Dec. 12, 2011

Ofield Dukes, Dead at 79, Remembered as Champion for the Black Press

By Hazel Trice Edney

In this NNPA Summer Conference 2006 photo, Ofield Dukes receives an award from then NNPA Foundation Chairman  Brian Townsend and then NNPA Chairman John B. Smith Sr. in appreciation for his years of service to the Black Press of America. The Conference was in Detroit that year.

(TriceEdneyWire.com) – Ofield Dukes, the public relations mogul known as a powerful mover and shaker in Washington political circles, is remembered this week – not only as a national PR giant - but as a champion for the Black Press.

“He was a remarkable, extraordinary individual whose presence will be missed beyond measure. He was probably the leading advocate of the Black Press and was one of the great pioneers,” said Danny Bakewell Sr., immediate past chairman of the National Newspaper Publishers Association, the Black Press of America, which Dukes served faithfully for decades. “He was always there when we asked him to do something. His legacy will be a light of truth and courage and undaunting pursuit of equality for Black people measured through the eyes of the Black Press.”

Dukes died Wednesday, Dec. 7, at Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit, where he started his career as an award-winning columnist and editorial writer for the Michigan Chronicle from 1958 to 1964. He had returned to his home of Detroit in the latter part of this year, suffering with multiple myeloma, a blood cancer that affects the bones. He was 79.

"While Ofield's accomplishments and accolades are varied and plentiful over the past four decades, the best adjective I can bestow upon him is true and loyal friend who was like a brother to me,” said John B. Smith Sr., publisher of the Atlanta Inquirer and two-term NNPA Chairman, a fete that he attributes to Dukes’ support. “I will never be able to recount the many times we discussed various issues pertaining to the Black Press of America and his foresight and aptitude was always on point…Ofield was among the premiere communications strategists you could ever find.”

A viewing was set for 9 a.m.-9 p.m. on Tuesday, Dec. 13, at the James H. Cole Funeral Home Northwest Chapel at 16100 Schaefer Highway in Detroit. The funeral was set for 11 a.m. Wednesday, Dec. 14, at Tabernacle Baptist Church, 2080 W. Grand Blvd. in Detroit with interment at Woodlawn Cemetery, 19975 Woodward Ave. For more information on arrangements: Naomi R. Patton, 313-223-4485 or This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

A Washington, D.C. memorial service is being planned for Wednesday, January 11.

Richmond Free Press Editor/Publisher Raymond H. Boone Sr., who has known Dukes for 50 years, remained in touch with him during his final months.

“We remained in constant touch until the last weeks before his death. In our last telephone conversation, he remained courageously upbeat while cherishing the blessings of his life as he faced the reality of his future,” Boone said.

Boone met Dukes as a member of the Johnson-Humphrey Administration, which Boone was covering as a reporter for the Washington Afro American. “We immediately struck a lasting friendship in 1964,” Boone recalled.

After Humphrey lost his presidential bid against Richard M. Nixon in 1968, Dukes established Ofield Dukes & Associates, beginning a stellar PR career. The first African-American recipient of both the Gold and Silver Anvils, the highest awards of the Public Relations Society of America (PRSA), Dukes was among the most highly sought after public relations executives in Washington. Motown was his first client.

Yet, he remained grounded, never forsaking his passion for the progress of Black people.

“As a standout in politics, education and business, his foremost concern was how he could help others and advance the cause of human rights,” Boone said. “He knew the importance of the Black Press and was a strong advocate for its mission to give a strong voice to the voiceless.”

Dukes organized the first Congressional Black Caucus Dinner in 1971 and worked tediously in his final years to keep the CBC and Black Press connected.

“He will be sorely missed for his many years of service to the Democratic party, the Congressional Black Caucus and The Black Press of America,” says Dorothy Leavell, former NNPA president and former chair of the NNPA Foundation of which Dukes served as a board member for six years. “He loved the Black Press and he served it faithfully throughout his career. We shall all miss his service to the Fourth Estate.”

Leavell specifically recalled Dukes’ working for Black Press inclusion in briefings with President Clinton as well as the inclusion of the Black Press on advertising buys with the Democratic National Committee. Dukes was the architect of the collaboration between CBC members and NNPAF's Wire Service to syndicate CBC op-editorials to NNPA’s 200-plus member newspapers.

Among CBC stalwarts, Dukes was especially close to U. S. Rep. Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.).

“As a Member of Congress, I have been blessed to call many wonderful people my friend, but none more than Ofield Dukes. I am extremely saddened by the passing of such a great man who had significant impact in not only my life, but that of my colleagues in the Congressional Black Caucus, dating back to its founding,” Rangel said in a statement. “Aside from his many accomplishments in business, politics and his personal life, Ofield was simply a true and kind person who sought to make our country a better place for all. I will forever miss his virtue, justness and sincerity.”

Dukes’ accomplishments are extensive:

He was born Aug. 8, 1932, in Rutledge, Ala., served in the U.S. Army from 1952 to 1954, earned a journalism degree at Wayne State University in 1958 and got a job at the Chronicle the same year. He left the Chronicle for Washington, D.C. in 1964 to serve as deputy director of information for the President's Committee on Equal Employment Opportunity under President Lyndon B. Johnson. In 1966, he joined the staff of Vice President Hubert Humphrey as a consultant and continued as a consultant to every Democratic presidential campaign since then.

In 2002, Radio One founder Cathy Hughes named the building that houses three of her Detroit stations the Ofield Dukes Communications Center because of his sustaining impact on her career.

Known to spout wisdom and encouragement, Dukes taught as an adjunct professor at Howard University for l7 years and at the American University School of Communications for eight years.

He is founder of the Black Public Relations Society of Washington and was a member of the Washington, DC/National Capital Public Relations Society of America Hall of Fame and the Virginia Communications Hall of Fame.

The PRSA Detroit, which will hold its first diversity summit in February, has named the summit after Dukes and is also providing a scholarship in his name, according to the Detroit Free Press.

Dukes is survived by his beloved daughter Roxi Victorian, a performing arts graduate from Howard University; a grandson; and three sisters, Anne Harris, Betty Hayden, and Lou Brock.

"His kind, like that, there ain't no more Ofield Dukeses,” said Sam Logan, publisher of the Michigan Chronicle, in an interview with the Detroit Free Press. The Chronicle honored Dukes upon its 75^th anniversary in November. “There will not be another," Logan said.

Concludes Ray Boone: “We can best pay tribute to Ofield by emulating his high level of expertise and unswerving commitment to justice.”

News Analysis

Assault On Voting Rights

By Jabari Asim

Jabari Asim

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - A strategic campaign to deny voting rights to African-Americans and Latinos is well underway, according to a report issued Monday by the NAACP and the NAACP Legal Defense Fund. The report, “Defending Democracy,” finds evidence of a coordinated movement to undo the political gains of the 2008 election and reverse the nation’s half-century of voting-rights progress.

The block-the-vote effort, funded by wealthy conservatives, includes more than 40 different legislative proposals and involves millions of dollars. The report’s sponsors say the document is intended not only to alert and inform voters but also to call them to action. In a joint statement, both groups urged their supporters to join them in a “quest to preserve and protect” voting rights for all Americans.

After Obama’s thunderous victory provided a dazzling display of multicultural ballot-box power, oppositional forces began working to return the electoral atmosphere to its pre-Civil Rights depths. If they succeed, the impact of voting would be drastically diminished and corporations and their allies would gain even more freedom to operate outside the limits of government. In this context, the block-the-vote campaign can be seen as a dry run for an entirely new form of sovereignty.

The shift from citizen-powered democracy would enable the rise of a new type of political animal that the New York Times has dubbed “the policy-making billionaire.” Whereas some tycoons have asserted their policy-making impulse via aggressive philanthropic projects in such areas as job training and public health initiatives, others have pointed their wallets toward schemes designed to undermine the very infrastructure of our republic. Of the latter, the most active are David and Charles Koch, billionaire heads of Koch Industries. In addition to running the nation’s largest privately held company, the Koch brothers have funneled millions into think tanks, the Tea Party and other groups animated by a virulent distaste for justice, compassion and equal opportunity.

In eloquent prose bolstered by judiciously chosen research, “Defending Democracy” urges progressive-minded Americans to act now before it’s too late. Their success depends on generating sufficient momentum to overcome an opponent that is already off and running. It also requires a far-reaching plan that is both future-oriented and sensitive to the lessons of the past.

Roots of Repression

As the report notes, the struggle for fairness and full equality has been “characterized by expansion often followed by swift contraction.” Prior to the Civil War, the Dred Scott decision appeared to settle the question of black citizenship once and for all. Supreme Court chief justice Roger B. Taney, speaking for the majority, wrote that Negro equality was “incompatible with the Constitution,” leaving blacks with “no rights which a white man was bound to respect.” Despite more than a century of struggle aimed at destroying the legacy of Scott, Taney’s damning idea continues to resonate.

After the Civil War, attempts to dismantle the legislative advances of Reconstruction were extensive and successful, prompting W.E.B. DuBois to soberly reflect, “the slave went free; stood a brief moment in the sun; then moved back again toward slavery.” During the period between Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, enemies of freedom have strived to counter every significant advance with an equal and opposite push backward. Opposition to black rights, while never the sole obsession of a particular faction or party, has been as steadfast and unrelenting as the national faith in free markets and manifest destiny.

New Era, New Tactics

In previous decades, opponents could freely employ poll taxes, grandfather clauses, literacy tests, intimidation and lynching as weapons to prevent minorities from voting. The modern era’s discouragement of overt racism requires the use of cunning, more insidious maneuvers. The most chilling passages in “Defending Democracy” are those providing details of the new tactics.

According to the report, the block-the-vote operations target states in which minority voters have demonstrated significant influence or where Census figures indicate substantial population growth among communities of color. Attacks on voting rights include proposals to enact photo-ID requirements (bills have been introduced in 34 states), attempts to challenge the core protections of the Voting Rights Act, efforts to curtail or eliminate early voting, absentee ballots and voter-registration campaigns, and enacting laws denying felons the right to vote.

Unsurprisingly, each of those measures disproportionately affects black and Latino voters—and not by accident. “Defending Democracy” traces many of these efforts to legislation drafted by the conservative group American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC). The report quotes the founder of ALEC explaining, “our leverage in the elections quite candidly goes up as the voting populace goes down.”

Clearly, the 2008 presidential election provided a motivating spark for ALEC and its cohorts. As the New York Times recently noted, in 2008 Obama “won in places where no Democrat had won in a while, including Virginia, North Carolina, Indiana and Colorado. And he won in quite a few states that Democrats cannot traditionally rely on, like Florida and Ohio.” Less than a week after the Times report, the Associated Press noted, “Efforts to restrict early voting have been approved in Florida, Ohio and Wisconsin.” Its unpatriotic ideology aside, the movement apparently conceals a method behind its madness.

And money, too. Lots of it.

Financing Unfairness

A slippery, shapeless entity with countless tentacles extending into such disparate worlds as health-care, politics, business deregulation and environmental concerns sounds like something out of a space movie or a spy novel. But Koch Industries’ long, powerful reach more than proves that reality is often stranger than fiction.  With resources in the billions stemming from Brawny paper towels, Dixie cups and other products, the Koch brothers use their money to steamroll anybody—or any government—that dares to stand in their way.

According to Jane Mayer of The New Yorker, the Kochs “have funded opposition campaigns against so many Obama Administration policies—from health-care reform to the economic-stimulus program—that, in political circles, their ideological network is known as the Kochtopus.”

The Kochs carry out their schemes through a variety of innocent-sounding front groups. A partial list includes the Americans for Prosperity Foundation, the Institute for Justice, the Institute for Humane Studies, the Bill of Rights Institute, the Cato Institute, the Independent Women’s Forum, the Foundation for Research on Economics and the Environment, Citizens for a Sound Economy, Citizens for the Environment and Patients United Now. According to Mayer, “Americans for Prosperity, in concert with the family’s other organizations, has been instrumental in disrupting the Obama Presidency.” What could be more disruptive than preventing millions of potential supporters from casting their ballots in the next presidential election?

Battling Back: The Struggle Continues

In the past, Democrats have been as active as Republicans in keeping blacks and other minorities from the ballot box. During the years since Bush v. Gore, however, efforts at disfranchisement have acquired a distinct right-wing aura.  Obama’s presence in the White House seems to have intensified their exertions.

Their activities haven’t escaped notice. Florida Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz heads the Democratic National Committee. She told the Associated Press, “we’re aggressively engaged in making sure that we help voters move these obstacles and barriers that are being put in their way that are essentially designed to rig an election when Republicans can’t win these elections on the merits.”

The right’s frenzied movement echoes the feverish resistance that Southern states mounted against activists during the Fifties and Sixties. And the tactics remain dishearteningly similar. Consider civil-rights hero John Lewis’s description of Selma, Ala., in 1955. He told National Public Radio, “In Selma, you could only attempt to register to vote on the first and third Mondays of each month. You had to go down to the courthouse and get a copy of the so-called literacy test and attempt to pass the test. And people stood in line day in and day out failing to get a copy of the test or failing to pass the test.”

In Lewis’ view, the subsequent protests that he and others organized “created a sense of righteous indignation among the American people.”

“Defending Democracy” calls for a similar activist spirit. The report recommends “employing all available tools and advocacy techniques from litigation and political action, to grassroots organizing.” Other suggestions include spreading the word about block-the-vote campaigns to friends and neighbors, expressing dissatisfaction to elected representatives, volunteering at the polls and joining a march for freedom in New York on Dec. 10. Progressives believe that only a forceful, concerted effort can protect the freedoms guaranteed by the Voting Rights Act, a document already regarded as fragile by some observers on the left and right. When signing that tide-changing legislation on Aug. 6, 1965, President Lyndon Baines Johnson observed, "The vote is the most powerful instrument ever devised by man for breaking down injustice and destroying the terrible walls which imprison men because they are different from other men."

Few have been as dedicated to rebuilding those terrible walls as the forces currently arrayed against voting rights.  As “Defending Democracy” makes clear, to remain silent and do nothing would be the same as handing them the bricks and mortar.

Jabari Asim is Editor-in-Chief of The Crisis magazine, the NAACP’s flagship publication.

Mumia Abu-Jamal Wins Against Death Penalty, but Still in Prison for Life

(TriceEdneyWire.com) – A case of justice long fought by civil rights leaders has received a major victory, yet is not totally won. The Philadelphia District Attorney's Office has dropped its pursuit of the death penalty for former journalist Mumia Abu-Jamal.  But, he is still in prison for life.

According to a release from the NAACP Legal Defense & Education Fund, Inc. (LDF), Abu-Jamal is now required by law to be “sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole for his controversial 1982 murder conviction in the shooting death of a police officer in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.”

The LDF and the Widener law professor Judith Ritter have represented Abu-Jamal in his appeals of the murder conviction and the death sentence.

John Payton, Director-Counsel of LDF stated in the release: "The District Attorney did the right thing.  After three long decades, it was time to bring the quest for a death sentence for Mr. Abu-Jamal to an end."  Prof. Ritter added, "There is no question that justice is served when a death sentence from a misinformed jury is overturned. Thirty years later, the District Attorney' s decision not to seek a new death sentence also furthers the interests of justice."

A formal resentencing hearing has not been scheduled, but will be held in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas.  Civil rights leaders, who have consistently argued that Mumia was framed, have already begun discussion on strategies for his total freedom.

Dec. 12, 2011

Two Thousand Leaders Rally for Jobs and Affordable Housing