banner2e top

On Father’s Day: These Super Dads Defy the Statistics by Hazel Trice Edney

June 10, 2013

On Father’s Day: These Super Dads Defy the Statistics
By Hazel Trice Edney

brooksfamily1

Marlon and Rosalind Brooks of Houston, Texas, say team work is the key to juggling their work schedules and family time.

martinandbabygirl

Martin Smith, a Bowie, Md. father of seven, says he loves road trips and Bible study with his wife, Walida, and their children.

(TriceEdneyWire.com) – We hear the statistics all too often. Currently, “only 28 percent of Black youth have their fathers in the home. In 1920, it was 90 percent and in 1960 it was 80 percent.”

Those are the stats recently quoted by Dr. Jawanza Kunjufu, a foremost expert on the rearing of African-American children; especially boys. He boldly asserts: “I believe one of the greatest problems facing the Black community is fatherlessness.”

Plenty of other national experts back him up, pointing to multiple social ills as evidence of the dire need for fathers in the home. Even President Obama has focused on this issue when speaking to Black audiences. But, that’s not what this story is about.

On Father’s Day, June 16, 2013, millions of Black fathers, stepfathers, uncles, mentors, big brothers, relatives and father figures will be celebrated and appreciated because of their powerful and positive influence on their children every day. Some will even be given, well, super dad status.

Meet Martin Smith, a wealth planner and investment advisor who resides in Bowie, Md. He gives his view on the most important aspect of fatherhood:

“I think legacy and having the privilege and the honor to raise children and to have them develop into who God has called them uniquely to be,” he says. “All of them are totally different from one another. And so it really stretches you to see how you have to nurture them.”

Smith should know. He and his wife, Walida, have seven children - six girls ages 18, 16, 11, 9, 8, and 5 and one boy, 13.

“In my case – seven different personalities,” he chuckles, speaking from a cell phone as the entire family enjoys a road trip from Bowie to the San Diego, California area to visit family and tour colleges. “We’re trying to get them exposed now, start them thinking about it early.”

Along the way, they had stopped in to visit long-time friends, Marlon and Rosalind Brooks of Houston, Texas. The Brooks also have a large family – five children - including four boys ages 14, 10, 8, and 4, and one girl, 12.

Marlon Brooks tells his strategy for fatherhood:

“It’s hard to give them equal attention, but you have to give them attention as if you were wanting attention yourself,” he says. “You’ve got to manage the kids, you’ve got to manage time with your wife; you’ve got to manage taking care of the house, you’ve got to manage making sure that you’re going to provide for them and sometimes in the midst of all of that you just don’t want to be bothered,” he chuckled.  “But, even then, I’ve got to make sure that I’m a good steward over the emotions of all of the kids.”

The owners of a 4-year-old food service operation, Brooks Family Barbecue, the Brooks are about to take on yet another venture in Houston. They are opening a full service restaurant in July. That’s coupled with Mrs. Brooks’ full time job as an ROTC instructor.

They say balancing their careers and caring for the children can only be done as a team.

“Even on a daily basis we pretty much divide everything up,” she said, with a special emphasis on their education. “He and I spend equal time at the school. They know him just like they know me as far as the teachers and the administrators.”

When it comes to discipline, the retired U. S. Navy Commander says she is the strict one. “I’m kind of hard-nosed when it comes to certain things.” She recalls how the children think, “'Mom says we can’t do this, but Dad might find a way for us to be able to work it out.’ I think when God called us together, he just knew these different temperaments we had. And we’re just a good balance.”

Walida Smith,  a working mother of seven children, says she admires her husbands’ “commitment to their spiritual growth above anything else. That’s like the first and foremost concern,” she said.

In that regard, Martin Smith says one of his favorite family group activities is Bible Study. He has temporarily set aside his pursuit of a Master of Divinity degree while completing a Masters of Real Estate Finance at Georgetown University, which he says will enhance his services at Wealth Care Financial Group Inc. of which he is owner, president and chief executive officer.

Despite their jam-packed schedules, both couples say finding time for each other and nurturing their own relationships are keys to good parenting.

“You make time,” says Mrs. Smith, who works as director of Publications and Resources for the Skinner Leadership Institute based in Tracy’s Landing, Md. “We have teenagers. The older ones are taught how to take care of the younger ones so that [we] are able to do that. And then we live near family and have family available so that makes a difference.”

The main ingredient is sacrificing for each other even if it’s a constant struggle, says Marlon Brooks.

“We date. That’s very important. We spend time as husband and wife, but sometimes we need to spend time together as friends. And when we spend time together as friends we kind of talk about the needs of the kids and each other’s needs,” he says. “Every time we do that for each other I feel like the Lord meets our needs.”

President Obama’s Insecure National Security State by Dr. Wilmer J. Leon III

June 9, 2013

President Obama’s Insecure National Security State
By Dr. Wilmer J. Leon III

NEWS ANALYSIS

officialpresidentialphoto-2013

 

“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.” Benjamin Franklin

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Last week The Guardian newspaper confirmed what many Americans have suspected for a very long time, the American government is spying on its own citizens.

The Guardian published a copy of a top secret court order requiring domestic telecom companies to provide the NSA with “…communication records of millions of US citizens…collected indiscriminately and in bulk – regardless of whether they are suspected of any wrongdoing.”  According to The Guardian, “The secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA) granted the order to the FBI on April 25, giving the government unlimited authority to obtain the data for a specified three-month period ending on July 19.”  It is also alleged that internet giants such as Apple, Microsoft, Yahoo, Google, Facebook, have also provided the NSA access to confidential user data.

President Obama, who as a Senator campaigned against such practices as they were being engaged in by the Bush administration, is now defending them.  When asked in 2007 if the president has Constitutional authority to conduct surveillance for national security purposes without judicial warrants, Senator Obama stated, “The Supreme Court has never held that the president has such powers.” Now, according to the President in defense of such measures, "My assessment and my team's assessment…was that they help us prevent terrorist attacks, and the modest encroachments on privacy that are involved…that on net was worth us doing."  He went on to say, "When it comes to telephone calls, nobody is listening to your calls. That's not what this program is about…What the intelligence community is doing is looking at phone numbers and durations of calls -- they're not looking at people's names and they're not looking at content."

I understand that the FISA court granted the order to the FBI but the larger issue is that the NSA and FBI are engaged in the surveillance of American citizens who have not engaged in any wrongdoing.  One has to question the standards that the FISA court is using to grant its orders and whether or not there is truly a check and balance as required by the constitution.

As a Constitutional scholar President Obama should know that his position on this issue fails the “laugh test” on a number of levels. He considers the NSA collecting the telephone records of millions of US telecom customers, having access to the numbers of both parties on a call, location data, call duration, unique identifiers, and the time and duration of all calls as “modest encroachments?  What ever happened to the fundamental legal premise of presumption of innocence?

Has President Obama and/or any member of his “team” ever heard of the 4th Amendment? “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” Where is the basis of “probable cause” to proactively search the records of millions of Americans who have never engaged in any illegal activity let alone activity of a “terrorist” nature?

It is disingenuous for President Obama to attempt to alleviate fears and concerns of Americans about this incredible encroachment and excessive expansion of government power by saying, “nobody is listening to your calls…” That’s not the point; telephone numbers, like social security numbers are assigned to individuals.  If you have the number you have the name. It’s the collection, analysis, and storage of call data of innocent citizens that matters.

I believe that more Americans would be outraged if this were a physical invasion of their privacy as opposed to a technological invasion.  If the police were entering the homes of millions of Americans and taking photographs of their contents and video of their activities more people would be outraged.  Remember the outrage when shortly after 9/11 then Attorney General John Ashcroft proposed using members of the US Postal Service to spy on American citizens?  These actions are a clear violation of the intent of, “The right of the people to be secure… against unreasonable searches and seizures…

This is clearly an attempt by the “liberal” Obama administration to further the development of the National Security State (NSS) all under the pretext of the Bush era marketing strategy the “War on Terror.” Some will consider my use of the term NSS as an exaggeration or over-the-top.  According to the Center for Media and Democracy, elements of the NSS are that the military exerts important influence over political, economic, as well as military affairs (Eisenhower’s “military industrial complex”). National Security States often maintain an appearance of democracy. However, ultimate power rests with the military or within a broader National Security Establishment.

The military and related sectors wield substantial political and economic power. They do so in the context of an ideology which stresses that 'freedom" and "development" are possible only when capital is concentrated in the hands of elites (the rise of the One-Percent).  Finally, defending against external and/or internal enemies becomes a leading preoccupation of the state, a distorting factor in the economy, and a major source of national identity and purpose.

According to the President, “But my assessment... was that they (these programs) help us prevent terrorist attacks.”  Well, by my assessment the best way to prevent terrorist attacks is to stop engaging in practices that contribute to the promotion and recruitment of “terrorists” and validate the perception/reality of America as an imperialist interloper.  Remember, “One man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom-fighter.”  Stop invading and/or supporting the invasion of sovereign countries.  Stop killing innocent civilians “collateral damage” with drone strikes. These programs and policies destabilize regions and contribute to the influx of weapons that support this destabilization.

President Obama’s National Security State is making American’s insecure. “Freedom of speech is a principal pillar of a free government; when this support is taken away, the constitution of a free society is dissolved, and tyranny is erected on its ruins. Republics and limited monarchies derive their strength and vigor from a popular examination into the action of the magistrates." Benjamin Franklin - 17 November 1737.

Dr. Wilmer Leon is the Producer/ Host of the Sirisu/XM Satellite radio channel 110  call-in talk radio program “Inside the Issues with Leon”  Go to www.wilmerleon.com or email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

 

Prudential Study: African-Americans Optimistic About Finances, Future

June 9, 2013

Prudential Study: African-Americans Optimistic About Finances, Future

Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from Target Market News

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Prudential Financial, Inc. has released the results of its 2013-2014 "African American Financial Experience" study, which found that members of the African-American community remains optimistic and continue to demonstrate financial progress, confidence and growing affluence, despite mounting debt and little contact with the financial services industry.

"The study shows increasing economic power and an emerging middle class within the community," said Charles Lowrey, Prudential's chief operating officer, U.S. Businesses. "Approximately 4 in 10 households surveyed have annual incomes of at least $75,000, and nearly a quarter earn $100,000 or more. Half of African Americans surveyed said they feel better off financially than a year ago, while only 19 percent say they feel worse."

The study also brings to light distinctive characteristics of the African American community that influence financial priorities and corresponding behaviors. According to the findings, the African American financial experience is largely defined by family-oriented priorities and goals, including greater ownership of protection-oriented financial products, greater reliance on faith-based organizations as a source of financial education, financial decisions driven by women and earlier retirement.

The 2013-14 "African American Financial Experience" is Prudential's second study measuring the financial trends and attitudes in the African American community, and is part of a series of signature research by the company examining financial trends in America's multicultural communities.

As in the inaugural survey, only about a quarter of African Americans feel any financial services company has effectively shown support to the community. Across all levels of affluence, African Americans are 13 percent less likely than the general population to have been contacted by a financial advisor. While half of African Americans surveyed say they believe working with an advisor would help them make better financial decisions, only 19 percent say they have a financial advisor.

The study also finds African Americans remain significantly more confident and optimistic about their financial future than the general population. While the general population's financial confidence is driven largely by level of asset accumulation and macroeconomic factors, African Americans' financial confidence is shaped by a broader and balanced array of factors, including life insurance protection, level of debt and expenses, and health care costs.

"Family remains a key factor in the African American financial experience. African Americans also report managing more financial priorities than the general population, despite doing so with lower incomes. African Americans have a greater number of family-oriented financial priorities, like adequately protecting loved ones, leaving an inheritance and funding education," said Sharon Taylor, senior vice president and head of human resources at Prudential.

The study also points out that African Americans are more likely to live in multi-generational and female-headed households, and to be financially responsible for supporting other family members. Of those surveyed, 57 percent provide financial support to another family member. Reflecting the impact of today's economic condition on African Americans, the survey further revealed that many African Americans are providing financial support to unemployed friends and family - nearly double the rate among the general population.

Student loan debt also was reported as a significant obstacle to wealth building for African Americans. College-educated African Americans are twice as likely to have student loan debt, proof of economic progress while at the same time hampering the ability to save or invest.

In addition, the study finds African-Americans own insurance products, such as life and disability, at equal or greater rates compared to the general population, but are about half as likely as the general population to own investment products, such as IRAs, mutual funds, stocks and bonds.

Nearly half of African-Americans say they have a 401(k) or other workplace retirement plan, and 8 in 10 of those currently eligible are contributing. However, African Americans' balances within employer plans are less than half those of the general population's, in part due to the impact of loans and withdrawals. And three in 10 have taken loans from their plan, citing the need to repay other debt.

The study is based on a March 2013 poll of 1,153 Americans who identify as African-American or Black and 471 general population Americans on a broad range of financial topics. Respondents are age 25-70, with a household income of $25,000 or more and some involvement in household financial decisions. Among those meeting the survey criterion of $25,000 or more in household income, the median household income was $61,000. The overall margin of sampling error is +/- 5 percent for African-Americans and +/- 6% for the general population.

An oversample of 471 U.S. adults was also obtained as a reference point. The General Population sample met the same screening criteria as the African-American sample. A quota was applied in order to obtain at least 300 African-Americans and 100 of the General Population with a household income of $75,000 or more.

Results were then weighted according to the U.S. Census to reflect the proper proportions of African Americans and the general population within each of these income groups. The first African American Financial Experience survey was conducted in 2011. Other research in the series includes focuses on women and the LGBT community.

To view and print a copy of the study, visit http://www.prudential.com/media/managed/aa/AAStudy.pdf

Mandela 'Serious but Stable' in Pretoria Hospital

June 9, 2013

Mandela 'Serious but Stable' in Pretoria Hospital

nelsonmandela

(TriceEdneyWire.com) – World-revered Former South Africa President Nelson Mandela remained hospitalized in "serious but stable" condition this week.

The 94-year-old Nobel Peace Prize recipient was again being treated for a recurring severe lung infection after he was rushed to Pretoria hospital Saturday, June 8, according to reports. His wife, activist and humanitarian Graca Machel, is reportedly by his side.

Mandela contracted tuberculosis while imprisoned for 27 years under racist apartheid rule; the same rule that was ended by the African National Congress after his release from prison in 1990 and rise to the democratic presidency in 1994. He served until 1999.

"We need to hold our thoughts and keep him in our minds," said Mac Maharaj, the president's spokesman, according to the Associated Press. "He is a fighter, he has recovered many times from very serious conditions and he will be with us. Let's pray for him and help him to get better."

Trial of Trayvon’s Killer Began This Week

June 9, 2013

Trial of Trayvon’s Killer Began This Week

zimmerman-trayvon

Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from the Richmond Free Press

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - The long-awaited Florida trial of the Neighborhood Watch captain accused of gunning down teenager Trayvon Martin in cold blood opened this week. And it is expected to focus the nation on Florida’s controversial “Stand Your Ground” law.

The law allows a person to use deadly force against an attacker in self-defense without any obligation to retreat first. Focus was put on the law when George Zimmerman, a 28-year-old Hispanic American, shot and killed Trayvon, a 17-year-old African-American, Feb. 26, 2012, in Sanford, Fla.

Zimmerman was at first not charged in the deadly incident. But after national protests, including ones in Richmond and Petersburg, he was arrested and charged with second-degree murder.

His trial was scheduled to begin Monday, June 10.

According to authorities, Trayvon was walking to the house of his father’s fiancée after going to a convenience store that night when he was confronted by Zimmerman in the gated community. The autopsy report shows Zimmerman shot the teenager in the chest at close range.

Trayvon’s parents, Tracy Martin and Sybrina Fulton, his attorney, Benjamin Crump, and supporters claim the killing was cold-blooded murder by an overzealous volunteer acting out his police fantasy. Zimmerman, who is out on a $1 million bond, claims Trayvon attacked him, forcing him to shoot.

On March 5, Zimmerman’s attorney, Mark O’Mara, waived a preliminary hearing on the “Stand Your Ground” law to allow his client to go before a jury. He said he might later seek immunity for Zimmerman.

Late last month, Judge Debra Nelson ruled that Trayvon’s familiarity with guns, his marijuana use and fights he may have been in cannot be used in Zimmerman’s defense. Zimmerman could face up to 30 years in prison if he is convicted.

Separately, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights has approved an investigation into the “Stand Your Ground” law. The organization will decide whether race is a factor in the enforcement of the law that 24 states have put in place.

“We’re going to take our own cut at it, go down, dig through records at the district attorney, police level and other things, and start going through … to see whether or not, as some people suspect, that there is bias in the assertion or denial of Stand Your Ground, depending on the race of the victim or the race of the person asserting the defense,” said Democratic Commissioner Michael Yaki.

X