banner2e top

The Resegregation of America By Rev. Jesse Jackson Sr.

May 24, 2015

The Resegregation of America
By Rev. Jesse Jackson Sr.

Jesse3
(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Sixty-one years ago, a unanimous Supreme Court ruled in Brown v. Board of Education that separate but (allegedly) equal schools were unconstitutional, that apartheid – legalized segregation –could not withstand the Constitutional demand of equal rights for all.

That decision produced a revolution, and a massive resistance.  White Southerners fled to private schools and starved public schools.  Neighborhoods grew more segregated, making it easier to keep schools segregated.  The white noose of suburbs grew around inner cities, with schools separate and savagely unequal.  

The courts stepped in, enforcing the Supreme Court’s decision.  They ordered mandatory busing.  They struck down racially segregated school districts.  By the early 1970s, the slow, tortuous process produced greater school integration.  By 1972, only one in four black children went to schools that were 90 percent Black, a dramatic improvement from segregation.
But the resistance spread north.  Parents revolted against busing.  President Nixon gutted federal enforcement.  The courts backed off.  By 2011, over half – 53 percent - of black children were in schools that are 90% black.  One-fourth of the black students in Alabama go to schools with less than 1 percent White children.  Segregation and apartheid schools have returned, with the worst, ironically, based on residential racial patterns in the Northeast and Midwest, where black and Latino ghettos and barrios are increasingly isolated.  Black children across the South now attend majority black schools at levels not seen since Brown v. Board of Education.

Modern day segregated schools are as separate and as unequal as those before the Brown decision.  There has been vast transformation of the nation’s school population – with white students dropping out and Hispanics rising.  In the West and South, people of color are a majority of students in public schools.  Latinos suffer the worst forms of segregated housing. 
The effects are well known.  Schools with students who are predominantly people of color get the least experienced and worst paid teachers.  Their teachers are less likely to be certified or qualified for the courses they teach.  Per pupil spending is lower than predominantly white schools.  Advanced courses are less available.  Various facilities – from labs to gyms – are starved for funds, if existing at all.  Blacks are more likely to be disciplined, more likely to be suspended or expelled (at three times the rate of whites), more likely to be arrested. One fourth grow up in neighborhoods their parents say are unsafe.  

The effects are clear.  Blacks drop out of high school at two times the rate of whites.  One third of whites have bachelor degrees or more, while only one in five blacks (19 percent) share the same accomplishments.”  As UCLA’s Gary Orfield, a leading scholar of school desegregation reports, research since Brown “shows that many forms of unequal opportunity are linked to segregation” and that “desegregated education has substantial benefits for educational and later life outcomes for students from all backgrounds.”  

Thus the goal of a public education of equal high quality for all students is still an aspiration of the future.In this light, the riots in Baltimore sadly mirror those of the 1960s that were also often sparked by police excesses.  Once more a nation separate and unequal is being forged.  Once more, segregated communities – the contrast between the downtown and the west side – lead to segregated schools, segregated opportunities, segregated dreams.  Once more the only way to change things is challenge the limits and borders of the current debate.  Once more it takes dramatic demonstrations to get liberals and elites to pay attention.  Once more we see vividly:  the powerful who rigged the rules have no desire to change them:  they are dong fine with the current arrangements.

This nation knows what it takes to build great public schools.  Now, as schools become increasingly minority majority – and as our future workforce becomes increasingly people of color – we have to decide if we will invest to give every child a fair start.  Perhaps the new gentrification of cities – as millennials decide in large numbers to move into the city rather than out of it – offers a new opportunity to desegregate housing, neighborhoods and schools.  But this won’t happen automatically.  It will take a change in policy and new profiles in courage.

Ignoring Infrastructure Needs is 'Stupid' by Julianne Malveaux

May 24, 2015

Ignoring Infrastructure Needs is 'Stupid'
By Julianne Malveaux

malveaux

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - When Amtrak Northeast Regional Train 188 derailed on May 12, federal budget observers wondered if the underfunding of our nation’s fraying infrastructure was at least partly responsible for the deaths of eight people (according to the New York Times) and the injury of 200 more.  Despite these questions, House Republicans voted to reduce President Obama’s request for Amtrak funding from $2.45 billion to $1.14 billion.   The Republican proposal not only reduces the current level of funding for Amtrak (which is $1.4 billion).  It also delays or eliminates needed capitol for improvements.

Legislators who represent areas served by the Northeast corridor trains (running from Washington DC to Boston), including New York’s Charles Schumer (D) and Philadelphia’s Chaka Fattah (D), have voiced objection to the parsimonious plan to underfund Amtrak.  Still, House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH), as characteristically myopic as the proverbial ostrich with its head in the sand, lost his cool when a reporter asked about funding for Amtrak.

When Ginger Gibson, a political reporter for the International Business Times, queried Boehner about Democratic criticisms Amtrak funding, he called her question  “stupid”.  He then embarked on a partisan rant that ignored the fact that eight people died because of the derailment.  What does money have to do with it?  If budgets allowed for more than one engineer on a train, then Brandon Bostian, the engineer who does not remember why the train sped up, might have had some backup.  Further, with more funding, would the positive train control safety system (which slows speeding trains) have been functioning properly (it was not)?

Investigations have not yet revealed why Train 188 derailed.  It was going 106 miles per hour when it should have been going 50, but how did it speed up so rapidly, and why?  Why are there not enough precautions to prevent this kind of accident?   What will be done to prevent a similar tragedy in the future?

Trains aren’t the only parts of our infrastructure that need attention.  The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) issues a report card on our nation’s infrastructure every four years.  The most recent report, released in 2013, gives the US a   GPA of D+ when 16 areas (including rail, bridges, aviation, roads and waste disposal) are considered.  We get the highest grade, B-, in solid waste disposal because we are both producing less trash per capita, and recycling more of it.  We earn D- grades for the status of our levees and waterways.  We earn D grades for most other categories, so the C+ grade for rail (compared to D grades for aviation and roads), may not seem like such a bad thing.  Still, while U.S. trains should be excellent they are just a tad better than mediocre.

ASCE says that $3.6 trillion dollars are needed to bring our infrastructure to a good, or B, level by 2020.  They say the gap between what is funded and what is needed is about $1.6 trillion, or $201 billion a year.  Our Congress is so focused on cutting spending that they refuse to invest in infrastructure.

Other parts of our infrastructure are even more substandard.  One in eight of our nation’s bridges are structurally deficient, and more than 200 million trips are made across these deficient bridges in our 102 largest metropolitan areas each year.  Many of these bridges have been poorly maintained and still handle heavy traffic.  They are, on average, 42 years old.  While repairs or new construction has begun on some (such as New York’s Tappan Zee Bridge), other neglected bridges are tragedies waiting to happen.

A strong infrastructure is an essential part of a sound economy. It makes it easier and more efficient to move both people and products.  It provides jobs and other economic opportunities.  On the other hand, allowing infrastructure to erode costs money.  For example, ASCE reports that 42 percent of our nation’s highways are congested, costing $101 billion in wasted time and fuel each year.  In the name of reducing our carbon footprint, some will eschew roads for urban rapid transit, but mass transit is unevenly provided in many cities, often providing less service in poor neighborhoods.  Public transportation is also woefully lacking outside urban areas, with 45 percent of the US population having no access to public transportation.  Business Insider’s Madeline Stone wrote that New York had the best public transportation system, followed by San Francisco and Boston.  The Metro system in the nation’s capitol doesn’t even make the top 10 list.  On a recent weekend it operated at half capacity.  What does that say about our infrastructure?

Whether we examine roads, planes, trains, waterways, bridges, dams or energy, ASCE finds our infrastructure pathetically inadequate.  These deficiencies are costly drains on our economy, while investments in infrastructure generate sizeable returns.  Moody’s economist Mark Zandi says that every dollar spent on infrastructure yields as much as $1.57 in gross domestic product.

The Amtrak derailment should be a warning about the status of our infrastructure.  It ought to force us to think about ways we can avoid accidents and to operate more efficiently.  It ought to motivate the kinds of investments that ASCE and others say are necessary.  To ignore the wake up call is, to quote John Boehner, “stupid.”

Julianne Malveaux is an author and economist. She can be reached at www.juliannemalveaux.com

Ferguson is Still Everywhere If You're Black by Rika Tyler and T-Dubb-O

May 22, 2015

Ferguson is Still Everywhere If You're Black
By Rika Tyler and T-Dubb-O

tdubbo
T-Dubb-O

rikatyler
Rika Tyler

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - It’s been 250 plus  days since our fallen brethren Michael Brown Jr. was fatally shot in Canfield Apartments in Ferguson, Mo. by Ferguson Police Officer Darren Wilson.

Wilson got rich, famous, and a vacation after killing Mike Brown, a phenomenon that is occurring all too often across the U. S.  In fact, an MXGM (Malcolm X Grassroots Movement) study has reported that every 28 hours a Black person is killed by police. Accountability is the key. Accountability is the answer.

As you may remember, Wilson was not indicted and the community of the Saint Louis and Saint Louis County Region still suffers for it. Ferguson’s response sparked a movement and uprising from people of different congregations, ethnicities, genders, and ages nationwide to stand up against this system and be a voice for Black, brown, and oppressed people.

Since the killing of Michael Brown, there have been numerous similar killings and then protests, rallies, direct actions, and more. Yet it will not stop. From private attorneys to the Department of Justice, there have been several investigations of shootings of unarmed African-Americans; yet we still cannot fully attain the transparency or accountability that we deserve from police officers. Ferguson is still everywhere if you're Black.   

Therefore, we must start moving in a way to create our own narrative. This means doing our own investigations of these incidents involving officers, who are sworn to protect and serve us. The system itself also needs investigating.

In other words, we need policies that establish accountability. Accountability by police would mean them taking responsibility, being liable and answerable for these travesties of justice. Looking at what accountability actually means, can we as a nation say our police departments are truly held accountable for their fumbling of community relationships?

The constant mistakes, bad judgement, racist motives,  and lack of transparency would result in immediate termination in any other fields in this country. Why don't normal morals and human standards apply to police officers?

They tell us police have the right to make it home. Well shouldn't every citizen in this country have the right to make it home? Or how about the right to be able to sleep in your home and not be killed due to reckless gun fire by police like 7-year-old Aiyana Jones who was killed by Detroit police during a raid at her home. Final charges against Joseph Weekley, the cop who shot her, were dismissed early this year.

We must hold these officers accountable. In the Saint Louis Region there have been at least 10 more police involved killings since Michael Brown Jr. which happened in August of 2014. Around the nation, there are too many names to name with similar circumstances with no transparency and no justice in the system: Kimberly Randall King, Vonderritt Myers Jr., Tamir Rice, Eric Garner, and more recently Freddie Gray of Baltimore.

Fortunately there are indictments of the officers in the Freddie Gray case, but for the most part around the country, there is currently no way to hold these departments accountable. It seems as if they run the nation and we serve them instead of the other way around.

During protests in Ferguson, municipalities established many unconstitutional rules. For example, they refused to wear name badges even after the Department of Justice said they were legally obligated to do so. They refused to identify themselves. They continued to use illegal unnecessary force against citizens. Ferguson Police officers even issued a five-second rule stating that a person could be subject to arrest if they stood still for longer than five seconds while protesting. A federal court ruled against it. Yet, police officers are still on the normal predator policing tactic.

The Department of justice released a report confirming all the racial targeting that the Ferguson police department practiced against people of color and oppressed people in general. Yet, police still use shoot first tactics because there is no one holding them accountable. Ferguson is still everywhere if you are Black.

T-Dubb-O, a Hip-Hop artist, is a director for Hands Up United, a grass roots organization building towards the liberation of oppressed Black, Brown and Poor people through education, art, civil disobedience, advocacy and agriculture.

Rika Tyler, a community organizer and advocate for children, is a program director of Hands Up United. She works to ensure programs are aligned to serving the community of Ferguson and the Greater St. Louis area.

This article is part of an op-ed series on behalf of the Civil Rights Coalition on Police Reform.  The coalition, convened and led by the national Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, is comprised of over 30 national civil and human rights organizations, faith and community leaders working to address the nationwide epidemic of police brutality and lethal shootings, claiming the lives of Black men, women and youth; and provide necessary reforms to change the culture of policing in America.  For more information, please visit www.lawyerscommittee.org.

Searching for the Compassionate Conservative by Dr. E. Faye Williams

May 24, 2015

Searching for the Compassionate Conservative
By Dr. E. Faye Williams 

williams2

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - One of the principles of civics that I hold inviolate is that which tells me to vote for the candidate who’s most likely to pursue policies and practices I believe are in my best interest and the interest of my community and country.  After giving it thought, most will agree.

Accepting that principle means that I must search for and accept a candidate without regard for political party affiliation.  In each election, I strive to do that. The 2016 election is no exception and I’ve already begun my evaluations of declared and potential candidates.  Since the Republican Presidential candidates are greater in number this cycle, I’ll begin with them to decide whether a worthy Republican exists!

Although I usually find the Morning Joe program too negative to begin my day, I learned that Louisiana's Governor, Bobby Jindal, would be a guest on the show.  Since I’m a native of Louisiana and have family members who remain there, I’m always eager to examine the vision of any Louisiana politician who aspires to lead us into the future.  Having done nothing to improve Louisiana or its national image, I was not surprised to hear Jindal state the unrealistic case for considering him for the presidency.

Facts (according to StateMaster.com) I consider about Louisiana are:  Crime is a significant problem.  The state leads the nation in homicides per capita, in the number of state and federal prisoners in jail per capita.  It maintains relatively high levels of aggravated assaults and violent crimes.  Health is a major concern.  Of the 50 states, Louisiana was dead last in Morgan Quitno Press's Health Index.  Key indicators were a high child mortality rate, the nation's highest rate of STD's and low health coverage for residents.  These issues were made worse by Hurricane Katrina.

In addition to bringing this type of governance to the United States as President, Jindal has stated that he, specifically, wants to get rid of the Affordable Care Act.  I can only guess that he desires for all lower and middle income Americans to suffer for health care the way similarly situated Louisianans do now.  I have personal knowledge of the many who seek health care they can afford while Governor Jindal refuses to exercise his power to help them get it.

Jindal thinks that he can improve upon American Education.  I would hope that he doesn’t "improve" it to Louisiana's current standing.  According to ALEC, the right-leaning American Legislative Exchange Council, Louisiana ranks 48th in national academic achievement levels.  It's also a good time to note that this same brand of Republican education leadership guides 16 of the bottom 25 states in the union.

He thinks he has the answer to "Religious Freedom."  He’s among Republican candidates who criticize President Barack Obama for over- stepping the legislative process on things like Immigration Reform.  As is typical with hypocrites, after the Louisiana legislature gave the governor thumbs down on his personal brand of religious freedom, what did the governor do?  Within hours, he initiated an Executive Order reversing the will of the legislature.

If we analyze the records of many of the other candidates as closely as we have Jindal's, we’d have to ask, "When the problems of your state, seemingly, overwhelm you, how do you expect us to hand the reigns of national authority and leadership for you to dismantle the good we’ve been able to wrench from those vested against us."

I will always give people a chance to prove themselves, but, when their record of failure and incompetence dictates, I will not allow them to convince me to join them in the madness of their failures.  One good thing I can say is that Louisiana remains the largest producer of crayfish in the world!

(Dr. E. Faye Williams is President of the National Congress of Black Women.  202/678-6788.  www.nationalcongressbw.org.)

Ghana Celebrities Join Call to End Painful Power Outages

May 18, 2015

Ghana Celebrities Join Call to End Painful Power Outages

 bringbackourlight

Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from Global Information Network


(TriceEdneyWire.com) – Throngs of Ghanaians thronged the capital Accra this past week but the celebrities in their midst were not the main attraction.

Thousands of citizens, movie stars, civil servant, academics and others took to the streets to protest the government’s failure to end a three-year long electric power crisis.

The energy crisis has crippled business at home and angered ordinary Ghanaians. Currently the electric company provides power for 12 hours out of a 36 hour cycle. Homes are plunged into darkness, refrigerators shut down, as do TVs, water pumps and fans.

“Three years is more than enough to solve this crisis,” said Yvonne Nelson, actress, model, beauty pageant contestant and march organizer. “It’s taking a toll on our livelihood.”

Authorities blame low water levels at the Akosombo Hydroelectric Dam – the main supplier of electricity for Ghana – and a lack of gas to power the country’s thermal plants as the main cause of the crisis.

But commentators point to old and out of date machinery at the country’s three power plants and a demand for electricity that outstrips the supply. The power outages are known locally as “dumsor” – a word in the local Twi language used for irregular power blackouts.

Major employers like Coca-Cola, Cadbury Ghana and a construction supply company have started laying off workers.

About 3,000 workers have already been laid off as a result of the power cuts and as many as 5,000 workers could lose their jobs by September if the situation does not improve, Ghana’s Chamber of Commerce and Industry warned last month.

A bit of Ghana’s colonial history was recalled on The Guardian newspaper’s website by Napolean Abdulai, a disarmament expert. He noted that a nuclear energy project was planned as early as 1961“to exploit nuclear energy for peaceful applications for the solution of problems of national development.” Scientists and technicians from the former Soviet Union were coming to Ghana to oversee the work.

After President Kwame Nkrumah was overthrown, the nuclear project was declared unnecessary by British physicist Sir John Cockcroft although critics said that to accept Cockroft’s recommendations “was to perpetuate backwardness.’

Other projects were dismantled and a number of scientific and technical staff departed.

With citizen restlessness in view, deputy finance minister, Cassiel Ato Forson took pains to assure a reporter that the government had a clear plan to improve the economy and would deliver more than 3,000 megawatts of additional power over the next five years.

X