banner2e top

Some Black Men Believe They are Viewed as "Less Valuable" By Kelly-Ann Brown, Brelaun Douglas and Jasmine Rennie

March 16, 2014

Some Black Men Believe They are Viewed as "Less Valuable"
By Kelly-Ann Brown, Brelaun Douglas and Jasmine Rennie

black males - crump
Christopher Crump: Recent verdicts indicate the justice system is "not meant for us."

 
black males - richards
Gregory Richards says Black males are sometimes "unconscious of our personalities" around people who are different.

 
black males - randall1
Marcus Randall says he is always "cautious of my actions and mindful of my surroundings."

(TriceEdneyWire.com) – As the national focus continues on high profiled shootings of unarmed young Black men, some say the controversies have caused them to fear attack even when they are doing what is right and normal.

With fallout from the Florida-based Jordan Davis and Trayvon Martin cases - and the not so recent, but still relevant, Sean Bell and Oscar Grant cases - all brimming with racial undertones - Black males seem to be in danger of being killed for that reason alone - being Black.

Most recently, Michael Dunn, 43, of Jacksonville, Fla., shot and killed 17-year-old Jordan Davis during an argument at a gas station. Dunn opened fire, shooting toward an SUV carrying Davis and three friends. He claimed he thought he saw a gun during a dispute over the teens’ loud music.

Though convicted by a jury of three counts of attempted murder, the jury could not reach a verdict on the first degree murder charge in relation to Davis’s death. Dun’s sentencing has been delayed until he is retried on the remaining first-degree murder charge May 5.

The case of Jordan Davis is reminiscent of scenarios that civil rights leaders argue the Black community has heard far too often. That scenario is that a young African-American male is unjustly killed and the trial often ends in a disappointing verdict.

As heartbreaking as the verdict had been, many young Black men were not surprised by the Dunn outcome at all, noting a culture of attacks against innocent Black me by those who stereotype or profile them.

Joshua Lanier, 25, a community supervision assistant for the Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency in Washington, D.C., notes a common theme among the Jordan Davis case and others like it:

“A Black male’s life seems to be less valuable than anybody else's in this country,” says Lanier. “Anytime you hear a case involving a young Black male [and] the police, he always seems to get the short end of the stick.”

For many it seems the outcomes of these cases – including the George Zimmerman acquittal in the killing of Trayvon Martin - have only reaffirmed what many Black men have considered to be true: “The justice system…is not meant for us,” says Christopher Crump, 19- year-old California resident attending Hampton University.

Though law officials pride themselves on objectivity, by nature people are judgmental and often unable to separate their emotions and personal experiences from their decision making as well as their views of others.

“Times haven’t changed,” says Nicholas Taylor, a 19-year-old Texas native attending Howard University. “There’s still an innate fear of African-American males … whether you are [a] law enforcement [official] or an average citizen.”

But when it comes to being a Black male in America, to what extent does race effect their interactions with others?

“I think many of us are unconscious of our personalities around people who are not like us, especially Caucasians,” says Gregory Richards, 24, an accounts receivable representative from The Bronx, N.Y.

Lanier, the community supervision assistant, agrees. He believes that Black males are feared “more than any other race and gender” because society has depicted the Black man to be aggressive and unpredictable. In response to this often false depiction, other races can be overly aggressive when attempting to diffuse a minor conflict; especially when it escalates to a killing.

Stresses related to being stereotyped and profiled are also known to affect the health of Black men, according to Dr. Waldo E. Johnson Jr., associate professor at the School of Social Service Administration and faculty affiliate in the Center for the Study of Race, Politics and Culture at the University of Chicago.

At a symposium at the university last month, Johnson said African-American men suffer from much higher rates of depression because of trauma compared to their white counterparts, and many Black men don't recognize that they have been traumatized, according to an article on TheNorthStarNews.com

According to the article, “Because young Black men and Black men rarely find places where they can feel safe, they are on hyper-surveillance concerning their surroundings, and they are hyper-vigilant to any signs of danger coming from the police, or individuals who act like the police, such as a George Zimmerman, security guards following them in stores and other individuals in positions of authority, Dr. Johnson said. He added that black men always are under intense surveillance by others.”

Recent high-profiled cases shed light on the belief that young Black men are apparently being killed because of their culture, such as Davis’s loud music which irritated Dunn, or their physical appearance, like Martin’s Hoodie which apparently caused shooter George Zimmerman to see him as suspicious. The stereotypical conclusion: Black men pose a threat.

As a result, some Black men change themselves to meet the expectations of others.

“Regardless of the situation they are going to see us as something we are not,” said 21-year-old Philadelphia resident Marcus Randall currently attending Penn State. “At the end of the day, I just have to be cautious of my surroundings and mindful of my actions.”

Through advice and personal experiences, many Black males have found strategies to combat these prejudices in hopes of making themselves seem less intimidating. “It’s not always about staying true to who you are, it’s about adapting. Adaptation doesn’t mean selling out,” says Taylor, the Howard student.

“I can understand not wanting to change because that’s who they are,” Taylor said. He concluded, but even “animals that don’t change go extinct.”



Nearing March 31 Deadline, Forty Percent Rise in Healthcare Website by Zenitha Prince

March 17, 2014

Nearing March 31 Deadline, Forty Percent Rise in Healthcare Website 
Spike Linked to ‘Between Two Ferns’ Appearance

By Zenitha Prince

obama and galifianakis
President Barack Obama participates in an interview with Zach Galifianakis for "Between Two Ferns with Zach Galifianakis," in the Diplomatic Reception Room of the White House, Feb. 24, 2014.  PHOTO: Pete Souza/The White House

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - According to the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, which manages Healthcare.gov, 4.2 million Americans have enrolled for health insurance through the federal marketplace as of March 11. That's apparently because, from running presidential campaigns to running the government in the White House, the Obama machine has always found unique ways to achieve its goals.

In an attempt to promote the Affordable Care Act and encourage younger Americans to sign up for health insurance before the March 31 deadline, President Obama appeared in Zach Galifianakis’ “Between Two Ferns” show on comic website Funny or Die, bypassing more traditional media outlets. The video was meant to “reach Americans where they live,” said White House press secretary Jay Carney in a press briefing on March 11.

"Gone are the days when your broadcasts …. can reach everybody that we need to reach," Carney said to broadcast journalists at the briefing.

He added, “We're involved in a multifaceted effort to reach communities out there of folks who can benefit from quality, affordable health insurance, can avail themselves of the options that they’ll find on healthcare.gov. And we're looking for creative ways to do that. This was one of them.”

In the satirical six-minute skit, “The Hangover” star posed awkward questions and traded insults with the commander-in-chief.

"What's it like to be the last Black president?" Galifianakis asked.

"Seriously?" Obama deadpans. "What's it like for this to be the last time you ever talk to a president?"

Halfway through the clip, as the president begins urging young people to sign up for health care, the comedian sighs heavily and mutters, “Here we go,” and comments later amid Obama’s plug, “Is this what they mean by drones?”

"I think it's fair to say I wouldn't be here today if I didn't have something to plug," Obama said in one sally.

The president’s comedic outing drew criticism from all corners of the spectrum.

Former Fox News journalist Roger Friedman said in his Showbiz411 website column that Obama’s performance was “less presidential than Richard Nixon saying ‘Sock it to me on ‘Laugh In,’” and that he “should not quit his day job.”

During the White House briefing on March 10, the press corps grilled Carney about the faux interview, questioning whether the “dignity” of the presidential office had been “damaged".

"We obviously assess opportunities that we have and, you know, look at whether they're going to be successful and wise," Carney replied. "And I think we made the right call here."

The evidence seems to bear that out as, despite the detractors, the president’s use of a comedic platform seemed to achieve its purpose. According to tweets from Healthcare.gov, hourly traffic spiked on the day the video premiered; and there were 32,000 Funny or Die referrals and 575,000 site visits by 6 p.m. March 10. The next day, visits to Healthcare.gov were up by 40 percent. And, the video had 15 million views and had acquired “immortal” status—meaning it was popular and highly rated—as of March 13.


Armed Angry White Males; the New Domestic Terrorists By Dr. Wilmer J. Leon, III

March 16, 2014

Armed Angry White Males; the New Domestic Terrorists
By Dr. Wilmer J. Leon, III

NEWS ANALYSIS

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - “You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing's replaced them….And it's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy toward people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.” Senator Barack Obama April 6, 2008

While out on the presidential campaign trail in 2008, Senator Obama made this statement and was castigated by both Democrats and Republicans.  Hillary Clinton responded by saying, "Pennsylvanians don't need a president who looks down on them. They need a president who stands up for them, who fights for them, who works hard for your futures, your jobs, your families."  Senator John McCain (R-AZ) said through his spokesman Steve Schmidt. "It shows an elitism and condescension towards hardworking Americans that is nothing short of breathtaking…It is hard to imagine someone running for president who is more out of touch with average Americans."

Eventually, instead of standing behind his very astute assessment of the fear that plagues rural White America, Senator Obama backed away from his remarks with an apology, "If I worded things in a way that made people offended, I deeply regret that."

I wish Senator Obama had held his ground.

To put Sen. Obama’s comments in historical perspective one can look to Federalist #10 in which James Madison wrote, ”Among the numerous advantages promised by a well constructed Union, none deserves to be more accurately developed than its tendency to break and control the violence of faction.”  Madison saw factions as groups of citizens, with interests contrary to the rights of others or the interests of the whole community. Madison’s violent “factions” from 1787 are Obama’s angry small town Americans in 2008.

When viewed from our country’s racial context, these “factions” have reared their ugly heads time after time.  In their book A Festival of Violence, Tolnay and Beck “identified 2,805 victims of lynch mobs killed between 1882 and 1930 in ten southern states.  Although mobs murdered almost 300 white men and women, the vast majority-almost 2,500-of lynch victims were African-American.  The scale of this carnage means that, on average, a black man, woman, or child was murdered nearly once a week, every week, between 1882 and 1930 by a hate driven white mob.”

As African-American soldiers returned from fighting in WWI and keeping the world safe for democracy, they attempted to exercise their social, political, and economic rights here at home.  They were met by riots and lynching’s led by White mobs throughout Black communities in 15 states and 27 cities across America from April to November, 1919.  According to Cameron McWhirter’s book Red Summer: The Summer of 1919 and the Awakening of Black America the NAACP’s James Weldon Johnson called it the “Red Summer” because it was so bloody.  In total, millions of Americans had their lives disrupted.  Hundreds of people most of them Black, were killed.

On June 1, 1921 a White mob in Tulsa, OK burned and bombed 34 square blocks of Tulsa’s Black Greenwood Community to the ground.  According to Tim Madigan’s The Burning: Massacre, Destruction, and the Tulsa Race Riot of 1921 the actual death toll was never determined.  Conservative estimates put it around 100.  More commonly accepted estimates place the death toll between 300 and 400.

The lynching’s documented by Tolnay and Beck, the Red Summer of 1919, and the Tulsa Race Riot of 1921 are historic examples of American domestic terrorism.

More recently, on June 7, 1998, James Byrd, Jr. was murdered by Shawn Berry, Lawrence Russell Brewer, and John King.  At least two of them, Brewer and King were admitted Whited supremacists.  They dragged Byrd for three miles behind a pickup truck along an asphalt road in Jasper, Texas. Mr. Byrd, who remained conscious throughout most of the ordeal, was killed when his body hit the edge of a culvert, severing his right arm and head. The murderers drove on for another mile before dumping his torso in front of an African-American cemetery in Jasper.

Today, lynch mobs have been replaced by “Zimmerman’s” and “Dunn’s” that feel empowered by “Stand Your Ground”, believing that juries of their peers will exonerate them of their use of deadly force when Black youths are involved.

Unfortunately, all too often these events and so many others do not get discussed or analyzed in that context.

Not only were Senator Obama’s comments astute in terms of their historical accuracy, as we look at the George Zimmerman’s and Michael Dunn’s of the world, his comments could be considered prophetic.

It is my contention that the recent “murders” of Treyvon Martin and Jordan Davis should not be viewed as isolated incidents. They did not occur in a vacuum. They are part of a larger murderous American historical continuum.  At the heart of this murderous continuum are race and xenophobia (a fear of others) and a violent reaction to it.  To many in the dominant culture “their” America is changing, The “browning” of America has evoked a return and acceptance of the murderous continuum.  Former Colorado Congressman Tom Tancredo best expressed this sentiment when he proclaimed; “I want my country back”.

Conceal Carry permits, “Stand Your Ground” laws and inept prosecutors are creating a climate that provides the Zimmerman’s and Dunn’s of the world with a license to kill as well as juries that are predisposed to letting them to do so.

As the American economy continues to contract and full-time well-paying jobs become harder to find, the face of poverty in America is changing. The stereotypical “urban” or “Black” poor have now become the “suburban” or White poor. According to CBC  “Hardship is particularly growing among Whites, based on several measures... More than 19 million Whites fall below the poverty line…accounting for more than 41 percent of the nations destitute, nearly double the number of poor blacks.”

According to the Christian Science Monitor, “Suburbs are increasingly becoming the address of America's poor. Suburban poverty across the country grew 53 percent between 2000 and 2010, more than twice the rate of urban poverty…”  Many of those newly poor suburbanites are White and many of them are angry, blaming people of color, instead of directing their ire toward corporate greed, the outsourcing of factory jobs to overseas companies and governmental policies that favor the wealthy for their misfortunes.

Senator Obama’s assessment in 2008 was historically accurate and more prophetic than pundits and commentators have been willing to give him credit for.  Armed angry White males like George Zimmerman and Michael Dunn have been operating in our midst for centuries.  Their actions are not new; the lack of analysis of them in the context of terrorism is not surprising.  The narrative has to change and we must engage in a broader discussion of them as the new domestic terrorists.

Dr. Wilmer Leon is the Producer/ Host of the Sirius/XM Satellite radio channel 110 call-in talk radio program “Inside the Issues with Wilmer Leon” Go to www.wilmerleon.com or email:This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.www.twitter.com/drwleon and Dr. Leon’s Prescription at Facebook.com  © 2014 InfoWave Communications, LLC

Holder Calls for Changes in Federal Low-Level Drug Sentences by Frederick H. Lowe

March 16, 2014

Holder Calls for Changes in Federal Low-Level Drug Sentences
By Frederick H. Lowe

eric_holder_official_portrait

Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from TheNorthStarNews.com

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder today endorsed proposed changes that would cut federal sentences for low-level drug offenders and dramatically reduce the Bureau of Prisons population over the next five years if adopted.

Holder, who testified before the U.S. Sentencing Commission, supports changes to Federal Sentencing Guidelines that would reserve the harshest penalties for the most serious drug offenders.

In addition, Holder's proposal would lower by two levels the base offense associated with various drug quantities involved in drug trafficking crimes.

If adopted, the change would affect nearly 70 percent of all drug trafficking offenders and reduce the average sentence by 11 months, or nearly 18% , according to the Sentencing Commission.

Commission members also project that the Bureau of Prisons population would drop by 6,550 inmates at the end of five years.

"This is a straightforward adjustment to sentencing ranges --- while measured in scope --- would nonetheless send a strong message about the fairness of our criminal justice system," Holder testified. "And it would help to rein in federal prison spending while focusing limited resources on the most serious threats to public safety."

The move is Holder's latest step to alter the federal government's approach to dealing with non-violent drug offenders.
Last August, Holder announced his "Smart on Crime" initiative, which included a major change to the department's charging policy intended to reserve strict, mandatory minimum sentences for high-level or violent-drug traffickers.

Holder noted that state and federal governments spent a combined $80 billion on incarceration during 2010 alone. He added that of the more than 216,000 current federal inmates, nearly half are serving time for drug-related crimes.

"This focused reliance on incarceration is not just financially unsustainable --- it comes with human and moral costs that are impossible to calculate," Holder said."The United States comprises five percent of the world's population, but it incarcerates almost a quarter of the world's prisoners."

Commission members are scheduled to vote on the proposals in April.

Senate Refuses to Confirm Obama Justice Department Nominee by Frederick Lowe

March 10, 2014

Senate Refuses to Confirm Obama Justice Department Nominee 
By Frederick Lowe

debo
Debo Adegbile

Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from TheNorthStarNews.com

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - The United States Senate on Wednesday voted not to confirm Debo Adegbile as head of the U.S. Justice Department's Civil Rights Division because as part of his job he defended Mumia Abu-Jamal, who was convicted of the 1981 slaying of Daniel Faulkner, a Philadelphia police officer.

Republicans joined by seven Democrats voted down Adegbile's nomination 51 to 48 under pressure from police unions.

President Barack Obama, who nominated Adegbile for the job, called his defeat a "travesty based on wildly unfair character attacks against a good and qualified candidate."

Sherrilyn Ifill, president and director-counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, charged that Senate Republicans orchestrated a smear campaign against Adegible, who at one time was the organization's director of litigation, acting president and director-counsel and special counsel.

"Adegbile was attacked because the NAACP Legal Defense Fund became counsel for Mumia Abu-Jamal during Adegbile's tenure," Ifill said. "The NAACP Legal Defense Fund's involvement in Mumia Abu-Jamal's case reflects its institutional commitment to ensuring that the criminal justice system is administered fairly and in compliance with the U.S. Constitution for all Americans, no matter how controversial."

Jamal, a former Philadelphia radio reporter, is serving a life sentence for his murder conviction.

Adegbile was only a child when Abu-Jamal was convicted, but during Adegbile's 12 years with NAACP LDF, he represented Adu-Jamal's during his appeals process. Adegbile helped research and write a legal brief asserting that the jury instructions during Abu-Jamal's sentencing were improper. A federal court agreed.

Republicans, however, argued that Adegbile was unfit to run the civil rights division.  

Mitch McConnell, the Senate's minority leader, accused Adegbile of "seeking to glorify an unrepentant cop killer." U.S. Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) wanted to know if Adegbile could apply the law in an even-handed manner.

Ifill noted that many public servants, including U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, have provided pro bono time to represent a death-row inmate. Roberts represented John Ferguson, who was convicted of killing eight people.

John Adams represented in the 1770s a British soldier involved in the Boston Massacre. Adams was later elected president.

"Mr. Adegbile and the American people deserve better than the Senate delivered today," said Marcia Fudge, chair of the Congressional Black Caucus. "I am extremely disappointed in today's Senate vote that denied this country
a public servant who has a personal and professional commitment to protecting the civil and constitutional rights of all Americans."

An angry President Obama lashed out at the Senate.
"As a lawyer, Mr. Adegbile has played by the rules. And now Washington politics have used the rules against him. The fact that his nomination was defeated solely based on his legal representation of a defendant runs contrary to a fundamental principle of our system of justice--and those who voted against his nomination denied the American people an outstanding public servant," President Obama said.

Adegbile, who is half Nigerian and Irish, was raised by a single mother in New York City. The family was nearly homeless at one time.
X