banner2e top

More Children Living in High-Poverty Communities Than 10 Years Ago by Maria Morales

Feb. 26, 2012

More Children Living in High-Poverty Communities Than 10 Years Ago
By Maria Morales
Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from the Afro American Newspaper

(TriceEdneyWire.com)  — Nearly 8 million of America’s children live in high-poverty areas, about 1.6 million more since 2000, according to a new report from the Annie E. Casey Foundation. The Baltimore-based organization does research and funding to programs nationally that focus on disadvantaged children and families.

About 7.9 million, or 11 percent, of the nation’s children are growing up in areas where at least 30 percent of residents live below the federal poverty level of $22,000 per year for a family of four, according to the latest data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS), which covers 2006 through 2010.

African American, American Indian and Latino children are six to nine times more likely to live in high-poverty communities than their white counterparts.

Washington, D.C. ranks 10th out of the top 10 U.S. cities, with 32 percent of its children living in impoverished neighborhoods, a decrease since 2000. Baltimore falls toward the middle of the top 50 cities, listed at 22nd place, with 25 percent of its children living in poor neighborhoods.

The state of Maryland has one of the lowest numbers of poor children in the country, with just three percent of its children reportedly living in high-poverty areas.

According to the ACS, almost all states saw the number of children in high-poverty neighborhoods climb.

In 2000, 6.3 million kids, or 9 percent, were living in areas of concentrated poverty.

Such communities often lack access to resources that are critical to healthy growth and development, including quality education, medical care and safe outdoor spaces, said Laura Speer, associate director for policy reform and data at the Casey Foundation.

“Kids in these high-poverty areas are at risk for health and developmental challenges in almost every aspect of their lives, to their chances for economic success as adults,” Speer said. “Transforming disadvantaged communities into better places to raise children is vital to ensuring the next generation and their families realize their potential.”

Not all children living in these high-poverty neighborhoods are poor themselves, Speer clarified. “Nearly half of the kids living in these neighborhoods are in families above the poverty line, although they may be just above the line.”

But the outcomes for children in those communities are relatively the same, despite income, Speer said. The study found children of all income levels that lived in poor communities had higher stress levels, more social and emotional problems, struggle in school or drop out, especially children of color. “Kids living in a poor neighborhood are more affected,” she said. “It really is double jeopardy.”

Speer said that children in low-income families that live in higher income neighborhoods have a greater chance of success. “When a low-income child goes to school in a higher income area, they do better for the most part,” she said.

The survey also showed that three out of four children in these neighborhoods have at least one parent in the home who works. “Most people think incorrectly that these are families where no one is working,” Speer said. “But what we found is that the adults in the home may be working and need a better job, or are actively looking.

These communities need to create economic opportunities that parents and children can take advantage of, from schools to jobs.”

Affirmative Action: Conservative Supreme Court Offers Little Hope for Survival

Feb. 26, 2012

Affirmative Action: Conservative Supreme Court Offers Little Hope for Survival

Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from the Richmond Free Press

supreme_court

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Affirmative action once again appears to be on the chopping block.

The U.S. Supreme Court this week triggered nerve-jangling concern about the future of the decades-old policy. The nation’s highest court did so by agreeing to consider afresh whether race can be used in university admissions — just nine years after approving the use of affirmative action in a landmark decision in which now-retired Justice Sandra Day O’Connor played a key role.

The justices decided Feb. 21 to revisit the potentially divisive issue. They accepted a case challenging the admission policy the University of Texas employs to ensure racial and ethnic diversity in its undergraduate classes.

At issue: Whether the use of affirmative action violates the 14th Amendment guarantee of equal protection for White students competing with Black and other minority students for places in the freshman class at the state’s flagship university.

The agreement to hear the case to many legal experts is like a loud clanging bell tolling the court’s readiness to sweep affirmative action from the nation’s campuses — a move the court’s most conservative justice, Clarence Thomas, has long supported. Justice Thomas is the lone black member among the nine justices.

The fact the court is taking this case “is troubling news for those who support efforts to diversify institutions of higher education,” said Theodore M. “Ted” Shaw, a Columbia Law School professor and former director-counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund.

Shaw believes that Justice Thomas and the rest of the conservative majority, led by Chief Justice John Roberts, has

taken the case so it can reverse the 2003 decision and outlaw policies dating back to the 1960s that increase educational access opportunities for African-Americans, Hispanics and other disadvantaged minorities. He noted that the Roberts Court in 2007 “struck down voluntary school desegregation efforts.”

In that ruling, he said that the court “evinced hostility to race-conscious diversity efforts.”

The Texas case began when lead plaintiff Abigail Fisher and another white teenager were denied admission to the University of Texas and filed a constitutional challenge to race-based admissions nearly four years ago. Both are set to graduate from other schools this year.

Texas’ defense of its policies have been upheld in lower federal courts that have found the university created a program based on the high court’s groundbreaking decision that upheld a diversity plan of the University of Michigan Law School. In that 5-4 decision in Grutter v. Bollinger, the court established for the first time that a university’s compelling interest in creating classroom diversity justified the use of affirmative action.

Then-Justice O’Connor cast the decisive fifth vote. She wrote in her decision that schools currently are entitled to maintain such race-based policies to promote diversity, but expected the policies to be phased out as unnecessary within 25 years. She retired in 2006 and was replaced by a more conservative justice, Samuel Alito, who has disdained race-based policies as a court member.

Only eight justices will hear the case now expected to be election campaign. Justice Elena Kagan already has indicated she will not participate, likely because she worked on the Texas case as solicitor general in the Obama administration before joining the court in 2010.

With Justice O’Connor gone and Justice Kagan out, Justice Anthony Kennedy’s potential swing vote becomes essential in an eight-member court, Shaw said.

If Justice Kennedy joins three members of the liberal block, that would create an evenly divided court and affirm the lower court’s ruling upholding the Texas race-based plan, he said. If Justice Kennedy joins four justices in the conservative bloc to form a majority against the Texas plan, he said, then affirmative action is in deep trouble.

Some think that the court could limit its ruling to the University of Texas if the court is simply troubled by the university’s broad use of race to attempt to achieve diversity in every classroom at the university.

At the University of Texas, the majority of freshmen are admitted by means of a state law that requires race-neutral admission for the top 10 percent of every Texas high school class. The university uses affirmative action to fill any remaining slots. Shaw, though, is gloomily certain that this the new case is the one that the court’s “affirmative action opponents have been looking for to overturn Grutter.”

Others are cheering that thought. “The court is right to take the case,” said Roger Clegg, president of the Center for Equal Opportunity and a longtime critic of race-based admissions programs.

“As our nation becomes more and more multiracial and multiethnic” Clegg said, “it becomes more and more untenable for our public institutions to label, sort, and discriminate on the basis of skin color and national origin.”

That’s also the view of Joshua Thompson of the Pacific Legal Foundation, which also wants the court to stamp out affirmative action. “A policy of race-based preferences and discrimination in admissions is not just unfair, it is unconstitutional under the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment.”

African Diaspora in the UK Installs Plaque for Malcolm X

Feb. 26, 2012

African Diaspora in the UK Installs Plaque for Malcolm X

Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from GIN

malcolmxheadline1965

(TriceEdneyWire.com) – Years after a visit by El Hajj Malik El Shabazz (formerly Malcolm X) to Smethwick, Birmingham, England, the community has erected a plaque in his honor on the date of his assassination in New York's Audubon Ballroom.

Malcolm X visited Smethwick, after addressing the first meeting of the Council of African Organizations in London.

“The American civil rights activist … made the walk after being invited to view some of the residential houses being denied to African Caribbean and Asian property seekers in the Smethwick,” according to the Nu Jak media release.

“At the time the council had a policy of segregated housing,” the release said. ”The visit by Malcolm X to Marshall Road brought international media attention to the issue, and within a few months a new administration had been sworn in and the policy was overturned.

“Almost half a century later, visitors and site-seers from all over the world still visit Marshall Street to follow in the footsteps of his historic walk.”

To commemorate this, on Feb. 21, 2012, 47 years to the day of his passing, a coalition of local groups honored Malcolm X with a blue heritage plaque on Marshall Road in Smethwick.

Mandela Out of Hospital After Minor Surgery

Feb. 26, 2012

Mandela Out of Hospital After Minor Surgery

 nelsonmandela

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Former South Africa President Nelson Mandela, 93, has been released from the hospital after undergoing a minor surgery. Reports say he is in good health.

The Associated Press reports the 93-year-old Nobel peace laureate was released Sunday after undergoing a laparoscopy, a procedure by which "surgeons make an incision in the belly to insert a thin, lighted tube to look at abdominal organs."

South Africa President Jacob Zuma said "doctors have assured us that there is nothing to worry about", according to AP reports.

The world-revered Mandela spent 27 years in prison for protesting against aparthied, the racist and White supremacist-based government that formerly ruled South Africa. He became South Africa's first Black president in 1994 and served for five years. According to AP, he last appeared in public in July 2010.

 

Selma to Montgomery March to Protest New Voter Laws by Hazel Trice Edney

Reposted: Feb. 26, 2012

Selma to Montgomery March to Protest New Voter Laws

By Hazel Trice Edney

selmamarch01
A commemoration of the 1965 March from Selma to Montgomery will take place March 4-9, led by the National Action Network.

(TriceEdneyWire.com) – With a potential 5 million voters being affected by prospective new laws in 34 states, the Rev. Al Sharpton says his Selma to Montgomery march to be held March 4-9, aims to expose what appears to be a goal of disenfranchisement in the Nov. 6 election.

“It will dramatically show, by bringing scores of people – labor and others who are supporting us - to the steps where this was enacted in the first place, how this is not about anything except the violation of voting rights,” Sharpton said in an interview. “The drama of going back to Selma and staying every night where they stayed in ’65 makes it an irrevocable pitch to America that they are uprooting and undermining what was achieved in the Civil Rights Movement.”

Sharpton’s remarks were made following a Capital Hill press conference last week alongside members of the Congressional Black Caucus who represent a string of states that are being hit by the new laws. “Five million people who voted in 2008 will not be able to vote this year if those laws go into effect in 34 states,” Sharpton said.

The event will commemorate the historic 1965 Selma to Montgomery voting rights march. It will begin at the Edmund Pettus Bridge on March 4 and end with a rally at the Alabama State Capitol on Friday, March 9. Civil rights icon U. S. Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.) will participate in the march activities it was announced. Georgia is one of the states affected by the new laws.

The main issue is that states are passing laws that require voters to have a government-issued photo identification card in order to vote. Those states include Kansas, Texas, Wisconsin, Indiana, Tennessee, Alabama, Georgia, and South Carolina. Several other require proof of citizenship.

The issue has been targeted and heavily dealt with by civil rights leaders who say the laws are clear attempts to undermine the Black vote.

“Eleven percent of all Americans and 25 percent of African-Americans do not have driver’s licenses. In Georgia, 36 percent of those over 75 do not have a driver’s license,” wrote columnist Julianne Malveaux recently.

Republicans claim the new laws intend to prevent voter fraud. But, according to Malveaux, “a five-year investigation by the Bush Department of Justice showed a scant 86 voter fraud conviction, and most of these cases could not have been prevented by voter ID laws. Another study showed that only 24 people were convicted of or pled guilty to illegal voting between 2002 and 2005.”

Various legal strategies are being used by legislators and activists to fight the laws from state to state. The bottom line is that the powers that be need to see that the people are not sitting back in agreement with it, Sharpton said.

“This is going to be a long process. But, the courts and everybody else need to see people rise up,” he said.

Sharpton’s National Action Network is being joined by a string of other civil rights organizations, including AFSCME (American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees); the National Council of La Raza; the National Organization for Women; the National Urban League; The Leadership Conference on Civil & Human Rights; The American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO), NAACP; the National Coalition on Black Civic Participation; the American Civil Liberties Union; the American Federation of Teachers; and Communications Workers of America. 

Details and background on the history of the march on the NAN website explain how Sharpton believes the same kind of uprising that proved successful in 1965 can have the same affect today.

“National and international attention of the march highlighted the struggle, the adversity, the violence as well as the determination of the Selma protestors. As a result of the media coverage worldwide, Congress rushed to enact legislation that would guarantee voting rights for all Americans. President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Voting Rights Act into law on August 6, 1965,” said a statement on the site.

For more information on how to participate in the march and all activities, please visit http://nationalactionnetwork.net/events/94/selma-to-montgomery-march/ or call the NAN Hotline at 877-626-4651.

“How did we get a Voting Rights Act in the first place?” said Sharpton. “We need to have consistent dramatic efforts.”

X