banner2e top

Denying Food Has Caused Misery by Recklessness By David W. Marshall

July 21, 2025

david w. marshall

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - When Joe Biden defeated Donald Trump in the 2020 presidential election, the change in administration provided our nation with a four-year reprieve from much of the misery we are currently experiencing during the early months of Trump’s second term in office.

Multiple times during Trump’s first administration (2017–2021), the United States objected to U.N. resolutions that asserted the right to food as a legal and enforceable human right. Israel frequently joined the U.S. in casting opposing votes. The two allies were sometimes the only nations voting against the resolutions.

Officials under the Trump administration made it clear: while recognizing the importance of fighting hunger, they were unwilling to endorse the concept of a “right to food” as an obligation under international law. The votes reflect a consistent strategy of opposing the recognition of food as a binding human right. This pattern of inhumanity has continued into the second Trump term while producing needless suffering that has a direct impact on our nation’s foreign and domestic policies.

With 319 million people on the brink of starvation in places such as Gaza, Sudan, South Sudan, Mali, and Haiti, the State Department was recently forced to destroy 500 metric tons of warehoused food, which eventually expired and was no longer considered safe to send to potential recipients. The high-energy biscuits that were destroyed are typically used to meet the immediate nutritional needs of children in crisis situations.

Was this a situation that could have been avoided? If the Trump administration had not been reckless in dismantling the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) while suspending most foreign assistance, what are the chances that the destroyed emergency food could have been properly distributed?

Can humanitarian needs of any scale be handled with a sense of urgency and compassion when there is a political mindset that does not view the “right to food” as a binding human right? Is the “right to food” also ignored when the nation’s largest anti-hunger initiative, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), is suffering deep cuts from the so-called “One Big, Beautiful Bill Act.”

For many, this program is truly a legitimate lifeline, saving individuals from hunger. It is not just impacting the urban poor. The repercussions will be felt hard in rural communities and food deserts—areas where people overwhelmingly voted for Trump. SNAP benefits are not just a humanitarian effort; they play a critical part in small-town grocery stores and rural economies that rely on the steady and reliable income that SNAP benefits provide. It’s the ripple effect. When a local store loses a critical number of SNAP shoppers to government cuts, many stores will have no choice but to shut their doors for good. These rural stores immediately lose a major source of stable income, far greater than supermarkets in more affluent areas. When the only grocer in a town shuts down, it can automatically create a food desert.

St. Johns, Ariz. is a community that overwhelmingly supported Trump in the 2024 election. It sits halfway between Phoenix and Albuquerque with its one grocery store and one local food bank serving over 3,500 people. If the one grocery store closes due to the food aid cuts, the next closest option for groceries is approximately 30 miles away.

“I lean pretty heavily right most of the time, but one of the things that I do lean to the left on is we’re a pretty wealthy country, we can help people out,” said St. Johns Mayor Spence Udall. According to a study from the Commonwealth Fund, the Republicans’ cuts to the nation’s anti-hunger program will lead to thousands of job losses and a drop in revenue across the agriculture, retail grocery, and food processing industries.

Hunger relief organizations are also bracing for the ripple effect. Food banks are likely to bear the brunt of the cuts because they are often the last resort in the fight against hunger. Cuts to food assistance programs and other benefits could force millions of people to seek help from charitable organizations that currently lack the infrastructure to handle the potential surge of vulnerable individuals seeking assistance.

“A misperception of the public is that when needs go up, we do more. We can only do more when resources go up. We can’t magically produce more food,” said Brian Greene, president and CEO of the Houston Food Bank.

All the pending human misery comes from shortsighted lawmakers who are afraid and intimidated by President Donald Trump. They gave the dictator his megabill, even though it means people are going to encounter more stress of not knowing where their next meal is coming from, forcing people to rely on overwhelmed charities that will be faced with more people seeking help and less food to meet the need, and the continued destruction of the social safety net. In six months, America has found different ways to deny people the basic right to food. It’s reckless and cruel.

David W. Marshall is the founder of the faith-based organization TRB: The Reconciled Body and author of the book “God Bless Our Divided America.”

Jimmy Carter the Peacemaker By David W. Marshall

Jan. 6, 2025

david w. marshall

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Two hours after making his historic remarks on same-sex unions, then-President Barack Obama held a critical conference call with Black pastors to explain his support for gay marriage, according to the New York Times. The pastors who participated on the call told the paper that Obama explained how he struggled with the decision, and that several of them voiced their disapproval. The conference call was a quiet effort by the president to control the potential political damage which could possibly occur from his controversial announcement.

As a result, Black churches were conflicted in their reactions. Some were silent on the issue. At other churches, pastors spoke against the president’s decision – but spoke kindly of the man himself. While some were outraged at the president and his decision, there was a minority of pastors who spoke favorably of the decision while expressing understanding of the president’s change of heart. African-Americans were a key voting bloc for the president. During the previous 2008 presidential election, exit polls showed Obama lost to John McCain among white voters, but won more than 95% of the African-American vote. While African Americans overwhelmingly supported President Obama, traditionally most are socially conservative when it comes to gay marriage. Overall, many Black pastors said they will still support the president in the upcoming 2012 election even though they may not agree with him on this particular issue.

The gay marriage announcement by Obama highlighted a number of things. One, there exists a particular segment within the Black church that is progressive on issues regarding racial and economic equality, justice and fairness while remaining conservative on issues such as abortion and gay marriage. This particular stripe of Christian faith never aligned itself 100% politically with conservative or progressive evangelicals. It is a group that is motivated and passionate about racial and economic equality because it directly impacts their personal well-being and safety. It also directly impacts the well-being and safety of their families and communities. Secondly, it showed that the majority of Black Christians who previously supported Obama continued to do so despite their deep disagreement with the president over a major social issue. Despite their conservative beliefs, if a candidate fights for overall equality, justice and fairness which is critical to the day-to-day lives of people of color, it was proven that the candidate’s stance on gay marriage was not the type of deal breaker for them as it would be for the Religious Right voters.

As we reflect on the life of former President Jimmy Carter, we are reminded how he was clearly one of the most religious presidents in modern U.S. history who openly embraced the label “born-again Christian”.  As a progressive evangelical, Carter was outspoken about Jesus and justice. His rise to power occurred during a major transformative period in American Christianity. Like the Religious Right, Carter personally opposed abortion and same sex-marriage. Where Carter and the Religious Right differed was on legislation. Conservatives were in favor of specific legislation Carter believed infringed on the separation of church and state, such as a proposed constitutional amendment banning abortion and a legislative attempt to restore prayer in public schools.

He did not campaign to overturn Roe vs. Wade, and he was feminist who appointed more women to his administration than any other president before him. Carter supported the Equal Rights Amendment, a proposed change to the Constitution that would have guaranteed legal equality to women. Many white evangelicals did not believe in women’s equality. As a product of the Deep South, he was a theologically conservative evangelical with a progressive political platform. Carter’s public stance on culture war issues cost him politically when his fellow white evangelicals along with the political advocacy of the Moral Majority abandoned him for reelection. They eventually threw their support behind his Republican challenger Ronald Reagan who received an estimated 56% of the evangelical vote in the 1980 presidential election. These voters did not just turn away from Carter – they turned away from part of their own tradition, historians say.

Carter represented a religious tradition where a white evangelical could credibly claim to be a Bible-believing, “I’ve been saved by the blood of Jesus” Christian –and still be politically progressive, says Randall Balmer author of “Redeemer: The Life of Jimmy Carter.” As a white evangelical, Carter didn’t fit in with the likes of Jerry Falwell, who founded the Moral Majority. “He had no problem being identified as a progressive evangelical,” says Balmer, who in his book recounts the story about Carter’s defense of a Black Naval Academy classmate and his refusal to join a white supremacist group. Carter represented what one commentator calls the “road not taken” by many contemporary white evangelicals. He was a peacemaker.

He was a global peacemaker both as president and during his post-presidency. Carter won the 2002 Nobel Peace Prize for his decades of efforts to find peaceful solutions to international conflicts and advancing democracy and human rights. During his post-presidency, he was a peacemaker by promoting racial reconciliation and collective healing within the Baptist church. In 2006, Carter joined with Mercer University President Bill Underwood in bringing together Baptists of different races and ethnicities, regions, backgrounds and theological perspectives to form an informal alliance.  A year later, the New Baptist Covenant was formed. According to the Rev. Mitch Randall, CEO of Good Faith Media, “It was President Carter’s life-long dream to put Baptist together who had been divided.” With his passing, it is our hope his dream is fulfilled.

David W. Marshall is the founder of the faith-based organization, TRB: The Reconciled Body, and author of the book God Bless Our Divided America.

Among the Powerful Voices We Lost in 2024, Louis Gossett, Jr.’s Echoes Loudly By Ben Jealous

Dec. 4, 2024

benjealous pfaw

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - It was my last year as national president of the NAACP, at the end of 2013 Image Awards. I was with my dear friend Louis Gossett, Jr., the actor and activist who won an Oscar for his role in the film “An Officer and a Gentleman.” Lou said to me, “You know, Ben, I’ve been in this racial justice movement my whole life, but you know, sometimes, brother, I feel like we’re fighting over who’s in first class. What we should be doing is looking out the window, because the plane has fallen like 20,000 feet in the last two minutes.”

He saw I was a little confused. So he continued, “The planet is dying. It doesn’t matter who’s in first class on a dead planet.” 

Lou’s words have stuck with me for over a decade. It was Lou’s voice echoing in my ear that inspired me to get back into the environmental movement and take my current job as the head of the Sierra Club.

December is the customary month of remembrance. A time of year we take stock; a moment on the calendar when we pause to reflect on the giants we have lost.

Louis Gossett, Jr. is one of those giants. He died this past March.

Lou never shied away from using his platform to fight for people and the planet. Remembering his passion for justice and the path he forged can be a guiding light. His example, like that of scores of other Black leaders we lost in 2024, has a special resonance for America’s Black men and boys. But it is an example that should inspire anyone who sees a situation that their own moral calling tells them needs to change.

As a child, Lou loved superheroes. When he did not see anyone who looked like him playing his favorite superhero, Superman, he decided to become one – both on and off the screen. The character he portrayed in “An Officer and a Gentleman,” Gunnery Sergeant Emil Foley, was a soldier highly decorated for his patriotism. Offscreen Lou was a true patriot himself.

Lou often spoke of the need to focus on the “bigger picture.” He pictured concentric circles as he thought about how people could make a difference and have an impact in their family, community, country, as well as the world. He founded the Eracism Foundation to promote cultural diversity, historical enrichment, and anti-violence initiatives for young adults, teens and pre-teens through "Shamba Centers" throughout the country. 

Lou contributed one of the autobiographical essays in my book Reach: 40 Black Men Speak on Living, Leading, and Succeeding. In it, he wrote about meeting Nelson Mandela when the South African leader was finally released from prison after 27 years. Lou said Mandela’s message was simple: there is no time to focus on revenge, which is a “self-inflicting disease;” the only thing we have time to focus on is “uplifting ourselves and one another for the bigger picture, which is the salvation of the planet.”

Lou spoke of the values passed on to him and his cousins by their grandmother: “collective responsibility; empathy; being ready, willing and able to help another person when he or she is down.” Those are values to live by. I can relate. My own grandmother’s wisdom continues to guide me. Her sage advice continues to be one of my mantras in life: "Pessimists are right more often, but optimists win more often. As for me, I'll take winning." 

Of course, in addition to Lou, we lost many Black men this year whose lives and work inspired millions. Icons of stage and screen like James Earl Jones and John Amos, historymaking sports legends such as Willie Mays, and titans of the Civil Rights Movement like Rev. James Lawson, whom Dr. King called “the leading theorist and strategist of nonviolence in the world.” We lost Quincy Jones, who not only left an indelible mark on the music industry but was a champion for civil and human rights. And many others.

In my introduction to Reach, I noted that imitation has always been the first step for those seeking to achieve great things. Children pick up sticks to reenact the battles of warrior heroes. Toddlers preach to congregations, or sing to crowds, of teddy bears and puppets. Babies step into their parents shoes and try to walk. But we cannot imitate – or draw inspiration from – that which we have never seen, heard, or read about. I hope people continue to learn about my friend Louis Gossett, Jr. and the other giants we lost because the examples they set are surely ones to be imitated.

Lou’s hope was that younger generations grow up to remember that bigger picture of which he spoke. That “instead of talking about the salvation of the Irish or the Jew or the Black, they talk about the salvation of mankind and the planet. I think we can ask for and expect nothing less.”

Hear, hear.

Ben Jealous is the Executive Director of the Sierra Club and a Professor of Practice at the University of Pennsylvania.

A Day for Shirley Chisholm By Julianne Malveaux

Nov. 26, 2024

malveaux

ShirleyChisholm2

Rep. Shirley Chisholm

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - November 30 is Shirley Chisholm Day in New York, and it’s about time New York the nation, and indeed the world celebrates this Black woman, the first to be elected to Congress in 1969, just five years after the passage of the Civil Rights Act.

Shirley Chisholm was the first Black woman to run for President in 1972. Imagine the racism and sexism she encountered. But it didn’t stop her! She competed in just 12 primaries, as the good old boys worked to prevent her ballot access. Yet she amassed 152 delegates, around 10 percent of the total.

As a member of Congress, Shirley Chisholm authored about 50 pieces of legislation, mostly around race and gender equality, children, poverty, and ending the war in Vietnam. Her boldness was an inspiration for women like former New Jersey Secretary of State Regina Thomas and retiring Congresswoman Barbara Lee, who cast the lone vote against our war in Afghanistan.

If there were no Shirley Chisholm, there would be no Vice President Kamala Harris, whose own Presidential campaign reminds us of Chisholm. Shirley Chisholm was not only a legislator, representing Brooklyn, she was also an educator and activist. She earned a master’s degree in early childhood education from Columbia University, and that educational background gave her a heart for our children. Committed to women’s equal participation in politics she was, in 1971, a cofounder of the National Women’s Political Caucus. In 1977, she became the first Black woman, and only the second woman, to serve on the House Rules committee.

Her contributions are numerous, her impact legendary. She was awarded a posthumous Medal of Freedom by President Obama in 2015. She is an icon for many, especially for Black women, but for too many she is either unknown or forgotten. The sister who described herself as “unbought and unbossed” deserves a lot more recognition than the November 30 festivities, and the day reminds us of the many unsung heroines in our society. It is unfortunate that even in these days of “Black girl magic” we deify men and often ignore Black women.

I don’t know why New York chose to lift Shirley Chisholm up this November 30. Perhaps it is because she embodies the kind of audacity we need in these times. When asked how she wanted to be remembered, she said, “I want to be remembered as a woman who dared to be a catalyst.”

Dared. Catalyst. Audacious words for an audacious woman. And there are so many more than we need to remember, such as Dr. LaFrances Rogers Rose, a scholar who made her transition on November 10. The pioneering leader founded the International Congress of Black Women, was a champion for Black women scholars, and a selfless encourager of others. Like Chisholm, she had audacity.

We don’t have to go to the past, or even to the ancestors to find Chisholm-like women, because they are all around us. Consider, for example, LaTosha Brown, founder of Black Voters Matter. Or Barbara Arnwine, founder of the Transformative Justice Coalition, or Melanie Campbell convener of the Black Women’s Roundtable. So many sisters making a difference, a difference needed now more than ever.

Exceptional audacity is needed during these times. Too many are choosing caution, apprehensive about what the incoming President might do about our rights, our health, and our environment. Too many government workers, many who are Black women, are tiptoeing because the Orange Man has threatened to “streamline” the federal workforce. We need more who, like Chisholm, dare to speak up and speak out. I’m so glad that New York City chose to honor Shirley Anita Chisholm with a day of her own. While she certainly deserves the day to herself, I’ll think of it as Black Women’s Audacity Day in honor of all of those who, like Chisholm, are catalysts for change.

The Power Of The Gumbo Spirit Was On Display At Paris Olympics by Marc H. Morial

August 11, 2024

To Be Equal   

Express written permission must be obtained from Mauri Solages Photography for usage

(TriceEdneyWire.com - “In addition to giving us countless thrilling moments of athletic excellence, the Summer Games have given the DEI movement the greatest gift it could ever hope for: a picture of success that can inspire people from across the political spectrum … They represent what makes America great: individuals from diverse backgrounds, viewing their distinctive identities as sources of pride, cooperating together to achieve excellence and bring honor to their nation.” -- Eboo Patel

The power of the Gumbo spirit was on full display in Team USA at the 2024 Olympic Games in Paris.

The most diverse women’s gymnastics team in U.S. history was the most decorated, with 10 medals total, 3 of them gold, including the coveted individual all-around.

Team USA members of every racial and ethnic background found success in Paris, bringing home the gold in track and field, swimming, and other events. But the diversity of the women’s gymnastics team has captured the world’s attention, given the historic exclusion of women of color from the sport.

When Dominique Dawes competed in the Olympic trials for the 1992 Barcelona Games, she was the first Black gymnast to ever qualify. She was part of the celebrated “Magnificent Seven” in the 1996 Atlanta games who won the first-ever gold medal for the United States in the women's team competition.

A decade after Dawes Olympics debut, Gabby Douglas became the first Black woman of any nationality to win the all-around gold medal in gymnastics.

It would be absurd to argue that Black women were absent from Olympic gymnastics for nearly a century because of a lack of talent. It is an equally absurd argument to make about executive leadership in the nation’s top corporations, admissions to elite colleges and universities, or the Oval Office.

The anti-racial justice extremists who want to ban DEI policies would doom Team USA to mediocrity just to assure their own place on the roster. 

Diverse organizations – from Fortune 500 companies to Olympic gymnastics teams – perform better than exclusive organizations. People from different backgrounds bring a wealth of different experiences, knowledge, and skills. One study found that diverse and inclusive teams made better decisions than individuals 87% of the time.

Diverse companies see higher revenue , with75 percent of companies with strong DEI policies in their management teams will surpass their financial goals.

The gymnastics world did not sit passively by and wait for a fully-trained Simone Biles to find her own way, unbidden, to the National Championships in 2012.  Were it not for a sharp-eyed coach who noticed the tiny 6-year-old on a day-care field trip to a gym, Biles may never have been steered toward the sport.  Today she is almost universally recognized as the greatest gymnast of all time.

The leaders of the so-called “anti-woke” movement would rather dominate second-rate institutions than collaborate to build world-class organizations.

We can give thanks, at least, they’re not entrusted to assemble our sports teams. 
 

X