banner2e top

Senate Bill Quietly Curtails African Immigration by Jason Margolis

June 30, 2013

Senate Bill Quietly Curtails African Immigration
By Jason Margolis
africanprotest

African immigrants rally in front of the White House on April 3 to support keeping the Diversity Visa. Roughly 25,000 Africans come to the US each year through the program. PHOTO: Cameroon American Council

Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from New America Media

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Each year, 50,000 people are selected at random to immigrate to the United States. They don’t need specialized job skills or even a relative in the US. What they need most is a little luck, some basic educational or work training qualifications, and to be from a country with few recent immigrants living in the US.

The Diversity Visa, better known as the “Green Card Lottery,” is a little-known program inside the US, but is played by millions of people worldwide each year. It was established in 1990 to diversify the immigration population in the US, designed, in part, to help more Irish settle in the United States.

Over the past two decades though, the complexion of lottery winners has become noticeably darker. Today, about half of visa winners come from Africa.

The immigration bill making its way through the Senate would put an end it.

That’s sparked some anger among Africans living in the US, as well as the Congressional Black Caucus. They say if Africans aren’t fairly represented in the immigration overhaul, they’ll torpedo the bill.

Without the Diversity Visa, Africans like Dominic Tamin would’ve likely never made it to the US. Tamin’s father won the Green Card Lottery in the 1990’s, and Tamin came to New York from Cameroon on January 18, 1997.

“That’s when I arrived here. I remember because it was so cold outside. I’d never experienced that cold weather before.”

Tamin is now a high school math teacher and entrepreneur in Newark, New Jersey. He talks about the high number of African immigrants who work in the healthcare fields, in nursing and in-home caregiving. He’s active in the movement to save the Green Card Lottery.

“It’s something that is dear to my heart. I don’t know how to put this, because I’m so passionate about it.”

So, he decided to express his passion through music. He recently produced this song, “DV Lottery” sung by the artist MayJa Money.



This argument, though, isn’t convincing most leaders in Congress. Many Democrats have quietly turned their backs on the Diversity Visa, giving it up as a bargaining chip.

Republicans, like Congressman Bob Goodlatte from Virginia, have been more outspoken against it. Goodlatte’s office turned down an interview request, but here he is speaking against the Diversity Visa on the House floor last year.



In his floor speech, Goodlatte describes the Diversity Visa as “unfair to people from more than a dozen countries around the world that stand in long lines, on waiting lists, and then watch somebody have their name drawn out of a computer at random with no particular job skills, no ties to this country, and they get to go right past them into a Green Card into the United States.”

Mark Krikorian, the executive the Center for Immigration Studies in Washington, a think tank that advocates for less immigration to the US, agrees with that. He said the Green Card Lottery is ripe for fraud, and that terrorists could steal a winning lottery number and enter the US illegally.

Plus, he said, immigration policy should not be based on national origin.

“And so what the (Congressional) Black Caucus seems to be saying is somehow that (ending the Diversity Visa) is unjust because they want more people who look like them in the immigration flow,” Krikorian said. “And what I’d like to know is how is that different from someone saying, ‘Well, I want more white people immigrating to the United States.’ It’s exactly the same thing.”

“C’mon now, let’s look at the population of the nation,” said Democratic Congresswoman Yvette Clarke, when I posed this to her. Clarke represents Brooklyn in the House of Representatives and is a member of the Congressional Black Caucus.

Clarke said any new immigration law must include a dedicated flow for African and Afro-Caribbean immigrants. Currently, Africans come to the US in three primary ways: asylum seekers, family visas, and the Diversity Visa program.

“We want to be sure that this nation is not one that doesn’t continue to welcome people of African descent and that it is comparable to what we do for others coming from around the world,” Clarke said.

It’s not comparable right now, argues Sylvie Bello, the founder and CEO of the Cameroon American Council in Washington. Bello said the immigration bill includes programs designed to benefit Asians, Latinos and European immigration, such as 10,500 visas annually set aside for Irish immigrants. But there’s nothing specifically for Africans.

“They’re taking us back to the Jim Crow era when we could only come to this country through special programs,” Bello said. “Yes, some of us will qualify for the STEM visa, but it was not created with us in mind. Yes, some of will qualify for the DREAM Act, but it was not made with us in mind. Yes, some of us may qualify for the agriculture visa, but it wasn’t made with us in mind. The only visa type that has a high proportion of Africans that come through is the Diversity Visa.”

Bello said she hopes President Barack Obama will speak about immigration on his visit to Africa this week. And that he remembers a time not long ago when very few Africans made it to America, Africans like Obama’s own father. He came here on a student visa.

Supreme Court Decision Reopens Door for Restrictive Voting Laws by Zenitha Prince

June 30, 2013

Supreme Court Decision Reopens Door for Restrictive Voting Laws
Texas Voter ID Law Revived

By Zenitha Prince
voting rights
Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from the Afro American Newspaper
(TriceEdneyWire.com) - One predicted consequence the Supreme Court’s invalidation of a central portion of the Voting Rights Act this week is already manifesting.

Voting rights activists had warned that the high court’s decision could result in the reintroduction and reenactment of previously blocked restrictive voting laws. On June 27, the Supreme Court threw out lower court rulings which barred a Texas voter ID law and a redistricting plan as discriminatory.

The justices ordered the lower courts to reexamine the case in light of their June 25 decision, which effectively gutted the provision of the Voting Rights Act that requires jurisdictions with a history of discrimination against minority voters, such as Texas, to obtain federal preapproval before making any changes to the election laws.

Five out of nine justices said Congress needs to recalibrate the formula used to determine eligible jurisdictions to match the evidence of racial progress.

Many activists and political observers doubt, however, whether this deeply divided Congress would have the political will to get it done. And, in the meantime, critics say, American democracy is being eroded.

At least 180 restrictive bills, which would make it harder to vote, were introduced since the beginning of 2011 in 41 states, the Brennan Center for Justice said in a report. Voting rights advocates fought back and many measures were impeded by citizen referendums, court rulings or by the Department of Justice. But now the Supreme Court’s decision handicaps such efforts and reopens the door to vote-stifling measures.

The Supreme Court decision “is a setback to our democracy and the voting rights of real Americans,” Wade Henderson, president and CEO of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, said in a June 27 statement. “We can’t allow discrimination at the ballot box and must prevent minorities from having their votes purged, packed, gerrymandered, and redistricted away. No one should be fooled by the Pollyannaish fantasy that voting discrimination no longer exists…. We urge Congress to act with urgency and on a bipartisan basis to protect voting rights for minorities.”

March on Washington Anniversary Organizers Aim for Change By Hazel Trice Edney

June 24, 2013

March on Washington Anniversary Organizers Aim for Change
By Hazel Trice Edney

marchonwashingtonannouncement2

Martin Luther King III, surrounding by fellow civil rights leaders, tells his dream for the 50th Anniversary of the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom.
PHOTO: Ebonie Riley/National Action Network

(TriceEdneyWire) – At the time of the Aug. 28, 1963 March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, there were 22 million people living in poverty in America. Upon the 50th Anniversary this year, that number has nearly tripled to 60 million.

This according to Martin Luther King III who has joined with dozens of civil and human rights leaders to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the march led by his father. A press conference held at the National Press Club June 24 drew dozens of high profile religious, civic and labor leaders, all vowing to unite and not only commemorate but renew the fight for equality and justice. They expect at least 10,000 to converge on Washington, D.C. for at least five days of events in late August.

“This is almost like a campaign,” King said. “First I’d like to think that we’d achieved the dream that Martin Luther King Jr. envisioned for our nation and parts of our world. But I’m sad to say that we have not achieved that dream. And so while some will see this as a commemoration, it is truly a continuation of being in the struggle of organizing communities around this nation – again, not just for this day.”

King continued, “We already know the issues. We know the issues around immigration. We know the issues around voting, we know the issues around poverty and no jobs in this country; We know that in 1963 there were 22 million people living in poverty, roughly and today there are nearly 60 million - unacceptable in a nation with so much wealth and so many resources and so much ingenuity. And the only way that we can change this is creating the right climate.”

Among dozens of national organizational heads in attendance were King’s sister, the Rev. Bernice King, the Rev. Al Sharpton, who presided at the press conference, Ben Jealous of the NAACP, Melanie Campbell of the National Coalition on Black Civic Participation, Wade Henderson of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, Charles Steele of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference and Dr. E. Faye Williams of the National Congress of Black Women.

Sharpton, who will co-lead the planned march with King, stressed that the 50th anniversary commemoration will not be a one-day event. “This will be the realigning of a coalition that will go and impact and affect where we are going in this country for the next several years and decades to come,” he said.

Unlike 1963, Sharpton said women and gays will play prominent roles on the forefront of the march and other activities, indicating how today’s civil rights leaders have ended misogynistic and other discriminatory ways. Moreover, the desire is to impact the nation for the better, Sharpton said.

“Like what Dr. King, Roy Wilkins, A. Phillip Randolph and Dr. [Dorothy] Height did in 1963 led to the ‘64 Civil Rights Act and the ‘65 Voting Rights Act, what we do in this August we intend to help shape and change legislation and the body politic and the spirit of this country going forward,” Sharpton said. “And we intend to address the powers in the kingdom and make change happen.”

Rev. Bernice King, president of the Martin Luther King Center for Social Change, who has taken the lead in organizing the five-day event, ticked off numerous festivities, including the commemorative march on Washington, slated for Saturday, August 24. More details, including times and locations, will be announced later. In a nutshell - the following are among the events she outlined:

  • Thursday and Friday, August 22 and 23 a string of town hall meetings, youth trainings, forums, receptions and a women’s intergenerational dialogue will take place.
  • On Saturday, August 24, there will be the march culminating on the Washington Mall, but also a “global freedom festival” will open on the mall. She described the global festival as four days of education, entertainment and activities for families and youth.
  • On Sunday, Monday and Tuesday, August 25, 26, and 27, there will be youth initiatives focused mainly on educating the next generation.
  • On Wednesday, Aug. 28, the actual anniversary of the 1963 March on Washington, a  9 a.m. Interfaith Service will be held at the foot of the King Memorial, the Stone of Hope. She said it will feature tributes from children and adults.
  • Also on Wednesday, Aug. 28, at 1 p.m., there will be a “Let Freedom Ring Global Commemoration Celebration Call to Action” on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial. That event will include tributes and entertainment from leaders; culminating with a “Let Freedom Ring” bell ringing at 3 p.m. She said states are asked to participate in the bell-ringing, “recommitting ourselves” to continue the work of freedom.

“Struggle is a never-ending process,” Rev. King quoted her mother, Coretta Scott King. “We are still fighting for freedom. This is a continuation of the freedom struggle.”

The leaders of the commemoration are hoping for a new movement that will sweep the nation:

“I am confident and convinced that our nation can and must and will do better,” said Martin King III. “But, it is our responsibility to challenge this nation. And again, that’s why we will come together in large numbers on August 24. But we will be going around to communities all over this nation over the next 24 months, mobilizing at every level - bringing business leaders, community leaders, religious leaders and elected officials together to determine how we’re going to define a strategic plan that brings about that freedom, justice and equality for our communities and ultimately for our nation.”

There is Strong Statistical Evidence that Politics is Resegregating by David A. Bositis, Ph.D.

June 30, 2013

State of Equality and Justice in America:
There is Strong Statistical Evidence that Politics is Resegregating
By David A. Bositis, Ph.D.
NEWS ANALYSIS
david bositis

David Bositis
(TriceEdneyWire.com) - There are demographic changes occurring in the United States that will change politics and public policy and make this country a more humane and equitable place. In another 20 to 30 years the U.S. will be a majority-minority country and White supremacy will be a discredited idea of the past. But we are not living in that future time. And for African-Americans, more than half of whom live in the southern states, the facts do not speak to a just or equitable society.

Black unemployment is twice that of Whites. The average Black income is much less. Black family financial assets are one-twentieth that of Whites. There are large racial disparities in health and access to health care and much higher high school drop-out rates for African-Americans; and of course much higher incarceration rates.

The gains that African-Americans have seen since the Civil Rights movement were substantially built on Black votes and civic participation. But despite the hardship and struggles that many African-Americans face, there are many who would oppose the progress and promise the future holds. The U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision in Shelby County v. Holder opened the door to widespread efforts in the South to diminish minority voting rights.

By invalidating Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act, the court has effectively eliminated Section 5 federal oversight. The current U.S. House of Representatives will almost certainly not provide a new definition for Section 4 coverage, and so Section 5 is out for the foreseeable future.

By next year's midterm elections, there will likely be photo identification laws operative in all the southern states, and Blacks and Hispanics are much more likely than Whites to lack government issued photo ids. The changes will not only involve photo identification laws. There will be a headlong rush to change election laws across Section 5 jurisdictions in order to discourage minority voters. This will involve not only state governments but local ones as well.

Section 2 is still in effect, but with no preclearance provisions. What this means is that all sorts of election changes will be put into effect to diminish minority votes - moving and locating polling places, changing hours, the mechanics of voting - not to mention extralegal intimidation - without federal intervention.

Even when these changes are challenged and the civil rights community 'wins' the legal case, the minority community's preferred candidate may still lose, and then the Section 2 cases result in consent decrees where the opposing side agrees not to do the same thing (actions to discourage minority voters) again - at least until the next election. The results of elections - even unfair elections - are rarely undone.

Following the election of President Barack Obama, some political observers - mostly conservative ones - suggested that the United States was now a post-racial society. At the present time, five years later, in the region of the country where a majority of African-Americans live, the South, there is strong statistical evidence that politics is resegregating with African-Americans once again excluded from power and representation.

Black voters and elected officials have less influence now than at any time since the Civil Rights Movement. Less than a handful of the 320 Black state legislators in the South serve in the majority in their legislative chambers. And southern state constitutions invest in the state legislatures' power over all aspects of government in those states, including local government.

Conservative Whites control all of the political power there, and they are enacting legislation and adopting policies both neglectful of the needs of minorities - in health care, education, employment - as well as some that are downright hostile to the rights of African-Americans , e.g., the assault on voting rights through photo identification laws and other means.

Last month, the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies published a report based on a survey of the five Deep South states (the states with the proportionally largest black populations - Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia and South Carolina) on attitudes toward Medicaid expansion. Majorities of the populations in all five states, and large majorities of African-Americans in those states, favored expansion. The state legislatures in those five states oppose expansion, and the disproportionally uninsured Black populations of those states will suffer the consequences.

Has the United States become a more just and equitable society? Almost 50 years ago - around the time that the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law was founded, Robert F. Kennedy gave a speech at the 1964 Democratic National Convention where he quoted from one of his brother's favorite poets: "...but I have promises to keep and miles to go before I sleep, and miles to go before I sleep."

David A. Bositis, Ph.D., a senior research associate for the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies, is a foremost expert on voting and Black political participation in America. This article - the twentieth of a 20-part series - is written in commemoration of the 50th Anniversary of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, of which Congressman John Lewis is grand marshal. The Lawyers' Committee is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization, formed in 1963 at the request of President John F. Kennedy to enlist the private bar's leadership and resources in combating racial discrimination and the resulting inequality of opportunity - work that continues to be vital today. For more information, please visit www.lawyerscommittee.org.

Zimmerman Jury Selected, Testimony Starts This Week

Zimmerman Jury Selected, Testimony Starts This Week

zimmerman-trayvon

George Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - The trial of George Zimmerman started in earnest this week in Sanford, Fla., where he killed unarmed teenager Trayvon Martin. A jury of six women - five white and one Black Hispanic – has been set to hear the case.

The proceedings culminate more than a year of protests and debate over the racially charged case in which 17-year-old Martin, who is Black, was shot while walking home to his father’s house after going to a neighborhood store for iced tea and Skittles.

Police tapes appear to make it clear that Zimmerman, a White Hispanic Neighborhood Watch captain, pursued Martin, profiling him as a troublemaker. The key question that the jury must solve is whether Zimmerman should be found guilty of second degree murder or whether he was acting in self-defense after a struggle ensued between the two.

Judge Debra Nelson has ruled out expert testimony on whether it was Zimmerman or Martin screaming for help, heard in the background on police 911 tapes. Two experts had said it is Trayvon Martin’s voice. But, an FBI analyst said the recording is too short for that opinion to be conclusive.

Despite the ruling against expert testimony on the audio, relatives of either Martin or Zimmerman are allowed to testify whose voice they believe it is, including Martin’s mother.

The high profile case is being viewed as yet another hallmark of racism in America, where Black men are often victims of police profiling and brutality.

X