banner2e top

Black Retirees Growing Older and Poorer: Next Year's Social Security Cost of Living Adjustment Lowest in 10 years By Charlene Crowell

 
Oct. 22, 2024
 
Image of Grandparents with Grandchild Central Indiana State of Aging
Image of Grandparents with Grandchild - Central Indiana State of Aging 
(TriceEdneyWire.com) - As Americans live longer, the ability to remain financially independent is an ongoing struggle. Especially for Black and other people of color whose lifetime incomes are often lower than that of other contemporaries, finding money to save for ‘old age’ is particularly daunting.
According to the National Council on Aging, racial and ethnic minorities accounted for one in 4 adults aged 65 and older in 2022.  In that same year, the average 65-year-old could expect to live another 18 years or longer, on a median income of $29,740.   
In 2022, the average yearly Social Security benefit for Black men ages 65 and older was $15,345, and for Black women was only $13,755. However, the average annual Social Security income for all 65 or older men was $18,910, and for all older women  was $14,824.
In past generations retiring workers often received a gold watch, pension, and company-sponsored health insurance. But today’s retirees face far different circumstances. With few remaining pensions available, most workers must look to themselves for financial security in their old age. And Social Security has become a financial lifeline.  
When enacted in 1935 during the throes of the Great Depression,Social Security was  a ground-breaking federal social safety net for retirees. Financed by payroll taxes that began in 1937, both employees and their employers paid into the program. A 1939 amendment to the law expanded the program to include survivor benefits for retirees’ widows and children, commonly known today as SSI. In 1956 disability benefits were added in a second expansion.
To compensate beneficiaries for rises in cost of living, an annual Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) began in 1975. Prior to 1972, only special acts of Congress could increase benefits.
Today, more than 80 years later, 68 million retirees and 4.5 million other program participants recently learned that a 2.5 percent COLA increase will be added to their monthly checks – even lower than the 2.6 percent decade-long average computed by Social Security. For retirees, the increase will begin in January. SSI beneficiaries will receive their increase with their December 31 payment.
Next year’s increase means the average retiree’s monthly $1,927 Social Security check will rise by $49. The monthly average for an elderly couple with both receiving benefits will be $3,089, from 2024’s $3,014 – a $75 increase. It is important to note that individual benefit levels are determined by a formula that uses a worker’s highest earnings over a 34-year career. Should Medicare’s 2025 rates increase as expected, the net increase to retiree checks will be even less. 
As the nation still struggles to cope with rising prices, the agency’s statement and those of elder advocates were polar opposites.
“Social Security benefits and SSI payments will increase in 2025, helping tens of millions of people keep up with expenses even as inflation has started to cool,” said Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security.
But according to AARP, when the projected Medicare increase is announced, most retirees will receive a net gain of only $10.20 in 2025.  
“[E]ven with the COLA, we know many older Americans who rely on Social Security may find it hard to pay their bills,” Jo Ann Jenkins, AARP’s chief executive officer, said in a statement. “Social Security is the primary source of income for 40 percent of older Americans.”
AARP’s concerns are validated by findings in an April 2024 report from the Society of Actuaries Research Institute, entitled, Retirement Wealth by Race and Ethnicity: Differences, Trends and Contributing Factors.
“Social Security provides a near-universal basic benefit, but many older adults, especially Black and Hispanic/Latino people and many people of other and multiple races and ethnicities, still struggle to meet the expenses they incur that are above those basic benefits because they have substantially fewer retirement savings, even after accounting for aspects such as education and income, than is the case for white households,” states the report. 
Key findings from the report include:
  • White households with a college degree had a median retirement wealth of $273,500, compared to $160,323 for Hispanic/Latino households, and $119,000 for Black households with a college degree; and
  • Over the past three decades, Black and Hispanic/Latino households, as well as households of other or multiple races or ethnicities, owned on average between one-third and 60% of the retirement wealth of white households. There is no robust indication of those gaps becoming smaller.
These retiree racial wealth gaps are framed as elder poverty in another report, Who Counts as ‘Poor’ in America?, from the New York-based Schwartz Center for Economic Policy Analysis.
“[I]magine being over 65 years old and trying to survive on $15,060 a year,” states the report. “According to official U.S. government poverty levels in 2024, one is considered “poor” in America – and thus qualifying for certain assistance – if their annual income is $15,060 or less for a single person, $31,200 for a family of four.”
The next Congress would be well-advised to get serious about the future solvency of Social Security. No one wants or should expect to become older and poorer.
Charlene Crowell is a senior fellow with the Center for Responsible Lending. She can be reached at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
 
 

NEWS ANALYSIS: Project 2025 Will Assault Black People First; then Everybody Else by Barrington M. Salmon

NEWS ANALYSIS

Project2025Presentation FRAME 1 HeritageFoundation

The Heritage Foundation in Northeast Washington, DC is the architect of Project 2025.

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - If Donald Trump becomes president again, African-Americans stand to lose the most. But so do women, other Black people, brown folks and immigrants – documented and undocumented.

This is not a conjecture.

The Center for American Progress says Project 2025’s sweeping tentacles would touch and influence just about every facet of American life with the goal of implementing “an authoritarian playbook that would destroy the system of checks and balances our forefathers designed when they sought freedom and popular sovereignty almost 250 years ago.

Their researchers continue, “In dissolving the American idea, the plan’s extremist policies would give far-right politicians, judges, and corporations more control over Americans’ lives.”

The LDF Thurgood Marshall Center concurs.  

“Project 2025 represents a direct and deliberate threat to Black communities across seven key areas addressed in this report: civil rights, education, political participation, the criminal legal system, housing, reproductive rights, and environmental protections,” Thurgood Marshall officials write. “At its core, it aims to dismantle essential agencies and regulations that protect civil rights while promoting anti-democratic and anti-justice initiatives that will weaponize civil rights enforcement by federal agencies. These proposals are designed to erode the very principles of equality, justice, and fairness that form the foundation of our democracy—and the impact would be devastating.”

Trump’s animosity toward Black people is palpable. He has spoken with contempt and hatred toward African Americans and immigrants and he promises to fight against and reverse civil rights and social and economic gains African Americans enjoy – if he’s elected to a second term.

The former president is promising retribution for his enemies and said he will defend his fellow Republicans who feel aggrieved and resentful of Civil rights, women’s equality, LGBTQ and trans rights and everything that has elevated non-white people since the 1960s. 

The vehicle Trump and throngs of far-right extremist supporters plan to use to drag the United States back is Project 2025, The 922-page document describes in stark detail every element of the plan. 

Project 2025 is a sweeping rightwing blueprint orchestrated by the Heritage Foundation, a right-wing conservative think tank and the Koch Brothers, which finances far-right and libertarian causes. More than 100 far-right organizations, all funded by a vast and secretive dark money network, are the financial and ideological drivers behind this project.

The actions of liberal politicians in Washington have created a desperate need and unique opportunity for conservatives to start undoing the damage the Left has wrought and build a better country for all Americans in 2025,” the Project 2025 manifesto says. “It is not enough for conservatives to win elections. If we are going to rescue the country from the grip of the radical Left, we need both a governing agenda and the right people in place, ready to carry this agenda out on day one of the next conservative administration.”

Project 2025 plans to privatize government functions, deregulate targeted industries, cut taxes for the most wealthy and American corporations and help the oligarchs churn out money at the expense of American workers, the middle class and everyone else who’re lower on the food chain.

Project 2025 and Trump’s Agenda 47 – another radical Republican scheme that embodies many of the Project 2025 proposals – touches everything from reproductive healthcare, access to abortions and abortion rights, general healthcare, labor, schools, labor unions, education and workers’ overtime. It would redirect more unchecked power into the presidency, use every mechanism and lever available in government to dismantle democratic institutions, while jettisoning America’s middle class, working class and the working poor.

USA Today explains that the plan calls for the overhaul of several federal government agencies, including the FBI. It would allow limited access to abortion pills; repeal aspects of the Affordable Care Act; push the Food and Drug Administration to reverse approval of abortion pills; and further empower Immigration and Customs Enforcement to round up, detain and deport as many as 20 million legal and undocumented immigrants.

Family Compassion, an organization committed to strengthening American families and the institutional and social frameworks that support them, warns of the dangers Project 2025 poses.

“Project 2025 presents a grim outlook for American families and the fundamental values and freedoms that exist today.  The plan will drastically cut budgets to critical support programs, likely leading to widespread financial instability, health crises, educational setbacks, housing insecurity, and food shortages,” agency officials said.

While acting as “a mandate to foster economic growth and enhance national security, Project 2025 poses a significant threat to the stability and well-being of countless families across the nation,” officials warned. “If successful, the project is likely to lead to devastating consequences for existing programs and policies that provide essential support to families.”

The far-right slate of proposals “will undercut the American Dream for another entire generation. And it will have our government turn its back on hundreds of thousands of innocent people in vulnerable situations, which is exactly the opposite of what our faith calls us to do.” 

Harold Meyerson, editor-at-large at The American Prospect, in a commentary titled, “The Far-Right has a Plan to Remake America. They Even Wrote It Down,” said the far-right cabal has compiled an extensive enemies’ list that includes “welfare recipients, lazy and liberal civil servants, anti-business regulators, environmentalists, and union bosses, “scientists, woke bureaucrats, woke educators, woke diplomats, woke generals and admirals, woke G-men, and anyone who doesn’t indulge the next Republican president’s every whim (an adaptation to the likelihood of a Trump nomination).”

Project 2025 organizers are said to have 55,000 Trump loyalists ready to step into civil service positions if Trump regains the White House. The Project 2025 document calls for “Those in charge in the incoming administration are prepared to purge those deemed disloyal after identifying and interviewing “every Treasury Department official who participated in its DEI (diversity, equity, and inclusion) activities and programs, and make such activity ‘“per se grounds for termination of employment.”’

Trump and conservative Republicans are openly hostile to education and what is taught at traditional colleges and universities, characterizing it as anti-American and politically motivated.

Of particular concern is the planned evisceration of the US Department of Education and the traditional public school system coupled with the elevation of school choice and voucher programs for private schools. Republicans would cut federal funding for public schools, including Title I and Head Start programs wish would affect millions of students, particularly those in low-income communities.

According to The Washington Monthly, “Project 2025, from pages 319 to 361, envisions a transformed higher education system in which the federal government strips resources from traditional liberal arts colleges and universities, politicizes college curricula; privatizes student loan programs; and weakens protections against race discrimination, sex discrimination, sexual harassment, and sexual assault.”

Democrats have for months publicized and put a spotlight on Project 2025. And Trump has been trying to dance away, pretending to be completing unaware of the plan and claiming in a number of social media posts that he doesn’t know the people behind the plan and insists that the group doesn’t speak for him.

Try as he may, the numbers don’t lie. A recent CNN report shows that at least 140 people who were in the Trump administration were involved with Project 2025 to varying degrees.

Critics say this radical policy agenda would position each aspect of government to dismantle democracy and pull the rug out from under America’s middle class.

Some areas that are threatened by Project 2025:

Civil rights: A new Trump administration would destroy all affirmative action policies as a way to fight the scourge of “anti-white racism.” Trump’s DOJ Civil Rights Division would also “prosecute all state and local governments, institutions of higher education, corporations, and any other private employers” with affirmative action or DEI policies. The DOJ would also go after “voter registration fraud and unlawful ballot correction,” and any policies that discriminate against White people.

Education: Including eliminating the Department of Education, the plan would roll back the Biden administration’s student debt relief efforts which have eliminated about $138 billion worth of student loan debt so far. Black borrowers would bear the brunt of any large-scale debt reversal.

Economic Support Programs: Project 2025 would potentially significantly undermine economic support programs that families depend on. The Child Tax Credit, a program crucial to reducing child poverty, faces severe cuts or elimination through the reallocation of resources.

Higher Taxes for Middle Class Families: Project 2025’s playbook includes plans to increase taxes for middle class families and allow employers to stop paying overtime. 

Regulations on Contraception and Life Saving Reproductive Care: Project 2025 would remove some forms of emergency contraception from no-cost coverage. The Affordable Care Act would be rescinded, removing coverage of preventive services, including all FDA-approved birth control methods and counseling, without copayments, coinsurance, or deductible. Almost 48 million women of reproductive age would lose their guaranteed no-cost access to emergency contraception. Project 2025 would remove this much-needed option, severely undermining couples’ ability to expand their families. 

Health care: Project 2025 would dismantle the Affordable Care Act and allow states to impose work requirements on Medicaid, a federal program which helps those in the low-income bracket. Some states are preparing to restructure Medicaid, in anticipation of Trump winning in November.

Black Civil Rights and civil society organizations have sounded the alarm:

“Our democracy stands at a crossroads: a path of infinite promise towards a more inclusive, equitable, and durable democracy on the one hand, and one of immeasurable and, potentially, irretrievable demise on the other,” said Jania Nelson, the NAACP Legal Defense Fund’s eighth President and Director-Counsel. “The assault on Black communities envisioned by Project 2025 will almost certainly condemn us to demise.”

Teamsters' Lack of Endorsement is the White Working Class Voting Against Their Own Self Interest by David W. Marshall

Sept. 23, 2024

david w. marshall

 A royalty free image from the transportation industry of a straking truck driver

IStock/ShotbyDave

NEWS ANALYSIS

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - The residents of Springfield, Ohio are experiencing the full and unfair effect from the politics of lies, division and hate generated from the Trump campaign and their followers.

“We did not have threats” before the claims, said Springfield Mayor Rob Rue, referring to the accusations made by Trump and J.D. Vance that Haitians are stealing and eating pets. “We need peace. “We need help, not hate.”

Vance, the U.S. Senator representing the state of Ohio, has since doubled down on the false claim that Haitians are eating pets in Springfield. He also says he’ll continue to describe Haitian residents there as “illegal aliens”, although most have been granted temporary protected legal status in the U.S. because of crisis in Haiti.  

Hate has become the political policy of choice for the Trump/Vance team. It is unfortunate that for many of Trump’s GOP supporters, it’s effective even when a Republican mayor is pleading for it to stop. Trump and Vance are fully aware that their strategy of lies, divisiveness and hate resonates with segments of their base, while the Haitian community in Springfield is suffering needlessly for it.

The false claims would not be used for political advantage if Trump followers were not driven by hate-filled emotions. Many who are White evangelicals claim to be drawn to him because of his policies despite Trump being a man who stirs up racial hate and division which contradicts their Biblical teaching. Union members tend to be the opposite. Trump’s policies are anti-union, yet many union members are still drawn to the candidate of hate.

One in every five voters in swing states is a union worker, according to AFL-CIO President Liz Shuler. Therefore, it is safe to say, Shuler’s statement is true in the swing state of Ohio. The Democratic Party has always been a big tent of inclusion with its members signifying a broad spectrum of beliefs and issues. Despite unions being a key demographic group within the big tent, unions are also a reflection of society’s culture wars.  The Teamsters union with its 1.3 million members is one of the largest unions in the nation representing truck drivers and a wide-range of other workers, from airline pilots to zookeepers. It is considered a valuable part of the big tent.

During previous presidential election cycles, the union endorsed Joe Biden in 2020, as well as Democrats Hillary Clinton in 2016 and Barack Obama in 2008 and 2012. The Teamsters said their internal polling data showed that before Biden’s withdrawal from the presidential race, members backed Biden 44.3 percent to Trump’s 36.3 percent. In a break with tradition, the Executive Board of the Teamsters chose not to make a formal endorsement for this year’s presidential election. The surprise announcement comes after the union released an internal poll showing 58 percent of members supported Trump, compared to 31 percent backing Harris.

The internal polling is an illustration that a number of White working class men from the Rust Belt who supported Biden were unwilling to support Harris. This becomes another case where White working class voters are willing to vote against their own self interest by supporting the candidate of hate. Between the first and second internal polling, the rank-and-file Teamsters must have forgotten how the first Trump administration was largely anti-union and anti-worker.

During his first term, Trump appointed a continuous flow of anti-union, pro-business right-wingers to the federal courts and to the National Labor Relations Board. They forgot how the vice president fought for multiple bills strongly backed by the Teamsters and other unions. This includes the Protecting the Right to Organize Act, which is the labor movement’s primary legislative priority making it easier for the Teamsters and other unions to organized. Trump, by the way, opposes the PRO Act. They forgot how Vice President Harris supported the Bipartisan Infrastructure Act, the CHIPS Act and the Inflation Reduction Act. These are pro-union legislations which will create hundred of thousands of union jobs for Teamsters and other union members. How could they forget that Trump opposes increasing the federal minimum wage? Harris supports increasing it from $7.25 to at least $15. Did they know that Vice President Harris walked the picket line with UAW workers in 2019?

The vice president’s senior advisor, Brian Fallon, noted that a number of Teamsters councils and locals in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and other battleground states unveiled endorsements for the vice president. She also won the endorsement of the National Black Caucus of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters - even as the Executive Board of Teamsters withheld its formal endorsement.

If Biden remained at the top of the ticket, he should have received the Teamsters endorsement as well as Harris. The president supported the pension restoration funding under the Butch Lewis Act which was part of the American Rescue Plan. It was Vice President Harris who cast the tie-breaking vote in the Senate for the American Rescue Plan. Ohio Senator Sherrod Brown named the Butch Lewis legislation in memory of the former retired head of the Teamsters Local 100 in southwest Ohio. This legislation saved the pensions for more than 100,000 Ohioans.

It is a stark reality in our nation. Many of those Ohioans will be moved more by the lies, hate and divisiveness coming from the Trump/Vance rhetoric rather than the actions displayed by the Biden/Harris administration which resulted in their pensions being saved.

David W. Marshall is the founder of the faith-based organization, TRB: The Reconciled Body, and author of the book God Bless Our Divided America.

Consumers to Receive $48 Million After Home Renter's Abuse Case by Charlene Crowell

Single Family Rental Home Urban Institute Image
Single family house for rent. PHOTO: Urban Institute
 
(TriceEdneyWire.com) - The nation’s largest corporate landlord for single-family home rentals was recently fined $48 million by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) for years-long financial abuses of tenants. The firm, Invitation Homes, also will be required to change its practices, and agree to long-term monitoring of its rental activity.
According to the September 24 settlement, renters who resided in one of Invitation Homes’ over 33,000 properties between 2018 and 2023 will be the beneficiaries. Its rental properties across the nation are located in both cities and suburbs including – but not limited to: Atlanta, Chicago, Dallas, Denver, Houston, Los Angeles, Miami, Minneapolis, and Seattle.
“Invitation Homes, the nation’s largest single-family home landlord, preyed on tenants through a variety of unfair and deceptive tactics, from saddling people with hidden fees and unjustly withholding security deposits to misleading people about eviction policies during the pandemic and even pursuing eviction proceedings after people had moved out,” said FTC Chair Lina M. Khan in a September 24 announcement. “No American should pay more for rent or be kicked out of their home because of illegal tactics by corporate landlords. The FTC will continue to use all our tools to protect renters from unlawful business practices.”
Founded in 2012, Invitation Homes’ initial public offering (IPO) raised approximately $1.77 billion, making it and is the second- largest real estate investment trust (REIT) IPO in history, according to its website.
Regulators said Invitation Homes was guilty of anti-consumer practices that included:
  • ·        Deceiving renters about lease costs including $500 ‘reservation fees’ in addition to application fees. Since 2019,  Invitation Homes has collected more than $18 million in application fees alone for deceptively priced houses;
  • ·        Charging undisclosed junk fees – costing consumers up to $1,700 per year;
  • ·        Failing to inspect homes before residents moved in; 
  • ·        Unfairly withholding tenants’ security deposits when they moved out; and 
  • ·        Other misrepresentations including total monthly leasing price, property condition, and availability of emergency maintenance,
In a related consumer alert posted on FTC’s website, Larissa Bungo, a senior attorney, shared more details documenting why the enforcement action is warranted.
“Landlords must truthfully advertise the prices and services they’re offering, said Bungo. “The FTC says Invitation Homes advertised an overall “worry-free leasing lifestyle” and promised pre-inspected homes before move-in and “24/7 emergency maintenance” for any issues, but failed to deliver.”
“Instead, new residents faced major issues like sewage backup, broken appliances, and visible rodent feces,” continued Bungo. “The promises didn’t live up to the hype and, to add insult to injury, according to the FTC, Invitation Homes wrongly withheld some or all of renters’ security deposits for things like normal wear and tear or damage that was already there before renters moved in. Which is also illegal.”
The fall settlement also marks a milestone victory for consumer advocates that in recent years have urged federal regulatory agencies to adopt and enforce rules to better protect consumers from an array of junk fees.
For example, in 2022, four national consumer advocates – Americans for Financial Reform, the Consumer Federation of America, the National Consumer Law Center, and the Center for Responsible Lending (CRL), jointly urged the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), to enact junk fee rules.
“Hidden fees and costs strip wealth from the most vulnerable consumers who are struggling to make ends meet,” wrote the advocates. “The most impacted consumers often come from communities of color already burdened by other predatory practices, further exacerbating racial inequities… Disclosure is intended to give consumers an opportunity “know before they owe.” But that knowledge is worthless if charges are imposed under circumstances that most consumers would not expect even if, with hindsight, the fees were disclosed.”
By early February 2023, junk fee advocacy grew to involve more than 40 national and state consumer advocates who together appealed to the FTC for its own agency rules and actions.
Created in 1915, the FTC has two primary missions: protecting competition and protecting consumers. It is empowered to investigate as well as prevent unfair methods of competition, and unfair or deceptive acts or practices affecting commerce. 
Consumers who suspect a company may be engaging in fraud, scams or bad business practices can share their concerns at https://reportfraud.ftc.gov/
 

$148 Million Returned to Consumers in Two Consumer Protection Actions By Charlene Crowell

September 22, 2024
 
poll lake research cfpb sep2024 2
(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Recent back-to-back financial enforcement actions taken by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) underscore why the nation’s sole agency dedicated to consumer financial fairness retains broad and strong voter support.
On September 11, TD Bank, the nation’s 10th largest commercial bank with 1,200 branches and 2,600 ATMs in 15 states and the District of Columbia was ordered for the second time by CFPB to pay restitution to thousands of consumers for illegally tarnishing credit reports of tens of thousands consumers. It repeatedly provided consumer credit bureaus with inaccurate information on its customers about personal bankruptcies and credit card delinquencies. It also failed to properly investigate and resolve customer disputes linked to the faulty information. Given the widespread use of credit reports, the bank’s actions threatened customers’ ability to get a loan, job, or housing.
Under the terms of the recent order, the bank will return $7.76 million to its harmed consumers and pay a $20 million penalty as well.
“The CFPB’s investigation found that TD Bank illegally threatened the consumer reports of its customers with fraudulent information and then barely lifted a finger to fix it,” said CFPB Director Rohit Chopra. “Rather than treating its customers fairly and following the law, TD Bank’s management clearly cared more about growth and expanding its empire through mergers. Regulators will need to focus major attention on TD Bank to change its course.”
On the following day, September 12, CFPB ordered another repeat offender, Navient – formerly known as Sallie Mae - to pay more restitution and banned it from ever servicing student loans again. Under the terms of the order, Navient would have to pay $100 million to harmed borrowers, and a $20 million penalty.   
The efforts to remove Navient from future student loan servicing followed several previous enforcement actions including: 
  • A 2014 $100 million joint order by the Department of Justice  and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation  for illegally overcharging nearly 78,000 military servicemembers;
  • A 2021 order from the Department of Education  to return more than $22 million in overcharges; and
  • In 2022, a $1.85 billion settlement brought by 39 state attorneys general for originating predatory student loans in addition to its forbearance steering practices.
 Consumer advocates also applauded the most recent Navient order.
“This is a step toward accountability and sends a powerful message to all student loan servicers that such behavior will not be condoned”, said Jaylon Herbin, director of federal campaigns at the Center for Responsible Lending (CRL). “For decades, Navient used deceptive tactics to steer borrowers into high-cost, long-term forbearances instead of placing them in affordable income-driven repayment (IDR) plans, leaving countless borrowers – many of whom were borrowers of color and low-income students – trapped in a cycle of debt.”
These and other actions that together demonstrate governmental support for financial fairness and are underscored in findings from a recent survey. Fresh data shows that voters of all or no political affiliations support the CFPB’s crack down on junk fees, discrimination, and other harmful actions from financial firms.  
A bipartisan polling team from Lake Research Partners and Chesapeake Beach Consulting conducted the survey commissioned by Americans for Financial Reform (AFR) and CRL. Released on September 9, the survey showed:
  • Nine in ten voters (91%) believe it is important to regulate financial services to ensure they are fair for consumers; this includes 95% of Democrats, 87% of Republicans, and 88% of independents;
  • After reading information about overdraft fees, 84% of voters support limiting the price banks can charge to only what the overdraft costs them, with no additional profit; a majority support this policy strongly;
  • 82% support the CFPB using all the tools available to hold financial companies accountable for discrimination in lending, with over three quarters in support across party lines;
  • 82% of voters support government regulators capping credit card late fees at $8 per month, down from $32 per month; at least three quarters of voters across party lines are supportive, with at least half strongly supporting the cap; and
  • After hearing a short description of the CFPB and its mission, four in five voters (81%) express support for the agency; favorability for the Consumer Bureau has been consistently very high over the past decade, ticking up slightly in 2020 and remaining at an elevated level. 
“Whether the subject is credit card late fees, medical debt, or private equity’s growing impact in health care, voters favor tough regulation and oversight of the financial sector,” said Lisa Donner, executive director at Americans for Financial Reform.
“Voters of all political persuasions understand the need for the Consumer Bureau – a government watchdog that protects consumers from financial firms’ junk fees, illegal discrimination, and other misconduct,” said Mike Calhoun, president at the Center for Responsible Lending.  “This poll reaffirms that politicians, regardless of their political affiliation, would best represent their constituents by supporting the Consumer Bureau and by keeping their hands off its funding structure.”
The survey has a range of additional questions, including on fintech, small business lending, and bank failures. To read the complete poll, visit: https://www.responsiblelending.org/research-publication/voters-strongly-support-consumer-bureaus-mission-across-political-spectrum. 
Charlene Crowell is a senior fellow with the Center for Responsible Lending. She can be reached at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
X