banner2e top

Color Of Change to 10 CBC Members: Stop Lobbying Against Net Neutrality by Frederick H. Lowe

July 6, 2014

Color Of Change to 10 CBC Members: Stop Lobbying Against Net Neutrality
By Frederick H. Lowe

bobbyrushd-ill

U.S. Rep.  Bobby Rush (D., Ill) is one on 10 members
of the Congressional Black Caucus lobbying
against net neutrality, according to Color Of Change.

Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from TheNorthStarNews.com

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Color Of Change, an Internet-based civil rights organization, has launched a campaign to persuade10 members of the Congressional Black Caucus to stop lobbying against net neutrality.

The Internet has allowed black bloggers, activists and entrepreneurs to flourish online despite being blocked out of ownership and participation by traditional media, ColorOfChange officials said.

"Ten members of the Congressional Black Caucus recently signed a letter to the Federal Communications Commission attacking net neutrality, the principle that prevents Internet service providers from discriminating online. All of these members have taken thousands in campaign contributions from the telecom industry," Color Of Change charged in a letter posted on its website.

The 10 are:  U.S. Reps. Bobby Rush, G.K. Butterfield, Sanford Bishop, Corrine Brown, Lacy Clay, Alcee Hastings, Gregory Meeks, David Scott, Bennie Thompson and Marc Veasey, according to Color of Change.  They are all Democrats. Butterfield is vice chair of the CBC. There were 44 members of the Congressional Black Caucus in the 113th Congress, according to the organization’s  media kit.

Color Of Change charged: "Big cable and phone companies have spent millions to influence the Congressional Black Caucus. Now some black representatives are attacking Internet freedom with deceptive arguments."

This is an important time for all members of the Congressional Black Caucus to support net neutrality, ColorOfChange officials said.

The FCC is now considering reclassifying Internet service as a public utility that would give the agency strong authority to enforce net neutrality for the public good.  

Color Of Change notes that U.S. Reps. Keith Ellison, Barbara Lee, John Lewis,  John Conyers, Donna Edwards, Eleanor Holmes Norton, Charlie Rangel, Bobby Scott and Andre Carson support net neutrality. Carson is secretary of the Congressional Black Caucus.

The Congressional Black Caucus Foundation, the nonprofit arm of the Congressional Black Caucus, will hold its 44th annual legislative conference Sept. 24 to 27 in Washington, D.C.

Women Leaders Divided on My Brother’s Keeper by Hazel Trice Edney

June 30, 2014

Leading Women of Color  Divided on My Brother’s Keeper by Hazel Trice Edney

By Hazel Trice Edney

bernice king

Rev. Dr. Bernice King is among leading women  who signed a letter to President Obama saying his My Brother's Keeper needs only to be strengthened.

julianne-mayday1

Dr. Julianne Malveaux is among leading women who signed a letter to President Obama asking him to "re-align" My Brother's Keeper to also address women and girls.

(TriceEdneyWire.com) – A letter to President Obama this week from a list of high-profiled women leaders praises his initiatives for women and girls of color asks for a "more targeted" My Brother's Keeper given the “very bleak” national statistics for Black Males.

TheJune 29  letter, which comes on the heels of a different letter to Obama criticizing his My Brother’s Keeper initiative, saying it should be completely “re-aligned” to include women and girls, indicates a division among leading Black women on the appropriate strategies to address deep social ills and statistics among both males and females of color.

“We are writing to you to applaud several initiatives implemented by your Administration to improve the lives of low income and at-risk Americans. We are particularly pleased with initiatives which have had a positive impact on women and girls of color,” states the letter from women representatives of faith and civic organizations, sent to President Obama on Sunday, June 29. “We are also writing to you because we are equally concerned about the special needs of at-risk boys and young men of color. As you are aware, statistics show that approximately two-thirds of African-American, and one-third of Hispanic/Latino children, are raised in single parent homes. Slightly more than 25% of Hispanic, African-American, and American Indian/Alaskan Native children live in poverty, while 15% of White Americans live in poverty…very bleak statistics. The dire statistics pertaining to boys and young men of color suggests the need for a more targeted approach.”

Among the approximately 40 names on the letter are: The Rev. Dr. Bernice A. King, CEO, The King Center in Atlanta; the Reverend Dr. Barbara Williams-Skinner, president, Skinner Leadership Institute; Melanie Campbell, president and CEO, National Coalition on Black Civic Participation and convener of the Black Women’s Roundtable; Shirley Franklin, former mayor of Atlanta; Dr. Ramona Edelin, executive director, D.C. Association of Public Chartered Schools; Ingrid Saunders Jones, chair, The National Council of Negro Women; Bishop Vashti McKenzie, presiding bishop, Thirteenth Episcopal District, African Methodist Episcopal Church of Dallas and Dr. Elsie Scott, founding director, Ron W. Walters Leadership and Public Policy Center at Howard University.

The June 29 letter listed what was described as “wonderful milestones” in support of women by the Obama Administration, including: “The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009; the White House Initiative on Educational Excellence for African Americans; the White House Initiative on Educational Excellence for Hispanics; The Affordable Care Act which covers women of color who represent 53% of the uninsured females; and, “Girls at Risk,” that provides prevention and education which focuses on the connection between juvenile delinquency and STD/HIV infection.”

It added thanks for the president’s efforts to raise minimum wage, “an issue affecting girls and women of color at disparate rates”, the work of the White House Commission on Women and Girls, and for “the excellent work that First Lady Michelle Obama has done in mentoring and outreach to girls – connecting them with women of substance and celebrity.”

On the other hand, listing “dismal statistics” on Black males, the June 29 letter asked the president to continue to engage women of color to help strengthen and craft his “My Brother’s Keeper” initiative announced early this year. The letter states: “According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, African American males, ages 10-24, are the victims of murder at a rate almost nineteen times than that of their non-Hispanic, and White American peers; and, Hispanic/Latino American males, in this same age group, are six times more likely to be victimized than their non-Hispanic White American peer group.”

It continues, “The U.S. Department of Education's Office of Civil Rights, reports that nearly 1 in 4 boys of color, (except for Latino and Asian American students with disabilities), have at some point been suspended from school. African American and Latino boys, and young men, are also more likely than their white peers to have witnessed violence, in or out of the home and have parents who are/have been incarcerated. African American and Latino males also have a much higher odds of being plagued by chronic health conditions and by contracting diseases which require repeated and consistent care for treatment, including: childhood asthma requiring hospitalization, childhood obesity, and HIV/AIDS.”

Describing themselves as “National Women Leadership Supporting My Brother’s Keeper”, the letter states, “These dismal figures have only served to increase our enthusiasm and support for your administration’s ‘My Brother’s Keeper’ initiative, launched earlier this year to assist every boy and young man of color, to beat the odds to live high quality lives for themselves, their families and communities. It is our understanding that after your February 27, 2014, call for support of the initiative, private philanthropies, businesses, governors, mayors, faith leaders, and nonprofit organizations, pledged to invest $200 million dollars over the next five years, in addition to the $150 million already invested. These earmarks are much needed in order to guarantee the success of the initiative. What is even more exciting to us about the initiative is your charge to all Americans, especially communities of color, to participate and make it successful by volunteering as mentors.” 

The timing of the Sunday, June 29, letter to President Obama is particularly significant since a different letter to Obama from a different group of more than 1,000 leading women of color – sent more than a week ago - expressed sentiments that clearly disagreed on some major points.The women on the first letter included “Mary Frances Berry, former chair of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights; Pulitzer Prize-winning novelist Alice Walker; actress Rosie Perez; political activist Angela Davis; Anita Hill, a law professor best known for testifying that she had been sexually harassed by future Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and economist Julianne Malveaux”, according to George E. Curry, editor-in-chief of the NNPA News Service and BlackPressUSA.com, who wrote a story on the first letter. 

The first letter expressed the need to acknowledge the crisis among Black males, but also listed the crisis-level statistics for women and girls of color, asking the President to “re-align” My Brother’s Keeper, according to the Curry article. “We simply cannot agree that the effects of these conditions on women and girls should pale to the point of invisibility, and are of such little significance that they warrant zero attention in the messaging, research and resourcing of this unprecedented Initiative. When we acknowledge that both our boys and girls struggle against the odds to succeed, and we dream about how, working together, we can develop transformative measures to help them realize their highest aspirations, we cannot rest easy on the notion that the girls must wait until another train comes for them. Not only is there no exceedingly persuasive reason not to include them, the price of such exclusion is too high and will hurt our communities and country for many generations to come,” Curry quoted the letter.

The citation from the letter continued, “While we applaud the efforts on the part of the White House, private philanthropy, social justice organizations and others to move beyond colorblind approaches to race-specific problems, we are profoundly troubled about the exclusion of women and girls of color from this critical undertaking. The need to acknowledge the crisis facing boys should not come at the expense of addressing the stunted opportunities for girls who live in the same households, suffer in the same schools, and struggle to overcome a common history of limited opportunities caused by various forms of discrimination.”

While the June 29 letter does not mention the earlier letter, the stark differences are clear as the most recent letter praises the President’s initiatives for women and pledges support for My Brother’s Keeper while pushing to assure that women maintain a voice in its development and structure. 

“We encourage you to continue to engage women of color leaders in the planning and implementation of My Brother’s Keeper initiative including - the White House briefings, ongoing conference calls with [My Brother’s Keeper] Chair, Broderick Johnson and other planning activities,” the June 29 letter states. “We believe that a successful ‘My Brother’s Keeper’ initiative can result in stronger families, stronger fathers, stronger employees, stronger leaders; and ultimately, a stronger America. Therefore, Mr. President, we pledge our commitment to support this ground-breaking and historic initiative, which addresses the challenges facing the everyday lives of our at-risk children and youth.”

'Lion of Harlem' Roars to Victory

June 29, 2014

'Lion of Harlem' Roars to Victory

charlesrangel

U. S. Rep. Charles Rangel

Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from the Richmond Free Press

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - U.S. Rep. Charles Rangel, “theLion of Harlem,” roared again on election night, June 24. In still unofficial results, the 84-year-old congressman overcame a fierce challenger in the Democratic primary to virtually ensure a 23rd term representing New York’s13th Congressional District.

With all precincts counted, the results show Rep. Rangel was ahead by 1,800 votes over state Sen. Adriano Espaillat in this rematch. Overall, Rep. Rangel claimed 47.3 percent of the vote to 44.6 percent for his rival, who also lost two years ago. After Rep. Rangel was declared the winner, the sound system that had played “I Will Survive” earlier in the night at his victory began blaring “Happy” by Pharrell Williams.

The primary win is tantamount to election since the winner is expected to be unopposed in the November general election. Rep. Rangel said that win or lose, this would be his final run for office. He was first elected to the seat in 1970 when he defeated incumbent Adam Clayton Powell Jr. Sen.

Espaillat was seeking to become the first Dominican-born member of Congress.The two men also squared off in 2012, a primary Rep. Rangel won by about 1,000 votes. One of the nation’s most powerful Black elected officials, Rep. Rangel has been the liberal voice for a district that was once heavily African-American but is now majority Hispanic.

Justice Denied: Most States Have Not Obeyed Court Ruling on Juveniles Sentenced to Life by Frederick H. Lowe

June 29, 2014

Justice Denied: Most States Have Not Obeyed Court Ruling on Juveniles Sentenced to Life
Overwhelming majority of juvenile lifers are African American; Some States Exceed 80 percent 

By Frederick H. Lowe

cell bars
A prison cell is home for life for many Black men who were convicted of murder as
teenagers.

chart on juveniles sentenced without parole

Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from TheNorthStarNews.com

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Two years after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that 28 states cannot automatically sentence juveniles to life in prison for murder without the chance of parole, a decision that affected mostly imprisoned black boys, only 13 states have changed their laws to comply with the ruling, but 15 states have not passed any statutory reforms, according to a study by The Sentencing Project, which works for a fair and effective U.S. criminal justice system.

The justices' decision and some states' response to it is a clear indication that states will respond quickly to some of the court rulings but not to others.

For example, after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down Section 4 of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, some state legislatures quickly moved to erect barriers to voting by African Americans. Fifteen states have passed laws making it more difficult to vote in the November midterm elections and in six states, groups are challenging the laws.

Following the case of Miller v Alabama, some states' governors and legislatures increased the minimum time that a person who was sentenced to prison as a juvenile must serve before being considered for parole.

A juvenile who was sentenced to life in prison for a murder he committed before his 18th birthday must serve 25 years in Washington and North Carolina and 40 years in Nebraska. The reluctance or the refusal of states to enact laws to comply with the U.S. Supreme Court's decision also underscores how difficult it is to enact and pass certain laws.  

"A majority of the states have ignored the court 's ruling and relief has not been granted as advocacy groups expected," said Ashley Nellis, Ph.D., senior research analyst  for The Sentencing Project and author of the report "Slow To Act: State Responses to 2012 Supreme Court Mandate On Life Without Parole." The Sentencing Project is based in Washington, D.C.

On June 25, 2012, in the case titled Miller v Alabama the U.S. Supreme Court banned the use of mandatory life sentences without parole for teenagers who committed murder. In their decision, the justices noted that juveniles have a proclivity for risk and impulsivity and the relative inability to assess consequences, all factors that should mitigate the punishment received by juvenile defendants."

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled, however, that states could impose life without parole but only after a judge considered each individual case’s circumstances.

At the time of the court's ruling, Alaska, Colorado, Kansas, Kentucky, Montana, New Mexico and the District of Columbia had banned life without parole for juveniles.  

Since the U.S. Supreme Court decision, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Louisiana, Michigan, Nebraska, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Texas, Washington and Wyoming have made legislative changes, according to  The Sentencing Project, have banned life without parole sentencing for juvenile offenders.

On the other hand, Alabama, Arizona, Connecticut, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Ohio, Vermont and Virginia have not passed laws that comply with the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling.

Others have skirted the law altogether

Following Miller v Alabama ruling, Iowa Gov. Terry Bransted commuted all of the sentences of juveniles serving life without parole to a minimum of 60 years, leaving their status unchanged, according to the Sentencing Project.
"Justice is a balance and these commutations ensure that justice is balanced with punishment for those vicious crimes and taking into account public safety," Bransted said in announcing his order.

States’ response to Miller v Alabama is mixed in other ways. State Supreme Courts in Illinois, Iowa, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Nebraska and Texas ruled that the U.S. Supreme Court decision is retroactive. Supreme Courts in Louisiana, Minnesota and Pennsylvania ruled just the opposite. In May, however, a federal court in Minnesota ruled that Miller v Alabama was retroactive.

The majority of the 2,500 men and women who were sentenced as juveniles to life without parole are African Americans, according to The Sentencing Project.

Black Unemployment Falls for Second Consecutive Month

June 29, 2014

Black Unemployment Falls for Second Consecutive Month

Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from Target Market News

(TriceEdneyWire.com) For the second month in a row, the nation's Black unemployment rate decreased, according to the Labor Department figures released for the month of May.

The unemployment rate for Blacks decreased slightly from 11.6 percent in April to 11.5 percent in May and was two percentage points lower than the 13.5 percent rate recorded a year ago. By comparison, the jobless rate for Whites barely rose from 5.3 percent in April to 5.4 percent in May.

Black women continued to make modest gains in the job market this year. The unemployment rate for Black women fell from 10.4 percent to 10 percent in May, compared to White women who saw their jobless rate climb from 4.7 percent to 4.9 percent last month.

Last year, more Blacks and Whites were either working on looking for jobs, a measure recorded as the labor force participation rate. In May 2013, that rate was 61.7 percent for Blacks and 63.8 percent for Whites. Now, the participation rate is 60.8 percent for Blacks and 63.1 percent for Whites.

X