banner2e top

Needed: White House Conference On Racial Justice By Rev. Jesse Jackson

June 21, 2015
 

Needed: White House Conference On Racial Justice 
By Rev. Jesse Jackson

Jesse3

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Not unlike the four little girls killed in a church bombing in Birmingham, Alabama in 1963, today the nation and the world are saddened and outraged at the hatred and senseless killing of nine African-Americans in the historic Emanuel AME Church in Charleston, S.C. – including its pastor and state senator.  Over three decades ago, Operation PUSH held its national convention centered in this church and I did two televised Firing Line interviews with William F. Buckley there.

And, not unlike the economic and political context of Birmingham, the nation and its leadership are still failing to see, understand and come to grips with the underlying economic and political circumstances that led to such a tragedy.  This young White man, whoever he is, did not originate terrorism.  He is merely reflecting decades and centuries of institutional and active political terrorism.  There were 164 lynching's of African-Americans between 1877 and 1950 in South Carolina.

The shooting in Charleston is the result and the product of a protracted political genocide resulting from institutionalized racism, centuries of dehumanization and the current denial of economic and political equality of opportunity.  Today everyone is outraged at the killings, but there is not the same outrage that African- Americans are number one in infant mortality, in life expectancy, in unemployment, in cheap wages, in access to capital and denial of bank loans, in imprisonment, in segregated housing and home foreclosures, in segregated and underfunded public schools, in poverty, in heart disease, liver disease, diabetes, mental health issues, HIV/AIDS and the lack of access to health care and more.  We ignore this institutionalized state of terror and the resulting racial fears at our peril.

There was an urgency to identify and arrest this individual before he hurts anyone else, but there is not the same urgency to identify and arrest the current economic and political conditions – the institutional racism and structural injustices – before anyone else gets hurt.  Today in South Carolina, a historically Black university, South Carolina State, is on the verge of closing, but I don’t see the same urgency to save it by the Governor and the South Carolina legislature.  

Gov. Nikki Haley appropriately asked South Carolinians to pray for the victims and their families of these killings and decried violence at religious institutions, but she denies poor people access to health care by refusing to accept Medicaid monies under the Affordable Care Act - which is jeopardizing the economic viability of the state’s hospitals and costing South Carolinians thousands of jobs - and she still flies the Confederate Flag on the Capitol grounds.

These injustices and indifferences are not just limited to South Carolina. They’re national in scope.  We need a White House Conference on racial justice and urban policy to make sure no one else is being hurt because of economic, political and leadership indifference or lack of vision of what needs to be done!  Racism deserves a remedy.

Before the arrest of 21-year-old Dylan Roof, the Charleston police chief said, “We will put all effort, we will put all resources and we will put all of our energy into finding this individual who committed this crime tonight."  We need the President, the Congress, the 50 Governors and state legislatures to put the same effort, resources and energy into ending the crime of racism, economic injustice and political denial throughout the nation.  We’ve had enough Michael Brown, Eric Garner, Tamir Rice and Walter Scott killings.  We’ve had enough infant mortality deaths.  We’ve had enough unemployment – always at least twice the rate of Whites.

We’ve had enough of segregated and inadequately funded educational opportunities.  We’ve had enough lack of access to capital.  We’ve had enough lack of access to health care.  We’ve had enough of homelessness and home foreclosures. We need prayer and we need hope, but we also need a political commitment and a financial budget committed to ending this protracted political genocide.

As the AP reported, “the Emmanuel AME church is a historic African-American church that traces its roots to 1816, when several churches split from Charleston's Methodist Episcopal church. One of its founders, Denmark Vesey, tried to organize a slave revolt in 1822.  He was caught, and White landowners had his church burned in revenge.  Parishioners worshipped underground until after the Civil War.”

As we have throughout history, we still need leadership with a vision for racial justice.  We need an investment for economic justice – the current rising tide hasn’t lifted all boats.  And we need fairness in political representation.  That’s what we need if we are ever going to put an end to the protracted political genocide of which African-Americans have been the victims for nearly 400 years in the United States.  We deserve equal economic and political opportunity.  We deserve equal justice under the law.

Eye of the Beholder By Dr. E. Faye Williams, Esq.

June 21, 2015

Eye of the Beholder
By Dr. E. Faye Williams, Esq.  

williams2

(TriceEdneyWire.com) – Many have given their opinions.  Now it's my turn to weigh in on the subject of race and the right of self-identification.  My central question is, "With events occurring in the world that require serious attention, why is there so much interest in a white woman, Rachel Dolezal, wanting to live and identify as a Black woman?"

Are whites so alarmed in disbelief that a White woman would be so enamored by the "Black Experience" that she would be willing to give up her "White privilege"?  Does "White guilt" cause them to wonder how a White could join the target of their animus and discrimination?  Is her decision comparable to the same self-hatred conditioned into many African Americans?  Or, is her decision predicated on living in a manner that reflects the values, goals and aspirations that she holds dear?

Have Blacks been lured into unfair analyses of Rachel's motives and behaviors that support the suggestion that there is something inherently wrong with being Black?  Have Blacks, by engaging in the analysis, endorsed the distorted belief that being Black yields a person of lesser/inferior quality and character?   Rather than yielding to the temptation to critique and criticize, Black people should withdraw from this conversation and leave white people to their own frustrations regarding her actions.

Did Rachel do something wrong?  Yes, she misrepresented who she was!  Was this misrepresentation disingenuous, against the law or did it prevent her from achieving significant or positive outcomes in her community?  No, it was not and did not!

I wish that Black critics would step back, listen and not be overly judgmental of Rachel.  After all, many African-Americans have been intimidated or demoralized by trying to answer the question, "Am I Black enough for you?"  Attempting to manufacture purity of ideal, thought and intent, we sometimes impose a requirement for others to conform to who we think they should be.  As a Black woman, I can understand what she did, though I don't understand why she did it.  Those who best know her, even after she defined herself as Black, think the good she's done outweighs the bad.

I see the Dolezal controversy as a personal and familial dispute between her parents and her.  Whatever their motives for outing her will probably never be fully understood, but I have not heard her criticized as incompetent in her work.  She's been lauded by her NAACP branch and supported by the national NAACP.

I'm willing to take her good and praise it.   I'm not threatened by her serving as President of the Spokane NAACP.  In truth, I'm more concerned about and critical of the Black people who don't belong to the NAACP.  As for the NAACP, white people have been an integral part for 106 years since its founding.

Few may accept my point of view, but I come from a multi-racial family.  I love my Blackness, but I welcome any person of any race or culture who shares common interests.

Though many White Americans speak in exclusionary terms of "taking back their country," we, in the Black community, take pride in our acceptance of others.  We've prayed for the day when we wouldn't be judged by the color of our skin.  Let's give Rachel the benefit of the doubt that she meant well--even though she made a few mistakes along the way.

Rachel Dolezal could have used her White privilege to do anything she desired. She chose to define and identify herself as a Black woman.  I ask, "Who am I to judge her and tell her she shouldn't want to be like me?"  Some think her desire for Blackness is bizarre, but isn't it a refreshing change for a White woman to choose to be Black!

(Dr. E. Faye Williams is National President of the National Congress of Black Women.  www.nationalcongressbw.org.  202/678-6788)

White Gunman Murders 9 Worshippers in a Black Church

June 18, 2015

White Gunman Murders 9 Worshippers in a Black Church 
Alleged killer gunman captured

By Frederick H. Lowe

dylannroof2
Dylann Roof, the alleged killer of nine people in a black Charleston, S.C., church. Roof was later captured with incident.  He has not yet been charged. Facebook photo

clementia2

Pastor Clementia Pinckney of  Emanuel AME Church was  shot to death Wednesday night in a massacre. Facebook photo

Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from NorthStarNewsToday.com

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - A white gunman  who walked into an African-American church in Charleston, S.C., Wednesday night and shot and killed nine worshippers, attending Bible study, has been captured without incident even though police warned he was armed and very dangerous.

Charles Frances, a spokesperson for the Charleston police department, said the alleged murderer Dylann Roof,21, of Lexington S.C., was arrested Thursday morning in Shelby N.C.  Frances did not know the circumstances that led to Roof’s arrest, but other sources said Roof was apprehended during at a traffic stop, 240 miles from Charleston. Roof will not be charged until he is in the custody of the Charleston police, Frances told NorthStar News Today.com. Police handled the Roof’s arrest much more differently than the arrest last July of an unarmed Eric Garner, who was choked to death by Daniel Pantaleo, a New York City cop, for selling loose cigarettes.

Eight of the victims died at the scene and one died in a hospital, said Charleston Police Chief Greg Mullen. One of the victims was pastor Clementa Pinckney, a longtime state senator who spent the earlier part of the day campaigning in the city with Hillary Clinton. The names of the other victims will be released later by the county coc

Mullen added there were survivors but he refused to disclose how many, according to news reports. After the shooting, police cordoned off the area, but the gunman got away.

The incident is being called a hate crime and a massacre. Mullen said the suspect attended the Bible meeting for an hour before standing up and firing his gun.
According to an eyewitness, he says that he has “to do it” because black people “rape our women” and are “taking over our country,” said Richard Cohen, president of the Southern Poverty Law Center, which monitors hate groups.

Roof reloaded his gun, which was a present for his 21st birthday, several times before fleeing. Cohen said Roof admired apartheid, the separation of the races in South Africa.

“The only reason someone would walk into a church and shoot people that were praying is hate,” said Mayor Joe Riley.

At about the same time, there were several bomb threats in the area.

The shooting occurred around 9 p.m. at the Emanuel AME Church in downtown Charleston, according to news reports.
Known as “Mother Emanuel,” the church is the oldest AME church in the South, having been founded in 1816 under the leadership of abolitionist minister Morris Brown, the second bishop of the AME Church in the U. S.

The deadly shootings have angered African-American church officials. Rev. Anthony Evans, president of the Washington, D.C.-based National Black Church Initiative, said he is traveling to South Carolina to personally direct 682 churches on security measures for congregants and their families.

Rev. Evans said, “This horrendous act follows a litany of brutal attacks on African Americans over the past several years across  the United States."

What About the Real Black women? by Julianne Malveaux

June 21, 2015

What About the Real Black women?
By Julianne Malveaux

malveaux

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - By now, perhaps the disturbing story of Rachel Dolezal, the prevaricating White woman who passed for Black, led the Spokane NAACP, and wove a web of elaborate lies, has receded from media headlines.  Probably not.  I expect further follow-up, a book, and a reality show.  While most African- Americans have concluded that Dolezal is a mentally impaired liar, too many Caucasian, obsessed with race, are likely to give this story legs.

Meanwhile, there are millions of African-American women who are rendered invisible by the media.  If Matt Lauer wants to focus on the women in the NAACP, he ought to interview Roslyn Brock, the Chair of the NAACP board.  If he wanted to look at the women who lead organizations, he should focus on Melanie Campbell (National Coalition for Black Civic Participation) or Sherilyn Ifill (NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund).  These women can add substance, not sensationalist fluff, to a conversation about women and race.

Where is the fifteen minute interview of Dajerria Becton, the teenager who, bikini-clad, was brutally dragged by her hair at a Texas pool party?  Where is the follow-up on Renisha McBride, the teen who was killed by a crazed White man from behind his locked screen door?  When have any of the African-American women in Congress been featured in the lengthy interviews that others in Congress get?  Admittedly, lengthy profiles don’t happen often, but when they do happen, African- American women certainly aren’t the focus of them.

The presence of African-American women in media is much improved from just a decade ago.  MSNBC anchor Melissa Harris-Perry brings a welcome approach to issues, Gayle King and Tamryn Hall diversify a morning news lineup that was once far more homogeneous, and Gwen Ifill bring a necessary gravitas to evening news, and Donna Brazile is an important part of the commentariat.  While those who bring the news are more diverse, the content of news is much less so, and frivolous sensationalism is often given more visibility than substance is.

African-American women are also ignored by our natural allies, the White women who lead women’s organizations.  To be sure, we can count on NOW’s Terry O’Neill, to be an advocate for social and economic justice issues.  She has been a reliable ally to the Rainbow/PUSH Coalition, a regular presence on Rev. Jesse Jackson’s radio program (disclosure – I’ve been on the program with her, on occasion), and a supportive force at national conventions.  Still, Roland Martin was right to take her on regarding her silence about the way Dajerria Becton was brutalized.  Truth be told, NOW should also be chastised for the many ways African American women, and our issues, are ignored by the nation’s premier women’s organization.  In the words of Sojourner Truth, “Ain’t I A Woman”

Now that the Treasury Department has agreed that a woman will be on the US currency by 2020, and Treasury Secretary Jack Lew is seeking input on which women through a Treasury department website.  A self-described grassroots organization called Women on 20s delivered a petition to President Obama in May, calling for a woman to appear on the twenty dollar bill.  Of the 600,000 people who signed the petition, the most people selected Harriet Tubman to appear on the bill, with Eleanor Roosevelt being the second choice.  Wouldn’t it be great if majority women’s organizations pushed for an African American woman to grace our currency?  It would certainly go a long way toward recognizing, not ignoring, Black women.

The United Nations has designated 2015-2024 the International Decade for People of African Descent.  The theme of the decade is recognition, justice and development.  The UN General Assembly has released a resolution that includes objectives and a program of activities for the decade.  What if the media spent as much time on this as they have spent on a troubled imposter?  To the extent that women of African descent around the globe experience similar histories and oppressions, such coverage could be informative and educational.

Because African-American women are too often invisible (or underrepresented) in the media and elsewhere, it is especially galling to watch the disturbing week of Dolezal coverage.  Are African-American only interesting when we are being portrayed by a confused wannabe Black woman?  What about the real Black women?  And what about asking African-American women what they think about this nonsense to get interesting perspectives on this sideshow?

What about looking at the “passing” phenomenon from an African-American perspective (nobody knows how many African-Americans passed for Caucasian to gain access to opportunities, educational and financial, during the Jim Crow days)?   If Rachel Dolezal’s chicanery is to be covered by the media, it ought at least be placed in context.  Sojourner Truth said, “I have plowed and planted and not a man could head me, and ain’t I a woman”.  Dolezal has neither plowed nor planted.  Her hijinks should be ignored, not glorified.

Dr. Julianne Malveaux is an author and economist based in Washington, D.C. She can be reached at www.juliannemalveaux.com

New Air Standards Could Disproportionately Affect Urban Communities by Hazel Trice Edney

June 15, 2015

New Air Standards Could Disproportionately Affect Urban Communities
By Hazel Trice Edney

rosagill
Rosa Gill

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - As President Obama moves to implement policies that his administration says will reduce smog levels, he is facing a backlash in the urban and largely Black communities that are at the core of his political base and key to the Democratic Party’s success in next year’s elections.

In recent weeks, politicians, business representatives and other leaders in urban and racial minority communities have been warning that new air standards that government regulators are attempting to put in place may have negative economic consequences for local economies from New York City to St. Louis, Chicago, Denver and across North Carolina.

N. C. State Rep. Rosa Gill, a Democratic member of the N. C. Legislative Black Caucus, recently wrote to the White House warning the new standards would undermine the success the President has had in creating an environment that has fostered job growth in areas on the economic margins.

“The minority and disadvantaged population in my district is especially grateful for President Obama’s tireless efforts on their behalf,” she wrote. “So you’ll understand why I’m concerned that the newly proposed air quality standards would act as a drag on the long awaited recovery my constituents are now enjoying.”

The concern is being raised on the eve of the U. S. Conference of Mayors 83rd Annual Meeting in San Francisco, where President Obama is scheduled to speak this week. The debate centers on new ozone - or smog - standards that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) plans to put in place in October. It requires states, counties and other localities to hold ground-level ozone to 65-70 parts per billion - or risk losing federal highway money. The current standard is 75 parts per billion of ground-level ozone in the atmosphere.

Ground-level ozone is sometimes called smog, and it has declined by nearly 20 percent in the past 15 years as a result of efforts by industry and government. It forms when emissions from industrial or construction activity, as well as from forest fires or decaying plants, mix with heat and sunlight.

There are a number of concerns that critics raise about the new standards. They include the fact that the EPA has limited ways to measure whether or not a municipality or other locality is in compliance with the standards.

Indeed, only 675 of the nation's 3,000 counties have ozone monitors in place. As a result, the EPA would rely on computer models to determine ozone levels in a given area – an approach critics call highly imprecise given the financial stakes involved.

More alarming to critics is the negative impact the new standards may have on businesses and job growth. By its own reckoning, EPA says it could cost businesses up to $15 billion a year. But, business groups say the figure is much higher.

For example, earlier this year the National Association of Manufacturers issued a study that concluded the new standard would drain U.S. GDP of $140 billion a year - or $1.7 trillion - from 2017 to 2040. It would also mean 1.4 million fewer jobs, according to the report.

The impact will be especially hard in urban areas that already have the most difficulty meeting the current standard, including Philadelphia, Camden, N.J., Atlanta, Chicago and St. Louis – all with sizable Black populations. In many cases, the communities hardest hit by the standards have lagged behind the rest of the country in rebounding from the economic downturn.

“As a business owner, I know how these regulations will adversely impact Minority and Women owned businesses,” Akilah Graham, a member of the Colorado Black Chamber of Commerce in Denver, wrote in a recent letter to the White House, adding that the costs of the regulations would be “borne disproportionately by those least able to afford them.”

Some political observers note the bind the situation creates for Democrats as election year approaches, given that many of these communities are heavily Democratic and stand to lose in one of two way: reductions in federal aid if they fail to meet the new standards or a slowdown in economic activity if businesses scale back to offset the financial costs of the new standards.

“The irony for Democrats is that the new standards pushed by Obama's EPA will have an especially large impact on metropolitan areas,” John Burnett, a financial analyst and Republican activist from Harlem, recently wrote in a column for the U.S. News. “In short, these regulations don't even make political sense, particularly in an election cycle.”

X