banner2e top

Future of Democratic Party Lies in Moving to the Moral Center By Jesse Jackson Sr.

Aug. 13, 2018

Future of Democratic Party Lies in Moving to the Moral Center
By Jesse Jackson Sr. 

Jesse3

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - The media is now reporting on the debate among Democrats and activists about what the party should stand for, and how it will win elections. Establishment Democrats are said to fear that the populist reform energy represented by Bernie Sanders and rising star Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (who upset Rep. Joe Crowley, the fourth-ranking Democrat in the House, in a New York City primary) will turn off the moderate, upscale, white suburban Republicans who they believe are appalled by Trump and the key to taking back the Congress. 

A Wall-Street-funded group known as the Third Way — which might better be known as the Wrong Way since it has been wrong about every major issue facing the country over the last years, championing disastrous corporate trade deals, deregulation of Wall Street and the Iraq War among other calamities — even convened a small gathering, “cohosted” by a billionaire real estate developer to map out how to counter what the media describes as the left. The very terms of this debate are misleading.

Ideas that have broad public support, such as tuition-free college, are labeled “left.” Ideas that offend philosophical conservatives, such as subsidies to big oil companies, are tagged as on the right, championed by Republicans. We’d be wiser to focus on common sense and basic principles. When Dr. Martin Luther King spoke forcefully against what he called the “triple evils” of “racism, economic exploitation and militarism,” he was criticized for weakening the cause of civil rights, for getting out of his lane by talking about economic inequality and against the Vietnam War. He responded, “I’m against segregation at lunch counters, and I’m not going to segregate my moral concerns.”

Cowardice, he taught us, asks the question “Is it safe?” Expediency asks, “Is it politic?” Vanity asks, “Is it popular?” Conscience asks, “Is it right?” We are a nation faced with great perils. Inequality has reached new extremes and, even with the economy near full employment, working people still struggle simply to stay afloat. Big money corrupts our politics and distorts our government. We are mired in wars without end — 17 years in Afghanistan and counting — and without victory or sense. We have a president who believes he profits politically by spreading racial division, appealing to our fears rather than our hopes. This is the time for citizens and for true leaders to move not left or right, to the expedient or the cautious, but to the moral center.

Affordable health care for all isn’t left or right, it is the moral center. Jobs that pay a living wage, affordable housing, public education, college without debt, clean water and air, action to address catastrophic climate change that literally may endanger the world — these are not ideas of the right or left. They are the moral center. Holding to the moral center has its own power. Opposition to slavery started as a minority position, but its moral force was undeniable. Integration seemed impossible in the segregated South, but its moral force could not be denied. In this time of troubles,

I believe that Americans in large numbers are looking for leaders who will embrace the moral center, not the expedient, the safe or the fashionable. They are looking for champions who will represent them, not those with deep pockets. That may be the final irony. The most successful political strategy may well be not to trim to prevailing opinion or compromise with entrenched interest but to stand up forcefully for what is right.

Black Pastors Demonstrate Skunk-like Behavior at White House by Rev. Barbara Reynolds

August 13, 2018

Black Pastors Demonstrate Skunk-like Behavior in Meeting With Trump at White House
By Rev. Barbara Reynolds

barbara_reynolds2

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - ”Many of us have been indicted, arrested and our homes bombed, but when we stand before the Negro population at prayer meetings, we can repeat that it is an honor to face jail for a just cause.”

If only those words of just causes and sacrifices of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and the actions of thousands of others—both Black and White—had seared the souls of the black preachers who met with President Trump last week, they could not have praised a man who has vulgarly demeaned women, executed a policy locking brown kids into cages and labeled black African homelands as “shitholes.”

Yet their skunk- like presence could not have hit so hard, if more of the authentic preachers, who fancy themselves as moral leaders had stood up forcibly to the obscenity of the Trump brand. In the vacuum of leadership, the skunk-like pastors just walked into the tea party, became intoxicated by having a seat at the table and left a smelly scent over just causes of black communities.

The meeting was organized by Pastor Paula White, a White evangelical Trump supporter, to discuss prison reform but made no mention of the racial injustice that fuels it nor why black NFL football players protesting the broken criminal justice system are called SOB’s by the president. No dissent was voiced as one pastor praised Trump as one of the most “pro-black” presidents and belittled Barack Obama, the nation’s first Black president.

While Dr. King’s name was bandied about in the meeting, the ministers should have emulated him by speaking forcefully as moral leaders with an agenda that should have included taking Trump to task for his consistent disparaging of black leaders, such as CNN’s Don Lemon, Rep. Maxine Waters (D. Calif.) and LeBron James as dumb or low-IQ individuals.  While this character assassination may energize his base, it also helps make Black Americans vulnerable to hateful acts of harassment and discrimination.

Dr. King and his disciples, often had a seat at the table, meeting with presidents, but they were accountable to those who depended upon them to address their pain. In high level meetings, the King aides worked to control the content of the agenda, searching for a win-win position. Only if that failed, did direct action of boycotts and or marches follow.

No better model of the King non-violent methods was a meeting with President John F. Kennedy which resulted in the 1963 march on Washington after the president did not agree to forcibly press Congress to pass a strong federal civil rights bill. JFK’s initial reaction, reportedly, was that the march was Ill-timed, but the movement leaders decided there is no right time for injustice. The march resulted in the bill signed into law on July 2, 1964.

The movement’s model for speaking Truth to Power did not end with King’s assassination in 1968. Coretta Scott King, his widow, continued having a seat at the table and challenging unjust human rights policies. One incident, she recalled in my recent memoir of her, Coretta, My Life, My Love, My Legacy, involved her taking Richard Nixon to task.

“As a coalition leader I had made several trips to the Nixon White House to further our human rights agenda. Not only did Nixon refuse to implement any of our policy requests, he also blocked funds for construction of the King Center which we were building to carry on my husband’s non-violent domestic programs, which the nation sorely needed. While I went out of my way not to be offensive, at a press conference I strongly criticized him for playing to a Southern strategy that denounced black people via coded language and negative stereotyping.”

Like many other civil rights leaders of her ilk, Coretta King felt she had a moral obligation when she walked into the corridors of power to speak for the disenfranchised and to challenge rather than cheerlead unjust causes in order to keep her seat at the table.

Probably it was Rosa Parks the seamstress and NAACP secretary whose arrest launched the 1955 Montgomery Bus Boycott and the modern civil rights movement, who summed up the proper role for moral leaders and what motivated her not to follow orders and move to the back of the bus.

“If was a matter of dignity. I could not have faced myself or my people, if I had moved.”

The Trump preachers are apparently march to a different beat, but despite their failings they are only part of the problem because some black church leaders and major civil rights groups, who carry weight in the black community, have not raised their voices loud enough or cemented a strategy to counter the abuses of Trump and the GOP leaders who protect him.

So, what happens when there is silence among the righteous? The Ugly Truths have a party and convince themselves of their greatness.

Barbara Reynolds is an ordained minister, educator and columnist for USA TODAY. She is the author of seven books the latest is the award winning memoirs of Coretta Scott King, My Life, My love, My legacy was published in paperback this year.

 

 

 

Deadline Nears for Public Comment on 2020 Census Controversies By Khalil Abdullah

Aug. 3, 2018
Deadline Nears for Public Comment on 2020 Census Controversies
By Khalil Abdullah
census graphic

Before the public comment period on the 2020 Census closes at 11:59 pm on August 7, civil rights organizations continue to amplify the clarion call to Americans to denounce the inclusion of a "citizenship question" on the final census form - a question as to whether respondents are U.S. citizens.
Jeri Green, Senior Advisor for the 2020 Census, National Urban League (NUL), said the citizenship question was "untested, unjust, and unconstitutional," and should be opposed by all Americans.
Conducted every 10 years, the constitutionally mandated census is "the nation's largest and complex peacetime activity," explained Terri Ann Lowenthal, former Staff Director of the House Census and Population Subcommittee, and currently Policy Advisor, Leadership Conference Education Fund (LCEF).
Generating feedback on the citizenship question, though time-sensitive, was only one concern of each of the panelists on a LCEF media conference call organized with the assistance of Ethnic Media Services.
For example, Green, a former Census Bureau employee, contends that the Census Bureau's typical "what's in it for you?" messaging to the Black community must change. "A different narrative is needed to motivate the Black population to participate in the 2020 Census."
Green said The National Urban League, in concert with other organizations, is "developing strategies to ensure that African Americans understand that political power and representation are at stake, and that we cannot afford to lose an inch of political ground by ignoring the Census."
She reminded attendant media that "Black America" comprises immigrants from Africa and the Caribbean, as well as those African Americans who, with predictable regularity, are still undercounted and have been so since the first 1790 census.
Panelists repeatedly emphasized the importance of the Census Bureau getting the count right because mistakes have monetary and social repercussions lasting through the decade and beyond. The estimated annual $600 to $675 billion draw-down of federal funds, based on and allocated to states, counties, and cities using census data, would expand to over six trillion dollars until next decennial count in 2030. More difficult to quantify and qualify over that span is the impact of the loss of a family's home, food insecurity, or lack of access to medical care.
Yes, Green said, African Americans, as do many Americans across ethnic lines, benefit from federally programs based on Census data, among them the Medical Assistance Program (Medicaid); Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP); Health Center Programs (Community, Migrant, Homeless, Public Housing); and Low Income Home Energy Assistance (LIHEAP).
"But for many African Americans residing in urban communities," she argued, "state and local funding has become a one-way ticket out of their communities, out of affordable housing, and out of health-care coverage -- bye-bye Obama Care."
With the near universal specter of urban gentrification across America in mind, Green said, "The neighborhood school funded by state and local funding 10 years ago, has been razed and a new multi-million-dollar condominium complex sits in its place today. Simply put, many African Americans are not better off than they were 10 years ago.
"But, wherever you might live -- even if displaced, federal funding allocations, based on Census data, still support services vital to our communities, and well-being."
One of the NUL's concerns about the 2020 Census is the practice of prison-based gerrymandering. Prisoners are still to be counted as residents of the communities where they are incarcerated rather than as members of communities where they live, this despite an outpouring of public comment for the Census Bureau to end the practice.
Green said NUL president, Marc Morial, considers this type of gerrymandering predatory because the per capita funds that should follow each prisoner into his or her community - revenue that would benefit the hospitals, housing, schools, and transportation infrastructure therein -- is being diverted. In his view, African-American communities are continuously and unjustly losing to others revenue that should rightly be theirs.
However, loss or diversion of funding is but one consequence of an undercount. John C. Yang, president and executive director of the Asian Americans Advancing Justice reiterated that census data are the basis for drawing congressional districts. Less well known, he explained, that data also trigger a provision of the Voting Rights Act. Census data are the driving factors in determining when ballots are required to be printed in an additional language, based upon the percentage of an ethnic group's population who do not speak English as their primary language.
It was Census data in 2010, for example, that recorded the growth of the Chinese American population in Harris County, Texas, the home of Houston. Thus, for the first time in that jurisdiction - and mandated by law -- election materials and ballots also were printed in Chinese.
Voting education and ballot access likely will continue to be a core issue for newly minted Asian Americans. Yang said that, due to recent immigration, "one in four Asian Americans have never participated in the census" and that when all the ethnic groups comprising the Asian American community are totaled, "60 percent are immigrants." Initiatives that depress Census participation - like the citizenship question -- could negatively affect the future political voice of Asian Americans.
Taking umbrage and aim at the intention of Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross to include the citizenship question on the Census form, Vanita Gupta, president and CEO of LCEF, called the Ross initiative misguided and politically motivated. Comments and e-mail exchanges between and among administration officials are being made public due to Freedom of Information Act requests. Those materials are bearing out her assertions, according a judge who is ruling in one of the raft of law of lawsuits challenging Secretary Ross's goal.
Panelists ceded that some issues plaguing the 2020 count are not of Census Bureau's own making, including leadership vacancies as a result the administration's inaction, or the chronic shortfall in funding. Gupta said determining funding levels for the census will be a leading issue for Congress in its upcoming calendar.
But the addition of the question in the current political environment -- one highly charged with acrimonious debate -- would subvert the objective of the census itself, which is to count all persons living on U.S. soil, not just citizens.
Arturo Vargas, executive director of the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials (NALEO) Educational Fund believes that there is already evidence that it will depress the response rates from the Latino community.
Immigrants, though "legal" or documented, often have relatives or acquaintances who share "mixed status" households. Thus, whether one's personal immigrant status is secure, others within the same familial or social orbit - whose status may be unresolved - might well decline to respond, fearing deportation or possible incarceration.
Among Asian Americans, residual paranoia about responding to the census is more than partly due to the indelible memory of the U.S government's use of census data to identify and imprison Americans of Japanese ancestry during World War II.
Yang, though convinced there now are "much stronger privacy laws in place" to sufficiently protect the confidentiality of census data, also opposes adding the citizenship question.
Lowenthal and Vargas stressed that the public should and can weigh in, before August 7, on any proposed census methodology. Such concerns might include the robustness of cybersecurity protections, or the Bureau's over-reliance on Internet responses as opposed to increasing the number of door-to-door enumerators, particularly to cover rural areas and other hard to count communities. "Time is of the essence," said Gupta.
Lowenthal said that public comments have carried weight with the Census Bureau's professional staff. She cited past examples, such as the revision of racial categories to provide more options for the increasingly ethnically diverse American demographic.
But apparently, the weight thus far on behalf of ending prison-based gerrymandering has been insufficient. Green said Morial and the NUL will continue to fight on numerous fronts.
Public comments should be submitted to: www.censuscounts.org.

New National Poll Finds Consumers Still Want Financial Regulation by Charlene Crowell

August 5, 2018

 

New National Poll Finds Consumers Still Want Financial Regulation

By Charlene Crowell

crl color graphics 1

 

crl color graphics 2

 


charlene-crowell

Charlene Crowell

 

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - A decade ago, the entire nation suffered through a financial crisis that led to the brink of a global financial collapse.  While Wall Street reckoned with its risky practices, America’s families suffered lost wealth of nearly $2 trillion, half of it coming from communities of color who were targeted for high-cost and unsustainable mortgages.

 

Now a new poll finds that even with the passage of a decade, consumers still support financial regulation and related enforcement. Moreover, when it comes to payday and car-title lending, consumer scorn has grown even stronger over the past year for these small-dollar, debt trap loans that come with triple-digit interest rates.

 

The 2018 poll, conducted by Lake Research Partners and Chesapeake Beach Consulting, found that among respondents more than 90 percent viewed regulation of financial services to be very important, and registered support across partisan affiliations. Among Republicans, 85 percent supported regulation, compared to 92 percent of independents and 96 percent of Democrats.

 

Further, a growth in the number of consumers supporting a rule to hold payday lenders accountable increased six percentage points in just the past year. Believing that payday lenders prey upon those who have the fewest financial resources – low-wage earners, working families, and elder Americans, 79 percent of survey respondents want the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) to hold these predatory lenders accountable. A similar poll taken in 2017 tallied support of a CFPB payday rule at 73 percent.

 

When asked about the lack of enforcement against abuses by payday lenders, 81 percent were concerned about CFPB’s inaction. And again, these strong responses crossed party lines: 77 percent of Republicans, 82 percent of independents, and 85 percent of Democrats.

 

The telephone survey of 1,000 likely 2018 general election voters occurred between June 28 to July 7, 2018, and has a margin of error of +/- 3.1.  The effort was jointly underwritten by Americans for Financial Reform (AFR) and the Center for Responsible Lending (CRL).

 

“Ten years after the financial crisis, the public knows what it wants,” noted Lisa Donner, AFR executive director. “But Wall Street and high-cost lenders are constantly pushing for deregulation and spending vast amounts of money to get it.”

 

The current federal deregulation trend can be traced to an executive order signed by President Donald Trump on January 20, 2017, and then published in the Federal Register on February 3. The order directed all federal offices to repeal two existing regulations for every new one proposed. Secondly for Fiscal Year 2017, the incremental cost of every newly proposed regulation could not bring any costs.

 

To put it plainly, no proposed regulation could cost a cent. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) was granted the sole authority to review and decide any requested written exceptions.

 

That official is Mick Mulvaney, who joined the Trump Administration as its OMB Director and has dually served as the Acting CFPB Director since late 2017.

 

So it is particularly noteworthy that 80 percent of survey respondents expressed concerns with three recent Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) developments:

 

  1. Curbing the enforcement of fair lending rules;
  2. Ending enforcement of payday lending rules; and
  3. Restricting public access to the Bureau’s complaint database

 

The 2018 survey results speak to the stark differences between CFPB today and its era before Mulvaney’s arrival.

 

As of July 2017, CFPB received approximately 1.3 million consumer complaints that were investigated and in turn led to a series of enforcement actions that totaled $11.9 billion of restitution, forgiveness and other enforcement. As many of these were class action cases, an even larger number of consumers -- 29 million were helped.

 

Broad consumer contact and confidence was bolstered by the 41 cities where CFPB held either field hearings on a given issue or public town halls, 169 visits to military installations and 63 appearances to testify before Congress.

 

“Before Mick Mulvaney’s tenure at the agency, the CFPB was a champion for working families – giving back billions of dollars in relief to consumers who were cheated by financial companies,” noted Mike Calhoun, CRL president.

 

“Now, under the CFPB’s current leadership, payday lenders have preferred access because one of their own is leading the consumer bureau,” continued Calhoun. “We need to build on CFPB’s previous success, not block its progress of protecting consumers from abusive financial practices.”

 

Charlene Crowell is the Communications Deputy Director with the Center for Responsible Lending. She can be reached at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

Ethiopian Leader Sparks Euphoria During a Whirlwind U. S. Trip

 

Aug. 1, 2018

Ethiopian Leader Sparks Euphoria During a Whirlwind U. S. Trip

 

abiy ahmed

 

(TriceEdneyWire.com/GIN) - It’s been called “Abiy-mania” – an impulse to reach out and hug the young new Prime Minister of Ethiopia, Abiy Ahmed, who brought an end to his country’s two-decade-long war with Eritrea and other sweeping changes in the Horn of Africa.

 

This month, the 41-year-old Ethiopian leader landed in the United States where he met with thousands of his countrymen and women and reiterated his message of love and unity.

 

“He urged them to tear down the wall of hatred and bring home the culture of innovation that Los Angeles is known for,” his chief of staff wrote on Twitter.

 

His six-day journey took him to Washington,D.C., Los Angeles and Minneapolis, where “Kassa”, a researcher at North Carolina State University was heard to exclaim: “I want to hug him! He’s a hugger, I know, so I want to hug him.”

 

Abiy’s call to the Diaspora seems to have already softened the fiercest critics of the ruling party’s previous regime.

 

Among them was Abede Yimenu, a former major in the Ethiopian army and one of the 300,000 Ethiopians who live in the District of Columbia. He told the Washington Post he is also thinking of going home after being away for 17 years.

 

Tapping his red beret, he said: “This uniform shows that we believe in this prime minister and that we still love our country and that we still need to serve our country.”

 

Abiy also met with the leader of Patriotic Ginbot 7, an opposition group named for May 15, the date of a general election in 2005 marred by fraud and the deaths of about 200 people. The pro-democracy party was labeled a terrorist organization by the former government.

 

Aside from the peace treaty with neighboring Eritrea, Abiy has lifted the state of emergency and freed hundreds of political prisoners.

 

Meanwhile, in Washington, at the Walter E. Washington Convention Center, there was dancing, flag waving and ululation. Religious leaders began the rally with prayers, praising Abiy and celebrating the future of the country. D.C. Mayor Muriel E. Bowser declared July 28 “Ethiopia Day” to great applause.

 

Before embarking for the west coast, Abiy met with the head of the World Bank, the IMF and Vice President Mike Pence.  He also oversaw the reconciliation of rival synods of the Ethiopian Orthodox Church, and met the Muslim community.

 

The new prime minister has the advantage of speaking fluent Oromo, Amharic, and Tigrinya. He is also steeped in Islam and the traditions of the Orthodox Church. There is something to satisfy each element of the coalition, which controls all of Parliament.

 

GLOBAL INFORMATION NETWORK creates and distributes news and feature articles on current affairs in Africa to media outlets, scholars, students and activists in the U.S. and Canada. Our goal is to introduce important new voices on topics relevant to Americans, to increase the perspectives available to readers in North America and to bring into their view information about global issues that are overlooked or under-reported by mainstream media.

X