banner2e top

Man Who Spent 41 Years in Solitary Confinement Dies Surrounded by Friends

Oct. 14, 2013

Man Who Spent 41 Years in Solitary Confinement Dies Surrounded by Friends

Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from TheNorthStarNews.com

herman-wallace-jackie-sumell-nsn100813

Jackie Sumell and Herman Wallace

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Herman Wallace, who spent more than 41 years in solitary confinement in a Louisiana prison, died on Friday, October 4, three days after he was released because he was deathly ill.

"About sunrise this morning, Herman Wallace passed away a free man, unshackled, in a New Orleans home, surrounded by supporters who loved him dearly," Jackie Sumell, Wallace's close friend, wrote on her Facebook page. "His dying words were 'love y'all,'" Sumell wrote.

Prison officials released Wallace, who was suffering from terminal liver cancer, to Interim Louisiana State University Hospital in New Orleans. Hospital officials released him to friends and to supporters so he could die in a home. He was 71 years old.

Wallace was serving a 50 year-prison sentence for armed robbery at the Louisiana State Prison in Angola, La., when he and two others were convicted of the 1972 stabbing death of prison guard Brent Miller.

Miller's widow, Leontine Verrett, has said in a video that she did not believe Wallace, Robert King and Albert Woodfox were involved in her husband's murder. All three men denied involvement in the crime.

There was no DNA evidence linking Wallace to the crime, said Amnesty International.

The men, known as the Angola 3, were framed for the murder because they had founded a prison chapter of the Black Panther Party, argue supporters. The three were sentenced to solitary confinement, which according to the website Solitary Watch, means inmates are locked in their cells 22 to 24 hours a day.

Amnesty International said during his more than 40 years in solitary confinement, Wallace was allowed out of his six-foot-by-nine-foot cell only seven hours each week to shower and to engage in solitary recreation.

"Under international law, these conditions amount to cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment," said Steven Hawkins, executive director of Amnesty International USA, which is based in New York.

In 2011, Amnesty International published "USA: 100 Years In Solitary: The 'Angola 3' And Their Fight For Justice."

King was exonerated of Miller's murder and released from prison in 2001 after 29 years in solitary confinement. Woodfox still remains in solitary confinement.

On Oct. 1, in the case of Herman Miller versus Howard Prince, warden of Angola prison, Judge Brian A. Jackson, chief judge of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana, overturned Wallace's murder conviction because women were prohibited from serving on the Grand Jury that indicted Wallace. The ruling, however, was moot because Wallace's life was quickly coming to an end.

After learning of his death, Hawkins issued this statement: "Today is a very sad day for the family and friends of Herman Wallace and for those who spent so many years working toward his freedom. We at Amnesty International offer our condolences to his loved ones."

Md. in Violation of HBCU Students' Constitutional Rights HBCU Equality Lawsuit by Zenitha Prince

Oct. 14, 2013

Court Ruling: Md. Violated HBCU Students' Rights
By Zenitha Prince
hbcu_lawsuit

Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from the Afro American Newspapers

(TriceEdneywire.com) - In a historic, 60-page decision Oct. 7, a federal court judge ruled that Maryland violated its constitutional commitment to dissolving vestiges of segregation in higher education by allowing traditionally White institutions to duplicate programs already offered by historically Black colleges and universities.

In the suit, filed in 2006 and argued in 2012, current and former students of Maryland’s public HBCUs—Bowie State University, Coppin State University, Morgan State University, and the University of Maryland Eastern Shore—argued they were subjected to ongoing segregative policies traceable to the de jure or legal era of segregation.

Federal District Judge Catherine Blake ruled partly in their favor, agreeing that Maryland had undermined HBCUs through unnecessary program duplication, such as the replication of Morgan State’s MBA program by Towson State and University of Baltimore, jointly. The resulting lack of unique programs at the state’s HBCUs, she wrote, had a segregative effect, by making those schools less attractive to students of all races. For example, according to the ruling, in 1976, HBCUs reported 18.2 percent White undergraduate and graduate enrollment. But, by 2008—seemingly as a result of the increase in duplicative programs at proximate TWIs-the enrollment of White undergraduates at HBIs was 3.35 percent.

Judge Blake found that Maryland’s penchant for harmful program duplication was “comparable to, and in some cases more pronounced than, the duplication found in Mississippi" in the Supreme Court case from two decades ago that sought to mitigate the vestiges of segregation in that state’s education system.

The court found that while the state’s TWIs have 296 unique noncore programs, its HBCUs have only 44. More significantly, among the high-demand programs, Maryland’s HBCUs offer only 11 non-duplicated programs, compared with 122 such programs at TWIs.

The court further concluded that Maryland "offered no evidence that it has made any serious effort to address continuing historic duplication. Second, and even more troubling, the State has failed to prevent additional duplication, to the detriment of the HBIs."

David Burton, president of the lead plaintiff, the Coalition for Excellence and Equity in Higher Education, said they were “elated” by the ruling.

"The very reason the Coalition was created was after the state undermined and duplicated Morgan's MBA program. We sought to prevent the marginalization of the HBIs and wanted them to have academic programs that are attractive to students and properly supported by faculty, facilities and other resources," he said in a statement.

Judge Blake did not order a specific remedy but provided guidelines for consideration including "expansion of mission and program uniqueness and institutional identity at the HBIs." She also suggested that "the transfer or merger of select high demand programs from TWIs to HBIs will be necessary.”

Michael D. Jones, lead counsel for the plaintiffs and a partner at Kirkland & Ellis LLP in Washington, D.C., said that those suggested solutions would require an infusion of resources—to train faculty and possibly enhance facilities—to ensure success..

"We look forward to the remedies phase of the trial,” he said. “We will present evidence of the costs of developing programs and identifying those programs at the Traditionally White Institutions that need to be transferred to the Historically Black Institutions. We will also outline the additional resources that are necessary for those programs to be successful.

“We expect that at the end of the process Maryland's HBIs will be shining examples of the possibilities at HBIs."

Though Judge Blake’s ruling provided some vindication to the plaintiffs, it was only a partial victory. The court did not agree with the Coalition’s assertion that the state’s funding formula was unconstitutional, although it did recognize "an abundance of evidence demonstrating that Maryland's HBIs face challenges that stem from direct and indirect discrimination, economic stratification and pre-K-12th grade educational inequity."

HBCU supporters say they hope that the outcome of this case will prompt the state to do right by its traditionally Black institutions.

"Now that the Court has found Maryland in violation of the constitution,” said Jon Greenbaum, co-lead counsel for the plaintiffs and chief counsel of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, “we hope that Maryland will finally do the right thing and get serious about providing an adequate remedy that will enable HBIs to prosper."

Obama Winning the Polls, GOP Winning the Argument By Dr. Wilmer J. Leon, III

Oct. 13, 2013

Obama Winning the Polls, GOP Winning the Argument 
By Dr. Wilmer J. Leon, III

NEWS ANALYSIS

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Since the Republican-led House of Representatives shut down the government, polls show a continued shift in public sentiment away from Republicans and toward the President.

According to the latest Washington Post-ABC News poll, Americans disapproval of the way Congressional Republicans are “handling negotiations over the federal budget” has jumped to 70 percent with a 24 percent approving of Congressional Republicans.  The disapproval rate of President Obama’s performance on the budget negotiations has narrowed, 51 percent to 45 percent.  That’s a small improvement from the previous week’s 50 percent to 41 percent disapproval ratio.

The issue is not with the poll numbers.  If you are a member of the administration, the numbers are trending in the right direction.  Their concern should be with the construct of the narrative by the mainstream media.  Programs such as Meet the Press, Face the Nation, and This Week are following the narrative articulated by Speaker Boehner and other Republicans, “Why won’t President Obama negotiate?”

Savannah Guthrie from Meet the Press asked Treasury Secretary Jack Lew, “Is the president ready to watch this country go into default rather than negotiate with Republicans?” Later she tells Representative Fudge (D-Ohio), “As this goes on and on, the president's stance is, "I won't negotiate."  And even if there's a host of reasons why that is a responsible position, as a bumper sticker, it's not the greatest, is it?”

Supporters of the administration’s position are allowing themselves to be brought into a debate based upon a false premise. The nature of Guthrie’s questions presumes that the Republican’s position has merit.  It does not.

George Stephanopoulos from This Week opened his round-table discussion by allowing his guest, Paul Giot, to say the President is playing with fire by failing to negotiate - as though the Republicans position is intellectually honest.  Giot went on to recount how many continuing resolutions (CR’s) have been negotiated by previous presidents as though that history is relevant to the current circumstance.  It is not.  This time Republicans are holding the country hostage to reargue established law.  Even Sen. McCain (R-Ariz.) has said, “We fought as hard as we could in a fair and honest manner and we lost…”

The hosts of these programs and others may consider themselves to be unbiased journalists by allowing the Republican spokespeople and pundits to go unchallenged but they are really doing the public a great disservice.  Facts matter. The truth is important and should always be paramount.

The shutdown of the government is being led by a small band of elected officials who are more focused on their narrow political ideology than operating in the best interest of the American people.  According to The New York Times, “Shortly after President Obama started his second term, a loose-knit coalition of conservative activists led by former Attorney General Edwin Meese III gathered in the capital to plot strategy.”  The result was what has been described as the “blueprint to defunding Obamacare." According to the Times, “It articulated a take-no-prisoners legislative strategy that had long percolated in conservative circles: that Republicans could derail the health care overhaul if conservative lawmakers were willing to push fellow Republicans — including their cautious leaders — into cutting off financing for the entire federal government.

This of course comes on the heels of the infamous January 20, 2009 dinner where, according to Robert Draper's book, Do Not Ask What Good We Do: Inside the U.S. House of Representatives Republican leadership “met and plotted to sabotage, undermine and destroy America's Economy.” The senior GOP members plotted to bring Congress to a standstill regardless how much it would hurt the American Economy by pledging to obstruct and block President Obama on all legislation.

Contrary to how Boehner, Cantor, et al try to position the current shutdown we are exactly where they wanted us to be. It is not a noble gesture that the Republicans are championing on behalf of “the American people”.  This is, according to the Times, “the outgrowth of a long-running effort to undo the law, the Affordable Care Act, since its passage in 2010 — waged by a galaxy of conservative groups (such as the Koch Brothers) with more money, organized tactics and interconnections than is commonly known.”

It is also the Republican Party playing to a bigoted ideologically driven element of their party, the White Southern Republican base.  According to The Nation, “Many factors play into the shutdown, but a leading cause is the fact that the Republican Party is whiter, more Southern and more conservative than ever before.”  As a result of the 2012 census and restricting, “…while the country continues to grow more racially diverse, the average Republican district continues to get even whiter.” Contrary to Boehner’s mantra, Republicans are not listening to “the American people,” they are playing to the narrow structural base of the Republican Party.

For mainstream American journalists to allow Republican representatives to justify their “negotiating” position as though it is valid perpetuates the lie.  For Democrats to participate in television and radio programs where the questions they are being asked are based upon faulty premises and trying to answer the questions without highlighting their flaws is a formula for disaster.

It is also interesting how journalists, Democratic strategists, and Democratic members of Congress have adopted the Republican-created pejorative term “ObamaCare.”  When you allow your enemy to define your position you’ve already lost the argument.  Not once have I heard Representative Fudge (D-Ohio) or others say, “No, it’s not ObamaCare; it’s the Affordable Care Act. (ACA).”

Polls have shown many Americans oppose “ObamaCare” but support the ACA, demonstrating how effective Republican marketing has been and how the administration has failed to explain its flagship legislation.  He who defines reality controls others perception of reality.

Even though the polls are showing that Americans disapprove of the way congressional Republicans are “handling negotiations over the federal budget” I believe the administration has lost control of the narrative, again. They can’t seem to construct a consistent and cohesive message. The ACA is not a takeover of healthcare; it’s a change to health insurance which provides greater access to care for the previously uninsured.

In terms of mainstream media, the administration has failed to get program hosts to focus on why Republicans are opposed to expanding healthcare to more Americans and are willing to shut down the government in order to prevent it.  Also, why should the President negotiate issues (ACA) that are unrelated to a clean CR?

By failing to force the narrative to address these issues, as the day’s pass and the country again get’s closer to the fiscal cliff, the winds of public sentiment may shift; forcing the administration to concede defeat when the battle, if properly fought, was already won.

Dr. Wilmer Leon is the Producer/ Host of the Sirisu/XM Satellite radio channel 110 call-in talk radio program “Inside the Issues with Wilmer Leon” Go to www.wilmerleon.com or email:This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.www.twitter.com/drwleon and Dr. Leon’s Prescription at Facebook.com  © 2013 InfoWave Communications, LLC

Black Ministers Slam State Governors’ Resistance to Obamacare

Oct. 14, 2013

Black Ministers Slam State Governors’ Resistance to Obamacare

 anthonyevansrev

Rev. Anthony Evans, president, National Black Church Initiative


Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from the Afro American Newspapers

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Governors who refuse to expand their state Medicaid programs to accommodate the Affordable Care Act (ACA) are “doing an extreme disservice to their citizens,” the National Black Church Initiative (NBCI) said Oct.11.

The NBCI, a coalition of 34,000 churches representing 15.7 million African American churchgoers, labeled governors who are blocking implementation of President Obama’s signature health care reform initiative as “wrong, misguided, and placing more undue financial burdens on the backs of the poor and middle class.”

“We are ashamed to see governors throughout our country refusing to expand Medicaid in their states as a part of the ACA – what we see as President Obama’s greatest accomplishment and indeed one of the greatest laws in American history,” NBCI President Rev Anthony Evans said in a statement released Oct. 11.

The Black ministers’ group “applauds President Obama and his administration on the greatest legislation accomplishment in decades.” They characterized the statute as a “monumental law [that] will provide quality and affordable health care access to millions of underserved in the African American community” and added that “its implementation is long overdue.”

The statement was issued at the end of the second week of a chaotic inaugural sign-up period for health insurance under the ACA. Yet, the NBCI statement pointed out, “more than twenty states, mainly Republican-led ... are refusing to expand Medicaid or leaning in that direction.”

Evans singled out the GOP for criticism, too. “As a party that proclaims Christianity is the center of their ideology, I am dumbfounded at these governors’ inactions. Every citizen in the United States has a God-given right to accessible and affordable health care,” he said.

“NBCI will do everything in its power to advocate for a decision reversal in these states, and will work tirelessly to make sure the mission of the ACA reaches each American.”

Obama Signals: Join ‘Team Obamacare’ By Hazel Trice Edney

Oct. 7, 2013

Obama Signals: Join ‘Team Obamacare’
By Hazel Trice Edney

acaenrollees

President Barack Obama, with HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, listen as enrollees in the Affordable Care Act tell their stories in the Oval Office, Oct. 1. The enrollees later joined the President for a statement in the Rose Garden. PHOTO: Pete Souza/The White House 

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Amidst a continuing standoff between Congressional Republicans and Democrats this week, President Obama has reached out to his base, asking them to start signing up for Affordable Health Care coverage and to even embrace the Republican-invented word, “Obamacare”.

“I know there are groups that are working to make Obamacare fail, including a group of House Republicans that voted more than 40 times to derail the law,” Obama said in a video emailed to millions of people who he described as “the best grassroots team ever.”

Reminding viewers of the basic reasons for the law - so there would be no more discrimination based on “pre-existing conditions” and so that single mothers can afford both health care and college for their children, among other reasons - the President, encouraged supporters to join “Team Obamacare.”

“There are groups working against this law that are spending a lot of money to try to confuse people about health reform. That’s why it’s so important that all of us make sure that people have the facts,” he says in the video. “You know I’m on Team Obamacare. Today I’m asking you to be a part of it too. I’m asking you to talk to your family and friends, neighbors and co-workers and tell them to check out healthcare.gov for themselves, to see what plan works best for them and their families.”

What was billed as a “personal message for OFA supporters”, appeared to be a direct message from Obama to his large African-American base. OFA, Organizing for Action, is the same email target used to undergird his strategic campaign move in November, surprising Republicans with millions of votes that they least expected.

The President appears to be strategically embracing the term, “Obamacare”, and encouraging supporters to do so even as some news agencies are debating whether or not to even use it.

“The Associated Press and NPR have decided to cut back on use of the term ‘Obamacare,’ with NPR describing the word as seeming ‘to be straddling somewhere between being a politically-charged term and an accepted part of the vernacular,’” reports Richard Prince in his Journal-isms column Oct. 3. “Separately, the AP went further and said the name of the health-care law, the Affordable Care Act, was also prejudicial in that ‘its very name is promotional; opponents believe it will not be affordable for individuals or the country,’” Prince wrote.

The shut-down of non-essential services of the U. S. Government, causing hundreds of thousands of layoffs, remain in effect this week. Republicans continue to hold out on a vote until the President makes concession on the ACA or on entitlements, says Republican House Speaker John Boehner.

The President has refused to negotiate on the issue, his email appearing to making sure his base knows why.

“I couldn’t be more proud to have the support of the best grassroots team ever. Together, we’re going to finish what we started.”

X