we could all be celebrating today. We know what to do, but knowing is only half the battle. Sign up for a mammogram today or encourage all the women you know and love to make that potentially life-saving appointment.

Breast Cancer Awareness Month: Raising Awareness and Saving Lives by Marc H. Morial

Oct. 11, 2015

To Be Equal 
Breast Cancer Awareness Month: Raising Awareness and Saving Lives
By Marc H. Morial 

marcmorial

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - “Too often, precious lives are interrupted or cut short by cancer. Breast cancer, one of the most common cancers among American women, affects roughly 230,000 women as well as 2,300 men each year and is responsible for more than 40,000 deaths annually in the United States. Breast cancer does not discriminate -- it strikes people of all races, ages, and income levels -- and we must raise awareness of this disease and its symptoms so we can more easily identify it and more effectively treat it.” – President Barack Obama, National Breast Cancer Awareness Month Proclamation, October 2015.

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the United States. It strikes blindly, touching women of all racial and ethnic groups. But while race is not a risk factor for breast cancer, Black and Hispanic women—who are less likely to get breast cancer than white women—are dying from the devastating disease at higher rates. To save thousands more lives, we must continue to make strides and improvements in prevention, diagnosis and treatment, while comprehensively addressing the stunning health disparities that consign so many women of color to preventable deaths.

The wide disparity in deaths and survival rates (Black women have a five-year survival rate of 77 percent in comparison to 90 percent for white women) can be attributed to a variety of factors—ranging from biology to access to quality health care. According to the Black Women’s Health Imperative, breast cancer tends to appear in Black women at a younger age and in more advanced forms. Women of color are more likely to be diagnosed with more aggressive cancers and later stage breast cancers. Because, historically, Black women have been less likely to get regular mammograms, their cancers are more likely to be advanced when they are finally diagnosed. This is why screening, and screening early, matters. While screening can neither eliminate nor undo the design of biology, the earlier you can detect and begin to treat breast cancer, the lower your risk of dying.

Women of color—particularly Black women who are 40 percent more likely to die of breast cancer than white women—need access to quality preventative measures like mammograms to reduce their risk. State and private programs that provide low to no-cost mammograms for women have helped closed the gap between the health insurance haves and have-nots. Through the Affordable Care Act, obstacles to regular screenings have practically been eliminated for all women. Under the ACA, most health insurers are required to cover recommended preventative services—including mammograms—at no out-of-pocket cost.

Despite the increase in access to screening, women of color also tend to get follow-up care later than white women. Black women often experience follow-up times of over 60 days after a receiving an abnormal mammogram result. When time is of the essence, waiting for follow-up care may lead to the cancer becoming more aggressive and it may increase its spread in the body.

Low-income and uninsured women in the 21 states that refused to expand  Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act are less likely to have breast and cervical cancer screenings than other women.   Expanding Medicare in those states could mean the difference between finding early stage cancer when it’s more easily treatable and finding it after it becomes life threatening.

Treatment is another area where disparities are potentially costing us lives. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, only 69 percent of Black women start treatment within 30 days of receiving a diagnosis of breast cancer, compared to the 83 percent of white women who begin within 30 days. Black women are also less likely to receive (or are resistant to receiving), certain surgeries, radiation and hormone therapies. Whiles strides are being made in care continuum, women of color must be educated about their options and have access—from care to treatment—to improve their outcomes.

Think about this: nearly 1,800 fewer Black women would die of breast cancer if death rates were the same as white women, according to the CDC. That’s 1,800 more birthdays, weddings and graduations we could all be celebrating today. We know what to do, but knowing is only half the battle. Sign up for a mammogram today or encourage all the women you know and love to make that potentially life-saving appointment.

Speaking With a Forked Tongue by Dr. E. Faye Williams

Oct. 11, 2015

Speaking With a Forked Tongue
By Dr. E. Faye Williams 

williams2

(TriceEdneyWire.com) — If you were born between 1930 and 1960, you may remember that the Western Genre, or as it was more commonly called, the "Cowboy  Movie," was a favored theatrical production of the times.  The genre even overlapped into performance radio and television. In fact, the television series "Gunsmoke" stands as the longest-running (20 years) prime time live-action drama in US history.

Even when I was young, I could see the parallels between how Native and Black people were treated in those movies.  As much as with seemingly unnecessary demonstration of heavy-handed brutality, I learned the subtleties of dealing with whites by the use of some very telling movie expressions.  One that sticks in mind is the constant complaint from the Native Chief, "White man speak with forked tongue!"  It was true then and Lord knows it's true now!

Lest I create conflict and misunderstanding with my last statement, let me elaborate.  If circumstance can or could be manipulated to bring advantage to him, the white man would lie, cheat or steal.  Moreover, he would abandon his most cherished principles to realize that advantage.  A generalized and sweeping condemnation for sure, but justified in so many circumstances. I’m not talking about the white men who don’t do that—and you will know who you are better than I.  I have bothered to say that because I know how I feel when so many white people put all Black people in the same bag when speaking of negative things a single Black person may have done or been accused of doing.

Even though the history of the United States is full of examples of broken promises and treaties that can be examined, one doesn't have to go too far in the past to uncover duplicitous actions and intent on the part of an alarming number of white men.  Even white women will tell you that their own fathers, brothers, spouses kept the vote from them until 1920, and that many in Congress today are still trying to control every aspect of their lives.

From the mouths of the founders came a pledge of a country that holds the right to vote as sacrosanct.  Its superlatives include precious, private, inviolable, uninfringeable, unbreakable, and unchallenged.  Yet today in Alabama's so-called "Black Belt" access to the primary means of self-identification for the purpose of voting has been stripped from over 10 of the Blackest counties in the state.  These counties average Black populations of 75 percent and predictably vote for Democratic candidates.  Offices issuing drivers licenses have been closed to those populations and, by extension, limiting access to the ballot box.  Although proponents of this action claim no designed racist intent, the disparate impact is obvious as a (racist) action to dilute the Black vote.

While I usually don't focus on or make fun of personal impediments, I am truly amused by Republican Congressman and once heir-apparent to Speaker Boehner, Kevin McCarthy.  He appears incapable of functional speaking at any level.  It seems as though he was, at least temporarily, smitten with the curse of telling the truth.  He readily admitted that the select Congressional Committee on Benghazi was established to bring political ruination upon the democratic front-runner, Hillary Clinton, instead of discovering the truth of related circumstance.

Unfortunately, McCarthy backed away from the truth that he told and tried to put the genie back in the bottle with as implausible story I’ve ever heard.  Too late! The retreat didn’t help him, and he backed out of the race. From my perspective, truth is a commodity that is generally absent in the constructs of the Republican Party Establishment who are, by the way, predominantly male and predominantly white.  So much for sayings gleaned from old cowboy movies.

(Dr. E. Faye Williams is National President of the National Congress of Black Women, Inc.  www.nationalcongressbw.org.  202/678-6788)

X