banner2e top

The Power of Spoken Words By David W. Marshall

Sept. 21, 2026

david w. marshall

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Our words matter. The Bible teaches that words carry the deep power to heal, hurt, build up, or destroy. On one side, careless speech can be damaging and destructive. On the other side, words can bring calmness in the midst of chaos.

Our words matter, whether we use them as a weapon to attack or a shield to protect. Our words matter because they reflect our inner conscience and heart. Former U.S. Sen. Mitt Romney once said, “But my promise before God to apply impartial justice required that I put my personal feelings and political biases aside.”

At critical moments of our history, citizens expect our leaders to be conscience-driven servants whose inspiring words are consistently matched with inspiring actions.  Sen. Romney never became president. But a president’s words can shape the nation’s identity, change the political landscape, influence global politics, and set the country's moral and legal tone.  

In times of crisis, presidents rely on speeches to calm a frightened nation, such as President Franklin D. Roosevelt rallying the country after Pearl Harbor or President George W. Bush uniting a grieving public at Ground Zero after 9/11. Roosevelt’s famous phrase, “The only thing we have to fear is fear itself,” came during his first inaugural address at the height of the Great Depression. It was meant to counter the panic, uncertainty, and fear and replace it with public confidence and collective action. Before television, almost every home in America had a radio, and FDR used it to enter every household.

His fireside chats (evening radio addresses) were intimate speeches with a conversational tone and encouraging patriotic themes. He never painted a dark picture of America; instead, he urged people to face the future with patience, understanding, and faith. His calming manner lifted the public’s confidence and their trust in him as president. President Barack Obama’s three words, “Yes we can,” align with FDR’s messages, offering a shared vision of unity and progress. Obama’s vision of unity confronted the nation’s legacy of culture wars when he stated, “There is not a liberal America and a conservative America – there is the United States of America.” His words mattered because they highlighted a nation long divided politically, culturally, and racially.

President Abraham Lincoln navigated the same cultural and racial fault lines. In his House Divided speech, Lincoln stated, “A house divided against itself cannot stand.” In doing so, he warned that the United States could not permanently endure being a nation consisting of half slave and half free states. It became one of the defining summaries of the cultural crisis before the Civil War. In a moment of executive accountability, Lincoln also used the five powerful words written by his predecessor, President Thomas Jefferson.  Before Jefferson became the third president of the United States, he was the primary author of the Declaration of Independence.

It was written as a formal explanation of why the American colonies declared their independence from Great Britain. It became a point-by-point list of grievances and injustices against King George III and the British government. When Jefferson wrote “all men are created equal” as part of the Declaration of Independence, he did so as a man who was socially oppressed and suffering. “All men are created equal” turned the Declaration of Independence from a list of grievances into a profound commitment to preserving human dignity. Those five powerful words made the Declaration of Independence into a social justice document. Jefferson’s message of justice became timeless. Despite one man being king (King George III) and the other a subject of the king (Thomas Jefferson), in God’s eyes both men are created equal and have basic rights as human beings. Lincoln, in his Gettysburg Address, used “all men are created equal” as he tied it to the abolition of slavery. Women’s rights advocates used “all men and women are created equal” when fighting to get women the right to vote. Dr. Martin Luther King used “all men are created equal” in his famous “I Have a Dream” speech, which demanded equal rights for Blacks.

As an enslaver, Jefferson was selective in his fight for human dignity. His fight for freedom from British oppression did not result in freedom for Blacks suffering from the oppression of slavery. While diversity, equity, and inclusion were delayed, future generations picked them up. Again, words backed by action matter, and a future president took the baton of DEI and ran with it… even when it meant putting aside personal feelings and political biases. When President Lyndon Johnson spoke the words, “We shall overcome,” he used the civil-rights movement anthem in his 1965 address to Congress urging voting-rights legislation after violence in Selma, Alabama. In doing so, the phrase tied the presidency directly to the mass movement for racial justice.

Johnson was instrumental in changing the political landscape when he stated, “We are not fully free until all of us are free.” Presidential words can also be damaging when setting a fearful tone for the nation. When President Richard Nixon mentioned to an aide, “People react to fear, not love. They don’t teach that in Sunday school, but it’s true,” Nixon was speaking as an elected official who was fully aware of the impact fear plays in building walls and suspicion of others. Nixon’s defining words, “I am not a crook,” made him inseparable from the Watergate scandal. Speaking of crooks, the current president has no words of historical significance. President Harry Truman said it best when he stated, “The buck stops here,” when referring to executive responsibility. This is true even of the current president.

David W. Marshall founded the faith-based organization TRB: The Reconciled Body and wrote God Bless Our Divided America.

Troy Davis's Ghost Still Speaks After All These Years By Ben Jealous

 

Sept. 21, 2026

benjealous pfaw s

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - I woke up Monday thinking about Troy Davis. Fifteen years ago, Georgia executed him. He was innocent. I was outside the prison that night.

As the old song goes, that's the night the lights went out in Georgia.

No physical evidence tied Troy to the killing of Officer Mark MacPhail. The case rested on eyewitnesses. Seven of the nine later recanted or changed their accounts. Several swore the police had pressured them. They pointed instead to another man at the scene, the man who first gave police Troy's name. One witness testified he saw that man fire the shots.

Good people spoke up. William Sessions, who ran the FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation) under three presidents, wrote that the case was permeated in doubt. Bob Barr, a Republican who supports the death penalty, wrote that condemning a man on the skimpiest of evidence does not serve justice. I am grateful to them. But they did not have what I had. I worked that case for fifteen years. I read the affidavits myself. I did not come away with doubt. I came away certain. Georgia killed the wrong man.

Troy saw what we could not. He kept telling us the only way to break the killing machine was to make the country watch it work. So we built our campaign around a hashtag, #TooMuchDoubt. His execution became the second most tweeted event on earth that year. Weeks later, Gallup found support for the death penalty at a 39-year low.

The next spring, Connecticut abolished the death penalty with a horrific murder case still in the headlines. Troy made that possible. A year later, Maryland became the first state south of the Mason-Dixon Line to abolish. I watched that vote from the Senate balcony in Annapolis, beside Kirk Bloodsworth. Maryland had sent Kirk, a White waterman and former Marine, to death row for a murder he did not commit. DNA freed him. Virginia followed in 2021, the first state of the old Confederacy to abolish.

Then we stopped. No state has abolished the death penalty since Washington struck it from its books in 2023.

The machine kept running. Since 1973, at least 203 people have been exonerated from death row. For every eight people executed, one has been exonerated. Two years ago Missouri executed Marcellus Williams, after the very prosecutor's office that convicted him asked a court to throw out the conviction.

The death penalty preys on the poor. About 95 percent of the people on death row could not afford a lawyer.

Lynching still haunts us. At least ten Black people have been found hanging this year. Most have been ruled suicides. Their families want independent reviews. This month Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley and 59 colleagues asked the Justice Department and the FBI to investigate every one.

Frederick Douglass is often called the father of the civil rights movement. He was the first civil rights leader to call publicly for abolishing the death penalty. He said its roots were intertwined with the roots of the lynching tree. Both had to be cut down.

I learned the path thirty years ago at the National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty. The Eighth Amendment bans cruel and unusual punishment. The Supreme Court judges what is unusual by looking at the states. In 2005, once most states had barred executing children, the Court ended the practice. The threshold for ending the death penalty is 26 states.

We have 23. We need three.

Ohio is closest. Its Republican governor, Mike DeWine, has not carried out a single execution. In June he called for abolition. Pennsylvania's governor, Josh Shapiro, refuses to sign death warrants. North Carolina has not executed anyone in twenty years.

Much of the country is moving the other way. States executed 47 people last year, the most since 2009. Florida alone killed 19. In January 2025 the president signed an order pressing states to seek more death sentences.

These are hard times. We carry many fights. We cannot set this one down.

Two weeks before he died, Troy asked me to be an uncle to his nephew, De'Jaun. I said yes. I had known him since he was three. Today he is an engineer, helping build a dental school in Savannah, his uncle's hometown. Troy should have lived to see it.

Three states. Call your governor. Call your legislators. Douglass told us to cut down both trees. One is still standing. And it is time for the lights to stay on in Georgia.

Ben Jealous is a Professor of Practice at the University of Pennsylvania and a former national president of the NAACP. He is the author of Never Forget Our People Were Always Free: A Parable of American Healing.

Why I Support Cuba by Dr. E. Faye Williams

Sept. 18, 2026
 

drefayewilliamsnew

TriceEdneyWire.comDr. Ron Daniels, President of the Institute of the Black World, invited several U.S. leaders to go on a fact-finding mission to Cuba. Among those who went were Dr.Daniels, Louis Romain, Dr.Julianne Malveaux, Rev.Robert Turner, Dr. James Early,reporters from The Final Call, The Informer, World Conference of Mayors, Black Social Workers, young people, etc.  

I’ve been blessed to visit and work in many places in the world. I’ve seen people struggle in many of those places. Some have given up struggling to make their country better, but not Cubans! We saw them carrying on with the best they have, and they gave us the very best of everything available to them.

Many places are indeed run down from a lack of care through no fault of their own. There's trash on many streets, not because Cubans don’t want to take the trash away, but because of the blockade of the United States against them.They have no fuel to send garbage trucks to pick it up.

All the nations I've visited taught me something, but in no place were we more welcomed to see anything we wanted to see in Cubaincluding visiting with Cuba’s President and elected leaders, community organizers and justice workers, hospitals, and their famous medical school where young people who might never have had the opportunity to become doctors are doing so due to the graciousness of the Cuban people.

Some of those students are from the U.S.,and are studying in Cuba because they were not given a chance for various reasons to study in the U. S. No matter what, these students soldier on, studying under the most difficult of conditions now caused by the U.S. with the frequent power outages, lack of much-needed equipment and forms of treatment brought on by the U.S. with the cruel blockade of necessities. Yet they are willing to remain in Cuba because they know the value of becoming doctors and being willing to go into the most difficult, and dangerous places in the world to provide health care.

Cuba has research programs going on with something plaguing the United States now. They have done some of the most advanced memory care studies that we, in the U.S. are unable or unwilling to conquer. While visiting hospitals, we saw doctors with tears in their eyes because they were unable to provide their best-known treatment because of the U.S. blockade of goods,equipment and medication.They often struggle to get to where their patients need them because of the unavailability of fuel to travel where needed. One member of our team became ill in Cuba. They gave him the best treatment they could without charge—while here in the U.S. we have a doctor suing his patients who have no money to pay after his fellow Republicans deleted,out of spite, the health benefits President Barack Obama worked to give them.

We met people who’re suffering from the inability to get vitaminsfor headaches, eye drops, etc. because of the U.S. blockade. Yet, the Cubans showed us no hatred.They just struggle for peace from threats of destruction from the U.S. government, for an opportunity to feed their families, have gasoline to travel to work and for their children to go to school and have lights to study when it’s dark. We take these things for granted, but our government shows no regard for others needing the same thing.

As an American, I’m hurt and embarrassed about what the http://u.s.is/. Click or tap to follow the link." data-auth="NotApplicable" data-linkindex="0">U.S.is doing to Cuba—a country that has done nothing to us. I pray that our people will stand up and do everything possible to allow Cuba to live free without U.S. interference. President Obama respectfully visited Cuba and began an effort to resolve differences now shut down by current U.S. leaders.Thank you to Congressman Jonathan Jackson who is a major leader to free Cuba from U.S. cruelty.

(Dr. E. Faye Williams)

Blessed to Still Have Acts of Kindness By Dr. E. Faye Williams

July 11, 2026
drefayewilliamsnew
 

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - When Barack Obama became our President, some of us began to believe our nation was on its way to approaching equal rights for all where most of us had a chance to become whatever we chose to work for.  Some of us began to be comfortable with the idea that our children and grandchildren could become whatever they were willing to work for. They were becoming leaders at all kinds of places. They were having opportunities that we could not even dream we could ever have.

For a while, we didn’t have to read about so many murders of our children.  They didn’t witness the worst of America’s leaders from the top down using vulgar language, hearing about the highest ranking public officials raping women and not even serving time in jail for it!

We didn’t hear about Presidents in such an ugly way talking about their predecessors, using profanity during hours young people were up trying to concentrate on their studies.  We didn’t witness President ignoring court orders such as taking down his name from the President John F. Kennedy Center. He's still ignoring the order, and with another act of defiance of a court order, he placed a tarp over the space so no one would know the court order has not yet been obeyed or at least he keeps us believing that covering both his and President Kennedy’s name is what the court ordered, while he tries to figure out how to disobey the Court and leave his name there!

How Americans tolerate this man continuing to occupy our White House by disobeying every rule, every law, every practice followed for years without disobeying judges—and now he even disobeys Supreme Court orders without punishment! How do we teach our children to obey laws?

It’s no wonder many young people don’t feel they have to obey laws, do things reminiscent of many years past and think nothing of killing a young man by the name of Nolan Wells in Mississippi. I thank God for an athlete who has been cheated out of his chances to go as far as his talent would take him,  yet show his thoughtfulness by intervening and paying for seeking justice for young Nolan Wells.

Before Nolan Wells, there was Karmelo Anthony from Texas who was cheated out of a fair trial. Every possibility was denied him when certain witnesses who likely would have told a different story about what happened in the tragedy. Karmelo who was a senior in high school when he was convicted under questionable circumstances. He was given 35 years in prison and sent there immediately from the courtroom at the end of the trial.

In response to Karmelo’s tragedy, we’ve seen other acts of kindness when Attorneys Russell Wilson,11, Sean Moore, Brooke Cluse, (from Ben Crump’s Law Firm), Sean Dredia, and Justin Moore are handling his appeal against the conviction. They are conducting an independent review of the trial record to identify any legal errors there appear to be. I don’t believe so many lawyers of the caliber of this group would offer their services pro bono if they didn’t already see certain actions believed to be errors that denied Anthony a fair trial.

It seems that in many ways we’ve returned to the years when a Black person had no rights that a white man had to respect. It’s a tragedy that after the blood, sweat, tears and lives of so many people, we are brought back to where we were many years ago

We need more than Black people and a few others to show their humanity and not leave decency in this country to Black people alone who’ve already been denied so much. Everyday, I’m left to wonder where some of my non-Black friends are on confronting-what we have today!

Dr. E. Faye Williams is president of the Dick Gregory Society

The Bicentennial Was Healing. "Freedom 250" Was A Narcissistic Embarrassment By Marc H. Morial

To Be Equal 
July 11, 2026


Express written permission must be obtained from Mauri Solages Photography for usage

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - “The 1976 celebration was a more vital and happy one because of a broad belief that two years earlier the system had worked, and we were celebrating a system that had cleansed itself. We were in a period of renewal and relief, and today we’re in a period of fear and loathing. We don’t have any reason to celebrate our founding documents, because we’re living in an authoritarian state that is quite different from the one that the founders created.” -- Jonathan Alter

In a proclamation declaring 1976 The Bicentennial Year, President Ford called upon “every man, woman, and child to celebrate the diversity of tradition, culture and heritage that reflects our people and our patrimony.”

A half century later, President Trump used the occasion of the nation’s 250th anniversary to celebrate Trump.

In 2016, a bipartisan act of Congress created the United States Semiquincentennial Commission, branded America250, to “foster shared experiences that spark imagination, showcase the rich tapestry of our American stories, inspire service in our communities, honor the enduring strength, and celebrate the resilience of the United States of America”.

In 2025, the Trump administration began diverting funds intended for the nonpartisan commission to “Freedom 250,” a public–private partnership through which donors purchase access to Trump and millions of dollars could be funneled to Trump allies.  Among the events it produced were an IndyCar street race around the National Mall and a mixed martial arts combat event on the White House lawn.

On July 5, 1976, President Ford addressed newly naturalized Americans in Virginia: “‘Black is beautiful’ was a motto of genius which uplifted us far above its intention. Once Americans had thought about it and perceived its truth, we began to realize that so are brown, white, red, and yellow beautiful ... You came as strangers among us and you leave here as citizens, equal in fundamental rights, equal before the law, with an equal share in the promise of the future.”

In a speech to open the sparsely-attended Great American State Fair, Trump denigrated immigrants as “murderers, gang members, drug dealers, and dangerous criminals” and bragged about eliminating racial justice initiatives.

In 1976, the nation was struggling to recover from one of the most notorious episodes of presidential corruption in our history up to that point: a political espionage program, illegally funded by donor contributions, which the Nixon administration tried to cover up by destroying evidence, obstructing investigators, and bribing burglars.

The bipartisan resolve with which Congress confronted the Watergate scandal seems unthinkable today. Not only did a congressional committee vote unanimously to subpoena audiotapes that exposed the President’s guilt, members of the President’s own party stood ready to vote not only for his impeachment, but for his conviction, and urged him to resign.

But the reforms passed in the wake of the scandal did not anticipate a future president willing to flout institutional norms and test the limits of every available safeguard.

In his Bicentennial speech, Ford asked, “Are the institutions under which we live working the way they should? Are the foundations laid in 1776 and 1789 still strong enough and sound enough to resist the tremors of our times? Are our God-given rights secure, our hard-won liberties protected?”

Fifty years later, these questions no longer sound like a celebration of American resilience—they stand as an urgent test of whether our democracy can still summon the courage, accountability, and civic faith that once enabled it to correct its own course.

HBCUs are Still the Vanguard By Julianne Malveaux

 

July 7, 2026

malveaux

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - This week I am thinking about what it means to go back to school in a country that still rations opportunity. The stores are selling backpacks and dorm décor, but the deeper question is who gets access to education, who must borrow for it, and which institutions continue to carry the burden of Black possibility.

The fireworks have dimmed, and the Fourth-of-You-Lie sales are waning. In this country, we commemorate through commerce and celebrate through retail activity, so even though we are just a few days into July, back-to-school signs are already shouting from store windows and websites.

Who is going back to school, and under what circumstances?

As with every milestone in this country, inequality roars. Some students will return to school with new laptops, quiet rooms, family-paid tuition, and networks that cushion every stumble. Others will return carrying debt, doubt, family obligations, food insecurity, transportation challenges, and the accumulated disadvantages of underfunded schools and under-resourced communities.

The back-to-school season is marketed as a fresh start. For too many students, it is also a reminder that opportunity in America has always been rationed.

That is why Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) still matter. Indeed, that is why HBCUs remain the vanguard.

The vanguard is not always the largest part of the army. It is the front edge. It moves first. It absorbs blows. It clears the path. By that definition, HBCUs have always been the vanguard. They were built because this country’s higher education system excluded Black people by law, custom, violence, and contempt. Their founding question was not, “How do we reproduce privilege?” Their founding question was, “How do we cultivate genius where America has refused to see it?”

That question remains urgent.

HBCUs enroll only a fraction of Black college students, but their impact is outsized. In 2022, HBCUs enrolled about 9 percent of Black college students, yet they produced 16 percent of the bachelor’s degrees earned by Black students in 2021–22. UNCF reports that HBCUs generate $16.5 billion in annual economic impact, support more than 136,000 jobs, and that the 2021 HBCU graduating class is projected to earn $146 billion over their lifetimes.

These are not sentimental institutions. They are economic engines, leadership factories, and community anchors.

Still, HBCUs are too often asked to do transformative work with transactional support.

That contradiction is especially sharp now, as federal student loan policy shifts under the feet of students and families. The Biden-era SAVE plan — Saving on a Valuable Education — was designed to make repayment less punishing by tying payments to income and family size, reducing monthly payments for many borrowers, limiting runaway interest, and creating a shorter forgiveness path for some small-balance borrowers. Now SAVE has ended, and millions of borrowers have been told to move into other repayment plans.

The change lands first on borrowers already in repayment, but current students are not untouched. Undergraduates will face a narrower repayment landscape when they leave school. Families will confront new Parent PLUS limits. Graduate and professional students will face new borrowing caps just as advanced credentials remain expensive and often necessary. Graduate PLUS loans, which previously allowed many graduate students to borrow up to the cost of attendance, are being phased out for new borrowers. Grad PLUS was the backstop many students used when tuition and living costs exceeded unsubsidized loan limits.

These numbers are not abstractions. They determine who can become a nurse practitioner, a physical therapist, a psychologist, a professor, a public health leader, a lawyer, a dentist, a physician, or a minister. They determine who can move from the first degree to the next rung. They determine whether talent is nurtured or stranded.

For Black students, the stakes are higher because the debt burden is heavier. Black students are more likely to borrow for college, more likely to borrow more, and more likely to struggle in repayment because the racial wealth gap follows them from home to campus and from campus to workplace. A loan policy that may look race-neutral on paper can still deepen racial inequality in practice.

That is the context in which HBCUs do their work. They educate students through inequality, against inequality, and beyond inequality. They do not merely polish privilege. They cultivate possibility. They take seriously the students America too often treats as afterthoughts, and they turn potential into leadership.

Having led an HBCU, I know both the miracle, the math, and the myth. At Bennett College, I saw daily what HBCUs do with too little: stretch dollars, nurture brilliance, hold students close, and insist that Black women’s futures were worth fighting for. I know the devotion of faculty, the exhaustion of administrators, the anxiety of families, and the constant scramble for resources. I also know this: HBCUs cannot be praised in February and underfunded in July. They cannot be applauded at commencements and ignored in appropriations. They cannot be celebrated as cultural treasures while their students are left to navigate a debt system that punishes aspiration.

The country loves the symbolism of back-to-school season. New backpacks. New notebooks. New slogans. But the real question is not what is on sale, it's what is at stake.

If HBCUs are the vanguard, then the question is not whether they have earned our admiration. They have. The question is whether they will receive the investment, protection, and respect that their record demands.

Back to school should not mean back to debt, back to rationed opportunity, or back to the same old inequalities dressed up in fresh retail packaging. It should mean back to possibility. Back to purpose. Back to institutions that have carried us when the broader society would not.

HBCUs are still carrying us. The question is whether public policy will finally carry its share.

 
X