banner2e top

Suleimani Assassination: President Trump is Leading America Toward War Without End in the Middle East By Jesse Jackson

January 7, 2020

Suleimani Assassination: President Trump is Leading America Toward War Without End in the Middle East
By Jesse Jackson

NEWS ANALYSIS

gen.qasemsoleimani
General Suleimani  

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - It has come to this. An impeached president — still pending trial in the Senate — orders the assassination of a leading Iranian general as he is meeting with the leader of Iraq, a supposed ally. He does so without consultation, much less approval, of Congress. Besieged at home, he lashes out abroad.

This president ran on the promise to end the “endless wars “in the Middle East. Earlier, he ordered and then wisely called off bombing strikes on Iran, saying that he did not want a war. Now he claims that he has acted to stop a war, not start one.

He is either deliberately misleading the American people or deluding himself. Assassination of a foreign official is not the road to peace; violence almost inevitably begets violence. He has acted on what his own officials call “razor-thin” evidence, shocking his own military advisers. U.S. presidents now claim the right — and have the capability — to target and assassinate anyone in any place, foreigner or citizen, if they decide — on the basis of secret and often scanty intelligence — that the person may be considering an attack on U.S. allies or soldiers or representatives in the future. They call this potential threat evidence of an “imminent attack,” to pay mock respect to the international law that they are trampling.

General Qassim Suleimani is portrayed as a terrorist with American blood on his hands. But he was not a stateless terrorist. He was a high official in a foreign government with which we are not at war. Assassinating him is an act of war. Ironically, Iran and the Shiite militias in Iraq that Suliemani guided were leading, if unacknowledged, allies in the fight against ISIS, who are largely Sunnis.

Similarly, those who attacked the U.S. on 9/11 were Sunnis, almost all from Saudi Arabia, funded largely by Saudi money. Taliban in Afghanistan are Sunni. The attack on Yemen was led by Saudi Arabia, which is Sunni. Iran fought against ISIS in Iraq and Syria. Yet, somehow, it has become Trump’s leading target.

The road to this escalating conflict can be traced back to Trump’s perverse hatred of all things achieved by former President Barack Obama. One of Trump’s first acts was to pull the U.S. out of the Iran nuclear pact, over the objections of our allies and his own military advisers.

He ramped up sanctions on Iran, seeking to force them to surrender to a “better deal.” The result has been escalating tension and violence, as Iran has demonstrated — in attacks on Saudi oil facilities and on tankers in the Persian Gulf — that it has the capacity to strike back. Now, after the assassination, the entire region girds itself for the retaliation that has already been promised. This is utter folly.

Under George Bush, the U.S. destabilized this region by invading Iraq. That calamity has fostered escalating violence. Obama added to the mess seeking regime change in Syria and in Libya, spreading the chaos. Trump was right when he said it was time for the U.S. to get out of the Middle East.

We have no stake in the spreading conflict between Sunnis and Shiites. We have no desire to send the hundreds of thousands of troops needed to win a war or enforce a peace. All we are doing is squandering American lives and resources in an armed presence that simply adds to the violence without leading to a resolution. Why has Trump abandoned his campaign promise? Why did he abandon his wise decision not to strike Iran earlier? The only thing that has changed is that he has been impeached. Is he ramping up violence abroad to distract from the overwhelming evidence of his offenses? Is he using the U.S. military as a political campaign prop?

The next move is in Iran’s hands. If the regime reacts predictably by striking back, the assassination will lead to escalating violence. Eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth, and soon all are left without sight and without teeth. Iran could — if its leaders can rise above their grief and their anger — use this moment to take an initiative for peace, calling on our allies to join in convening a negotiation, opening a path to less violence and greater exchange.

Trump may not wish to respond, but surely our allies in Europe would jump at the chance. Clearly Congress must assert its constitutional war powers and limit the license of this or any president to wage war or assassinate foreign leaders on a whim. It must insist on public hearings to review the basis for the assassination. We need hearings on what we are doing in the Middle East and how we begin to bring the troops home.

Congress needs to pass a renewed war powers resolution instructing the president to bring the troops home, not send more of them to the region. If Congress cannot curb a rogue president, then this republic is in deep trouble. And the American people and its soldiers are headed deeper into wars without victory and without end.

Will the Assassination of Gen. Soleimani Be Trump’s 1914 Moment? By Dr. Wilmer J. Leon, III

Jan. 7, 2020

Will the Assassination of Iran's Gen. Soleimani Be Trump’s 1914 Moment?
By Dr. Wilmer J. Leon, III

wilmerleon-new
Dr. Wilmer Leon

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - "Last night, at my direction, the United States military successfully executed a flawless precision strike that killed a number one terrorist anywhere in the world, Qassem Soleimani…We took action last night to stop a war…We did not take action to start a war.” - President Donald Trump

On Friday, January 3, General Qassem Soleimani, Iran’s most beloved military commander and leader of its elite Quds force, was assassinated in a targeted US drone air strike outside Baghdad International Airport. Soleimani had relentlessly defended Iran and its interests in the Middle East for more than two decades.

US Secretary of State Michael Pompeo said that General Soleimani was killed in order to disrupt an "imminent attack" against American interests in the region. "I can't talk too much about the nature of the threats. But the American people should know that the President's decision to remove Soleimani from the battlefield saved American lives.", claims Pompeo.

It is important to recognize that neither the president nor Pompeo have offered any evidence to support this irresponsible and reckless action. It was lies from the Bush 43’ administration that took America into the illegal invasion of Iraq. It appears that lies and/or false narratives are being used to rationalize this latest heinous act that may also result in another senseless war.

Those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it. We know that President Trump is not well read, ignorant, not learned. Will the assassination of Gen. Soleimani become Trump’s 1914 moment?

Here's the background on this question: On June 28, 1914 Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria was assassinated by a Bosnian Serb nationalist during an official visit to the Bosnian capital of Sarajevo sparking a chain of events that led to the start of the World War I. As it was in 1914 it remains today. In several countries, it was a growing sense of nationalism, resistance to colonial rule and imperialism along with the constant quest for markets, territory and resources that laid the groundwork for Ferdinand’s assassination to trigger WWI. One can only wonder if Trump’s latest blunder will result in a similar outcome.

More frightening than the Trump administration’s blunder is the ahistorical context in which it is explained by many in US mainstream commercial media. One wonders if the media is engaging in a “wag-the-dog” scenario in order to defend failed ideas such as American exceptionalism.

Senator Warren, VP Biden and TV analysts say that General Soleimani’s assassination is morally justified since he “was a murderer” and had “American blood on his hands”. However, they also argue that from a tactical perspective, it was the wrong move at the wrong time. This is ahistorical, intellectually dishonest and hypocritical. There’s not a general in world who has been on the battlefield that does not have the blood of his enemy on his/her hands. General’s Schwarzkopf, Jr., Powell and Petraeus all have Iraqi blood on their hands. That’s what generals do.

Unlike Bush 43 and members of his administration, General Soleimani was never labeled a “war criminal” by the International Criminal Court or any other. According to Richard Clarke, former Bush 41’, 43’ and Clinton administration official, “…Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and their legal advisers…were tried in absentia in Malaysia...the five-panel tribunal unanimously delivered guilty verdicts against Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and their key legal advisors who were all convicted as war criminals for torture and cruel, inhumane and degrading treatment.”

General Soleimani was labeled a “terrorist”. The Trump administration took the unprecedented action of labeling Iran's Revolutionary Guard of which the Quds force is a part, a “terrorist organization”, thereby giving the general the designation. This was the first time the US labelled another nation's military as a terrorist organization.

Even more directly related to Iran, it was General’s Schwarzkopf’s father, General Herbert Norman Schwarzkopf, Sr. who along with Kermit Roosevelt implemented the 1953 coup d’état in Iran, known as Operation Ajax. This resulted in the overthrow of Iran’s democratically elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh and installed the dictatorial Shah. General Schwarzkopf, Sr. also helped to train what would later become known as the SAVAK; the Shah’s secret police that tortured and executed Iranian’s on behalf of the Iranian government, the CIA and the Israeli Mossad.

Iran is a sovereign nation. As such it is justified in using lethal force in order to protect it’s clearly defined geographic territory and borders against internal and external threats. Pompeo speaks in the context of defending American “interests”. “Where we see American interests at stake or fundamental norms around the world that need to be enforced, we’ll use all the powers that we have…” The term American interests is a very vague and ill-defined expansion of the lexicon that in the minds of Americans gives the US carte blanche to impose its will any place it sees fit. General Soleimani was defending his country and his country’s interests against the generations of threats and aggression of western imperialists. Again, to claim otherwise is ahistorical and incredibly hypocritical. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.

Analysts and commentators often opine that America’s relationship with Iran turned sour in 1979 with the taking of US hostages. They totally ignore the 1953 coup. They fail to explain that it was due to lies told to former President Carter, by former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and David Rockefeller that the Shah was dying from cancer and the only place in the world that he could receive treatment was in New York that convinced Carter to let the Shaw into the country. This resulted in a decision that Bloomberg reports led to "the seizure of American hostages in Tehran from 1979 to 1981."

The irresponsible decision to assassinate General Soleimani cannot be placed solely at the feet of Trump. One must ask Speaker Pelosi and the 188 Democrats that joined the GOP about handing Trump a $738B military budget devoid of the bipartisan amendment to stop the war in Iran. Since Soleimani’s assassination is an act of war, is it a coincidence that it occurred weeks after the NDAA was passed by the House?

This decision was dangerous, reckless, foolish and irresponsible. As Minister Farrakhan said about Bush 41’ in 1990, “…arrogance poisons one’s ability to properly assess reality…he’s your modern Pharaoh, your modern Caesar, your modern Nebuchadnezzar. He’s all wrapped up in all of those ancient sick men who got sick because they thought they were a god beside God…” So it was then; so it is today.

Let us pray that the leadership in Iran does not take the bait and recklessly respond. The world can ill afford for this to become Trump’s 1914 moment.

Dr. Wilmer Leon is the Producer/ Host of the nationally broadcast call-in talk radio program “Inside the Issues with Leon,” on SiriusXM Satellite radio channel 126. Go to www.wilmerleon.com or email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. www.twitter.com/drwleon and Dr. Leon’s Prescription at Facebook.com

© 2020 InfoWave Communications, LLC

 

 

 

Useful Guidelines for Action from Ancestral Warriors by A. Peter Bailey

Jan. 6, 2019

Useful Guidelines for Action from Ancestral Warriors
By A. Peter Bailey

apeterbailey

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - As we enter into a new year and a new decade, it will be to our advantage to pay much closer attention to serious guidelines from some of our most brilliant and committed ancestral warriors. In alphabetical order, they include the following:

Lerone Bennett, Jr.-“The Black middle class can no longer avoid its destiny. The Black middle class can no longer avoid the necessity of redefining itself in terms of the needs of black people. It is necessary now for the black middle class to become the servant of the black community and not the mediator of the white community...It is equally important for the black community to judge individuals on the basis of their contributions. Some men can write, some can fix cars, some can cook, some can raise hell: all—the writer, the mechanic, the cook, the hell raiser—are all valuable because their skills are complementary and not contradictory.”

Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.—“This plea for unity is not a call for uniformity. There must always be healthy debate. There will be inevitable differences of opinion...But Negroes can differ and still unite around common goals...This form of group unity can do infinitely more to liberate us than any action of individuals (italics his). We have been oppressed as a group and we must overcome that oppression as a group.”

Dr. Carter G. Woodson—“...The race needs workers, not leaders. Such workers will solve the problems which race leaders talk about and raise money to enable them to talk more and more about. When you hear a man talking, then, always inquire as to what he is doing or what he has done for humanity....It may be well to repeat here the saying that old men talk of what they have done, young men of what they are doing and fools of what they expect to do. Our race has had a rather large share of the last mentioned class.”

Brother Malcolm X—“Basically there are two kinds of power that count in America: economic and political, with social power deriving from the two. In order for the Afro-Americans to control their destiny, they must be able to control and affect the decisions which control their destiny: economic, political, social. This can only be done through organization. The Organization of Afro-American Unity will organize the Afro-American community block by block to make the community aware of its power and potential. We will start immediately a voter registration drive to make every unregistered voter in the Afro-American community an independent voter; we propose to support and/or organize political clubs to run independent candidates for office and to support any Afro-American already in office who answers to and is responsible to the Afro-American community....”

The question is whether we are intelligent enough as a group of people to follow the guidelines of our ancestral warriors.

New Decade Begins with Clear Black Agenda By Hazel Trice Edney

January 7, 2020

Note to Editors/Publishers: Please forgive the unusually long length of this article (Aprox. 1700 words). We deemed the length to be crucial given the weight of Black issues around the nation. Please feel free to cut/edit as necessary to fit your news space. - Hazel

New Decade Begins with Clear Black Agenda 
By Hazel Trice Edney

donaldtrump-officialpresidentialphoto
Trump impeachment highly supported by Black people, likely because of his fueling of racism and White supremacy.

 

campbellmelanie2
Activist Melanie Campbell maintains hope for increase in Black voting and Black elected leaders.

brown mike
Mike Brown is just one of the household names now iconic for the continuing issue of police killings of Black people.

blackskilledbypolice
Protests raged due to police killings of Black people.

 

conghearing-hands raised
2019 Congressional hearing showing Black homeownership groups agreeing that there are major issues with racial disparities. 

black-boys-suspended-more-nsn032514
Black youth are more often penalized and criminalized in public schools.

voters1
Attacks on voting rights remain major issue decades after the civil rights movement.

(TriceEdneyWire.com) – A clear Black agenda is laid out for the future as civil rights leaders, elected officials, political observers and activists celebrated the close of yet another decade of struggle and victories.

Voting rights, Black political participation, disparate killing and abuse of Black people by police; increasing White supremacy; and disparities in economic and educational systems will remain among the leading issues faced by African-Americans this decade. This according to a compilation of the highest profiled stories and reports between 2010 and 2020.

Black political participation

As the New Year of 2010 was celebrated, the euphoria hung heavily in the atmosphere as America had recently elected its first African-American president. A decade later, in 2020, the only three African-American Democratic presidential candidates – Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), and former Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick - did not even qualify for the last major debate Dec. 18 due to lack of financial support. Actually, by that time, Harris had already dropped out of the race. This leaves a field of White candidates in the forefront.

According to the latest CNN poll, former Vice President Joseph Biden continues to lead the race for the Democratic nomination. Among potential Democratic voters, Biden leads nationwide with 26 percent; Sen. Bernie Sanders is in a close second with 20 percent; and Sen. Elizabeth Warren is at 16 percent.

Nevertheless, Melanie Campbell, chair of the Black Women’s Roundtable and president/CEO of the National Coalition on Black Civic Participation, among the most prominent national non-partisan Black voting advocates, is optimistic about the future of Black and women candidates.

“Until people vote, polls are just polls. They’re a snapshot in time. President Obama, when he was a candidate, wasn’t doing great. But you see that he made it across the finish line,” Campbell said. “I’m of the mindset that hopefully by January we’ll see.”

Former Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams, a Black woman, is among those being considered viable vice presidential candidates. Abrams rose to fame across the nation in 2018 as she fought against voter suppression in her campaign against Secretary of State Brian Kemp. He prevailed by only about 55,000 votes.

Voting rights still under attack

Voting rights and voter suppression have remained front burner issues for the past two decades since President George W. Bush, amidst much fanfare in 2006, signed the reauthorization of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. But that hope quickly plummeted in 2013 as the U. S. Supreme Court gutted the Section 5 preclearance clause of the Voting Rights Act, which prohibited certain states and territories from changing voting laws without the oversight of and permission from the U. S. Department of Justice.

The Democrat-dominated U. S. House of Representatives, on December 6, 2019, passed legislation to restore the protections against changes in voting laws that could result in voter suppression. But the bill is not likely to become law under the predominately Republican Senate. And President Donald Trump has threatened to veto it.

While attacks from conservatives on voting rights are seen as the bottom line of voter disenfranchisement across the nation, leading voting advocates also say apathy within the Black community has prevented some gains. Donna Brazile, former chair of the Democratic National Committee, documented that more than 7 million prospective Black voters (7,135,303) were not registered in the spring of 2018.

Growth of White supremacy at the crux of 85 percent Black support of Trump impeachment

Meanwhile the impeachment of President Trump by the U. S. House of Representatives for abuse of power and obstruction of Congress has won wide applause from Black voters. The charges against Trump are based on his attempt to pressure Ukraine to investigate his political rival, Joseph Biden, by withholding nearly $400 million of military aid from the country.

“Eighty-five percent of African-Americans said President Trump should be impeached, the highest of any ethnic group, according to the latest NBC News-Wall Street Journal poll…However, only 41 percent of Whites do, according to the survey,” reported Richard Prince of Journal-isms.

Trump has become known for blatant insults against Black people. Those insults include his equating the rabid White supremacists who marched in Charlottesville, Va., resulting in the death of protestor Heather Heyer, with protestors who opposed the White supremacists. Trump shocked millions when he said, there were “very fine people on both sides.”

It is this kind of verbiage that has earned Trump a reputation as a racist, an extremist, and as one who has incited the growth and incubation of racism and White supremacy around the nation.

“The number of hate groups operating across America rose to a record high – 1,020 – in 2018 as President Trump continued to fan the flames of white resentment over immigration and the country’s changing demographics. It was the fourth straight year of hate group growth – a 30 percent increase roughly coinciding with Trump’s campaign and presidency,” wrote the Southern Poverty Law Center, America’s foremost tracker of racism and hate groups.

Police killings of Black people is now a leading cause of death

Trump was elected to office amidst an already volatile racial atmosphere in which the loose knit organization, Black Lives Matter, and others had emboldened the movement against police brutality and killings of Blacks, starting with the hashtag #BlackLivesMatter following the Feb. 26, 2012 killing of Trayvon Martin, 17, in Sanford, Fla.

Despite protests, the killings have remained consistent. According to a scientific report contained in the August 20, 2019 issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States or America, police violence is now a “leading cause of death among young Black men.”

Over the past decade, several high profiled cases of Black people killed by police have become household names. They include Philando Castile, 32, shot seven times in  Falcon Heights, Minnesota after telling Officer Jeronimo Yanez that he had a legal fire arm and assured him he was not reaching for it; Walter Scott, 50, shot in the back while running away from North Charleston, S. C. police Officer Michael Slager; Mike Brown, 18, shot dead in Ferguson, Mo. after confronted by police Officer Darren Wilson while simply walking down the street in his neighborhood; Eric Garner, 43, choked to death while pleading, “I can’t breathe” after confronted by Staten Island, N.Y. police officers while standing on the street; Tamir Rice, 12, immediately shot by Cleveland, Ohio Officer Timothy Loehmann as Rice wielded a play gun; and Baltimore’s Freddie Gray, 25, who was arrested as he left a coffee shop and died of a spinal cord injury sustained while in police custody.

These cases, among others, resulted in national protests as well as fiery riots in Ferguson and Baltimore. In Ferguson, the debut of police using military equipment shocked the world.

Yet, the most recent outrageous attacks by police have taken another turn. In recent incidents, police have attacked Black people in their own homes. Botham Jean, 26, was killed while sitting in his Dallas apartment as off-duty officer Amber Guyger burst in and shot him, later claiming she thought it was her apartment. Then 28-year-old Atatiana Jefferson, playing video games with her 8-year-old nephew, was shot dead through the window of her Fort Worth home by Officer Aaron Dean who subsequently resigned and is now charged with murder.

Black economic disparities still raging across the U. S.

On this issue, the statistics speak for themselves:

  • In February, 2019, there were only 2.6 million Black-owned businesses in the United States, whereas the U.S. Black population is estimated to be more than 40 million, according to the U. S. Black Chamber Inc.
  • The median wealth of White households is 20 times that of Black households.
  • The rate of Black homeownership in America was at 41.1 percent, according to 2019 census numbers – even lower than it was when the Fair Housing Act was signed into law 51 years ago on April 11, 1968. The White homeownership rate hovered at approximately 73 percent, according to the National Association of Real Estate Brokers. This issue prompted the founding of Black Wealth 2020 five years ago, a coalition of organizations established as a catalyst for Black economic justice.
  • Regardless of how high or low the national employment rate fluctuated over the past two decades, without fail, Black employment remained only half that of Whites.
  • Gentrification, called the new “negro removal” program, by Ron Daniels of the Institute of the Black World – 21st Century, continues to displace Black people and culture in record numbers in cities across the nation. The gentrification issue prompted an “emergency summit” by IBW last spring and promises to remain the focus of civil rights leaders.

Racial disparities in education and discipline continues as major issue in public schools

According to the U. S. Department of Education, Black children comprise 15 percent of students in public schools across the U. S. Yet, they accounted for 31 percent of the students either referred to law enforcement or arrested, according to the most recent US Department of Education’s Civil Rights Data Collection published bi- report annually.

Likewise, standardized test scores at majority Black public schools remain low, compared to majority White schools. But that has little to do with academic ability and much to do with wealth gaps reports

The racial "achievement gap" in standardized-test scores shouldn't be considered a racial gap at all, according to a study by the Center for Education Policy Analysis, which argues that the achievement gap should be called a “poverty gap.”

“U.S. public schools are highly segregated by both race and class,” says the report, released in the fall of 2019. “We use 8 years of data from all public school districts in the U.S. We find that racial school segregation is strongly associated with the magnitude of achievement gaps in 3rd grade, and with the rate at which gaps grow from third to eighth grade. The association of racial segregation with achievement gaps is completely accounted for by racial differences in school poverty: racial segregation appears to be harmful because it concentrates minority students in high-poverty schools, which are, on average, less effective than lower-poverty schools.”

Given the weight of these issues and others that have lingered from one decade to another, there is no doubt they will continue to fuel the civil rights agenda for years to come.

 

 

 

 

 

20/20 Vision By Dr. E Faye Williams, ESQ

Jan. 5, 2019

20/20 Vision
By Dr. E Faye Williams, ESQ 

drefayewilliamsnew

(TriceEdneyWire.com) — For some reason whenever I go to the eye doctor, I expect to get a good report on my vision. Sometimes I get one. Sometimes I don’t, but I am always hopeful. This year, I am truly hopeful that our leaders will have 20/20 vision so they can stop the warring attitudes and practices and the punishing behaviors toward the most vulnerable they have been chosen lead.

My prayer is for them to not just pray for, but work for a better and just world for all no matter where people live, the color of their skin or the culture from which they come.

My dream is for world leaders to care about everybody’s children, that no child would be left behind, that every child would have access to a useable education. Years ago when young people graduated from high school, it was understood that all of them would not be going to college, so they were taught useable skills so that they could go to work to make a living right out of high school. Whatever some may think of those days, I want to see that part of our past come back.

Is it possible for all of us to give meaning to this year being 20/20? Let it be the cue for all of us to think about what we can do to show that we have clearer vision. With wars, poor education systems, injustices especially for women and non-white people, the unemployment rate with a lack of livable wages for so many, the lack of hope for too many people, and the desire for instant gratification—these things lead to desperation and other negative outcomes.

Too many leaders have lost that 20/20 vision of where we should be going such that nobody wants to, or sees the wisdom of following them. We’ve lost confidence in them because few of them seem to care about nothing more than their own well-being.

General Colin Powell said, “Leadership is a position of problem solving which is conflict resolution. The day people stop bringing you (meaning leaders) their problems is the day you have stopped leading them. They’ve either lost confidence that you can help or concluded you do not care. Either case this is a failure of leadership.”

He also said, “Leadership is all about people. It is not about organizations. It is not about plans. It is not about strategies. It is all about people motivating people to get the job done. You have to be people centered.”

Further, he said, “None of us can change our yesterdays but all of us can change our tomorrows.”

There was a time that leaders convened with positive motives—really willing to compromise in order to accomplish great things for all the people. We, the people have a responsibility in electing and choosing leaders who make good on their promises once elected or chosen and not ones who just begin to flip flop on their promises depending on the way the wind blows or the money finds its way to their pockets. On that note, we the people must insist upon overturning the destructive Citizens United.

We, the people, must be determined that our leaders are qualified to lead. Just look at the man people elected to our White House has done to undermine certain members of his team. He is the total opposite of what a leader should be. He not only does not offer leadership for all the people, he does not offer leadership for vision to his team whose members might want to do the right thing. We, the people, must demand 20/20 visionary leaders.

(Dr. E. Faye Williams is the National President of the National Congress of Black Women. www.nationalcongressbw.org. 202/678/6788. She is also the host of Wake Up and Stay Woke on WPFW-FM 89.3.)

X