banner2e top

Holder Calls for Changes in Federal Low-Level Drug Sentences by Frederick H. Lowe

March 16, 2014

Holder Calls for Changes in Federal Low-Level Drug Sentences
By Frederick H. Lowe

eric_holder_official_portrait

Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from TheNorthStarNews.com

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder today endorsed proposed changes that would cut federal sentences for low-level drug offenders and dramatically reduce the Bureau of Prisons population over the next five years if adopted.

Holder, who testified before the U.S. Sentencing Commission, supports changes to Federal Sentencing Guidelines that would reserve the harshest penalties for the most serious drug offenders.

In addition, Holder's proposal would lower by two levels the base offense associated with various drug quantities involved in drug trafficking crimes.

If adopted, the change would affect nearly 70 percent of all drug trafficking offenders and reduce the average sentence by 11 months, or nearly 18% , according to the Sentencing Commission.

Commission members also project that the Bureau of Prisons population would drop by 6,550 inmates at the end of five years.

"This is a straightforward adjustment to sentencing ranges --- while measured in scope --- would nonetheless send a strong message about the fairness of our criminal justice system," Holder testified. "And it would help to rein in federal prison spending while focusing limited resources on the most serious threats to public safety."

The move is Holder's latest step to alter the federal government's approach to dealing with non-violent drug offenders.
Last August, Holder announced his "Smart on Crime" initiative, which included a major change to the department's charging policy intended to reserve strict, mandatory minimum sentences for high-level or violent-drug traffickers.

Holder noted that state and federal governments spent a combined $80 billion on incarceration during 2010 alone. He added that of the more than 216,000 current federal inmates, nearly half are serving time for drug-related crimes.

"This focused reliance on incarceration is not just financially unsustainable --- it comes with human and moral costs that are impossible to calculate," Holder said."The United States comprises five percent of the world's population, but it incarcerates almost a quarter of the world's prisoners."

Commission members are scheduled to vote on the proposals in April.

Armed Angry White Males; the New Domestic Terrorists By Dr. Wilmer J. Leon, III

March 16, 2014

Armed Angry White Males; the New Domestic Terrorists
By Dr. Wilmer J. Leon, III

NEWS ANALYSIS

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - “You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing's replaced them….And it's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy toward people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.” Senator Barack Obama April 6, 2008

While out on the presidential campaign trail in 2008, Senator Obama made this statement and was castigated by both Democrats and Republicans.  Hillary Clinton responded by saying, "Pennsylvanians don't need a president who looks down on them. They need a president who stands up for them, who fights for them, who works hard for your futures, your jobs, your families."  Senator John McCain (R-AZ) said through his spokesman Steve Schmidt. "It shows an elitism and condescension towards hardworking Americans that is nothing short of breathtaking…It is hard to imagine someone running for president who is more out of touch with average Americans."

Eventually, instead of standing behind his very astute assessment of the fear that plagues rural White America, Senator Obama backed away from his remarks with an apology, "If I worded things in a way that made people offended, I deeply regret that."

I wish Senator Obama had held his ground.

To put Sen. Obama’s comments in historical perspective one can look to Federalist #10 in which James Madison wrote, ”Among the numerous advantages promised by a well constructed Union, none deserves to be more accurately developed than its tendency to break and control the violence of faction.”  Madison saw factions as groups of citizens, with interests contrary to the rights of others or the interests of the whole community. Madison’s violent “factions” from 1787 are Obama’s angry small town Americans in 2008.

When viewed from our country’s racial context, these “factions” have reared their ugly heads time after time.  In their book A Festival of Violence, Tolnay and Beck “identified 2,805 victims of lynch mobs killed between 1882 and 1930 in ten southern states.  Although mobs murdered almost 300 white men and women, the vast majority-almost 2,500-of lynch victims were African-American.  The scale of this carnage means that, on average, a black man, woman, or child was murdered nearly once a week, every week, between 1882 and 1930 by a hate driven white mob.”

As African-American soldiers returned from fighting in WWI and keeping the world safe for democracy, they attempted to exercise their social, political, and economic rights here at home.  They were met by riots and lynching’s led by White mobs throughout Black communities in 15 states and 27 cities across America from April to November, 1919.  According to Cameron McWhirter’s book Red Summer: The Summer of 1919 and the Awakening of Black America the NAACP’s James Weldon Johnson called it the “Red Summer” because it was so bloody.  In total, millions of Americans had their lives disrupted.  Hundreds of people most of them Black, were killed.

On June 1, 1921 a White mob in Tulsa, OK burned and bombed 34 square blocks of Tulsa’s Black Greenwood Community to the ground.  According to Tim Madigan’s The Burning: Massacre, Destruction, and the Tulsa Race Riot of 1921 the actual death toll was never determined.  Conservative estimates put it around 100.  More commonly accepted estimates place the death toll between 300 and 400.

The lynching’s documented by Tolnay and Beck, the Red Summer of 1919, and the Tulsa Race Riot of 1921 are historic examples of American domestic terrorism.

More recently, on June 7, 1998, James Byrd, Jr. was murdered by Shawn Berry, Lawrence Russell Brewer, and John King.  At least two of them, Brewer and King were admitted Whited supremacists.  They dragged Byrd for three miles behind a pickup truck along an asphalt road in Jasper, Texas. Mr. Byrd, who remained conscious throughout most of the ordeal, was killed when his body hit the edge of a culvert, severing his right arm and head. The murderers drove on for another mile before dumping his torso in front of an African-American cemetery in Jasper.

Today, lynch mobs have been replaced by “Zimmerman’s” and “Dunn’s” that feel empowered by “Stand Your Ground”, believing that juries of their peers will exonerate them of their use of deadly force when Black youths are involved.

Unfortunately, all too often these events and so many others do not get discussed or analyzed in that context.

Not only were Senator Obama’s comments astute in terms of their historical accuracy, as we look at the George Zimmerman’s and Michael Dunn’s of the world, his comments could be considered prophetic.

It is my contention that the recent “murders” of Treyvon Martin and Jordan Davis should not be viewed as isolated incidents. They did not occur in a vacuum. They are part of a larger murderous American historical continuum.  At the heart of this murderous continuum are race and xenophobia (a fear of others) and a violent reaction to it.  To many in the dominant culture “their” America is changing, The “browning” of America has evoked a return and acceptance of the murderous continuum.  Former Colorado Congressman Tom Tancredo best expressed this sentiment when he proclaimed; “I want my country back”.

Conceal Carry permits, “Stand Your Ground” laws and inept prosecutors are creating a climate that provides the Zimmerman’s and Dunn’s of the world with a license to kill as well as juries that are predisposed to letting them to do so.

As the American economy continues to contract and full-time well-paying jobs become harder to find, the face of poverty in America is changing. The stereotypical “urban” or “Black” poor have now become the “suburban” or White poor. According to CBC  “Hardship is particularly growing among Whites, based on several measures... More than 19 million Whites fall below the poverty line…accounting for more than 41 percent of the nations destitute, nearly double the number of poor blacks.”

According to the Christian Science Monitor, “Suburbs are increasingly becoming the address of America's poor. Suburban poverty across the country grew 53 percent between 2000 and 2010, more than twice the rate of urban poverty…”  Many of those newly poor suburbanites are White and many of them are angry, blaming people of color, instead of directing their ire toward corporate greed, the outsourcing of factory jobs to overseas companies and governmental policies that favor the wealthy for their misfortunes.

Senator Obama’s assessment in 2008 was historically accurate and more prophetic than pundits and commentators have been willing to give him credit for.  Armed angry White males like George Zimmerman and Michael Dunn have been operating in our midst for centuries.  Their actions are not new; the lack of analysis of them in the context of terrorism is not surprising.  The narrative has to change and we must engage in a broader discussion of them as the new domestic terrorists.

Dr. Wilmer Leon is the Producer/ Host of the Sirius/XM Satellite radio channel 110 call-in talk radio program “Inside the Issues with Wilmer Leon” Go to www.wilmerleon.com or email:This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.www.twitter.com/drwleon and Dr. Leon’s Prescription at Facebook.com  © 2014 InfoWave Communications, LLC

African Hearts Swell at Lupita Nyong'O's Oscar Prize

March 10, 2014

African Hearts Swell at Lupita Nyong'O's Oscar Prize

lupita

Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from Global Informational News

 (TriceEdneyWire.com) – The chatter on social media sites was off the charts as the Oscar choice for best supporting actress was named – the luminescent Lupita Nyong’o - for her role in the Hollywood feature “12 Years a Slave.”

Nigerian journalist Bim Adewunmi, writing in The Guardian, was one of many Africans covering the long night of prizes and accolades and who would witness Nyong’o at the moment of her victory and feel the chills of the much-deserved award.

Adewunmi recalled the moment: “She never had that look of being cowed or over-awed by all the pomp and pageantry. Dazzled, sure (who wouldn't be?), but never looking out of place with it. There was always a confidence, borne out by her wonderful and gracious acceptance speeches and interviews.

“It helps that she looks beautiful too, with her super-short hair (a fade! On a black woman! On the red carpet!) and dark brown skin, but even that beauty seems independent of the circus around her.”

At an earlier event - the Essence Black Women In Hollywood luncheon – Nyong’o had said: "I remember a time when I too felt unbeautiful. I put on the TV and only saw pale skin, I got teased and taunted about my night-shaded skin. And my one prayer to God, the miracle worker, was that I would wake up lighter-skinned."

On the Kenyan blogs, the chatter took a turn to the personal. “Dear African women and your daughters, LOOK! No weave on Lupita’s head,” penned noted Kenyan writer Binyavanga Wainaina.

He exulted: “African women in spotlight today forgot chemical burns, fake hair,” adding for good measure: “Millions of African women today pulled weaves out with bare hands!”

The Kenyan actress and Yale School of Drama graduate, who turned 31 on Saturday, won plaudits for both her efforts on screen and her impeccable fashion sense.

Meanwhile, on the blog site bellanaija.com, breathless accolades poured out: “I am sooooo proud, u ve given us hope”… “Dreams come true… wish her all the best in her future endeavors” …  “I usually don’t care for things like these but dang Lupita’s speech brought tears to my eyes!! She’s all types of adorable!! More grease to her elbows and I hope she stays grounded too! 

 

“Lupita Nyong’o has arrived,” declared Adewunmi. “And while most of us seem glad of it, some of us are inevitably more glad than others

Senate Refuses to Confirm Obama Justice Department Nominee by Frederick Lowe

March 10, 2014

Senate Refuses to Confirm Obama Justice Department Nominee 
By Frederick Lowe

debo
Debo Adegbile

Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from TheNorthStarNews.com

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - The United States Senate on Wednesday voted not to confirm Debo Adegbile as head of the U.S. Justice Department's Civil Rights Division because as part of his job he defended Mumia Abu-Jamal, who was convicted of the 1981 slaying of Daniel Faulkner, a Philadelphia police officer.

Republicans joined by seven Democrats voted down Adegbile's nomination 51 to 48 under pressure from police unions.

President Barack Obama, who nominated Adegbile for the job, called his defeat a "travesty based on wildly unfair character attacks against a good and qualified candidate."

Sherrilyn Ifill, president and director-counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, charged that Senate Republicans orchestrated a smear campaign against Adegible, who at one time was the organization's director of litigation, acting president and director-counsel and special counsel.

"Adegbile was attacked because the NAACP Legal Defense Fund became counsel for Mumia Abu-Jamal during Adegbile's tenure," Ifill said. "The NAACP Legal Defense Fund's involvement in Mumia Abu-Jamal's case reflects its institutional commitment to ensuring that the criminal justice system is administered fairly and in compliance with the U.S. Constitution for all Americans, no matter how controversial."

Jamal, a former Philadelphia radio reporter, is serving a life sentence for his murder conviction.

Adegbile was only a child when Abu-Jamal was convicted, but during Adegbile's 12 years with NAACP LDF, he represented Adu-Jamal's during his appeals process. Adegbile helped research and write a legal brief asserting that the jury instructions during Abu-Jamal's sentencing were improper. A federal court agreed.

Republicans, however, argued that Adegbile was unfit to run the civil rights division.  

Mitch McConnell, the Senate's minority leader, accused Adegbile of "seeking to glorify an unrepentant cop killer." U.S. Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) wanted to know if Adegbile could apply the law in an even-handed manner.

Ifill noted that many public servants, including U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, have provided pro bono time to represent a death-row inmate. Roberts represented John Ferguson, who was convicted of killing eight people.

John Adams represented in the 1770s a British soldier involved in the Boston Massacre. Adams was later elected president.

"Mr. Adegbile and the American people deserve better than the Senate delivered today," said Marcia Fudge, chair of the Congressional Black Caucus. "I am extremely disappointed in today's Senate vote that denied this country
a public servant who has a personal and professional commitment to protecting the civil and constitutional rights of all Americans."

An angry President Obama lashed out at the Senate.
"As a lawyer, Mr. Adegbile has played by the rules. And now Washington politics have used the rules against him. The fact that his nomination was defeated solely based on his legal representation of a defendant runs contrary to a fundamental principle of our system of justice--and those who voted against his nomination denied the American people an outstanding public servant," President Obama said.

Adegbile, who is half Nigerian and Irish, was raised by a single mother in New York City. The family was nearly homeless at one time.

Cummings Discusses Colleague's Rude Actions at Hearing

March 10, 2014

Cummings Discusses Colleague's Rude Actions at Hearing
By Zenitha Prince

elijahcummings3

Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) (Courtesy Photo)

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - In an exclusive interview with the AFRO, Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.), discussed the events of a March 5 hearing held by House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, of which Cummings is the ranking member. During the hearing, former IRS employee Lois Lerner was questioned on the agency’s alleged targeting of conservative political groups. Chairman Darrell E. Issa (R-Calif.) posed questions for approximately 15 minutes, though Lerner had already invoked her Fifth Amendment right not to speak. When Cummings tried to take his turn, Issa adjourned the meeting, turned off Cummings’ microphone, and he and other Republicans filed out.

AFRO: How would you characterize Chairman Issa’s actions or behavior at the hearing on Wednesday?

CUMMINGS: They were disrespectful and counterproductive. There’s a rule that when—the majority in this instance—has an opportunity to ask questions, the other side is entitled to at least five minutes to talk about anything they want to talk about.

Chairman Issa had called Ms. Lerner in, knowing that she would assert the Fifth. He then proceeded to ask her 10 questions knowing she was going to answer each question by saying that I cannot answer at advice of counsel. He knew that, and she did just that—10 times. He then closed the hearing without Democrats having a chance to say one syllable; he would not allow us to say anything. And that is not the way you run a hearing in Washington, nor in any democracy.

AFRO:
What do you think prompted Chairman Issa’s actions?


CUMMINGS: Mr. Issa had been involved in a discussion with Ms. Lerner’s attorney a week or so before the hearing. And they had been talking about something called a proffer, that is, the attorney was willing to say what Ms. Lerner would have said if she were to testify. So we would have at least have come out of the hearing knowing that. Democrats were not included in these private meetings with the attorney, so the only place I could ask about it was in the hearing. But, for some reason, Issa cut me off.

Although he claims he wants to hear what Ms. Lerner has to say, I don’t think he really does because he realizes that what she’s going to say is that the president has nothing to do with this so-called targeting of Tea Party groups; she would have said there was no White House involvement and that it was not about political reasons, period…. But the Republicans want to keep pushing, trying to prove something that is simply not true.

AFRO: Was this unprecedented behavior on Rep. Issa’s part?

CUMMINGS: About two or three weeks ago he did it to one of our members, Congressman [John] Tierney, he set his mike off. Now Tierney is White, and he did it to him, and there was protest from the committee. So this is the second time within the last month that he’s done this. But you don’t see this on other committees.

AFRO: As a congressman who has been on the Hill for a while, has this ever happened to you before, and if not, how did it feel?

CUMMINGS: I felt such a disappointment that, in 2014, that this member of Congress, who has a tremendous amount of power, would abuse that power by cutting off debate and trying to silence the members of the Democratic Party. There are countries where their democracy is not as strong as ours or where they have not been a democracy for as long as we have where this would never happen. And so I think it sets a dangerous precedent.

AFRO: What, if any, discussion have you had with Rep. Issa since the hearing on Wednesday?

CUMMINGS: He called me yesterday evening [March 6] to discuss some matters that are coming up next week, and some voting we had to do in the committee, and at the very end of the conversation he said, ‘I just wanted you to know I’m sorry.’

AFRO: Did you think it was a genuine apology?

CUMMINGS: Yes, I do, but I don’t know how long it’s going to last. That’s the problem. But we’ll see.

AFRO: Despite that apology do you think—as some Democrats have called for—that Chairman Issa should lose his chairmanship?

CUMMINGS: I don’t want to get into that because I think that’s up to the Republicans; they have to make that determination. But I don’t think we should have people sitting in chairmanships who do not know how to respect members on both sides of the aisle. If I could not respect my Republican colleagues I would not want to be chairman, because I realize if I’m the chairman, I’m chairman of the entire committee. And, the integrity of that committee would depend on me trying to work with my colleagues and respecting them so that we can come up with the best products.

AFRO: What are the broader implications of Rep. Issa’s actions as it regards protocol and civility in Congress?

CUMMINGS: I’m hoping that all of the Congress would look at this and understand that this is bigger than Elijah Cummings, this is about the way our democracy should function. This is about the way the minority party should have a voice. This is about the way that every member of our Congress, each of whom serves 700,000 people, should be respected. We just cannot go forward and continue to be a Congress where the minority is totally disrespected and basically told, ‘You can be present, but we don’t want you to say anything.’ That’s ridiculous.

 

X