banner2e top

Report: African Americans ‘Locked Out’ of Home Ownership by Della Hasselle

Oct. 2, 2016

Report: African-Americans ‘Locked Out’ of Home Ownership
By Della Hasselle
cooper ron1
Ron Cooper, NAREP president

Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from the Louisiana Weekly

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - The homeownership rate for African-Americans is now lower than the national homeownership rate was during the 1930s, as the United States was in the throes of the Great Depression.

That is one of many findings reported by four authors for the National Association of Real Estate Brokers (NAREB), in a 2016 report called the State of Housing in Black America.

That same report found homeownership for non-Hispanic White people stood at 68.5 percent in 2014. In comparison, the rate was 41.2 percent among Black people.

The reason for these statistics, according to the NAREB, is that Black Americans have long had unequal access to mainstream mortgage credit – a finding that the organization blasted in a Sept. 20 release, while signaling a “clarion call” for change to lawmakers, regulators, government agencies and lenders.

“The continued institutional denial of equal access to mortgage credit is the single-most detrimental factor obstructing wealth building among Black Americans,” said Ron Cooper, president of the National Association of Black Real Estate Brokers.

Black Americans, simply put, have been “locked out,” he said.

In the report, the authors argued that the vast majority of African Americans who attempted to buy homes in the U.S. were either trapped in predatory mortgage schemes, or denied access to home loans altogether.

This is particularly detrimental to the long-term health of African-American families, according to the NAREB, because homeownership is the “single most important asset” for wealth accumulation in most United States households.

In the report, the authors draw upon statistics to emphasize the thesis that conventional loans are still out of reach for most African-American homeowners.

For one, the “vast majority” of Black borrowers rely on Federal Housing Administration (FHA) loans, or “nonconventional” loans that have served as a “critical source of credit” for borrowers of color, according to authors James H. Carr, Michela Zonta, Fred McKinney and Gerald Jaynes.

The report shows that while applications from Black applicants for conventional loans decreased by 82 percent in the decade between 2004 and 2014, applications for nonconventional loans increased by 60 percent.

In 2014, the authors found, a whopping 68 percent of applications coming in from African-American prospective homeowners were for nonconventional loans, compared with just 19 percent in 2004.

Yet, although applications to nonconventional loans increased, homeownership didn’t.

The share of all applications for conventional loans coming from Black applicants decreased from eight percent in 2004 to three percent in 2014. Yet Black borrowers received only three percent of all originated conventional loans in 2014, well below the share recorded in 2004 of six percent.

And, despite an increase in the number of nonconventional loans since 2004—from 88,000 to 139,000—the share of all nonconventional loans going to Black borrowers was 10 percent in 2014, down from 13 percent in 2004, they said.

The authors point to an “anemic” housing recovery from lending predatory practices that has all but bypassed the Black community, they said.

Moreover, the authors argue that predatory practices still exist within the housing market today, in new forms of lending that are disproportionately affecting people of color.

Lenders, they said, still won’t extend loans to borrowers with lower credit scores and smaller down payments “due to a concern that the federal housing agencies might identify defects in the loans.”

Further, they said, all three major federal housing agencies require lenders to submit loans evaluated using “outdated” credit-scoring models.

The Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) price loans in such a way that Black people are then “unfairly and disproportionately” required to pay a higher cost to access credit than non-Hispanic white people, the authors said.

Simply put, Black families attempting to become homeowners have “largely been trapped,” the authors wrote.

“Black America is relegated to a perpetual cycle of institutional denial of equal access to credit conducted by private actors, reinforced and supported by actions and inactions of government institutions,” the report read.

The financial models, they said, have been “unavailable” for public scrutiny, they added.

This, they said, is “in spite of the reality that they deny credit access to Blacks based on the differences in financial capacity between non-Hispanic whites and Blacks, differences that are the direct legacy of decades of unchecked discrimination.”

The authors point to inequity in the labor market that they said compounds obstacles African-Americans face when trying to buy homes.

Despite the fact that the U.S. economy since 2010 has undergone job recovery, with 287,000 jobs added in June 2016, Black Americans have not equally enjoyed this surge, the authors wrote.

During the Great Recession, the unemployment rate for Blacks rose to a high of 16.8. By June 2016, it had fallen by nearly half. Still, at 8.6 percent it remains almost twice the rate of 4.4 percent for that of non-Hispanic white workers.

When African-Americans do find work, the report added, they “disproportionately” attain low-wage jobs with little or no employment security and few, if any, benefits.

Moreover, the wage gap between Blacks and non-Hispanic whites has not narrowed in more than 35 years, they said, with Blacks earning 75 percent of the median hourly earnings of non-Hispanic whites.

The situation for African-American homeownership is not slated to improve without radical changes to lending practices, the authors argued – a change they said was not “insurmountable.”

To increase Black ownership would require the removal of “discriminatory, unfair, and deceptive barriers to credit access,” the authors wrote, including those that are “programmed into the technologies and practices” of the modern housing finance system.

“All signs suggest the wealth divide will continue to grow as homeownership for Blacks falls throughout the coming decade and beyond,” the authors wrote.

In an expert panel assembled by the association, during the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation’s 46th Annual Legislative Caucus, experts agreed that mortgage lending disparities, coupled with public policies and governmental inaction, had conspired over time to impede the growth of homeownership by Black people in the U.S.

Moreover, the panelists found, the issue isn’t that Black people have an inability to pay for mortgages.

For instance, the panelists universally agreed that lenders use instruments that work to deny Black borrowers a mortgage loan when other credible models exist, but are not widely used by lending institutions.

“While I agree that we do not want to return to the excesses and abuses of the past, we must still find a way toward responsible lending for creditworthy borrowers, including those borrowers of modest means,” said Congressman Gregory Meeks, a Democrat from New York. “Policies must be set in place to ensure affordability and increase access to mortgage credit, and there’s an essential role the government must and should play in that process.”

The NAREB was formed in 1947 to ensure equal and fair access to homeownership and opportunity for African-American real estate professionals, according to its website.

Va. Supreme Court Rejects Contempt Charge for McAuliffe, Freeing Him to Restore Voting Rights Jeremy Lazarus

Oct. 2, 2016

Va. Supreme Court Rejects Contempt Charge for McAuliffe, Freeing Him to  Restore Voting Rights 
Jeremy Lazarus 

mcauliffe terry

Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from the Richmond Free Press

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Gov. Terry McAuliffe, former chair of the Democratic National Committee, is now free to keep restoring the voting rights of felons who have served their time — a relief to more than 18,000 people whose rights he has restored since Aug. 22. 

The Virginia Supreme Court refused to wade further into this increasingly partisan battle and threw out another Republican attempt to restrict the governor’s constitutional authority to restore voting rights.

On Sept. 15, the court dismissed with little comment a request from GOP leaders in the General Assembly to hold Gov. McAuliffe in contempt for shifting from a blanket restoration of rights to a fast-paced, individual restoration of the right of felons to vote.

Restoring a person’s rights also allows him or her to run for office, serve on juries and become a notary public. 

Earlier in the summer, the state’s highest court blocked the governor from restoring the rights of more than 200,000 felons en masse after GOP House Speaker William J. Howell of Fredericksburg and GOP Senate Majority Leader Thomas K. Norment of James City County, challenged his authority to do what no other governor had ever done.

For Gov. McAuliffe, the court’s terse decision to throw out the follow-up contempt request represents a win in a bitter fight that could lead to an attempt to change the state Constitution to strip future governors of the authority to restore felons’ rights — an authority in place for 186 years.

“I am pleased that the Supreme Court has dismissed the case Republicans filed in their latest attempt to prevent individuals who have served their time having a full voice in our society,” Gov. McAuliffe stated after learning of the court’s decision.

“It is my hope,” he continued, “that the court’s validation of the process we are using will convince Republicans to drop their divisive efforts to prevent Virginians from regaining their voting rights and focus their energy and resources on making Virginia a better place to live for the people who elected all of us to lead.”

Virginia Attorney General Mark R. Herring, who represented the governor before the court, added that “this contempt motion was completely baseless, and I’m glad that the Supreme Court dispatched it so quickly. 

“Gov. McAuliffe is doing the right thing in giving these Virginians back their voice and their vote and I hope the legislature will join the effort,” he added.

Republican leaders indicated they are finished trying to restrain Gov. McAuliffe through the courts, but would take up legislation at the next General Assembly session in January to push for restraining the governor’s authority. 

“We are disappointed, but respect the Supreme Court’s order,” Speaker Howell stated. “Throughout this process, our goal was to hold the governor accountable to the Constitution and the rule of law. The governor stretched the bounds of the Virginia Constitution and sought to expand executive power in a manner we viewed as inappropriate and reckless.

“The General Assembly must now review the Constitution’s provision governing felon voting,” Howell added. “The current provisions of the constitution are vague, vulnerable to executive overreach. Several proposals have already emerged, and we expect others to come forward.”

Sen. Norment already has proposed a constitutional amendment that would automatically restore voting rights to nonviolent felons who have completed their sentences and paid any restitution, court costs and fees. But it also would bar violent felons from ever having their rights restored.

Gov. McAuliffe and other Democrats complain that the payment requirement for nonviolent felons would amount to a modern day poll tax, although Democrats in the state Senate previously supported a similar amendment with a payment requirement that Republicans killed. 

In 2015, Gov. McAuliffe dropped any requirement that felons first pay court costs and fees and began restoring rights for those who had fully completed their sentences, including probation and parole. At that time, Republicans did not object to that move because it involved only nonviolent offenders. 

Republicans began to object when the governor moved in April to an en masse restoration for violent as well as nonviolent offenders who had completed their terms.

Republican Delegate Greg Hadeeb of Salem has introduced his own proposed amendment in the House. Like Sen. Norment, his proposal would automatically restore the rights of nonviolent felons who have served their time and paid court debts. However the Hadeeb proposal would allow violent felons to apply to the governor for restoration of rights two years after completing their sentences and paying court debts. 
Republican Delegates Peter Farrell and John O’Bannon of Henrico County plan to co-patron that proposal.

Such proposals, though, would not impact Gov. McAuliffe, who will be out of office in early January 2018 and could restore the rights of 200,000 felons or more before he leaves office using the procedures now in place.

It takes at least two years to get a constitutional amendment on the ballot for voters to consider. The General Assembly first must pass a proposal in two separate sessions, separated by an election of members. That means any measure passed in the 2017 legislative session would have to pass again in the 2018 session, following the election of a new governor and members of the House. 

Virginia is one of four states that permanently disenfranchises felons, with the governor being the only official who can restore their rights.

Gov. McAuliffe has pushed harder to restore felons’ rights than any of his predecessors. It remains to be seen whether the Republican backlash will block his successors from taking a similar aggressive approach on the issue.

Social Protest is Fundamentally Patriotic By Marc H. Morial

Oct. 2, 2016

 

To Be Equal 

Social Protest is Fundamentally Patriotic

By Marc H. Morial

 

marcmorial

 

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - "Few are willing to brave the disapproval of their fellows, the censure of the colleagues, the wrath of their society. Moral courage is a rarer commodity than bravery in battle or great intelligence. Yet it is the one essential, vital quality for those who seek to change a world that yields most painfully to change. Each time a person stands up for an idea, or acts to improve the lot of others, or strikes out against injustice, (s)he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope, and crossing each other from a million different centers of energy and daring, those ripples build a current that can sweep down the mightiest walls of oppression and resistance." - Robert F. Kennedy

 

Social protest is a fundamental element of American democracy. The right to self-expression, the right to dissent, and the right to confront those in authority with ones grievances are enshrined in the Constitution.

 

Thus, San Francisco 49er Colin Kaepernick’s decision to protest police violence against African Americans by declining to stand for the National Anthem is a profoundly patriotic act.

 

While we live in the same country, the reality of day-to-day life for white and Black Americans can be vastly different. Most Black men and women in America know the humiliation of being targeted – by police, by store clerks, by security officers - for nothing more than their appearance. Black children are viewed as older and more responsible for their actions than white children of the same age. From minor offenses like being bypassed by a taxicab to the overwhelmingly racially skewed criminal justice system, the experiences of Black Americans simply are not the same for whites.

 

A majority of African Americans support Kaepernick’s choice, while a majority of whites do not.  According to an informal Twitter poll the National Urban League conducted among our followers, an overwhelming 88 percent say they are proud of Kaepernick.

 

Some white football fans, meanwhile, have burned Kaepernick’s jersey and have engaged in hateful racial invective on social media.

 

The divergent views on Kaepernick’s action reflect the divergent views on the very reason for his protest – the use of excessive and fatal force by police, disproportionately directed at people of color, and the failure of authorities to hold officers accountable for misconduct.  According to a recent survey, the vast majority white Americans hold a favorable view of police, while a slight majority of Black Americans hold an unfavorable view. A majority of whites believe police generally are held accountable for their misconduct, and a majority of black believe they are not.  A majority of Black respondents said police are too quick to use lethal force, while most white respondents said police only use lethal force when necessary.

 

While I myself will continue to stand for the National Anthem, I support his right to protest.  And while I wholeheartedly share Kaepernick’s despair over excessive force and the failure to hold police accountable, but I would support his protest even if I did not.

 

Despite the outrage Kaepernick’s protest has raised, he has ignited a movement of sorts.  Since Kaepernick since first declined refused to stand in late August, 22 NFL players have joined his protest, as have athletes in high schools, youth leagues, and colleges all across the country.

 

It’s interesting to note that, while no white NFL player has yet joined the protest, many of the high school and college students protesting are white. Young people have the power to change the future, and it is encouraging that their eyes are open to the racism and injustice many of their elders seem unable to see.

 

It is not merely Kaepernick’s right to register his discontent with the status quo, some would argue it is a moral imperative.  As Abraham Lincoln said, “To sin by silence when they should protest makes cowards of men.”

African-American and African Museums Draw Crowds in DC

Oct. 1, 2016

African-American and African Museums Draw Crowds in DC

african and african american museums


(TriceEdneyWire.com/GIN) – As thousands streamed into the striking new National Museum of African American History and Culture in Washington, DC, last week, another Africa-centered museum was also welcoming visitors to the nation’s capital.

 

At the nearby National Museum of African Art, a special screening of the film “Am I: Too African to be American or Too American to be African?” was taking place.

 

With a warm greeting to those touring the history and culture museum, the African Art museum urged museum-goers to also see the film and meet film director, Nadia Sasso, for a parallel event.

 

The award-winning documentary explores the complex identity formation of young African women living in the United States and West Africa who identify as bicultural. The film examines race, complexion, gender, heritage and more.

 

Sasso commented: “I created “Am I: the Film” as a way to not only explore how immigrants and their offspring engage with the issue of bicultural identity politics on the American and African landscapes, but to create a dialogue between the generations. Cultural dualism is a reality that affects everyone, from our President of the United States, Barack Obama, to everyday citizens like myself.”

 

The first in a series, the film features interviews with seven women of African descent in media, including “Awkward Black Girl” creator Issa Rae, who is half-Senegalese.

 

Sasso, 25, was born in America to parents who emigrated from Sierra Leone. In 2010, she co-founded Yehri Wi Cry (YWC), an organization that distributes birthing kits in Sierra Leone to increase the successful delivery rates for women. Now, she is a fashion consultant and the new media strategist for Royal Dynamite, a designer clothing business with a focus on community empowerment.

 

The recipient of several commendations, Sasso was among the “Next Generation of Female Leaders;” a Young African Committed to Excellence Award by Face2Face Africa magazine, and was the 2013 recipient of the Posse Foundation’s Ainslie Alumni Achievement Award for her commitment to social responsibility and her ability to inspire others.

 

The film will show in New York City on Oct. 15 and again in Washington, DC on Oct. 22.

 

The two museums are operated by the Smithsonian Institution – the world’s largest museum and research complex. Admission is free and the museums are open every day of the year except Dec. 25. Also in the complex is the America Indian Museum and the Air and Space Museum.

 

Exhibits at the new African American History museum can be viewed online at https://www.si.edu/Exhibitions/Museum/22

 

GLOBAL INFORMATION NETWORK creates and distributes news and feature articles on current affairs in Africa to media outlets, scholars, students and activists in the U.S. and Canada. Our goal is to introduce important new voices on topics relevant to Americans, to increase the perspectives available to readers in North America and to bring into their view information about global issues that are overlooked or under-reported by mainstream media.

Blaming the Victim by James Clingman

Oct. 2, 2016

Blackonomics

Blaming the Victim                                                    
By James Clingman

clingman

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Now that the dust has settled around President Obama’s comments at the Congressional Black Caucus Banquet, let me give you my take on the subject.  In 2010, immediately following the midterm elections, in some instances, Black folks were blamed for the “Shellacking” as Barack Obama put it, of Democrat candidates.  Again in 2014, the rancor directed at Blacks for failing to vote was raised to an even higher level.  In response, U.S. Representative, Marcia Fudge, in an article by Sabrina Eaton of Cleveland.com, noted that “preliminary exit polls showed the African American proportion of the electorate increased over the 2010 midterms, and urged critics to ‘find another scapegoat. Don't blame us!’”

Fudge continued, "Our community organizations and churches mobilized to encourage early voting opportunities with programs like 'Souls to the Polls,' and African American activists and state leaders stood ready to combat any instance of voter intimidation or fraud," her statement said. "Black elected officials crisscrossed the country to discuss the urgency and importance of this election. We phone banked, knocked on doors and held 'Get Out the Vote' rallies. Our losses were not a referendum on African American political engagement. We did our part, so don't blame us!"

In 2008 and 2012, Black voters turned out in unprecedented numbers to help Obama win the Presidency.  Now in 2016 as the first Black President prepares to leave office, Black voters will again be held responsible for turning out in droves.  We have been given our “marching orders” once again by the President during his “most passionate” speech ever, as some have described it, to the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC).

Obama declared, “I will consider it a personal insult, an insult to my legacy, if this community lets down its guard and fails to activate itself in this election,” Obama said with a stern look and booming passion. “You want to give me a good send-off, go vote.”

While it is well known that fewer Blacks vote in midterm elections than we do in Presidential elections, it just may be the result of Black people seeing ourselves being taken for granted after the President gets elected and very little that was promised during the campaign was delivered afterwards.   In 2002, NAACP Chairman, Julian Bond, said Democrats "failed to engage African-American voters. They had all the issues on their side: high unemployment, failing pensions, people losing vast sums of money and the stock market crash.  But the Democrats didn't push these issues. Instead they offered pale shadows of what the Republicans were offering, and that just wasn't good enough."

The excuses for the midterm meltdowns among Democrats over the past decade or so are essentially what we call “blaming the victim.”  Black people are really victims of the political system in this nation.  We have been “clowned” by political pundits and sycophants, and now we are caught in their web of false promises and lack of reciprocity for our votes.

I don’t know what the CBC has said or will say in response to President Obama’s admonishment to them to protect his legacy by voting for Hillary, thereby giving him a “good send-off;” but here are my requests of Brother Barack in return for his good send off.  These requests can be read in full on http://www.iamoneofthemillion.com/our-planks.html among our twenty-two platform planks.

  1. Get Brother Edward Pinkney out of prison in Michigan.  Since when do trumped up charges and false accusations on a misdemeanor crime get a person ten years in a maximum security prison?  Plank #20
  2. Exonerate Marcus Mosiah Garvey, in support of his son, Dr. Julius Garvey.  Plank #22
  3. Amend the 13th Amendment by removing the “Exception Clause.”  Plank #11
  4. Support misconduct and/or malpractice insurance for police officers.  Plank #6
  5. Change your mind about reparations for descendants of African enslaved people, and suggest ways it can be done.  You can begin by advocating reparations for the victims of the Tulsa Riot in 1921. You supported reparations for Filipino war vets, and surely you support the Japanese reparations of 1988, Native Alaskans in 1971, and reparations for the Jewish people.  Why not in our case, which is just as reasonable as all the others?  Plank #14
  6. Finally, we would love to for you to be a guest on the Carl Nelson Show, www.woldcnews.com, where conscious Black people hang out.

Mr. President, these are just five of our planks, both internal (those that call for our own personal responsibility toward one another) and external.  A good send-off for our Black President should include, at a minimum, your support for these few requests.  Your legacy will be even greater among the folks who have supported you for the past eight years if you reciprocate to your own demand of us to “Go Vote!”  If you refuse to help us, as Marcia Fudge said, “Don’t blame us.”

 

 

 

X