banner2e top

Small-Dollar Debt Shouldn’t Mean Big Profits for Predatory Lenders By LeeAnn Hall and Glenn Harris

March 7, 2016

Small-Dollar Debt Shouldn’t Mean Big Profits for Predatory Lenders
By LeeAnn Hall and Glenn Harris

leeann hall
LeeAnn Hall


glenn harris photo
Glenn Harris

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - How can a corporation get rich off people who have almost nothing? That’s the business model for a predatory debt industry targeting African Americans, raking in billions by exploiting economic vulnerability. 

It’s time we stop this parasitic industry and demand the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) institute tough rules to end the small-dollar debt trap.

The debt trap catches people where they live, work, study and drive. With one-quarter of Black families having only $5 in reserves, people have no financial breathing room. One domino falls – a cancelled shift at work – and everything else falls, too.

When that happens, the payday and car-title lenders come calling with false promises. Instead of tossing a lifeline, they strip communities of over $10 billion annually in interest and fees, trapping families in debt.

The toll on African-Americans is steep. According to the New York Times, “If you are black, you’re far more likely to see your electricity cut, more likely to be sued over a debt, and more likely to land in jail because of a parking ticket.” 

Conventional wisdom tells people the debt trap is their fault. That’s untrue, but it’s a convenient way for predators to trap customers in shame along with debt. 

The debt trap is a systemic problem hurting people of all races but hitting African-Americans especially hard. That’s because African-Americans have been specifically and historically shut out of policies that helped white families build nest eggs.

Take the housing segregation that blocked many Black families from home investments. The policies behind this segregation excluded African- Americans from the country’s most important source of family wealth. 

The result is a racial wealth gap leaving Black families with 6 percent the wealth of white families. Along with this gap comes economic distress in Black communities that, as described by the Washington Post’s Emily Badger, “extends out the door of a family's home and occupies the entire neighborhood around it, touching the streets, the schools, the grocery stores.”

Next to shops in Black communities you’ll likely find a predatory payday lender that jacks up loans at interest rates near 400 percent. In Midwest cities, payday lenders bunch in African-American and Latino neighborhoods at three times the rate they’re found in other neighborhoods. 

Payday lenders aren’t the only problem. African-Americans are also getting crushed under student loans, mortgages, medical debt and the fines cities charge to finance operations instead of taxing equitably. 

Our financial system is segregated by race and class. Affluent White communities count on banks offering wealth-building credit. Black communities have to count on debt predators that tap the few assets people have – or hope to have someday.

Once the industry ties people to debt, it sends debt collectors that call day and night, harass family members, and grab dollars they’re not entitled to – leading to thousands of complaints at the CFPB against companies profiting in the hundreds of millions.

This points to a debt-industrial complex straddling Black communities. The debt of African-Americans is that industry’s wealth.

We can dismantle the racial wealth gap and achieve widespread economic equity. This requires dismantling structural racism and the segregated financial system, and providing true economic equity in everything from education to jobs, health care and income.  

But we cannot wait until that work is done to tackle the back-of-the-bus credit system preying on families now.

The CFPB is currently writing rules that, done right, will stop the debt trap in small-dollar lending by ensuring every loan is a loan that can actually be repaid – eliminating abuses like serial roll-overs and refinances, or lenders holding cars or bank accounts hostage. 

The CFPB needs to hear from us all to counter pressure from predators and their congressional mouthpieces. Let’s tell predatory lenders they have no business in African-American communities.

LeeAnn Hall is executive director of the Alliance for a Just Society, a national network of community organizations working for economic, racial and social justice. Glenn Harris is president of the Center for Social Inclusion, a nonprofit that advocates for racial equality.

Contraception Now Accessible Through a Smartphone App for Women by Alanté Millow

March 7, 2016

Contraception Now Accessible Through a Smartphone App for Women
But, Some Doctors Recommend Caution
By Alanté Millow

callinginorder
A new smartphone application offers delivery of birth control as a convenience. But,
some doctors say it could lead to health risks.

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Are you on the pill? That is a common question women hear when sexually active. Whether the question is coming from a doctor, concerned parent, friend or sexual partner, women often feel obligated to obtain their own protection.

That’s the reason that a new smartphone application, called Nurx, is rapidly becoming what some perceive as a girl’s best friend. It expedites the process of getting birth control by delivering it to a person’s door within 24 hours.

“I’m super lazy and taking time out of my schedule to visit the doctor just so they can prescribe more birth control is annoying,” said Amber O’Riley (Not her real name), who is currently prescribed to birth control. O’Riley asked that her real name not be used in this story in order to protect her privacy.

Once the application is downloaded, the user answers eight questions in order to receive three months’ worth of their chosen contraception. The chosen contraception will be prescribed by a physician licensed in the state where the order takes place. Nurx provides these services for free to those who have insurance, and charges as low as $15 for those without.

Currently, the application provides services to women 18 and up in the state of California and will soon expand to New York, Florida and Illinois, according to Hans Gangeskar, a founder of Nurx and a former attorney.

According to a Contraception in America study, conducted by medical communications company Strategic Pharma Solutions, about 15 percent of women use the pill compared to only 8 percent who said they used a male condom.

According to PlannedParent.org, there are 11 birth control methods available for women, compared to only two for men. However, it can be more difficult for women to obtain birth control pills, as they can not be picked up on a late night store run. Also, the process of making an appointment and consulting with a physician every few months can be daunting for many women.

Not only does Nurx provide convenient delivery, but the application also eliminates the need to constantly follow-up with doctors. However, users can reach their physicians via text message if they have any questions or concerns.

Dr. James K. Massengill, an obstetrician-gynecologist, believes the application is a good idea, but, he does have two main concerns.

“First, young ladies might not get their pap smears done as they will not have to come in for their birth control pill refills,” Massengill said.

Secondly, Massengill says if women stay away from their doctors, they may not get necessary testing for sexually transmitted diseases. “They may have infections that will not be detected and thus not treated and can have tubal damage,” he said.

Dr. Rudolph M. Chang, an osteopathic physician, also said the new application may run into some issues. He is concerned that users may not fully understand the “side effects [such as] problems with increased risk of blood clotting, especially in smokers and obese patients.” He said there may also be a possibility of undelivered items and theft which can ultimately result in unintended pregnancies.

Regardless of criticism, Gangeskar, along with his co-founder, Edvar Engesaeth, a physician, have decided women need more convenience in obtaining birth control.

“We wanted to make preventative healthcare more accessible for people,” Gangeskar said. “We started with contraception because this is a complicated and burdensome process for many people today.”

After viewing Nurx on her smartphone, O’Riley said, “I like how the app shows you several birth control options with the specific names of each of them … Whenever I go into the doctor’s office, I always feel so overwhelmed by everything they tell me and he ends up just picking the option for me. I’m not even sure the name of the pill I’m on now.”

Gangeskar said that each year there are about three million unintended pregnancies in the United States. He believes main the main contributors to these pregnancies are the “financial barriers” and “unnecessary hoops people have to jump through” to obtain proper birth control.

“This motivated us to create an app that streamlines this process and, unlike similar apps, Nurx users have the option to use their insurance to cover the cost,” Gangeskar said. “We want women to be able to access their birth control on their own terms.”

Fears Rise That DRC President Will 'Cling to Power' in Re-election Bid

March 6, 2016

Fears Rise That DRC President Will 'Cling to Power' in Re-election Bid

activists
Student activists who opposed an additional term for Kabila PHOTO: Kambale Musavuli/Friends of the Congo

Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from Global Information Network

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Members of the Congolese opposition are pushing for elections this year, and for President Joseph Kabila to step down if elections are not held.

Seven senior members of the ruling coalition have already been expelled for urging the President not to cling to power after Dec. 19, 2016, the official end of his second term. The planning minister was also sacked from his post reportedly on order of the president.

The fate of President Kabila is the central issue that consumes Congolese politics today. As frustration grows, the Kabila regime has restricted political space, clamped down on free expression and stepped up its jailing of Congolese youth. The US State Department said it was "troubled by the harassment and detention of peaceful activists and opposition leaders" while Human Rights Watch issued a scathing indictment of the regime’s clampdown on peaceful protests and a spate of arrests countrywide.

With limits on free expression, Congolese have had to develop innovative ways of registering their political views. The victory of Congo's football (soccer) team in the African Nations Championships on Feb. 7 provided an ideal outlet for Congolese people to convey their sentiments toward the regime.

With each winning game, Congolese filled the streets to celebrate the team’s victory. In their celebratory chants, a political message could be heard: "Kabila oyebela... Mandate esili! Eloko nini esilaka te?" or "Kabila... You need to know your [presidential] term is over! What in life doesn't end?" This spurred the hashtag #Yebela on Twitter among Congolese.

Meanwhile, a half dozen activists from the youth-led organization LUCHA were arrested in the city of Goma for holding up signs calling for the president to respect the constitution. They were charged and sentenced to two years in prison for disturbing the peace and associating with subversive groups.

The arrests of the youth have spurred outrage inside and outside the DRC and inspired youth throughout the country to step up their fight for fundamental and lasting change in the DRC.


Supreme Court Injustice by Dr. Wilmer J. Leon, III

March 6, 2016

Supreme Court Injustice
By Dr. Wilmer J. Leon, III

NEWS ANALYSIS

wilmerleon-new

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - “The American people‎ should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice…Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new President." - Senate Majority Leader McConnell (R-KY)

With the passing of Supreme Court Justice Scalia Republicans have taken their hatred of and bigotry towards President Obama to another level.  Mainstream media is failing to call out the Republicans hypocrisy for what it is. McConnell and his racist band of thieves have taken the Supreme Court hostage and the American people don’t have the guts to pay the ransom.

There are a few simple problems with McConnell’s statement referenced above.  First, the American people have already spoken regarding the selection of Justice Scalia’s successor.  Their voices were heard loud and clear when they elected Senator Obama as President on November 4, 2008.  Their voices were even louder when President Obama was reelected for a second term on November 6, 2012.  Second, there is no constitutional nor historical support for the position taken by McConnell and his minions.

Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution is very clear on the issue of selecting and confirming a Supreme Court nominee. The President shall have the power to “…nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the Supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States…”

By blocking President Obama’s nominee Republicans have decided that they are going to potentially suspend the effectiveness of the Supreme Court just as they have brought the people’s business, the work of Congress to a screeching halt.  Without Scalia’s replacement the Court is operating with eight justices.  If the Court gets deadlocked in a 4-4 vote, the lower court (usually a state supreme court) decision is upheld.  The Supreme Court is neutered.

Republicans bigotry runs so deep that they would rather have a dysfunctional government than allow an African American President to effectively govern.  They have tried to mask their hatred as an ideological difference.

According to Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) “we are 1 justice away from a liberal majority”. Even if that is true would that really be that bad? The most liberal Supreme Court by most measures was the Warren Court (1953 – 1969).  Chief Justice Earl Warren, former Republican Gov. of California was nominated by a Republican President, Dwight Eisenhower.  Warren was confirmed with a unanimous voice vote by a Democratic Senate.

The Warren court gave us the Brown case, Miranda Rights, applied the exclusionary rule protecting us against illegal search and seizure to state courts (Mapp v. Ohio); extended the right to counsel in all criminal cases (Gideon) and constructed the right to privacy (Griswold).

Since the “right to privacy” is not explicitly stated in the Constitution many Conservatives have questioned the Warren Courts “construction” of the right to privacy in the Griswold case.  The Warren Court constructed the right based upon protections provided in the First Amendment, Third, Fourth and Fifth Amendments.  Today, the right to privacy is at the crux of the argument being presented by those siding with Apple as it challenges the FBI’s request to unlock iPhones.  This is another example of the power of forward thinking by a “liberal” court.

Journalists need to ask McConnell why President Obama should not be allowed to appoint a Supreme Court Justice in the last year of his term if it was constitutionally permissible for President Reagan to appoint Anthony Kennedy during Reagan’s last year in office.  A Senate controlled by Democrats confirmed Kennedy with 97-0 vote.  It’s also interesting, if not hypocritical that McConnell and Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) voted for Kennedy during Reagans last year.

Grassley has recently said, "The fact of the matter is that it’s been standard practice over the last 80 years to not confirm Supreme Court nominees during a presidential election year.”  Either Grassley has forgotten his vote for Kennedy in 1988, he can’t do simple math or he’s a hypocrite and a racist.

Why didn’t President Obama make a recess appointment to fill Scalia’s seat? Section II, Paragraph 2 of the Constitution also states, “The President shall have Power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session.”  It’s understood that such a recess appointee to the Supreme Court holds office only until the end of the next Senate session, no President since Eisenhower has made one and they have become quite controversial. Despite times call for desperate measures.  These are desperate times!

According to The New York Times, once Senate leaders said, “… that there would be no confirmation hearings, no vote, not even a courtesy meeting with President Obama’s nominee to replace Justice Antonin Scalia, all but slamming shut any prospects for an election-year Supreme Court confirmation” President Obama should have taken charge, used his Constitutional authority, appointed an African American woman and forced their hand. Imagine the political optics behind that move.  That would have been the Machiavellian move. Instead, he wants to talk with leadership and try to find “common ground”. He’s bringing a pea shooter to gun fight.

At the end of the day this is really simple.  There’s no constitutional or historic support for the Republican misleadership’s position.  They are operating based upon their bigotry towards and hatred of America’s first African American President and mainstream American media is allowing them to get away with it (and so is Obama).

Dr. Wilmer Leon is the Producer/ Host of the nationally broadcast call-in talk radio program “Inside the Issues with Leon,” on SiriusXM Satellite radio channel 126. Go to www.wilmerleon.com or email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. www.twitter.com/drwleon and Dr. Leon’s Prescription at Facebook.com.

Mexico is Our Neighbor, Not the Enemy By Jesse Jackson

March 6, 2016

Mexico is Our Neighbor, Not the Enemy
By Jesse Jackson

Jesse3

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Presidential campaigns often turn raw. Politicians reach for sound bites that bite. Often they gain by playing on fears, winning by division, not by addition. In 2016, insult has become the coin of the campaign, particularly in the Republican primaries. And too often the enemy singled out has been Mexico and Mexicans.

Mexico has been burlesqued as a source of illegal immigrants, who are slandered as rapists and criminals. Mexico is accused of taking our factories abroad and Mexican immigrants of stealing our jobs at home. Trumpets sound for building a wall across a 2,000-mile border, for deporting millions of Mexicans living in America, for booting out the Dreamers who were born here, and more.

We would be wise to step back and take a deep breath. Mexico isn’t our backdoor; it is our next-door neighbor. One hundred million people live in the 10 U.S. and Mexican states along the border region, and taken together these form the equivalent of the fourth largest economy in the world. Our ties with Mexico are deep, our peoples intertwined. They should not be reduced to a sound bite or an insult.

Thirty-four million Mexicans and Mexican-Americans live in the United States; about 22 million were born here. Every day, the U.S. and Mexico exchange $1.4 billion in two-way trade. Mexico is our second largest export market (after Canada). Mexico buys more U.S. goods than all of the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and Singapore) combined, nearly as much as the entire EU. Mexico is the third largest supplier of crude oil to the U.S. It is the largest export market for U.S. refined petroleum products and a growing market for our natural gas.

Cooperation between our two great countries is inescapable. We must and do coordinate on transportation, on legal entry points, on international organized crime, on trans-border infectious diseases and trans-border environmental challenges. In recent years focus has necessarily been placed on criminal activity — the flow of drugs coming north and the flow of guns and contraband cash going south. We are the biggest market for illegal drugs in the world. Our appetites feed the criminal drug rings that threaten entire countries. We have an obligation and a national interest in bolstering enforcement on both sides of the border.

We don’t need a wall; we need a bridge. We are neighbors, bound together by geography and by history. Now we hear all these fulminations about undocumented workers. People don’t leave their homes on a lark. They flee parched earth for green grass. For too long, we have exploited Mexican workers on both sides of the border. They pick our fruit and vegetables. They clean our houses. They fight and die in our wars, hoping for a green card and a shot at an American dream. Mexicans didn’t take our jobs to Mexico; U.S. corporations used NAFTA to take our jobs to Mexico. Mexicans don’t seek subminimum wages here. U.S. employers exploit the undocumented to pad their own pockets.

This furious debate about immigration is taking place as illegal immigration has virtually disappeared due to the lack of jobs in the U.S. The biggest flood of immigration came after NAFTA forced family farmers in Mexico to compete with subsidized agribusiness in the U.S. Many lost their lands and their livelihood and came north to survive. We need economic policies that work for working people on both sides of the border, not a policy of division and insult that allows employers to keep exploiting workers in both countries.

America’s strength is its diversity. And our security is enhanced by having close relations with our neighbors. American workers have every reason to be angry about an economy that is rigged to work against them and a politics that is corrupted by big money. But our Mexican neighbors didn’t do that, and building a wall won’t change it. The politics of insult ends up insulting us.

X