banner2e top

Public Opposing Plan for Incinerator in New Orleans' 9th Ward By Mason Harrison

Sept. 30, 2012

Public Opposing Plan for Incinerator in New Orleans' 9th Ward
By Mason Harrison

Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from the Louisiana Weekly

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Battle lines continue to be drawn in the public fight over a proposed trash incinerator in the Ninth Ward—engulfing business leaders, community activists and elected officials—as conflicting reports emerge about whether developers for the project have backed away from the proposal or are shelving the plan until constructing the facility becomes more politically tenable.

Sun Energy Group, the New Orleans-based firm pushing the proposal, has tried for several years to get the green light to erect a “gasification” plant in the Regional Business Park in New Orleans East that would dispose of tons of local and out-of-state garbage materials by turning the refuse into gases like carbon monoxide, hydrogen and carbon dioxide.

But the gas-induced process is controversial and has raised the ire of local politicians and community leaders. Local environmental activist Cathy Charbonnet compiled a list of risk factors associated with gasification technology, including the potential for toxic gas seepage into the atmosphere, increased energy usage and exposure to cancer-causing agents.

“This is not just a problem for the Ninth Ward,” Charbonnet said. “This is a problem for the whole city. I want to stress that. This is a problem for the whole city. Gases from these plants are able to travel up to 250 miles from their source.” Charbonnet believes the effort to place the plant “among poor Black people” is “not surprising” and is an example of environmental racism.

The issue was also raised at a September 13 candidate forum for the District E City Council race and has made its way once again to City Hall.

State Rep. Austin Badon, who is running for the District E post, called gasification “an untested technology” and stressed his “long history” of opposing the Sun Energy plant.

But James Gray, an attorney also running in District E, declined to condemn the proposed plant, stating, “I’m a lawyer, not a scientist. I wouldn’t be qualified to address the safety of the proposal.” Gray also noted that Sun Energy founder D’Juan Hernandez indicated that the trash incinerator planned for the area “wasn’t going to happen” following continued opposition to the effort from activists and politicians.

A spokesperson for Sun Energy said the plan is merely “on hold” but declined to provide further details about the proposal or shed light on the discussion between Gray and Hernandez. Hernandez did not respond at press time to repeated attempts to reach him directly for comment about the ongoing controversy and resistance to his firm’s proposal.

Marie Hurt, state director for the group A Community Voice, said Sun Energy’s statement that the project is on hold has been the company’s “standard line” while it continues to push for approval from the city’s planning commission to build the facility. “We know that they have been lobbying local elected officials behind the scenes to gain support for this plan,” Hurt said. She and other opponents of the plant believe local government support will help smooth the way for federal environmental regulators to sign off on the idea and not investigate the proposal in a thorough fashion.

Last month, the Deep South Center for Environmental Justice at Dillard University sent a letter to Mayor Mitch Landrieu outlining its opposition to the plant, calling the project “dangerous” and “not the answer to our community’s landfill problem or energy needs.” Plants like the one proposed by Sun Energy, the group said, “have a history of operational problems including explosions, cracks in the reactor siding due to high temperatures and corrosion, and leaking waste water basins.”

Gasification plants in other parts of the world are also known to “emit toxic chemicals, toxic metals and other pollutants into [the] air,” a factor known to Sun Energy, but is missing from the company’s paperwork submitted to gain approval for the project, according to the environmentalists at Dillard. The treatment of “large amounts of garbage will undermine recycling, zero waste and renewable energy programs that are vital to the health, environment and economic well-being of New Orleans. Citizens are concerned that the proposed Sun Entergy site can negatively impact the economic recovery of New Orleans East, the Lower Ninth Ward, and Gentilly.” The letter was signed by 14 other groups and individuals.

The Landrieu administration, however, did not respond to requests for comment about the letter or the mayor’s stance on the proposed plant.

Sun Energy has stated that the gasification project would produce jobs in a hard-hit area of the city and has countered charges that the proposed technology is dangerous. But the group’s efforts to win over public sentiment have stalled and have been resisted by area activists and elected officials since the inception of the company’s proposal to locate the plant in New Orleans East.

In 2009, then-U.S. Rep. Joseph Cao publicly opposed the proposed plant and questioned the safety of the technology used to turn what proponents call “waste-to-energy.” Cao blasted Sun Energy’s business plan as “suspect” and charged the firm with having a simple desire to make money at the expense of poor and disadvantaged New Orleanians.

NAACP Takes Felon Voting Rights Fight to U.N.

Sept. 30, 2012

NAACP Takes Felon Voting Rights Fight to U.N.

Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from GIN

Voting_Rights_Sign

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - The NAACP spoke up at the 21st session of the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva, Switzerland this week for the rights of millions of former felons who have been denied the right to vote.

“Today, nearly 5.3 million U.S. citizens have been stripped of their voting rights on a temporary or permanent basis, including more than 4.4 million citizens who are no longer incarcerated,” said Lorraine Miller, chair of the Advocacy and Policy Committee of the NAACP board of directors, during a panel discussion.

“We commend U.S. Attorney General Holder for his work to prevent the implementation of recent challenges to voting rights,” Miller added. “However, we remain deeply concerned with the continued practice and discriminatory impact of felony disenfranchisement. We are here to urge the United Nations’ Special Rapporteur on Racism to investigate racially discriminatory election laws.”

Earlier this year, the NAACP sent a delegation to Geneva to bring attention to a suite of laws, including voter ID measures, voter roll purges and reduced voting hours that could result in voter suppression.

Many of those measures, along with laws that bar felons from voting booths, unfairly target African Americans and other minorities, NAACP officials argued. More than two million African-Americans are among those felons who cannot vote, yet African Americans make up less than 13 percent of the U.S. population, officials said.

Kemba Smith Pradia, a convicted felon whose romantic link to a drug dealer resulted in her incarceration, decried the fact that she cannot vote in her home state of Virginia.

A published author and ex-offender rights advocate, Pradia said she believes such policies are guided by racism.

“Even if I did understand the state of Virginia’s hesitancy to automatically restore a [felony convict’s] right to vote, how could the state totally ignore that these felony disenfranchisement laws had racial intent and emerged after the 15th Amendment?” she said at the panel.“In 1901, Virginia state delegate Carter Glass stated, ‘This plan…will eliminate the darkey as a political factor in this State in less than 5 years, so that in no single county…will there be the least concern felt for the complete supremacy of the white race in the affairs of government.’

“It's time for Virginia to right this wrong and follow suit with the majority of other states across the United States.”

Virginia joins Florida, Iowa and Kentucky as the only states that continue to disenfranchise persons convicted of felonies even after they have completed their sentence. Florida joined the list this year after current Gov. Rick Scott (R) reinstated felony disenfranchisement restrictions even though his two predecessors, Jeb Bush and Charlie Crist) worked to remove them.

Hilary Shelton, NAACP senior vice president for advocacy, said such policies block access to the ballot box to those who need it most.

“These forms of disenfranchisement prevent those most in need of an advocate from the ability to elect someone who will represent their concerns: the need for a decent public education, for a health care system that addresses their specific demographic needs, as well as the creation of decent jobs, a functional criminal justice system and other basic human needs.”

National Congress of Black Women Bestows Five with 'Truth Award'

National Congress of Black Women Bestows Five with 'Truth Award'

ncbwawardees

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Six Black professionals were honored by the National Congress of Black Women during its Annual Brunch following the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation’s Annual Legislative Conference on Sunday, Sept. 23. Dr. E. Faye Williams, national chair of the organization, presented the recipients of the 2012 Truth Awards and the Good Brother Award before a packed audience of nearly 800.

Named for abolitionist and rights activist Sojourner Truth, the Truth Awards are given each year to women who display remarkable leadership in their fields. A Good Brother award is also given.

Pictured, Left to Right are: Good Brother award recipient Dr. John Hope Bryant, founder of Operation Hope, America’s first non-profit social investment banking organization; NCBW Chair Dr. Williams; and Truth Award recipients:  Veteran Black Press journalist Hazel Trice Edney, president/CEO of Trice Edney Communications and News Wire, the first Black woman owner of a national news wire; Award-winning Secret Service veteran Paula A. Reid, Special Agent in Charge of the Miami Field Office of the Secret Service; nationally-renowned psychiatrist and race-theorist Dr. Francis Cress Welsing, author of the Cress Theory on Color Confrontation and Racism; Retired Air Force Pilot Monica Smith, accepting the posthumous award for Mildred Hemmons Carter, Alabama’s first Black female pilot and the first civilian hired for the Tuskegee air project; and integrative family physician Sakilibi Mines, MD, a prolific health educator and medical director at the Institute of Multidimensional Medicine and Medical Spa.

Amidst Same-Sex Marriage Debate: Jackson, Sharpton Implore Blacks to Keep 'Eyes on the Prize' By Hazel Trice Edney

Amidst Same-Sex Marriage Debate: Jackson, Sharpton Implore Blacks to Keep 'Eyes on the Prize'
By Hazel Trice Edney

rev.jacksonsomber

Rev. Jesse Jackson Sr. PHOTO: Roy Lewis/Trice Edney News Wire

revalsharptonpointing

Rev. Al Sharpton PHOTO: Roy Lewis/Trice Edney News Wire

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Why is it that with the Black jobless rate astronomically high, schools crumbling in Black neighborhoods, low test scores and dropout rates plaguing Black children and home foreclosures, incarceration, death and disease soaring in Black communities, why is it that some Black people are saying they will not go to the voting polls because President Barack Obama agrees with same-sex marriage?

That is the question that brought the Rev. Jesse Jackson to tears on Saturday, Sept. 22, during a forum at the Congressional Black Caucus Annual Legislative Conference. The question also riles the Rev. Al Sharpton, who believes some people are actually being paid to advocate staying home on Nov. 6.

Rev. Jackson used a handkerchief to wipe away tears as he sat on the panel at the Saturday morning brunch, recalling how he was jailed on July 6, 1960 for trying to use a public library and still targets pervasive racial injustices across America. Given the atrocities he sees, he’s “not quite ready to prioritize same-sex marriage” as an issue in the Black community.

Teaching the audience a quick lesson that brought them to roaring and empathetic laughter, he asked them to respond to the following questions:

“How many of you have a relative in jail? Raise your hand…How many of you support Medicare and Medicaid? Raise your hand…How many of you support social security? Raise your hand…How many have or know someone with home foreclosure? Raise your hand...You know somebody in student loan debt? Raise your hand…You know somebody with credit card debt? Raise your hand…You know of voter suppression? Raise your hand…You know somebody who needs a job? Raise your hand.”

With nearly every hand raised in response to most questions, Rev. Jackson then hit the audience with the unexpected question: “How many have ever been invited to a same-sex marriage?...How many has ever had one in your church?” Not a hand was raised in the room of about 300 people, who broke into laughter – mainly at themselves.

“While we [should be] arguing about our option of Medicare, Medicaid, housing, jobs, and justice, we are arguing about whether someone has the right to engage in a wedding that you were not invited to,” Rev. Jackson said as the audience roared with applause and laughter.

Rev. Jackson said he believes the same-sex marriage debate in the Black community is being caused by right wing conservatives who have pushed their priorities onto the Black community. "I don’t want anybody to jump line and pull on us their priority,” he said.

Likewise, the Rev. Al Sharpton also believes the pervasive discussion on same-sex marriage is a sinister agenda on the part of a stealth right wing that might even be funding those Blacks who advocate not going to the polls.

“I would say that that is the most ridiculous thing I’ve heard,” Sharpton said in a brief interview during Saturday night’s CBCF Phoenix Awards Dinner. “First of all, we have disagreed with every president on something. Bill Clinton put bills through that hurt us – welfare reform..We’ve never talked about not voting. I think that some of the people who are saying this are sponsored by our enemies because show me anywhere in history where we’ve ever said we’re not going to vote because we disagree with the opinion of a president. He didn’t propose a law, he didn’t say he was going to campaign for a law. He gave an opinion and then all of a sudden they tell people don’t vote? Somebody’s sponsoring this.”

The Rev. Dr. Jamal-Harrison Bryant, who has aimed to register a million voters before the Nov. 6 election says he has been told directly by some pastors that they will not be voting because of President Obama’s stance on same-sex marriage. This position gives civil rights leaders an even greater urgency to inspire people to go to the polls.

“President Barack could actually win the debates and lose the election,” said Jackson.  “I would urge us to keep your eyes on the prize. Hold on. Hold on. Don’t win the same sex debate and lose the right to a house, health, education, jobs, and justice.”

First Lady at CBC Dinner: 'Our Journey is Far, Far from Finished!' By Hazel Trice Edney

First Lady at CBC Dinner: 'Our Journey is Far, Far from Finished!'
By Hazel Trice Edney

michelleobamacbcdinner

michelleobamacbccrowd

First Lady Michelle Obama pauses to talk to a young girl as she presses through 
the crowd after address the Congressional Black Causes Annual Phoenix Awards
Dinner. PHOTOS: The White House

(TriceEdneyWire.com) – First Lady Michelle Obama, speaking to a standing-room-only dinner crowd of more than 2,000 mostly African-Americans Saturday night, drew from the experience of the Civil Rights Movement to inspire people to vote, saying although “there are no more ‘whites only’ signs keeping us out, no one barring our children from the schoolhouse door, we know that our journey is far, far from finished!”

Receiving rousing applause from the audience at the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation’s Annual Phoenix Awards Dinner, Mrs. Obama, who has accompanied the President as he addressed the dinner the past three years, clearly intended to inspire the people to turn out on Nov. 6 – even in an atmosphere of voter intimidation in dozens of states around the nation and during a season of apparent voter apathy in the Black community.

"So we cannot let anyone discourage us from casting our ballots," she said. "We cannot let anyone make us feel unwelcome in the voting booth. It is up to us to make sure that in every election, every voice is heard and every vote is counted. And that means making sure our laws preserve that right. It means monitoring the polls to ensure that every eligible voter can exercise that right."

She continued, "This is the movement of our era -- protecting that fundamental right not just for this election, but for the next generation and generations to come. Because in the end, it’s not just about who wins, or who loses, or who we vote for on Election Day. It’s about who we are as Americans."

Dozens of Republican-led states have taken on new voter laws; particularly requirements that voters show identifications at the polls. Despite contentions that the new laws are meant to prevent voter fraud, civil rights leaders contend the motive is to inhibit the voting of Blacks and Latinos, especially given that there is little evidence of a voter fraud problem in the U. S. Civil rights leaders predict at least five million African-Americans could be disenfranchised because of the changes.

Though the First Lady only alluded to voter intimidation as she spoke of the fight for the right to vote, her speech focused as much on the possibility that some might stay at home on Election Day.

“As citizens of this great country, that is our most fundamental right, our most solemn obligation -- to cast our ballots and have our say in the laws that shape our lives. Congressman Lewis understood the importance of that right. That's why he faced down that row of billy clubs on the Edmund Pettus Bridge, risking his life so we could one day cast our ballots,” she said. “But today, how many of us have asked someone whether they’re going to vote, and they say, no, I’m too busy -- and besides, I voted last time; or, nah, it’s not like my vote is going to make a difference? See, after so many folks sacrificed so much so that we could make our voices heard, too many of us still choose not to participate.”

As Mrs. Obama exhorted people to the polls, the President was out on the campaign trail. In fact, as the CBC dinner got started at 6, the President was campaigning in Milwaukee.

Though her speech was punctuated with applause, the quiet buzz among people in the audience was still about the President’s absence.

“She was on point. She probably wasn’t as fiery as the President would have been, but the message was well-spoken and well-taken,” said Gretchen Wharton, a Washington, D.C. native who has attended when the President was speaking.

Last year, President Obama received thunderous applause although some CBC members took offense to his chiding, telling them to “stop complaining”. The President’s subtle rebuke was an obvious response to some CBC members who had publically criticized him for not taking direct action to lower the Black jobless rate.

The message of First Lady Michelle Obama was clearly different, even stroking the 41-year-old, 43-member CBC with a large part of her speech, which was focused on the Caucus’ history and struggles on behalf of America.

“Since its earliest days, this caucus has been taking on challenges and leading the way in the urgent work of perfecting our union -- fighting for jobs and health care, working to give all our children opportunities worthy of their promise, standing up for the least among us every day, and earning the proud distinction as the ‘conscience of Congress.’”, she said to applause. “That is the legacy of this Caucus. And that's also what I want to talk a little bit about tonight. I want to talk about how we carry on that legacy for the next generation and generations to come.”

Ultimately, she used a story to remind the audience of the fact that, despite any disagreements with the President, they helped him to make history four years ago as the Nation’s first Black President. In doing so, she told the story of a little boy who visited the White House with his parents and brother and a photo that resulted.

“The father was a member of the White House staff, and he’d brought his wife and two young sons to meet my husband. In the photo, Barack is bent over at the waist. And one of the sons -- a little boy, just about five years old -- is reaching out his tiny little hand to touch my husband’s head,” she described.

“And it turns out that upon meeting Barack, this little boy gazed up at him longingly and he said, ‘I want to know if my hair is just like yours.’ And Barack replied, ‘Why don’t you touch it and see for yourself?’ So he bent way down so the little boy could feel his hair. And after touching my husband’s head, the little boy exclaimed, ‘Yes, it does feel the same!’”

Mrs. Obama concluded, “Now, every couple of weeks, the White House photographers change out all the photos in the West Wing -- except for that one. That one -- and that one alone -- has hung on that wall for more than three years. So if you ever wonder whether change is possible, I want you to think about that little black boy in the office -- the Oval Office of the White House -- touching the head of the first Black President.”

With that, she exhorted the applauding audience to press their way to the polls in the face of the history and modern day racial struggle in America:

“So through all the many heartbreaks and trials, all of you, and so many who came before you, you have kept the faith. You could only see that Promised Land from a distance,” she said. “But you never let it out of your sight. And today, if we are once again willing to work for it, if we’re once again willing to sacrifice for it, then I know -- I know -- that we can carry on that legacy. I know that we can meet our obligation to continue that struggle. And I know that we can finish the journey we started and finally fulfill the promise of our democracy for all our children.”

X