banner2e top

Obama, Democrats Defend Voting Rights

Obama, Democrats Defend Voting Rights
Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from the Richmond Free Press

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - There’s a new battle looming between Republicans and Democrats at the U.S. Capitol, and this one doesn’t have to do with guns, immigration or debt reduction — it’s about voting rights.

President Obama and Democratic leaders want to make voting easier for Americans as several recent studies suggest long lines at polling places and onerous voter registration procedures cost the Democrats hundreds of thousands of votes in November— particularly among African-Americans and Hispanics.

The president has been signaling his intentions since election night, when he made mention of the long queues to vote and intoned: “We have to fix that.” He reiterated that sentiment in his second inaugural address two weeks ago.

“Our journey is not complete until no citizen is forced to wait for hours to exercise the right to vote,” said President Obama, a one-time community organizer who once helped register impoverished Chicago voters.

The president’s State of the Union address this week was expected to address the issue. Congressional Democrats are behind him. They’ve already submitted bills that would require states to provide online voter registration and provide for at least 15 days of early voting. Those bills aren’t likely to pass, however, given Republicans control the House of Representatives.

Nonetheless, several states are currently considering expanding early voting, including the critical battlegrounds of Virginia, Ohio and Florida. The Sunshine State was particularly plagued with problems on Nov. 6, when some voters in minority neighborhoods waited as long as six hours to cast their ballots.

Voting rights are in the national spotlight just as the U.S. Supreme Court prepares to hear a challenge to the 1965 Voting Rights Act, legislation that was passed at the height of the Civil Rights Movement to prevent African-Americans from being denied the right to vote in the South. Civil liberties watchdogs point out those changes often include stricter voter ID requirements that can serve to disenfranchise minorities and the poor — many of them Democratic voters.

The Voting Rights Act requirement, known as Section 5, applies to Virginia and all or part of 16 states that have a history of civil rights abuses at the ballot box. A number of civil rights groups will be at the Supreme Court on Feb. 27 to argue against Shelby County’s arguments.

Many on the far right of the Republican Party are dead set against any efforts to modernize voter registration. At a recent Heritage Foundation panel in Washington, moderator Hans von Spakovsky decried calls by some voting rights advocates to implement universal voter registration, saying it will invite “fraud” and permit non-citizens to vote.

Despite Republican claims to the contrary, there’s scant evidence that voter fraud is a chronic problem in the United States, although Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach told the panel that “aliens” stealing votes and invading voter lists was a pervasive, genuine problem. Republicans also have been griping in recent weeks about the electoral college, the controversial institution that officially elects the president and the vice president every four years.

When voters go to the polls on Election Day in the U.S., they choose which candidate receives their state’s “electors,” and the electors then select the president and his No. 2. The electoral college has occasionally permitted a candidate who received fewer popular votes to win the election, most recently George W. Bush in 2000. Nonetheless, 13 years and two crushing electoral defeats later, some Republicans apparently have had enough of the current day electoral college.

Republican proposals in states that include Michigan, Ohio and Pennsylvania would see electoral college votes assigned based on the winners of congressional districts, a setup that benefits Republicans. If the system had been in place in Virginia in November, for example, Republican Mitt Romney would have won nine of 13 electoral votes, even while losing the state by 150,000 votes.

Reince Preibus, chairman of the Republican National Committee, threw his support behind those proposals recently, even though Virginia Republicans killed the Electoral College change last week.

The Associated Press contributed heavily to this article.

Congressional Black Caucus Outlines Agenda for 113th Congress by Zenitha Prince

Feb. 10, 2013

Congressional Black Caucus Outlines Agenda for 113th Congress
By Zenitha Prince

cbc members

The 43-member Congressional Black Caucus at the beginning of the 113th Congress. Seated front
right is CBC Chair Marsha Fudge (D-Ohio) and former chair Emmanuel Cleaver (D-Mo.). PHOTO: Courtesy/CBC Foundation

Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from the Afro American Newspaper

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - The Congressional Black Caucus will continue its fight to reverse policies adversely impacting communities of color during the first session of the 113th Congress.

The group’s legislative agenda for the next few months will include advocacy on issues regarding voting rights, economic empowerment and immigration reform, according to a list of priorities released in early February.

“For more than four decades, the Congressional Black Caucus policy agenda has promoted and advocated for legislation supporting social and economic progress, equality and fairness among all Americans and particularly for African Americans and neglected communities,” CBC Chair Marcia L. Fudge said in a statement. “Protecting civil rights legislative victories such as the Voting Rights Act and championing policies that protect vital programs to the communities served by members of the CBC are consistently two of the Caucus’s most significant priorities.”

The group’s legislative work will focus on three key areas.

The first is voter protection and empowerment, including but not limited to protecting the Voting Rights Act, modernizing the current voting system and eliminating barriers for all eligible voters to cast their ballots.

The CBC will also champion policies that eradicate poverty in the U.S. and promote economic parity, particularly in the African-American community, and will push for the creation of jobs.

Lastly, the group will support immigration reform, but only if it does not undermine policies meant to improve the lot of low-income and vulnerable communities. Such immigration reform would also need to address the issue of the mass detention and unjust criminality of immigrant populations. The CBC seeks to ensure that the voices of undocumented immigrants of African descent are represented in the immigration debate

Blacks Should Expect More from Obama Administration, Panel Says

Feb. 4, 2013

Blacks Should Expect More from Obama Administration, Panel Says
By Criscia Dawson  

Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from the Howard University News Service

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Black Americans should expect more from President Barack Obama in his second term, according to a panel of political experts.

The prominent topic of the panel discussion at Howard University was President Obama’s relationship with the Black American community and his Black American political agenda.

The panel discussion, “Looking Back, Looking Ahead: The Legacy of President Barack Obama,” is one of several events hosted by Howard University during Inauguration 2013.

Wilmer Leon, a political scientist and radio talk show host, moderated the panel and opened the discussion acknowledging that the President’s second inauguration coincides with the Martin Luther King Jr. holiday.

“Some see Obama as a manifestation of Martin Luther King’s dream,” Leon said. “The dream can not be fulfilled when President Obama has to run a deracialized campaign to make the masses comfortable. As we look back on the past four years and forward on the next four years, do not confuse a down payment with a balance paid in full.

“African Americans gave 95 percent support to Obama, but none of the issues African-Americans face were touched on during the presidential campaign,” Leon said.

In the 2012 general election, about 94 percent of blacks who voted cast a ballot for President Obama. In 2008, the percentage was slightly higher. Since President Obama's re-election, some in the Black community have called for a return for their overwhelming support. In December, a group of about 40 prominent Blacks met to hash out a strategy to force the President to pay more attention to black America.

The panel at the Howard event included Atlanta Mayor Kasim Reed (D), Michael Grant, president of the National Bankers Association, Stefanie Brown James, a member of the 2013 Presidential Inauguration Committee and Dr. Greg Carr, Howard University associate professor and chairman of Africana Studies.

“President Obama is the leader of our country, not the leader of our movement,” Grant said. But “we (African-Americans) need to take our agenda to President Obama and hold him accountable for what we need. Not to tear him down, but to respect him and hold him up.”

Grant and the other panelists gave President Obama credit for getting the United States through the most difficult economic times since the Great Depression.

“President Obama is consequential because he got the country through the most detrimental situation the country has been in since Franklin D. Roosevelt,” Mayor Reed said.

Toward the end of the program, audience members posed questions to the panelists.

One question came from Rose Porter, a health management major at Howard. After hearing Mayor Reed say that the younger generation hasn’t faced the kinds of hurdles faced by those who came before them and should stop complaining, Porter asked how the panelists would motivate youth to get where they need to be.

James, the 2013 Inaugural Committee member, stepped forward to answer.

“Sometimes it is okay to not have it together,” James said, “It can be a motivating piece to see that you need to move forward.”

When faced with the question of why minorities are not working together toward a common goal, the panelists explained that this collaboration is occurring, but there is nothing wrong with an interest group having its own agenda.

“Until we (African-Americans) can be ourselves in public, we can never be free,” Carr said. “We have to be ourselves in public first in order to come together. Stop being so scared. If Hilary Clinton becomes president in four years, she will have a more progressive agenda than Obama because she will not be scared to be herself.”

Economists, Scholars Call on Obama to Deal With Economic Discrimination By Hazel Trice Edney

Economists, Scholars Call on Obama to Deal With Economic Discrimination
By Hazel Trice Edney

econforum-carr

James H. Carr

(TriceEdneyWire.com) – A day-long summit to scrutinize the economic policies of the Obama administration has ended with clarion calls for the President to become more specific in dealing with racial discrimination that is causing economic and social injustices.

“As of last year, babies born in America are now majority children of color…This is really imperative and it’s a point that we need to really drive home to make more clear to policy makers,” said James H. Carr, a housing finance, banking and urban policy consultant with Opportunity Agenda, a New York City-based research center. “If we have a financial system – particularly housing finance - that can’t accommodate the fastest-growing ultimately majority population, can that be long-term healthy for the U.S. financial system? It certainly won’t be long-term healthy for wealth-growth and economic mobility in America.”

Carr was the luncheon keynote speaker for the nine-hour summit, sponsored by Howard University, Feb.1. It drew hundreds of economists, activists and public policy makers to the campus from around the country. Carr told the audience that the “single largest contributor to the racial wealth gap” is the home ownership rates of Latinos and African-Americans in comparison to Whites.

The home ownership rate for Latinos and African-Americans is in the mid to low 40 percentile in comparison to Whites, which is around 75 percent, Carr said. He called it “silly” to argue that people of color have reached the bounds of homeownership. “There’s a lot more room for home ownership among our population and that’s where the wealth creator is.”

Throughout the day, expert panelists outlined statistics and struggled to present solutions. But, most resolved that just about every new answer presents a new problem.

“We have to make sure that when we pay for these new tax cuts that we voted for, that we do it in a rational and comprehensive way,” said U. S. Rep. Bobby Scott (D-Va.), who serves on the House Committee on Education and Workforce.  “The last thing we want to do is to cut Social Security, Medicare, or education - things like that - in order to provide for these tax cuts and not have any money left over for a jobs bill.”

The economic summit was the fourth in a series and the second at Howard during the Obama Administration. In his first term, the summit was held to specifically discuss jobs.

At times, the experts appeared to struggle to explain why the Obama administration is not more forthcoming on the issue of race and the part it plays in America’s economic pains.

“The administration seems to be following an indirect approach for assisting distressed members of the community,” said Rodney Green, an urban economics professor at Howard who also serves as executive director of the university’s Center for Urban Progress. “A more direct approach would seem appropriate,” he said. “Racial inequalities have deepened in the last decade. While incomes for African-Americans have fallen 10 percent, they have fallen only 1 percent for White families. Relative Black wealth has fallen even further.”

Howard professor of political science, Lorenzo Morris, predicted that the President will eventually come around on the specific issue of race, but, by then it may be too late to invoke policies to deal with it.  “I certainly believe he will find his voice, but he won’t have a big stick to carry with it. It will just be a voice,” Morris said.

Perhaps the strongest outright criticism of the Obama administration came from economist Bernard E. Anderson, a professor emeritus at the Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania.

“Let’s be clear about what we’re talking about here,” Anderson said. “We’re talking about an economic system that is shot through with institutional discrimination against Black people that denies them opportunity to participate fully in this economy. And until we attack that head on we are going to continue to have racial inequality.”

He continued, “That’s why I think we need to not let the President off the hook in his second term. Black people are smart. They gave him a pass in the first term because they knew that if he ever raised the question of race that if he ever raised the question in the first term, he would never have a hope of being re-elected. I like to be candid about this. I’m unusually frank about this. He is not going to run again for anything. He does not deserve a pass anymore. Let him not only find his voice, but summon his carriage and use his political capital to address racial inequality. He owes that to the African-American community.”

Anderson pointed to the President’s inaugural address as clear evidence that he will continue to keep the issue of race on the back burner.

“What were the priorities he mentioned in his second inaugural address – wage equality for women, gay rights, immigration and energy; not a single blessed word on race,” he said. “Don’t let him off the hook. He doesn’t deserve to be let off the hook. I am not going to understand why he will not address this issue.”

Carr concluded his luncheon remarks with a list of recommendations on how to close the housing/wealth gap. Among his points:

  • Make sure that the system actually provides credit to alternative forms of housing like cooperatives and small rental properties. “These are things that people of color, low income can afford to buy but they’re not supported by the mortgage finance systems of today.”
  • Support comprehensive community reinvestments such as a housing and community infrastructure bank that has been proposed by Opportunity Agenda.
  • Make sure that the system does something radically different than it does today like to support comprehensive community reinvestment.

Comprehensive community reinvestment is something that President Obama has stressed since his first term, but it needs to broaden to America’s grassroots communities, Carr said.

“The president when he was candidate Obama was eloquent and masterful in explaining all the reasons why investment in infrastructure as a stimulant for the economy would actually create long-term jobs and real economic growth and prosperity across race, ethnicity, income and wealth,” he said. “But, we also believe there needs to be an infrastructure bank that is on a more local level that focuses on the rehabilitation and new construction of rental and owner-occupied units that are designed for community residents.”

This redevelopment would include repairs of streets, roads, sewers, schools and perhaps even local mass transit opportunities, he said. Carr concluded that it would make no sense to argue that there’s no money for such initiatives.

“We had no money for the wars we just fought but we spent a whole lot of it,” he said to applause from the audience. “We need to ask for what we need… We need to make sure that the market is designed to take care of the need and the aspirations of people of color. And when it does, it will only be taking care of the needs and aspirations of the majority of America.”

New CBC Chair Aims to Forge Bi-partisan Relationships by Hazel Trice Edney

Feb. 4, 2013

New CBC Chair Aims to Forge Bi-partisan Relationships
By Hazel Trice Edney

repmarciafudge

(TriceEdneyWire.com) – U. S. Rep. Marcia Fudge (D-Ohio), the new chair of the Congressional Black Caucus, says she believes opportunities for bi-partisan co-operation between the CBC and Republican legislators may be more prevalent than some believe.

“I certainly think that bi-partisanship is going to be important going forward…We have to, as we look at how polarized the House of Representatives is, we’re going to have to find ways that we can find some common ground,” Fudge said in an interview.

Fudge was unanimously elected to serve a two-year term as chair, succeeding Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-Mo.), whose term ended at the close of the 112th Congress.

She is known for her bi-partisan relationships, such as the Restore our Neighborhoods Act of 2012 that she co-sponsored with then Rep. Steven LaTourette (R-Ohio) to finance demolition of vacant, foreclosed and abandoned homes throughout the nation.

“The only way that that [bill] even got the light of day, quite frankly, and got unanimous vote in the House is because Steve LaTourette was one of the sponsors of the bill,” she spoke of her Republican colleague. “And every single urban community in this country could use those kinds of resources when we talk about just a growing number of vacant and abandoned buildings and Steven and I had been trying to figure out how we could do something to help our community. As we explained to both sides of the aisle, they went right on board because everybody in a lot of ways are in the same situation.”

Fudge says she believes this kind of bi-partisan co-operation is absent from Congress. Recent bi-partisan cooperation on gun control legislation has given a sign of hope. But, more often than not Congress has been at a stalemate on issues due to partisan politics.

As she leads the CBC the next two years, she said she believes her knack for coalescing will be to their benefit.

“I think that because I’ve already built certain kinds of relationships, when people on the other side of the aisle, our Republican colleagues, need assistance on our side, they will feel that I have more of a leadership role and would be more likely to come to me to talk to me about issues that they believe we can work together on.”

A former mayor of Warrensville Heights, Ohio, Fudge describes herself as both liberal and conservative.

“Even though I am a staunch social liberal, I really truly am a fiscal conservative. Because I’ve had to be. When you’re the mayor of a city, you’ve got to balance your budget,” she said.

However, she indicates there are some issues on which she will not compromise. As a social liberal, she will no doubt lead the 43-member, mostly Democratic Caucus on some of the key bread and butter issues that their predominately Black constituents will need. Partisan disagreements often arise over fiscally conservative Republican attempts to cut social programs that socially liberal Democrats desire to keep.

“Obviously one of my major issues is poverty. I’m on the Agriculture Committee and I make sure that our children have decent meals in schools, that we don’t significantly cut food stamps and we make sure that our food banks are funded and that people have a place to live.”

Fudge is also concerned about a level of violence in Black communities that had reached astronomical levels long before the tragic Dec. 17 massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary in Newtown, Conn.

“We have to address this culture of violence in our community. I mean our young people are exposed to violence every day,” she said. “I understand all of the things that have gone along with the big kind of incidents like Newtown that raise our consciences and break our hearts, but our children are confronted with violence every day and what affect does that have on their lives going forward?”

Fudge was elected to Congress in 2008 in a special election following the death of Ohio Stephanie Tubbs Jones, who had represented the seat for nearly a decade. A former chief of staff to the popular Jones, Fudge has now earned her own Congressional reputation as a staunch advocate for the poor.

She describes herself through the eyes of the CBC which casted an unusual unanimous vote for her election: “Very, very strong in my views and my opinions and that I will fight for what I think is right. As well as I hope that they would say that I care so deeply about, not just the members of the Caucus obviously, but all of the people that we represent that I am never going to lose sight of why I’m there.”

With the re-election of President Obama, Fudge sees the next four years as “a strong opportunity for “our seniors, our disabled and our children.”

She concludes, “We’re not walking on egg shells; the President has been re-elected, we want to make sure that we are strong in the things that we believe in…We want to be at the table.”

X