banner2e top

Wall Street Lacks Diversity by Rev. Jesse Jackson Sr.

Oct. 26, 2014

Wall Street Lacks Diversity
By Rev. Jesse Jackson Sr.

Jesse3

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Wall Street may lead America in financial rewards, but it is a laggard when it comes to diversity. The lack of diversity among its CEOs and managing partners is notorious. Now a survey by Vettery, a recruiting firm, reports that the Street fails the test among its first year hires as well. It isn’t only skewed at the top; it is failing to build the pipeline that might change that in the future.

Vittery reports that first-year bankers are more than 3/4 men — unchanged from 2013 — and nearly 2/3 white. Twenty-nine percent are Asian, while African-Amerians and Hispanics make up a paltry 6 percent. Sallie Krawcheck, former executive of Citibank and Bank of America who now runs the women’s network Ellevate, concludes that banks went into the financial crisis “white, male and middle -aged” and came out “whiter, male-er and middle age-er.”

The bank with the highest percentage of blacks and Hispanics was JPMorgan Chase with 13 percent; Morgan Stanley was close with 12 percent. The worst was DeutscheBank. Both DeutscheBank and Barclays challenged Vettery’s figures as inaccurate, but refused to provide their own figures on their incoming hires.

Silicon Valley, another powerhouse American industry, has been exposed for its lack of diversity, but it turns out Wall Street is worse. And Silicon Valley firms have taken real steps to correct their reality; Wall Street seems still to be largely in denial.

We know all the “reasons” behind this lack of diversity. African-Americans and Hispanics are less likely to have a family history in banking, or inherit a ton of money. They are less likely to have the family contacts, the shared experiences and associations. When they or women are aggressive, that might be seen more as threatening and unattractive than the same behavior exhibited by white men. Bigotry is no longer acceptable, but unconscious bias still governs significant behavior. That is why affirmative actions are vital if old barriers are to be broken down.

One question is whether the government will begin to investigate these patterns, enforcing equal opportunity laws, engaging the SEC regulatory powers and more. Wall Street should be particularly targeted for tough regulation. Their excesses blew up the economy. They got bailed out, while homeowners were left to fend for themselves. As Mitt Romney showed us, they take advantage of a range of tax breaks and dodges, leaving billionaires paying lower tax rates than their secretaries. They shouldn’t pocket all these subsidies and benefits without at the very least opening their doors to women and minorities.

Diversity isn’t just a moral and legal imperative. It is good business, too. America is soon to become majority minority. Those institutions that reflect the diversity of their customers are more likely to thrive than those who isolate themselves. And Wall Street, like Silicon Valley, is a global industry. America’s strength is its diversity. If Wall Street keeps the doors shut to a majority of Americans and a majority of the world, it may find itself shut out of more and more opportunities.

Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen Talks about Income Inequality by Marc H. Morial

October 26, 2014

To Be Equal 
Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen Talks about Income Inequality

By Marc H. Morial

marcmorial

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - “The extent of and continuing increase in inequality in the United States greatly concern me… I think it is appropriate to ask whether this trend is compatible with values rooted in our nation’s history, among them the high value Americans have traditionally placed on equality of opportunity.” Janet Yellen, Chair of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System


With all the political, national security and disease news recently flooding the airways, you may have missed one of the most important American speeches from one of the world’s most powerful economic leaders last week.  In a speech at the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston on Friday, Janet Yellen, who in February became the first woman Federal Reserve Chair, bravely waded into the national debate on income inequality.  Her remarks echoed many of the opportunity themes that have been championed by the National Urban League throughout our 104-year history. 

Drawing from the Federal Reserve’s triennial Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF), Yellen documents that “The past several decades have seen the most sustained rise in inequality since the 19th century…”  She also outlines what she calls four “building blocks” of opportunity to help improve the economic circumstances of individuals and families.  These building blocks closely align with the National Urban League’s long-standing economic empowerment agenda:  resources available to children, higher education that families can afford, business ownership and inherited wealth.

Highlights from Yellen’s comments include:

  • The average income of the top 5 percent of households grew by 38 percent from 1989 to 2013, while the average real income of the other 95 percent of households grew less than 10 percent.
  • The average real worth of families in the top 5 percent has nearly doubled, on net- from $3.6 million in 1989 to $6.8 million in 2013, while the average net worth of the lower half of distribution, representing 62 million households, was $11,000 in 2013.
  • While Americans in all economic groups were adversely affected by the housing crisis, homeowners in the bottom half of households by wealth reported 61 percent less home equity in 2013 than in 2007.  The next 45 percent reported a 29 percent loss of housing wealth, and the top 5 lost 20 percent.
  • Research tells us that inequality tends to persist from one generation to the next.  One study found that 4 in 10 children raised in families in the lowest-income fifth of households remain in that quintile as adults.


Again, while Yellen points out that “to the extent that opportunity itself is enhanced by access to economic resources, inequality of outcomes can exacerbate inequality of opportunity, thereby perpetuating a trend of increasing inequality,” she does not attempt to directly link how much the opportunity factors influence income and wealth inequality.  But we do. 

We know that opportunity is not equal when affluent families have significant resources for things like better nutrition, health care and early childhood education, while many other households have very little, if any resources, to spare for these purposes.  We know that low-income families face an unfair disadvantage when public funding for safety net programs and public education is cut.  We also know that the rising cost of college, the slowdown in business formation for low-income Americans, and the huge gap in inheritances between the top and bottom rungs of the economic ladder directly impact economic prosperity and mobility. 

What makes Janet Yellen’s comments about income inequality so remarkable is the fact that rarely, if ever, has a Fed Chair spoken so honestly and openly about such a hot-button issue. We applaud her for speaking out, and this is an issue that should “greatly concern” us all.

Some Black Voters Still Focused on "Bread and Butter" Issues

Oct. 21, 2014

Some Black Voters Still Focused on "Bread and Butter" Issues

votingrightsact

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Despite outrage over killings by police, concern about Ebola, and U. S. troops now fighting ISIS in the Middle East, it appears that so-called “bread and butter issues” – the economy, education and jobs – are still very much on the minds of voters heading to the polls across the nation through Nov. 4.

“I think the inequality in the way the wealth in this country and even in my city is dispersed is an outrage,” says Charlotte Marcoulis, 20, a college student planning to vote in Los Angeles. “More and more people suffer and nothing is done…I feel that all we have is each other in the big schemes of things so I think it’s in our best interest to support and lift one another up.”

Even new voters will be headed to the polls with finances on their minds. "Anything related to reducing the wealth gap!" agrees Jalen Price, 18, of St. Louis.

It was a suburb of St. Louis - Ferguson, Mo. -  where 18-year-old Michael Brown was shot and killed by police officer Darren Wilson Aug. 9. The shooting of the unarmed teenager – allegedly with his hands up - resulted in outrage across the country. The Rev. Al Sharpton, president/CEO of the National Action Network, has been traveling the country on what he calls a “Hands Up Voter Drive”. He is calling on “African-Americans to vote on Nov. 4th in the name of Michael Brown and Eric Garner”, another unarmed man who died after a police chokehold in Staten Island, N. Y. on July 17.

Sharpton is among other groups and civil rights leaders who are also encouraging African-Americans to vote. Mid-term elections, in comparison to presidential elections, usually draw a much lower voter turnout.

Because of this, a new group called the Power Check Coalition has hooked up with comedian Sommore to promote a “check your power” campaign through a new national non-partisan network of leaders and organizations. The network is focused on "tapping the power of social media to engage infrequent voters", says a statement released last week. Sommore was scheduled to hold an event Saturday, Oct. 25, in Harrisburg, Pa., attempting to rev up excitement about voting.  

Typically, voters will go to the polls when there are issues that they believe they can impact. The NAACP, which compiles an annual report card for members of Congress, scores Republicans and Democrats based on their votes for or against what the civil rights organization calls "bread and butter" issues. These are issues like jobs, quality health care, civil rights, and affordable education, which disparately affect African-Americans.

There has been much focus on the deadly Ebola virus that has killed more than 4,400 in West Africa and one in the U. S. Americans have also been concerned with more troops being sent into Iraq in order to fight a relatively new terrorist group, ISIS, which has become known for its ruthless beheading of people. But, based on various interviews, it is the bread and butter issues that appear to be driving many voters to the polls. 

The push to register early and get out the vote is largely in response to sweeping changes to voter laws that have caused alarm in the civil rights and African-American communities.  But, the push to get out to vote is also in response to high tension between Republicans and Democrats that has resulted in a battle for both parties to either maintain or take control of the U. S. House and Senate. Currently, Republicans dominate the House and Democrats dominate the Senate.

"I would really like to see Democrats...control the whole congress and see what they could accomplish,” says Monte Kenton, 40, a service clerk in East St. Louis, Ill., “Having an imbalance is keeping anything from getting done."

But, some voters are thinking closer to home as they go to pull the lever. Gayle Todd, 45, a self-employed realtor in Dallas, says she’s planning to vote in the Texas gubernatorial race, where the abortion rights issue has resurged. 

"I am concerned with keeping or furthering the rights we have right now. Big thing in our race for governor is Pro-Choice. I feel women should have a say so about their body,” Todd said.

Affordable college tuition rates, global warming and the environment are some of the other issues inspiring voters to the polls. 

“The environment is also a huge issue here in Los Angeles. There is an intense drought which I believe is direct effect of the warming going on globally. Something has to be done about it or we could be in some serious trouble in the next few years,” Marcoulis says.

Despite issues that directly affect people’s lives, such as health care, education and jobs, some still question whether their vote will really matter. Ayana Matthews, a 33-year-old working mom in San Francisco, is convinced that every vote counts. “While I’m in the booth I sit and ask myself, Does my vote really matter? Am I voting for a reason and or a purpose?,” Matthews says. “The most important election to me is every election because there was a time when Blacks weren’t allowed to vote at all, therefore I take advantage of every opportunity that I have to be able to vote.”

This article was compiled from interviews by Howard University journalism students Kahdijah Cole, Victoria Lockhart, LaShawn Moore, Grier Spry, Jennifer Thomas, and Sydney Todd.

Face the Truth and Honor It! by Dr. E. Faye Williams

Oct. 26, 2014

Face the Truth and Honor It!
By Dr. E. Faye Williams 

williams2

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Anyone unwilling to face the fact that RACE is the 2000 lbs. gorilla in the room of America's psyche is either a fool or plays one. There, I said it, and all of us who wish to see this country live up to its full potential must deal honestly with that fact. RACE is central to our national dysfunction.  We must do this before we lose the opportunity to finally come together for our collective good.

The November 4th election is a focal point for our willingness to confront our common dilemma.  It would be dishonest for me to recommend a starting point for this confrontation at a place other than the respect and treatment afforded President Obama.  It would be a travesty to attempt closure to our national nightmare without making a sincere effort to compare and contrast the fact and the vision of the President and his legislative supporters with the goals and objectives of the "disloyal opposition."

Any president - yes, white president – who’d realized the same successes and achievements as President Obama would be lauded as one of the best presidents in the nation's history.  If for no other reason than his leadership through the threat of the worst economic crisis the nation has faced since "The Great Depression," he should receive such acclaim.  BUT, there is more!

Other than the unreasonable, reactionary right minority that clings to the mantra of "Tea Party," what rational person would condemn a fellow-citizen to illness and disease solely by virtue of his or her bank balance?  President Obama's Affordable Care Act has eliminated that fate for millions of Americans who are too impoverished to afford medical care or who have pre-existing conditions.  Even young adults who’re in the earliest stages of employment can receive medical insurance coverage with their parents’ plan until they can get on their feet.

President Obama has refused to sit idly by and watch our nation's military mindlessly shuffled into one international conflict after another.  He has withdrawn our forces from harm's way over the protests of politicians whose ulterior motive appears to be the enrichment of their corporate cronies.

The Wall Street wealthy should be ashamed of allowing their less literate brethren in the general population to criticize President Obama's management of the economy.  These folks have seen record growth in the stock market and have realized record profits.  To their discredit, they’ve not reinvested these profits into growth opportunities for the economy.

In the spirit of full disclosure, I‘m sure Black voters will support the President and those legislators who support his agenda.  I’m willing to step out on faith that Black people and other voters of color will again vote in record numbers as they did in 2008 and 2012.  I know the majority of people of color and whites who mobilized for CHANGE will not willingly surrender the fight to the forces of repression and regression.

The challenge in this election is to get white voters who, for no other reason than the color of his skin, reject the advantages the President's policies now afford them.

White women, who’re 51% of the population must honestly reflect and assess the future that Republican policies will bring to them.  Much like they were when Africans were chattel, the Republican agenda would bring women and their reproductive autonomy under the benevolent dictates of their spouses or other males.

The recent denouncement of the minimum wage by Gov. Chris Christie should serve as a warning for all who struggle from paycheck to paycheck.

In the above circumstances, the reluctant must decide if they’ll choose to let their hatred of one man or of a group of people to push them over the brink of survival into personal oblivion.

(Dr. Williams is President/CEO of the National Congress of Black Women, Inc.  www.efayewilliams.com)

Killer Of Michael Brown Claims He 'Feared For His Life,' A Common Defense in Deadly Cop Shootings

Oct. 21, 2014

Killer Of Michael Brown Claims He 'Feared For His Life,' A Common Defense in Deadly Cop Shootings

michael brown

Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from BlackManStreet.Today

(TriceEdneywire.com) - Ferguson, Mo., cop Darren Wilson, who shot to death 18-year-old Michael Brown (pictured) on August 9, has told investigators that he 'feared for his life,' a common defense used by police officers in deadly shootings involving African-American men. Pro Publica, the Pulitzer-prize winning online newspaper, reported that wording was ruled legitimate in a 1985 U.S. Supreme Court decision, Tennessee vs. Garner.

The 6-3 ruling in the case said cops could justify the use of deadly force if they feared for their lives. However, several eyewitnesses have said that the unarmed Brown was fleeing from Wilson with his hands up when he was shot, which would have negated the use of deadly force.
There were 1,217 deadly shootings by police from 2010 to 2012 and blacks, 15 to 19, were killed at the rate of 31.17 per million while just 1.47 per million white males in that age range died at the hands of police, according to Pro Publica.
From 2005 to 2009, the "officer under attack" defense was cited in 62 percent of police killings, compared to 33 percent of police deadly shootings from 1980 to 1984, Pro Publica reported.

X