banner2e top

‘P. Diddy’ to keynote Howard Commencement: Some Criticize, Others Praise Decision by Jasmine Rennie

April 27, 2014

‘P. Diddy’ to Keynote Howard Commencement: Some Criticize, Others Praise Decision
By Jasmine Rennie

seancombs
Sean Combs

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Journalist and author A. Peter Bailey, a former Howard University student, best known for his work with Malcolm X, told a Howard journalism class that he was shocked to hear the University’s decision to award Hip-Hop artist Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs with an honorary doctorate degree in humanities and have him give the commencement address May 10.

“I almost fell off my chair when I heard that our illustrious University will be honoring Diddy with a Doctorate Degree and that he would be the commencement speaker,” said Bailey. “Now people like Diddy are the the ones getting PhD’s and furthering education. But what about all those brothers sitting in jail because they were listening to what you were advocating and promoting in your music?”

Bailey left Howard after two years around 1961. He traveled to New York where he met Malcolm X and became editor of his organizational newsletter and eventually an associate editor of Ebony magazine and adjunct professor of the Black Press at Virginia Commonwealth University.

His comments come amidst much chatter from students and alum who are both excited about and disappointed with Combs’ delivering the keynote speech. For some current and former Bison (Howard’s mascot), the announcement comes as a surprise and discouragement since Combs did not ultimately graduate from the university.

Howard has announced that the philanthropist and entertainment mogul—a former student in the School of Business-will be receiving the honorary doctorate and will be the 146th commencement speaker for the 1,800-member graduating class of 2014.

“In selecting the individuals who will be awarded honorary degrees, Howard University continues the tradition of identifying leaders whose work has clearly contributed to the advancement of their fields and the world,” Frederick said. "We are honored to have Mr. Combs serve as our speaker. He sat in classrooms where our students sit, walked 'The Yard,' and like many students, his entrepreneurial spirit was sparked at Howard. We know he will inspire our class to work hard and to always strive for excellence."

Also know as Sean “Puffy” Combs, “Diddy” left Howard after only two years in the late 1980s to pursue his career without graduating. He is chairman, chief executive officer and founder of Combs Enterprises, “one of the world's preeminent group of companies and brands,” states the Howard release. “Recently declared ‘One of the Most Influential Businessmen in the World’ by Time Magazine and CNN, Combs has built a reputation as a master brand builder, pop culture icon and champion of youth education and entrepreneurship.”

Hip Hop titles, such as “Bad Boy 4 Life” and “All About the Benjamins” are among his hits, which are often riddled with expletives and profanity – part of a culture that some view as toxic to youth. Nevertheless, his multi-million dollar enterprise continues to skyrocket. Just last year, he launched Revolt, a TV channel that features all music. The station reportedly airs in 20 million homes across the U. S.

His success is the reason that many are excited about the entertainer as speaker because he represents entrepreneurial focus and hard work on his craft, which happens to be music.

Graduating senior Kevon Paynter, also an entrepreneur, is an avid supporter of Combs as keynote speaker. Recently named first place winner of the Howard School of Communication’s business plan competition, Paynter said he had always admired Combs when he met him after literally bumping into him on a New York sidewalk in 2009 – only weeks before he was about to enter Howard. He introduced himself to Combs and told him he had been accepted to Howard.

“He congratulated me…It’s really amazing to me how, about five years later, he’s going to be the commencement speaker during my graduation – kind of like coming full circle.

Overall, he really was able to be a top notch entrepreneur. That’s something that, in the School of Communications, that is something that is revered and that is what many students strive to be and there is no better entrepreneur in my mind than Sean Combs,” Paynter said.

As for lyrics that some might find offensive or controversial, “It kind of rubs me the wrong way whenever we take the perspective that because this person is viewed as a role model, we have to follow every single aspect of this person. One of the things that I have successfully been able to do is have a couple of role models and pull the best aspects out of each one…We have a mind of our own.”

Still, Jennifer Brooks, a Mississippi native who is also a graduating senior, is adamantly against Combs as speaker: “We look stupid because he was able to become rich without college. Now he’s going to give us advice about what? How to hustle in the music industry?”

Stressing that she’s not a ‘Diddy hater at all,” Brooks says Combs is meant to speak to a specific group, not a graduating class, “Diddy is for a niche group; not Howard University Graduation.”

Maryland native and Howard University Alum, Ava Onalaja, is happy a fellow Bison is returning to Howard. “Even though he didn’t graduate, it’s great that he now has the opportunity to come back and thank the institution that helped contribute to some of his success,” she said.

Maia Miller agrees. “Diddy is a great example of someone who has used his skills and talents to get where he wanted to be,” she says. “He is an icon that has gone down in history, his name is recognized globally and he is at the top of his field.”

Miller says she is confused by the controversy. “Doesn’t the university aspire to produce young professionals like Diddy, who will take the world by storm, leave their mark and make HU proud?”

Often called, “the Mecca” because of its historic and national reputation for graduating successful students, past Commencement speakers have included the likes of former President Bill Clinton and Oprah Winfrey.

The 2014 honorary degrees will be received by four other individuals during the ceremony: They are transplant surgeon Clive Callender, CNN’s Wolf Blitzer, jazz legend Benny Golson and PepsiCO Corporation CEO Indra K. Nooyi.

 

 

Conyers to Re-introduce Legislation to Study Reparation by Frederick H. Lowe

April 27, 2014

Conyers to Re-introduce Legislation to Study Reparations
By Frederick H. Lowe

conyersatmic

Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from TheNorthStarNews.com

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - U.S. Rep. John Conyers Jr. said he will re-introduce in the 113th Congress legislation that calls for a seven-member commission to study reparations for African-Americans.

"It is the most important piece of legislation I have ever introduced, and I will re-introduce HR40 in the 113th Congress," Conyers (D., Mich.) told the 400 attendees at the "Revitalizing The Reparations Movement" conference on Saturday at Chicago State University. The 113th Congress first met Jan. 3, 2013.

He made his comments in the wake of 14 Caribbean nations demanding reparations and apology from Britain and other European countries for the trans-Atlantic slave trade. If the countries fail to negotiate with the Caribbean nations, they will sue them in the World Court, which is located in The Hague, The Netherlands. Thus far, Sweden is the only country that has indicated a willingness to negotiate reparations.

Conyers said the actions by the Caribbean nations will revitalize the reparations movement in the United States. "I think it is going to be a springboard for reparations," he said.

Conyers first introduced the legislation, titled "Commission to Study Reparation Proposals for African Americans Act," in 1989 during the 101th Congress. The bill was referred to the House Judiciary Committee, where Conyers is the ranking member.

The eight-page piece of legislation, which was co-introduced by U.S. Rep. Bobby Scott (D., Va.), said the 4 million Africans and their descendants were enslaved in the United States and colonies that became the United States from 1619 to 1865.  The government sanctioned slavery from 1789 through 1865, enabling it to flourish. At the same time, it deprived Africans of life, liberty, citizenship rights, and their cultural heritage. In addition, slavery denied
them the fruits of their own labor.

The Commission to Study Reparation Proposals for African Americans Act would study the lingering negative effects of slavery and discrimination and recommend appropriate remedies in consideration of the Commission's findings.  In addition, the Commission would examine defacto discrimination against freed slaves and their descendants from the end of the Civil War to the present, including economic, political, and social discrimination.

The Commission will hold hearings and submit a written report. Conyers said he wants to hold hearings in Washington, D.C. about reparations for African-Americans.

He said, "If the Republican Congress blocks the hearings, I will hold them throughout the country." 

Former SBA Leader: Blacks Must Use Leadership, Legacy for Economic Growth by Jasmine Rennie

April 21, 2014

Former SBA Leader: Blacks Must Use Leadership, Legacy for Economic Growth
By Jasmine Rennie

mariejohnspodium

Marie Johns

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - Former Deputy Administrator of the U. S. Small Businesses Administration (SBA) Marie Johns says people of color; especially African-Americans, must exercise leadership and attention to legacy in order to strengthen business ownership and personal economic prowess. 

“It’s about the legacy,” said Johns, now founder and president of L&L Consulting - a division of Leftwich & Ludaway, LLC. “Most African-Americans have not built a solid financial platform. This is what makes them unattractive to most banks…Sometimes things don’t change because we don’t require it.”

Johns shared her words of wisdom with a group of students at Howard University gathered to hear the results of a recent business plan completion. She covered a range of topics from unbanked households to the importance of the African American presence in the corporate world.

Consumerism, representation in corporations, and net worth - combined with business ownership and entrepreneurship - are all factors that African-Americans must tackle in order to attain success at the level of their White counterparts. It appears as though these topics have left a gap in overall success rates leaving African Americans struggling to catch up to other races.

“We have to do more to educate those around us about mindful consumerism,” said Johns.

According to a Nielsen Report, African-Americans have a current spending power of $1 trillion dollars and that number is set to increase by 2017. The Black community is noted for their excessive buying habits and are loved for their consumerism. They are seen as loyal and exhibit more aggressive consumption of certain items such as; media, hair care products and smartphones, according to the report.

Johns contends that giving the bulk of one’s salary to specific brands is not beneficial to the Black community: “If you know better you do better” she said.

In addition, she said, African-Americans are largely unbanked because of a number of reasons, an economic weakness that could be easily dealt with through education.

A 2011 FDIC survey concluded that there were approximately 10 million unbanked households within the United States. The African-American demographic represented 21.4 percent of the unbanked population, and served as the largest single group within the unbanked population. The unbanked population is described as a group of individuals who do not use banks or credit unions for their financial transactions. A number of consumers are unbanked for reasons that include: poor credit history, lack of knowledge about the United States banking system, and language barriers for immigrants.

On the other hand, a place for leadership in strength in the Black community could be in small business ownership, Johns said.

“Small businesses are the engine of the U.S. economy,” she said, noting that she believes firmly in entrepreneurship. “We can figure out how to commercialize our God given gifts so we can make money from them…We have a deep and rich history of Entrepreneurship [as] our ancestors created [it] in this country, so we have to exhibit leadership,” she said.

According to statistics on Repec.org (Research Papers in Economics), businesses owned by African-Americans tend to have lower sales, fewer employees, smaller payrolls, lower profits and higher closure rates. In addition, a new report conducted by Black Enterprise concludes that – despite the high level of spending by African-Americans - there are still 75 corporations out of America’s top 250 largest companies that lack Black representation among their board of directors.

The presence of Black people is so necessary. If we are not there, who is going to speak for us; How will our stories be told?” said Virginia Monet King, an associate of the Association of Public Health Laboratories. African-Americans must do more to “make sure we make our own decisions.”

The economic recession has also majorly impacted loans to Africans-Americans by the U. S. Small Business Administration. SBA is a crucial part of financing for entrepreneurs in starting, buying or expanding their businesses.

“Many Black business owners capitalize their businesses based on equity in their homes,” said Johns, According to an analysis by the Wall street journal, Black owned small businesses once received 8.2 percent of all loan money through SBA. That figure is now down to 2.3 percent while the Hispanic demographic remains steady at 4.7 percent.

Johns stressed that the key to overcoming is education and perseverance, with African- Americans maintaining in each arena. “We can’t let [anything] stop us. We must make a way out of no way.

 

Supreme Court Creates Affirmative Inaction By Zenitha Prince

April 27, 2014

Supreme Court Creates Affirmative Inaction
By Zenitha Prince

affirmativeaction-afro

Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from the Afro American Newspaper

(TriceEdneyWire.com) - A Supreme Court decision, April 22, upholding states’ right to ban the use of race-sensitive policies in university admissions wielded a serious blow to affirmative action, experts said, and shifts the battleground to the states.

“Many voices in the civil rights community will call this decision a major disappointment because it weakens the options for insuring diversity in our public institutions,” said Jose Anderson, professor of law, University of Baltimore.

“Advocates of affirmative action are going to have to work harder than ever before to attempt to sustain its viability.”

University of Maryland law professor Larry Gibson, however, saw the glass as being half-full.

“It doesn’t by itself do as much damage as I feared it might. The fight we’ve been having is whether affirmative action was constitutionally permissible and it remains so—unless it is banned by a state Constitution,” Gibson said. “The negative side is that [the decision] will probably encourage other states to enact similar bans.”

Justices voted 6-2 in the case brought by the Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, Integration & Immigrant Rights, and Fight for Equality By Any Means Necessary (BAMN) against the state of Michigan, whose voters approved an initiative banning racial preferences in university admissions.

The measure, called Proposal 2, was passed by 58-42 percent of voters in 2006, but has been embroiled in legal challenges for almost a decade.

In 2008, a District Court upheld Proposal 2, but the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the lower court’s judgment in 2011. With the Supreme Court’s ruling today, the Michigan law is back in force.

The high court’s decision was not unexpected, Anderson said.

“The Supreme Court has always been very cautious about approving specific affirmative action plans,” he said. “The basic idea of diversity has occasionally obtained support by justices, beginning with the Bakke case in 1978, but it has always been difficult to get the vote to uphold specific programs.”

Justice Anthony Kennedy, in his opinion shared by Justices John Roberts Jr. and Samuel Alito Jr., said the ruling did not weigh the viability of affirmative action policies. Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas joined in a separate concurring opinion and Justice Stephen Breyer offered another concurring opinion.

“This case is not about the constitutionality, or the merits, of race-conscious admissions policies in higher education,” Kennedy wrote. “…The holding in the instant case is simply that the courts may not disempower the voters from choosing which path to follow.”

Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s exhaustive 58-page dissent suggested such reasoning was a cowardly retreat from the persistent problems of race and from the high court’s duty to uphold equal protection for all citizens.

“Without checks democratically approved legislation can oppress minority groups,” she wrote in an opinion shared by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

The majority in Michigan reconfigured the political process, creating a “two-tiered” system “that burdened racial minorities,” she added. According to Michigan’s law, raced-based admissions proposals have to overcome a challenge to the state Constitution, while other proposals—such as those based on athletics or legacy—simply have to go to school boards.

The majority “effectively rigs the contest to guarantee a particular outcome,” Sotomayor, an affirmative action beneficiary, said.

Sotomayor further argued that the court’s decision would lead to a drop in minority enrollment and, therefore, to less diversity, citing outcomes in California and other states with similar policies to Michigan’s.

“The statistics I have described make that fact glaringly obvious,” she said.

Civil rights groups agree with Sotomayor’s assessment.

“Today’s Supreme Court decision is a step backward for racial inclusion by allowing voters to overrule the decision of Michigan University officials to consider race in admissions to achieve diversity,” said Jon Greenbaum, chief counsel for the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, in a statement. “The Court has disregarded long-standing precedent which prevents the majority from passing legislation that reconfigures the political process in ways that burden only a racial minority.”

In addition to Michigan and California, Florida, Washington, Arizona, Nebraska, Oklahoma and New Hampshire have similar prohibitions on racially-conscious admissions policies.

The court’s ruling does not impact affirmative action programs in the 42 other states.

South Africa Election May 7: ANC Hopes for Quick and Easy Victory

April 20, 2014

South Africa Election May 7: ANC Hopes for Quick and Easy Victory

anc gathering

Special to the Trice Edney News Wire from Global Information Network

(TriceEdneyWire.com) – As the May 7 election day in South Africa nears, former friends and allies of the ruling African National Congress are betting that voters will follow them out of the party or at least send a strong message that the country’s current direction is not good enough.

A number of veterans of the anti-apartheid struggle and former government leaders have even launched a “Vote NO!” campaign that could dash ANC hopes for a quick and easy win.

Among the veterans is former intelligence minister Ronnie Kasrils, former deputy health minister Nozizwe Madlala-Routledge and other ANC stalwarts.

"Sidikiwe! Vukani! - "We are fed up! Wake up!"  That’s the message coming from some longtime ANC loyalists who now say: "The ANC needs to know that it can no longer take for granted its traditional support and we would be failing South Africa and our democracy by not voting."

Other groups expecting to pick up votes from disillusioned voters are the Economic Freedom Fighters led by Julius Malema, the Democratic Alliance led by Helen Zille and the United Democratic Movement led by Bantu Holomisa.

ANC secretary general Gwede Mantashe rebuked the now-opposition leaders saying they hadn't done a good job when they were in Cabinet. Also with the opposition is Pallo Jordan, current member of the party’s national executive committee who has written columns critical of the $23 million upgrade of President Jacob Zuma’s country estate.

Income inequality is one issue that particularly incenses South Africans who are aghast at the sky high salaries for corporate CEOs.

There are “super salaries at the top, and very meager livelihoods at the bottom,” said Trade and Industry Minister Rob Davies. "The highest-paid chief executive has earned 51,000 times what someone earns at the lowest rung. That's the level of inequality that we have in South Africa."

Opposition politician Mamphela Ramphele said the Nkandla affair has exposed a serious flaw in the ruling party. “The ANC is in the death grip of corrupt, greedy and arrogant people who don’t actually see that they are destroying this beautiful country and its resources.”

Meanwhile, a popular parody song has become the refrain of the President’s re-election campaign. It goes: "If you're number one, you get to drive the gravy train."

X