banner2e top

South African War on Corruption Moves into High Gear

Jan. 7, 2018

South African War on Corruption Moves into High Gear

africa-southafricansprotestcorruption

(TriceEdneyWire.com/GIN) – A shakeup in the African National Party has boosted hopes that new party officials will make a clean sweep of the backroom dealings that have made millionaires out of a small South African elite and punished the majority with high unemployment and a national credit rating downgraded to “junk status.”

Business tycoon Cyril Ramaphosa, newly elected president of the African National Congress, has raised hopes that he will stamp out corruption, expedite job creation, improve the lackluster economy and speed up the transfer of land to black people.

“Corruption must be fought with the same intensity and purpose that we fight poverty, unemployment and inequality,” Ramaphosa declared in his maiden speech after his election. “We must also act fearlessly against alleged corruption and abuse of office within our ranks.”

“We must investigate without fear or favor the so-called ‘accounting irregularities’ that caused turmoil in the markets and wiped billions off the investments of ordinary South Africans,” he said.

Ramaphosa was echoing the frustration of South African citizens who turned out in the thousands this fall to march in anti-corruption protests in major cities around the country with blame often laid at the feet of the President.

“Things are just going down under President (Jacob) Zuma,” textile worker Florence Titus told Reuters.  “He needs to play a president’s role not just be there to fill his pockets and his family’s pockets. He must step down.”

Efforts to recover several billion rands diverted “into the hands of unproductive and corrupt elites” are not, however, waiting for the new administration. Last month, a 151 page application with thousands of attachments was submitted to the North Gauteng High Court suing the President, his son, and 71 others, demanding a criminal investigation and the recovery of billions of dollars within 20 days of the order.

The foundation of Helen Suzman, an anti-apartheid activist who died in 2009, was one of the filers of the suit.

In a related development, South Africa’s top court ruled last week that Parliament failed to hold President Zuma accountable over his use of state funds to upgrade his private home. The court’s ruling could trigger impeachment proceedings.

GLOBAL INFORMATION NETWORK creates and distributes news and feature articles on current affairs in Africa to media outlets, scholars, students and activists in the U.S. and Canada. Our goal is to introduce important new voices on topics relevant to Americans, to increase the perspectives available to readers in North America and to bring into their view information about global issues that are overlooked or under-reported by mainstream media.

2018 marks the 50th Anniversary of a Momentous Year in Civil Rights By Marc H. Morial

Jan. 7, 2017

To Be Equal 
2018 marks the 50th Anniversary of a Momentous Year in Civil Rights

By Marc H. Morial

marcmorial

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - “It is not an overstatement to say that the destiny of the entire human race depends on what is going on in America today. This is a staggering reality to the rest of the world; they must feel like passengers in a supersonic jetliner who are forced to watch helplessly while a passel of drunks, hypes, freaks, and madmen fight for the controls and the pilot's seat.” – Eldridge Cleaver, Soul on Ice, 1968”

As we embark upon the new year of 2018, we step into the 50th anniversary of a year that shook the world, in particular the world of civil rights in the United States.

Perhaps the most momentous of these events are the assassinations of Martín Luther King, Jr., and Robert Kennedy. Both of these tragic deaths hold personal significance for my family. My parents, civil rights activists, were personally acquainted with the Rev. King. My mother, Sybil Morial, and King were students together at Boston University while she pursued her Masters Degree in education and he his PhD in theology. In her memoir, Witness to Change, she writes of the moment on April 4 when she learned of his death:

I could hardly grasp the words: Martin Luther King has been shot to death in Memphis. Dutch was in the study. I called to him, and he came and stood by me. “Martin has been killed.” I could hardly say the words; I could hardly believe it. Not Martin. Dutch and I watched the gruesome footage in silence.

She recalled the words of his final speech, “I’ve seen the Promised Land. I may not get there with you. But I want you to know tonight, that we, as a people, will get to the Promised Land.”

He knew it, but we didn’t. And we didn’t understand his death. I was inconsolable ... I said to Dutch, “Now that Martin is gone, what will become of the movement?” “It will go on. It must.”

My late father-in-law, Ross Miller, was a trauma surgeon and Kennedy campaigner who was present at the Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles on June 5. When the shots rang out, he bravely stepped forward and tried to save the lives of Kennedy and others who where wounded.

These deaths are but two of the civil rights milestones of that historic year half a century ago.

On February 8, the Orangeburg Massacre took place in South Carolina. Highway Patrol officers opened fire on a crowd of 200 student gathered on the campus of South Carolina State University to demonstrate against the continued segregation at the bowling alley. Three young men were killed and 27 other protesters were injured.

On April 11, amid continuing unrest triggered by King’s murder, President Lyndon Johnson signed one of the most significant laws of the era - the Civil Rights Act Of 1968, more commonly known as the Fair Housing Act.  The Act prohibited not only racial and religious discrimination in the sale or rental of a home, but also racially-motivated threats, intimidation or retaliation in relation to housing.

In a move often cited as inspiration by current-day activists, on October 2 Black Olympians Tommie Smith and John Carlos African-American athletes raised their arms in a black power salute after winning the gold and bronze medals in the men's 200 meters.

November 22 saw the first interracial kiss ever to air on television in the United States, between the characters Captain James Kirk and Lieutenant Nyota Uhura, on the program Star Trek.

In the coming year, we will observe many of these anniversaries in-depth. We begin the year reflection on a half-century of civil eight progress, and the progress that lies ahead.

Emancipation Day Was Jan. 1: We Must Never Forget the Sacrifice and the Triumph By Jesse Jackson Sr.

Jan. 2, 2018

Emancipation Day Was Jan. 1: We Must Never Forget the Sacrifice and the Triumph
By Jesse Jackson Sr.

NEWS ANALYSIS

emancipationproclamation
Emancipation Proclamation. Credit: Library of Congress

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - One hundred forty-five years ago on Jan. 1, Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation, helping to transform this country from a union of states into a nation, from a country stained by slavery into one moving at great cost closer to “liberty and justice for all.”

On Jan. 1, 1863, in the midst of the Civil War, Abraham Lincoln, the Republican president, issued the proclamation on his own authority as commander-in-chief “in time of actual armed rebellion” against the United States. The emancipation was grounded on his wartime powers, as a “fit and necessary war measure for suppressing said rebellion.”

The emancipation did not end slavery in the United States. It applied only to the states still in rebellion, exempting the slave owning border states such as Maryland, Missouri and Kentucky that still had slaves. Lincoln was desperate to keep the border states from joining the South. Some abolitionists ridiculed him for this. “Where he has no power, Mr. Lincoln will set the negroes free, where he retains power we will consider them as slaves,” declared the London Times.

But the doubters did not understand the significance of the proclamation and its words. The president announced, “all persons held as slaves” in the states “in rebellion against the United States” are “forever free.” He called on the newly freed people to abstain from all violence and declared that they were eligible to be “received into the armed service of the United States.” The great abolitionist Frederick Douglass hailed it immediately as “an act of immense historic consequence.”

The proclamation, as James McPherson put it in “Battle Cry of Freedom,” “marked the transformation of a war to preserve the Union into a revolution to overthrow the old order.” This was extremely controversial, even in the North. There were violent protests in both the North and the South against the use of black troops. Black regiments were segregated, paid less than Whites and commanded by White officers.

Yet after years of battle, most Northerners would embrace anything that would help weaken the rebellion and hasten a victorious end to the war. Despite resistance, 179,000 black soldiers and nearly 10,000 black sailors bolstered Union forces through the end of the war. Victory, all now understood, would mean the abolition of slavery. The Emancipation Proclamation was hailed in England, ending all talk of recognizing (and aiding) the South.

The proclamation, a wartime act of necessity, turned the tide on slavery. It led directly to the 13th Amendment to the Constitution that outlawed slavery, the 14th Amendment that guarantees equal protection under the law, the 15th Amendment that prohibits states from denying the right to vote on the basis of race or color. The war — America’s bloodiest conflict — continued to take its deadly toll for over two more years after the Emancipation Proclamation. In his second inaugural address, Lincoln described the “terrible war” as “the woe due to those” in both North and South for the “offence” of American slavery.

He called for “malice toward none” and “charity for all,” that we “bind up the nation’s wounds” to create a just and lasting peace. Forty-one days later he was assassinated. Reconstruction soon was reversed into segregation, enforced by Klan terrorism. It would take another century and a civil rights movement to fulfill the promise implicit in Lincoln’s proclamation. Few Americans take the time to read the Emancipation Proclamation, yet it is as central to the foundation of modern America as the Constitution or the Declaration of Independence. The night before it was issued, there were vigils and church gatherings of people in anticipation.

This year, dozens of ministers have agreed to hold sessions to read and discuss the Emancipation Proclamation. This country paid a terrible price to remove the scourge of slavery and become one nation. At a time when some would drive us apart, it is worth remembering the sacrifice and the triumph.  

The Lull By Dr. E. Faye Williams, Esq.

Jan. 7, 2018

The Lull
By Dr. E. Faye Williams, Esq.

williams2

(TriceEdneyWire.com) — Certain characteristics are common to all living organisms.  The shared need for rest pops into mind most quickly.  Whether we label it rest, sleep, hibernation or dormancy, in the lifecycle of an organism, its health and well-being is only satisfied with time set aside for rejuvenation.

My studies and observations inform me that as the complexity of organisms increase, there is a corresponding complexity in their need for rest.  For example, examine the behavior of lower life forms versus the human animal.  Generally, lower life forms simply sleep when their need impacts.  Unless threatened, they will awaken and pursue outcomes that are more instinctive than not.  The simplicity and outcomes of their rest usually require no in-depth discussion.

Although the human animal will succumb to the need for sleep, its restfulness will be determined by a myriad of circumstances that include, but are not limited to: individual anxieties; physical threats; physical discomfort, and more.  Whatever our circumstance, rest is the absence of or a lull in the presence of stressors - the stressors that prevent us from allowing ourselves to experience a renewed state of peace and well-being.

Many who identify as my friends have called this year's holiday period a lull in their observation of the insane behaviors of #45.  Their need to remove immediate thoughts of the past eleven months and potential consequences from their consciousness has directed them impose a personal lull in the processing of current events.  I cannot help believing that this is the ultimate goal of #45 and his minions.  As I have stated numerous times before, I think it is in #45's plan to have us thinking in so many different directions that we can't see the truth of his actions.

As we embark on a new calendar year, I again encourage and admonish my readers to STAY WOKE and focus on #45's REAL intent for our lives and future of our nation.  Rather than tell you what I surmise his intent to be, I will ask several questions to which I want you to give serious and on-going consideration.  In the most honest manner possible, answer them for yourselves.  Discuss them with others and open a dialogue that results in the development of personal clarity:

1.  WHAT DOES OUR NATION GAIN WITH THE DESTRUCTION OF THE INSTITUTIONAL NORMS THAT GIVE DIRECTION TO OUR DAILY LIVES?

2.  WHAT BENEFITS ACCRUE TO OUR NATION WHEN #45 AND HIS LACKEYS DISTORT AND MISSHAPE THE FACTS WE USE TO CONSTRUCT OUR UNDERSTANDING OF THE TRUTH?

3.  WHAT POSITIVE OUTCOMES CAN BE EXPECTED FROM DESTROYING PUBLIC FAITH IN THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM AND THOSE WHO ENFORCE THE LAW?

4.  CAN OUR NATION, DIVIDED RACIALLY, ETHNICALLY, RELIGIOUSLY AND BY OTHER FACTORS, THRIVE WHEN THE DIVISION IS ENGENDERED BY POLITICAL LEADERS?

Steve Bannon told the 2017 CPAC, the Conservative Political Action Conference, that a major goal of #45 was "Deconstruction of the Administrative State."  He added, "...these cabinet appointees, they were selected for...deconstruction."  We see a Secretary of Education who has designs to eliminate public education.  The EPA Director has relaxed rules on dumping toxic waste and air and water quality.  The Attorney General has abandoned Civil and Voting Rights enforcement.  Every White House press conference challenges us to believe or not believe what we see with our eyes and hear with our ears.  #45 constantly condemns intelligence and law enforcement agencies that are not in lock-step with him.  And, #45 has engendered a resurgence of overt racism not seen in the last fifty years.

If nothing else, we must keep these questions in the forefront of our collective consciousness.  We mustn't let our need for rest lull us into inactivity.  Our Struggle continues and we will only succeed through action.

HAPPY NEW YEAR!!!

 

(Dr. E. Faye Williams, National President of the National Congress of Black Women, Inc. www.nationalcongressbw.org--202/678-6788.

U.S. Senator-elect Doug Jones Hires a Black Chief of Staff By Frederick H. Lowe

Jan. 2, 2017

U.S. Senator-elect Doug Jones Hires a Black Chief of Staff
By Frederick H. Lowe

danagresham
Dana Gresham

Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from NorthStarNewsToday.com

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - U.S. Senator-elect Doug Jones of Alabama this week hired Dana Gresham, an African-American Washington, D.C. insider, as his chief of staff.

Jones, who was set to be sworn in Wednesday, Jan. 3, will be the only Democratic U.S. Senator with a black chief of staff although two Republican U.S. Senators —- Tim Scott of South Carolina, and Jerry Moran of Kansas —- have hired black chiefs of staff.

The Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies, a Washington, D. C. -based think tank for Black elected officials pushed Jones to hire a diverse top staff because so few African Americans hold those positions. Jones announced Gresham’s hiring after the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies and other groups signed a letter written by 16 other organizations, urging Jones to hire a diverse staff including a diverse top staff. The Joint Center lobbied Jones to hire a diverse staff because a high black voter turnout in Alabama, a conservative Red state, helped elect  him, a Democrat, to office by defeating conservative Republican candidate Roy Moore in a special election.

African Americans account for just 1 percent of top Democratic U.S. Senate staff in Washington, D.C. and just 2 percent of top Republican U.S. Senate staff.

In addition, top Senate staffers manage the Senate’s legislative agenda and shape the $3.9 trillion U.S. federal budget. They also oversee the Senate confirmation process for federal judges, cabinet secretaries and U.S. ambassadors.

Gresham, a Birmingham, Alabama, native has held leadership roles in presidential administrations and for members of Congress. He led the Legislative Affairs Office at the Department of Transportation during the eight years of President Obama’s administration and he has worked on Capitol Hill 14 years. In 1994, he was awarded a Bachelor’s Degree in International Politics from Georgetown University.

The Alabama Secretary of State recently certified Jones as the election’s winner after Moore refused to concede.

Jones also announced three other senior staff hires. They are Mark Libell as legislative director, Ann Berry, a black woman, as transition advisor, and Katie Campbell as deputy legislative director. All three are Alabama natives and who have considerable experience.

Libell, formerly an assistant congressional liaison for the Federal Reserve Board, who also worked for Sen. Debbie Stabenow (Democrat of Michigan.) and former Sen. Jay Rockefeller (Democrat of West Virginia), will be legislative director.

Ann Berry, a deputy chief of staff to Sen. Patrick Leahy (Democrat of Vermont), is transition advisor. Katie Campbell, another veteran congressional aide, who served as an adviser to Sen. Joe Donnelly (Democrat of Indiana.) and as policy director for the Blue Dog Coalition, will be deputy legislative director.

Jones said in a statement, “Today I’m proud to announce that we have recruited four outstanding individuals to join our team.” 

X